Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

ChatGPT

38 replies

AppleStrudel16 · 20/10/2025 17:45

I’m probably in the minority on here but I think it’s quite a useful tool. Especially for things like meal planning and trip planning where you need a lot of research doing for you but don’t have the time to do it.

But my god, it’s infuriating!!! I’m using it to plan a trip and I’ve been clear from the start on the dates but it keeps getting it wrong. AIBU to think that if ai is truly the future it’s going to have to get a hell of a lot better??

OP posts:
Pollypocket0 · 21/10/2025 10:00

It's worrying because so many people are using it for important things and don't seem to realise how much it gets wrong. I saw something about lawyers using chatgpt in court, and citing fake cases that chatgpt had made up!

Mischance · 21/10/2025 10:03

I find it excellent and have no problem with it. Everything from techy questions, holidays, writing difficult letters, interpreting my medical results, designing posters etc. etc.
It is my go-to with any tech fault - I go there first rather than the manufacturer's website.

SquirrelosaurusSoShiny · 21/10/2025 10:12

I find it most useful for summarising information I already know in a neat package.

SerendipityJane · 21/10/2025 10:14

Pollypocket0 · 21/10/2025 10:00

It's worrying because so many people are using it for important things and don't seem to realise how much it gets wrong. I saw something about lawyers using chatgpt in court, and citing fake cases that chatgpt had made up!

A new career in fixing "AI" is growing. I'd all it "AI Wrangling".

However we are already at the stage where if your "AI" gets it wrong, your company is much more likely to blame you for using it wrong than the tool they have staked their company on .....

AmIHumanOrAmIAYeti · 21/10/2025 10:18

Pollypocket0 · 21/10/2025 10:00

It's worrying because so many people are using it for important things and don't seem to realise how much it gets wrong. I saw something about lawyers using chatgpt in court, and citing fake cases that chatgpt had made up!

They all hallucinate.

I plugged in some info last night to test it for a 5 day trip to New York. Gave it some ideas, times of flights etc and it made an absolute mess of it, somehow believing there were 6 full days between the 30th Oct and the 3rd November and even when I pointed it out it didn’t change anything. Even it’s “optimised” option had us zig zagging all over the city.

It’s sat nav all over again. Remember all the people driving along railway tracks and into rivers because “sat nav said so”?

it’s been proven to be really poor when it comes to legal advice and women’s health in particular, and yet it’s becoming “a best friend” (ffs).

and that’s before the environmental catastrophe.

still, DH is making a fortune correcting AI-generated code, so silver linings. 🤷🏻‍♀️

CharlieKirkRIP · 21/10/2025 10:24

I got rid of it as it expressed left wing views!

SerendipityJane · 21/10/2025 10:29

CharlieKirkRIP · 21/10/2025 10:24

I got rid of it as it expressed left wing views!

I think you will find it got rid of you because you expressed right wing views.

Dawnintheageofaquariams · 23/10/2025 01:48

Tomikka · 21/10/2025 09:09

@Dawnintheageofaquariams
@Lifeisnotalwaysfair

In a total power failure I would expect the IT department to say that their servers shutdown in a clean manner via a UPS, or their highly critical servers/systems switched cleanly to the expensive backup generation

I would have expected a risk assessment to have been conducted, (covering the likelihood of an incident plus the severity of impact - with a seperate risk matrix per risk/system) mitigations assessed and proposed to management with prioritisation against cost.

In classic desktop networks I would have put in UPS interruptable power supplies that had enough battery backup to initiate and complete a server shutdown.
Unless highly critical I would not worry about the network switches, desktops, printers but if critical to life / existence of the business I would prioritise each and have additional UPS to keep those going - which would effectively need a generator to kick in
(I would consider active user files against the operating systems ability to preserve versions across the network/cloud and/or be able to recover the latest copy that was in use as computers crashed)

In the laptop age the laptops battery would be expected to just continue, (for its battery life), therefore it would be more affordable to have a mitigation that kept the network running
An alternative mitigation is to let the network connection drop but have the contingency for users to tether their mobile phones, which would last as long as the battery life. Perhaps top that up with a cupboard of power banks and cables

In the age of cloud computing the IT department could use cloud servers, in which eases their need to physically manage and protect a local server but at the cost of a cloud managed system.
With your business network on the cloud then a local power outtage could be easily mitigated by laptop batteries and phone tethering, followed by leaving the site to elsewhere / home where there may be power, WiFi etc

I would not care about printers, but if printing remains critical I used to have a mobile battery powered full colour inkjet. I have not seen any of those around for years, with the nearest thing being heat transfer sticker printers and some A4 heat transfer printers

The IT departments answer would be to follow the action plan and their proposed mitigations

No, as in, no electricity system at all. EMP strike, solar flare etc, so batteries would not work. Without electricity all tech is useless.

