Am I being unreasonable if I choose a school with average/ Low academic standards instead of a school with very high academic standards, but where there's a mobile phone mast with the following measurements?
At the school with high academic standards, the school playground has a maximum value of 300,000 μW/m², and an average of 2,000–7,000 μW/m², with peak values of 50,000–300,000 μW/m².
Inside the classroom itself, the maximum measured value is 20,000 μW/m², with an average of 250–500 μW/m², and peak values of 3,000–6,000 μW/m².
It should be noted that these values are much, much higher than typical Wi-Fi and mobile phone radiation levels, which are around 18,000 μW/m² and 80,000 μW/m², respectively.
And just out of curiosity — how can people claim with such confidence that this is safe, when scientific research has produced differing results?
According to the BioInitiative Report, which follows the precautionary principle, the recommended long-term exposure limit is below 1,000 μW/m², and ideally under 100 μW/m² for vulnerable populations such as children.
This means that the recorded levels — particularly the peak and maximum values — far exceed what independent experts consider safe.
I would really like to hear from people who are knowledgeable in this area and who have looked into the science behind it.
I’m genuinely concerned, especially because we are talking about young children who would be exposed daily for 7 hours a day, over 9 years.
I worry whether such long-term exposure could increase the risk of cancer or neurodegenerative damage later in life.