Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Are there really multiple sign-offs needed to make a job offer?

10 replies

OfferPending · 22/10/2025 17:51

It’s mad to me how long it takes for some places to make a job offer. You do the interviews, feel like it went well, they say they’re keen and then silence for weeks.

Is it true that there are multiple “sign-offs” needed? Like senior managers, HR, finance, maybe someone who’s not even met you?

Or is it more that they’re stalling or keeping options open? Feels like it shouldn’t be this complicated to offer someone a job.

AIBU to think the whole thing could be streamlined or is this just how things work now?

OP posts:
lnks · 22/10/2025 17:52

yes there can be, certainly in some industries or bigger companies

RollerSkateLikePeggy · 22/10/2025 17:59

Yes, can be all those things. Depending on time of year a manager might get sign off to do recruitment, go through the process, but then wait for some revised budget figures to go through to make sure the company still has that role in the budget and get it signed off again

Smileybutwily · 22/10/2025 18:01

100%
Certainly where I work - pretty corporate, household name grocery head office
A million people to sign off the hiring process to begin with, then the same when an offer is to be made

Beyond frustrating, so I feel your pain, but if it helps it's highly possible that it's genuine

BournardTourney · 22/10/2025 18:01

Yes it’s definitely true and sometimes it’s just waiting on the last one of those people to sign off

IdaGlossop · 22/10/2025 18:02

Some companies, especially large ones, don't seem to realise that cumbersome recruitment processes dent the employer brand. Delay is also disempowrtung for the hiring manager.

Clairey1986 · 22/10/2025 18:04

I work in a large global professional services firm and our recruitment function is the bane of our lives, I’m always on at our boss to raise it at exec level - apparently it has and has improved slightly but it’s the opposite of any use. Same with general HR support.

My point being this is a massive organisation and it’s terrible, there is money to invest it yet it is still like banging your head against a brick wall. The people who actually interviewed you may feel very similarly.

Ponderingwindow · 22/10/2025 18:06

In my company, yes. A large part of that is because of the nature of how our work is organized.

DoYouReally · 22/10/2025 18:12

Absolutely.

Where I work,

3 sign offs for standard replacement hire.

4 where there's a headcount change or upwards budget change

Brightbluesomething · 22/10/2025 18:13

Yes that’s the case with us. We have checks and balances in place to ensure all managers have followed a fair process. Not all Managers recruit often and there’s significant liability for the employer if you get it wrong. Or if a manager tries to offer a role to someone you have recently dismissed…. Or the panel don’t agree etc etc. I’d never leave a candidate waiting weeks though, you’d lose them if they’re any good. It’s sometimes same day approval, max a couple of days.
A recruitment process is two way and tells you a lot about the culture. If they’re messing you about apply elsewhere.

Linenpickle · 22/10/2025 18:14

Yes. It’s called process and controls. Critical for any organisation.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page