Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Rainbow badges at work - upset

1000 replies

whatishappening123 · 01/10/2025 14:08

I work in a sector with vulnerable young people. A few years ago, we made the decision as a company to wear as part of our uniform, a name tag with the rainbow on as part of pledging our support to LGBT+
We have all received new name badges and for the first time ever- an option has been provided to have a red coloured one instead of the rainbow if staff 'do not agree with LGBT+'
I have raised this with HR and union and been told that staff are now allowed to choose and that is their right.
I feel really upset by this - colleagues I have known for years are now deciding against the rainbow badge.
We work with the most vulnerable- who are often LGBT. Some of our service users have asked staff directly why they are not using them- and they have lied saying " They'd run out , or the pin on the rainbow ones are crap, some staff are hiding the red ones.
It's not a majority by any means - it's probably about 11 staff in a staff of 60.
I just feel really really upset by it, but I can't quite put my finger on why.
I also don't understand how people can be 'against' LGBT
It's a protected characteristic.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
9
PinkFrogss · 01/10/2025 17:50

That’s not LGBT thought is it? Read my post at 17:20 which explains why “LGBT” is not a protected characteristic. It’s covered in part by two characteristics. If OP wants to claim that people are being discriminated against she should consider this in line with the equality act, not what she (or you) consider to be protected characteristics. For example, why would a rainbow badge to express support for LGBT people not discriminate against heterosexual people, but a red badge would discriminate against LGBT people? Being heterosexual is covered by the sexual orientation protected characteristic.

Wheresthebeach · 01/10/2025 17:50

I'd refuse a rainbow badge, they should be neutral.

Understory · 01/10/2025 17:51

Absolutely it should be a place which is equally inclusive of everyone. But unfortunately it isn't. LGBTQ+ people experience significant discrimination, hence the need for counterbalance.

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 01/10/2025 17:51

Understory · 01/10/2025 17:28

I feel female in my head, in my thoughts, along with the rest of my identity. Not in my vagina. So to me it seems entirely plausible that someone could have a vagina and feel male, or have a penis and feel female, or identity with both, or neither. Because identity is in the brain, not the body.

What on earth does feeling female in your head mean?

Ereshkigalangcleg · 01/10/2025 17:51

Meem321 · 01/10/2025 17:48

Yep here you go.

"The Equality Act 2010 says you must not be discriminated against because:

  • you are heterosexual, gay, lesbian or bisexual
  • someone thinks you have a particular sexual orientation (this is known as discrimination by perception)
  • you are connected to someone who has a particular sexual orientation (this is known as discrimination by association)
In the Equality Act, sexual orientation includes how you choose to express your sexual orientation, such as through your appearance or the places you visit."

To be honest, I'm not really as invested in this discussion as you are. That'll teach me for scrolling idly whilst my tea is cooking.

Peace out.

That’s not “LGBT” but as you are acknowledging you don’t really understand enough about this.

PinkFrogss · 01/10/2025 17:51

Meem321 · 01/10/2025 17:48

Yep here you go.

"The Equality Act 2010 says you must not be discriminated against because:

  • you are heterosexual, gay, lesbian or bisexual
  • someone thinks you have a particular sexual orientation (this is known as discrimination by perception)
  • you are connected to someone who has a particular sexual orientation (this is known as discrimination by association)
In the Equality Act, sexual orientation includes how you choose to express your sexual orientation, such as through your appearance or the places you visit."

To be honest, I'm not really as invested in this discussion as you are. That'll teach me for scrolling idly whilst my tea is cooking.

Peace out.

The first sexuality mentioned is heterosexual which I don’t believe falls under LGBT Grin

TheKeatingFive · 01/10/2025 17:52

Understory · 01/10/2025 17:51

Absolutely it should be a place which is equally inclusive of everyone. But unfortunately it isn't. LGBTQ+ people experience significant discrimination, hence the need for counterbalance.

What does that * stand for?

InfoSecInTheCity · 01/10/2025 17:52

Catssuddenlyappear · 01/10/2025 17:37

I don't think this is about 'politics' though - if a lot of the service users are LGBTQ+ it's there to show acceptance and solidarity.
I couldn't go to work, announce that I thought a lot of our customers were predators/mentally ill and expect to retain my job.

You seem to have come to a weird conclusion that people that don’t want to wear a rainbow badge walk around announcing their hatred for all things LGBT.

Personally I keep my opinions and beliefs to myself at work, because they are not relevant to my ability to do my job. Unless these workers are actually discriminating against LGBT service users, their personal beliefs are their business and they shouldn’t be forced to either lie about them and wear a symbol they disagree with or announce them via a badge.

ChelseaBagger · 01/10/2025 17:53

I absolutely support LGBT rights. I also support disabled rights, women's rights, protection against racism, protection against age discrimination (at both ends of the age scale). These things are bare minimum legal requirements in the workplace.

If you get pins made for all those things, then what you're actually saying is "I abide by the bare minimum legal expectations of a British workplace". Which isn't much of a statement, really.

But if you promote just one characteristic, does that mean you don't care about the others? Which would then actually be less than the bare minimum expectation.

RedToothBrush · 01/10/2025 17:53

The irony is there are a lot of gay people who now feel alienated by the rainbow police because theres a sizeable number who aren't gay and are using it to virtue signal in a homophobic way unfortunately.

It's no longer got the same meaning as it did.

There is now an active backlash - not against LGBT people in most cases - but against the authoritarian bullshit of virtue signalling at work.

Scout2016 · 01/10/2025 17:54

Interesting OP.
I now see rainbows on employees and think "are they anti woman and making a mockery of support for same sex attracted people. Or just doing empty performative virtue signalling?"

Your work should never have brought them in.

Understory · 01/10/2025 17:54

Well, your friend absolutely should get the ramps and spaces they need.

I agree, there may be better ways than badges to ensure everyone feels included. But there's certainly no harm in them.

CantHoldMeDown · 01/10/2025 17:54

This reply has been withdrawn

This has been withdrawn by MNHQ at the poster's request.

MrsSkylerWhite · 01/10/2025 17:54

NewGoldFox · 01/10/2025 17:48

The red badge is just neutral.

That’s not what OP is saying?

Augarden · 01/10/2025 17:54

This is so silly. Staff should not be showing any political allegiances on their badges, it's totally unprofessional. I know you might think "but it's just being a good person!" No not really. What has been done in the name of the rainbow is not all sunshine. (Google Isla Bryson if you are have not been paying attention.)

Coconutter24 · 01/10/2025 17:54

whatishappening123 · 01/10/2025 14:39

hmm lots to think about here - I think the neutrality thing is a good point and maybe we shouldn't ever have had the rainbow ones

Hmm dunno . Doesn't feel right to me though

Might not feel right to you but you don’t speak for everyone. Everyone can have their own opinions and preferences.

GagMeWithASpoon · 01/10/2025 17:54

Did they actually say red is for staff that don’t agree with LGBT? Why is it a binary choice, with one side being deemed “unsupportive “ /negative?

What about people that aren’t on either side? Or simply don’t care to put their views on display?

Why not have rainbow or plain lanyards and everyone chooses without any connotations?

The cynic in me thinks the real targets here are your (GC?) colleagues rather than the service users.

CatchingtheCat · 01/10/2025 17:55

Tandora · 01/10/2025 17:24

Being trans is not "role play".
It's a naturally occurring form of cognitive difference.

I hope that helps inform you.

One that often arises through use of porn, especially cissy porn.

MrsSkylerWhite · 01/10/2025 17:55

This reply has been deleted

This has been withdrawn by MNHQ at the poster's request.

Even if many of your service users identified as such?

RedToothBrush · 01/10/2025 17:55

Understory · 01/10/2025 17:51

Absolutely it should be a place which is equally inclusive of everyone. But unfortunately it isn't. LGBTQ+ people experience significant discrimination, hence the need for counterbalance.

You mean like gender critical women?

Yes sure.

That rock must have been pretty dark.

DIYagainstMould · 01/10/2025 17:55

I would only wear a rainbow badge if it has Noah's rainbow on it and reminds both the straight and the gay what that story means.

3luckystars · 01/10/2025 17:56

I love rainbows but all this rainbow shite is actually turning me off them.

Some people are private and are allowed to be.

BundleBoogie · 01/10/2025 17:56

StrawberryBluee · 01/10/2025 15:03

It is a protected characteristic.

It isn’t.

The protected characteristics are Sexual Orientation and Gender Reassignment.

One is a sexuality, the other is an identity.

The Equality Act says you can’t be treated detrimentally for being ‘trans’, the Supreme Court judgement says ‘being treated detrimentally’ doesn’t include forcing others to pretend you’ve changed sex or using the facilities of the opposite sex.

It also says that the pc of Gender Reassignment dies nut override that of Sexual Orientation so prevents the homophobia of the trans lobby that says sexual attraction is based on identity not our biological sex. It’s an important distinction.

OP demonstrates perfectly why NO ONE should be wearing political lanyards or badges in the workplace. It’s divisive.

MyDeftDuck · 01/10/2025 17:56

The colour red is NOT an anti LGBT colour and I think the staff should have a choice of the colour they wear.

RedToothBrush · 01/10/2025 17:57

Understory · 01/10/2025 17:54

Well, your friend absolutely should get the ramps and spaces they need.

I agree, there may be better ways than badges to ensure everyone feels included. But there's certainly no harm in them.

Fucking hell, the government will go bankrupt creating all these badges. They'll ruin my bloody clothes with all the pin holes.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread