Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think the task should count for more than the interview if someone clearly nails it?

5 replies

QuietEvaluator · 10/10/2025 13:19

Was talking to a friend about job interviews that have both a practical task and a competency-based Q&A. It got me thinking, if a candidate delivers a genuinely excellent task (structured, creative, well-reasoned with strong delivery) but their interview answers are solid not sparkling, shouldn’t that carry more weight?

Surely the task shows how they’d actually do the job, not just talk about it? Or do most panels still give equal or greater weight to the chat part, even if it’s less predictive of real performance?

If you’ve ever sat on an interview panel, especially in academia or public sector, what mattered more when deciding? The task or the talking?

OP posts:
OrwellianTimes · 10/10/2025 13:20

Ability to perform tasks can be taught, trained, developed. Personality can’t.

AgnesX · 10/10/2025 13:21

It really depends on the entire job description IMO. For some roles the applicant needs to be a good all rounder.

All they can do is ask for feedback.

Greggsit · 10/10/2025 13:22

One task is only going to be part of any job. It might be important that you know how to do it, but there's a lot of other things they need to find out about you.

toomuchfaff · 10/10/2025 13:22

It totally depends on what the role being interviewed is, and what relevance the "task" has to the role. What the interviewer is looking for. Theres not a one size fits all answer, although i would say that the applications with task and interview give a more rounded view of the individual. As long as the "task" is honed to what the recruiters want and its not just a tickbox

VegQueen · 10/10/2025 13:26

It depends on the role, existing make up of the team, and what the other candidates are like. If for example someone score 9/10 on the task and 6/10 on the interview vs someone who scored 8/10 on both - I think I’d go for the latter. Also the things missing from the interview answers may be just as important or more important than the task as usually the task is just part of the role, not the whole thing. E.g. when I hire a data analyst, they might do well on the technical test but if they don’t have good experience of stakeholder relationships and project management, then I don’t really want to hire them as the job requires more than just the technical aspects.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread