DH and I viewed a house recently which ticks so many boxes but we're doubtful about putting in an offer. We're in Scotland where the homeowner purchases their own home report, which is then shared with prospective buyers. When we viewed the kitchen it looked like it had been extended into another room of the house as it was quite big. DH asked the homeowner, who was doing the viewing, if that was the case as it wasn't mentioned in the HR that it had been done, she told us it was extended into the former dining room and was already like this when she moved in 8 years ago.
After the viewing DH commented that it looked like the kitchen ceiling was slightly bowing in the middle, I never noticed this myself though. Above the kitchen is a bedroom and bathroom and DH said it looked like when the original wall was removed between the kitchen and dining room they didn't put up a support beam and that's why the kitchen ceiling is slightly sagging. But should this not have been mentioned in the HR that a supporting wall had been removed?
When we went back to our solicitor he recommended a more detailed structural survey but when this was requested, the homeowner refused this being carried out. While this house meets a lot of our needs, we think it might be a mistake to buy it. What if there's other hidden things or a lot of damage caused by this missing support? Or are we being overly dramatic? My DB thinks we are especially as the house looks good on paper.