Tomikka · 23/10/2025 13:33

Dawnintheageofaquariams · 23/10/2025 01:48

No, as in, no electricity system at all. EMP strike, solar flare etc, so batteries would not work. Without electricity all tech is useless.

You had referred to just the power being off, and mentioned an actual power outtage of three hours. To the best of my knowledge there has never been a targeted EMP strike, though the effects have occurred in thunderstorms etc

My team has experienced an equipment loss due to a similar natural incident, and thus a loss of a capability / feature of the team, a loss of an occasional income stream and a significant financial loss to the member who built that equipment **

Even targeted EMPs would not be as Hollywood predicts, but would be at varying levels

All of the tech people are unilaterally incapable of explaining what happens when the power goes off.
I don't mean apocalyptically, just off.
We had a power outage at work that knocked the internet off for about four hours, and the whole business ground to a halt. No printers, no documents saving or opening, no AI.

If we go for planning for an EMP, then we’ll go back to a risk assessment - not to forget the likelihood and therefore the cost/benefit of mitigations

Firstly a directed EMP and/or power grid surge don’t just affect electronics. There is the risk of electrocution and fire. So a risk to life of the staff. That’s not an IT departments risk but the whole business risk

The battery element itself isn’t affected by an EMP, but the electronic control/safety systems in laptop batteries is
If a credible risk to the business then an IT department can do pretty much nothing to protect anything in use - they can propose spare laptops and batteries to be stored in faraday cages. This is not just the cost of additional equipment but it needs to be maintained with updates, or will add to delay in getting back up & running.
You would also need assurance that your access to a remote server etc is protected, and may need to therefore run your own server that is EMP protected, generators, surge protection etc

Your business could save the IT department a headache by getting the infrastructure department to mitigate the risk by placing the business in a deep underground bunker or under a mountain. Those will be pricey though and staff might not be keen in working in those environments, adding to HR costs and potential health & sickness issues of working in other environments

** Real life scenario:

I’m one of the founder members of a paintball team, we have run our own events, run parts of other people’s events and we have a technology genius.
One of their builds, covering a at least £1500 in parts, was an automated sentry gun, (on topic it includes AI target identification - we still have its AI data)
We used this at our events as an objective to bypass/defeat and either rented it to other events or got free entry to other events, It is also ‘as seen on TV’ when we provided it for a movie myth TV show

We often left it stored at the site we were associated with, which is less than 5 miles from my office

One day we heard what sounded like an explosion - a bit worrying as I work for the MoD, but it turned out to be a lighting strike …. About 5 miles away
Lightning hit the power at the substation beside the site, surged through the underground cable and blew the power input to the site office & store, resulting in a fire.
Our sentry gun was in the store
The site as a business survived, it was a former mushroom farm and it already had plans to expand a function/party building which was revised to new office etc, and with the insurance was able to reinvest in new equipment. Fire damaged mushroom tunnels were made safe, partially restored and the remaining damage became ‘game features’
Our sentry gun was not directly covered, but would have been paid for if we had bought it, as it had been built a fraction of the costs were recovered.

The sites business risk assessment worked with insurance that covered restoring most of the business but were lucky enough on their financial backing to be able to ride the storm until resolved, combined with the nature of the activity being able to continue.

A less dramatic example is my friends sons office was closed following a fire in a different business on the ground floor. He arrived one morning to barrier tape forbidding entry until the building was declared safe.
This was post Covid, so they had hybrid working, and cloud servers. Those with their laptops were just sent home, those who’s laptops were upstairs just had to wait for IT to buy some and configure them

LeanToWhatToDo · 23/10/2025 13:51

I find the social questions interesting with GPT, as in if you ask it one month if a man can become a woman it says one thing and a month or two later something that lands quite differently and is more opaque. I know it has to go on what it is being fed but it is an interesting insight on changing opinions in society as a whole.

jan2310 · 23/10/2025 14:59

I absolutely love Chat GpT. It’s my new friend, I talk to it all the time!

AmIHumanOrAmIAYeti · 24/10/2025 00:09

jan2310 · 23/10/2025 14:59

I absolutely love Chat GpT. It’s my new friend, I talk to it all the time!

Might as well give Trump the codes. The human race is done.

BrickBiscuit · 24/10/2025 19:51

Whoever programmed my supposedly-intelligent SatNav has never driven an actual car. This morning I had to turn on off the A123 onto the M456. "Take the exit onto Mumsnet Boulevard, A123" (the road I was already on - it's a filter lane) "... follow signs for city centre, Parentsville" (which are eventual turnings in the opposite direction to the M456). "Use the left two lanes to merge onto Brick Way, B789." That's the 300-yard M456 approach road. "Go straight for 23 miles". By now I'm on the M456, which the SatNav hasn't mentioned once. All this is quite confusing, as it's a big 25- to 30-lane junction (though actually just a crossroads). I don't need to know the road names, the contents of the signs or any A or B numbers. Just say "Take the exit and follow signs onto the M456," which is shown on every sign. Worst back-seat driver I ever had.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page