Was talking to a friend about job interviews that have both a practical task and a competency-based Q&A. It got me thinking, if a candidate delivers a genuinely excellent task (structured, creative, well-reasoned with strong delivery) but their interview answers are solid not sparkling, shouldn’t that carry more weight?
Surely the task shows how they’d actually do the job, not just talk about it? Or do most panels still give equal or greater weight to the chat part, even if it’s less predictive of real performance?
If you’ve ever sat on an interview panel, especially in academia or public sector, what mattered more when deciding? The task or the talking?