Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To hate the term 'bleeding out'...

70 replies

Powersout · 02/10/2025 11:47

I mean you're not going to be 'bleeding in' are you? I've seen it in lots of reports of someone seriously injured. Just seems sensationalist and crude somehow.

OP posts:
AgnesMcDoo · 02/10/2025 13:37

Port1aCastis · 02/10/2025 13:11

Bleeding out is not a respectful term, most

What exactly is disrespectful about it?

kittensinthekitchen · 02/10/2025 13:37

Powersout · 02/10/2025 13:23

Then why the fuck is there a messaging function on AIBU, it should just be voting if going by your logic. This place has turned so nasty, no-one can just disagree with anyone anymore, they have to absolutely annihilate them whilst they're at it!
I'm obviously just too sensitive, that's why I don't like 'bleeding out' right? Say anything to anyone and don't worry about how they take it, not your problem right.

I find your use of the term "annihilate" very disrespectful and inaccurate for the context you used it.

Powersout · 02/10/2025 13:38

Sera1989 · 02/10/2025 13:25

I remember hearing it first in American movies/TV shows before we started to use it here. I would use bleeding out to basically mean bleeding to death - large volume, losing blood quickly and immediate intervention needed. Whereas bleeding heavily would be more than a big cut but not necessarily life threatening e.g. a heavy nosebleed, head wound etc. which aren’t necessarily going to lead to shock and death fairly quickly. So I think it has value as a phrase. Still sounds American to me though for some reason

Yes, I feel it's very American. And only recently used by the average Brit. Which in itself isn't bad but that's probably why I read it as being a 'sensationalist' term used in a really delicate situation.

OP posts:
Powersout · 02/10/2025 13:38

kittensinthekitchen · 02/10/2025 13:37

I find your use of the term "annihilate" very disrespectful and inaccurate for the context you used it.

😂

OP posts:
JustGotToKeepOnKeepingOn · 02/10/2025 13:42

Powersout · 02/10/2025 11:55

But do medics actually use the term? I've only ever heard it used by some bystander to a stabbing/accident who is describing what they saw.

It’s a well known and used term. As PPs have said, it has a specific meaning and describes the seriousness of the situation. If a bystander saw someone unconscious and bleeding heavily, it’s the correct term to use. I don’t find it disrespectful, they are describing what they’re seeing.

PraisebetoGod · 02/10/2025 13:43

Okay you never said it was your greatest concern but you are concerned enough to write a post about it. My point remains. You mustn't have any actual real life concerns. Anyway you're not being very nice to me so, I'm bleedin' outta here!

JoshLymanSwagger · 02/10/2025 13:44

Powersout · 02/10/2025 11:53

I suppose. But no bystander who witnessed an accident and is stating what they saw woukd know that would they.

I think I'd notice if some poor soul was bleeding to death/had massive blood loss in front of me.

I do have eyes.

But then, you can't argue with stupid.

Humdingerydoo · 02/10/2025 13:47

I find it much more disrespectful that some anti-Semitic twat thought to go and slaughter Jewish people while they were praying on their holiest day of the year.

And the people who were murdered this morning presumably did bleed out if they were stabbed.

My heart goes out to everyone affected by this morning's horrific event. I can't quite come to terms with it.

Periperi2025 · 02/10/2025 13:49

I prefer the term exsanguinating, second only to exacerbation as big words i like to attempt to spell at work (when i started it was all paper records and it took me about a year to learn how to consistenly spell exacerbation correctly particularly at 4am on a night shift (now it's all digital complete with autocorrect-yeh!).

Herewegoagainandagainandagain · 02/10/2025 14:04

AgDulAmach · 02/10/2025 11:55

If non-medical people use the term then that is annoying, unless they've been told it by someone who knows what they're talking about. I presume they mean 'bleeding heavily' or 'there was a lot of blood.'

"bleeding out" is not a formal or official medical term. You might hear medical professionals use it informally, but there is nothing wrong with non medical people using it as a clear and understandable descriptive phrase for someone losing a significant amount of blood.

SchrodingersParrot · 02/10/2025 14:12

I've always understood "bleeding out" to mean bleeding to death. As far as I know it's yet another import from America. And as far as I'm concerned, America can bleeding well have it back.

Mistyglade · 02/10/2025 14:14

I get you might not like it but it’s a valid term. I have a blood disorder and hate the use of the word ‘clot’ to describe a silly person or act. My baby was stillborn because my blood clotted through the placenta preventing his growth but I can hardly get upset about it when I hear or read that word. Yes it’s very horrible and hurts but I’m not predisposing to police other people’s language.

Candyflosies · 02/10/2025 14:37

Powersout · 02/10/2025 13:35

Yes, because you have added absolutely nothing other than some nasty statement about me rather than the topic in hand!

Your the one that is getting offended and winding your self up over a word.

Name7623 · 02/10/2025 15:46

I saw those words in a BBC news report earlier. I felt that the BBC used to be better at avoiding inclusion of such gratuitous graphic details and that the BBC writer should realise that a person's loved ones could do without having that image put in their minds if they read that report.

So I voted YANBU on this thread because I took the timing of it to be in that context. I feel that it was completely unnecessary of them to word it so graphically in the report. Although the maybe in shock bystander blurted it out, that does not mean they must include it.

But I can also see why some posters are saying yabu about parts of the opost appearing to consider it to be an invalid term in general.

Fiftyandme · 02/10/2025 15:48

Bleeding out isn’t the same as bleeding from a paper cut.

TicklishReader · 02/10/2025 15:48

Powersout · 02/10/2025 11:55

But do medics actually use the term? I've only ever heard it used by some bystander to a stabbing/accident who is describing what they saw.

They do on ER. They are always yelling "HE'S BLEEDING OUT!"

UnctuousUnicorns · 02/10/2025 16:42

Kerrisk · 02/10/2025 12:28

‘Exsanguinate’ is brilliantly used by Hilary Mantel at the execution of Anne Boleyn in Bring Up the Bodies.

I'd have thought that blood loss was the least of AB's worries.

Name7623 · 02/10/2025 16:44

JDM625 · 02/10/2025 12:19

OP- What word would you prefer the media to use?

Edited

I probably should have quoted opp reply, not the question itself, but I'd say it should have been left out, not worded differently.

It being such a gratuitous detail is what I find disrespectful about it having been quoted in that BBC report at all, however worded.

GertrudePerkinsPaperyThing · 02/10/2025 17:18

I wouldn’t listen to the song by Imagine Dragons by the same name in that case! just that it repeats the phrase “bleeding out” many times!

SchrodingersParrot · 02/10/2025 17:21

TicklishReader · 02/10/2025 15:48

They do on ER. They are always yelling "HE'S BLEEDING OUT!"

ER is American.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread