- I think the BMA should be pushing for an additional independent reporting structure outside GPs' normal workplace to submit reports about the appropriateness of AHP reviews at their workplace.
There's a massive conflict of interest where GP partners are considering the financial needs of the business (wanting lower paid staff) and in that small business, reporting substandard practice (other than critical incidents) would be frowned upon and considered as nitpicking with colleagues.
Salaried doctors (who rely on those same GP partners for their livelihoods) are reluctant to report poor practice/delays/inefficient pathways to care, of which there are many.
The current reporting structures mean that decision makers nationally are only hearing about critical incidents but are not about the general picture of missed diagnoses , inefficient pathways, or delays to care due to extending scope of AHPs.
- I think practice leadership team/ICBs should be held directly responsible (including criminal liability) for failures in care if they are appointing AHPs and allowing them to practice extended scope roles without the background knowledge of a GP.
I'm not talking about chronic disease reviews/pharmacy team monitoring. That's bread and butter work for AHPs and they do it brilliantly. I'm talking about AHP led triage and AHP first contact with acute patients.
'If you hear hooves, think horses not zebras' is the expression you sometimes hear in medicine. However I've seen enough zebras in my career to know that it can be disastrous to assume the likely answer is going to be the right one.
For example - assumptions I have seen from AHP colleagues in various workplaces:
Coughs are viruses (seen a missed asbestosis with that one)
All sore throats can be assessed through online scoring symptoms (seen a missed/untreated scarlet fever with that one),
Back pain is usually caused by strain/slipped disc (missed myeloma).
Muscle aches/tiredness assumed to be a virus (delay to coeliac diagnosis).
Nurse triage - Vomiting caused by d&v illness and advised to rest for 48 hours (vomiting caused by raging sepsis - patient told by hospital team he could have lost his life).
Abdominal pain with suprapubic tenderness and urinary symptoms treated as UTI (missed appendicitis).
The notes and question formulation are not up to scratch to protect these AHP if these cases were investigated and they could be prosecuted. I have a lot more examples but I'll end here.