Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To Stop Generating Taxable Income?

144 replies

GabrielsOboe · 23/09/2025 19:11

Quite simply, I am done with being taxed to
death, whilst getting little or nothing in return from
the state.

OP posts:
MyElatedUmberFinch · 23/09/2025 22:02

Kuretake · 23/09/2025 19:20

If you can afford to retire 100% go for it.

I’m retired and pay a lot of tax.

EasternStandard · 23/09/2025 22:03

Flossflower · 23/09/2025 21:45

I am a pensioner and I would agree with this. RR needs to raise more money and it should not all come from the working population.

The last budget was said to be a one off tax hike. Why do Reeves and Starmer need more?

cupfinalchaos · 23/09/2025 22:04

tara66 · 23/09/2025 21:54

Tax in UK is simply too high. It means there is no incentive to work hard and get a high salary because of rate of tax you have to pay or for that matter save any capital as half the interest earned will soon go to the state in tax. So if you took a bond at 4% interest on any half decent amount you would end up paying half of that in tax. So you take all the risk tying up your money in bonds but the state takes half the benefit, so why bother?

This exactly. We don’t benefit hugely from public services.. kids went private, private health as impossible to see a nhs doctor, pay for rubbish collections. All very well people saying what about providing for others but it’s easy to be generous with other people’s money.

Trafficwardentina · 23/09/2025 22:08

Flossflower · 23/09/2025 21:45

I am a pensioner and I would agree with this. RR needs to raise more money and it should not all come from the working population.

This was the thinking. Many pensioners know full well more tax needs to be raised and think it’s far fairer that it comes from them rather than their grandchildren.

WunTooThree · 23/09/2025 22:09

cupfinalchaos · 23/09/2025 22:04

This exactly. We don’t benefit hugely from public services.. kids went private, private health as impossible to see a nhs doctor, pay for rubbish collections. All very well people saying what about providing for others but it’s easy to be generous with other people’s money.

If you don't benefit hugely then good for you. You can get private schools, health insurance etc. But you can't have private police or fire service, or roads, bin emptying etc.
You don't get more out of the state as you don't need it. You are very privileged to be in that position. Some of us are very reliant on it. Don't envy us.

Talkinpeace · 23/09/2025 22:09

Move to Denmark ...
then understand

randomchap · 23/09/2025 22:10

cupfinalchaos · 23/09/2025 22:04

This exactly. We don’t benefit hugely from public services.. kids went private, private health as impossible to see a nhs doctor, pay for rubbish collections. All very well people saying what about providing for others but it’s easy to be generous with other people’s money.

But you do benefit from the education and health of others. Without a fit and educated population whatever you do for money would be far harder if not impossible.

It's easy to look at the direct benefit you get from tax, but that's a foolish and simplistic viewpoint and misses a huge amount of what taxes actually do for you indirectly.

intrepidpanda · 23/09/2025 22:11

Go on to benefits. Nobody can judge if you have already paid for them.

Timeforabitofpeace · 23/09/2025 22:13

Well said @randomchap.

padso · 23/09/2025 22:13

The last budget was said to be a one off tax hike. Why do Reeves and Starmer need more?

You need growth to fund public services. No growth = increased taxes. Add to that an ageing population so even more tax burden

What we desperately need is growth but that's eluded us for nearly 2 decades (the financial crash). Investment helps growth but again we have had years of underinvestment. It's disastrous!

WunTooThree · 23/09/2025 22:14

randomchap · 23/09/2025 22:10

But you do benefit from the education and health of others. Without a fit and educated population whatever you do for money would be far harder if not impossible.

It's easy to look at the direct benefit you get from tax, but that's a foolish and simplistic viewpoint and misses a huge amount of what taxes actually do for you indirectly.

Ha yes. They pay for bin collections? Do they think the bin men were privately educated?

itsAforapple · 23/09/2025 22:15

cupfinalchaos · 23/09/2025 22:04

This exactly. We don’t benefit hugely from public services.. kids went private, private health as impossible to see a nhs doctor, pay for rubbish collections. All very well people saying what about providing for others but it’s easy to be generous with other people’s money.

You chose to spunk your money on school fees and private health care, that’s on you. Same
as if you choose the Range Rover £100k
car over a £30k fam-a-lam car … there are options.

BoxesOnTheWardrobe · 23/09/2025 22:21

Wolfcub · 23/09/2025 19:46

As long as you don’t make use of any services made available through taxation (assuming you earn enough to pay and are choosing not to on principle) then go ahead.

And does the same principle apply to everyone who isn’t a net contributor? So those on top up benefits for example? You’ve tied yourself in knots there.

NamelessNancy · 23/09/2025 22:24

Reminds me of this poem. I'm really not a poetry person but I bloody love this.

To Stop Generating Taxable Income?
MaidOfSteel · 23/09/2025 22:40

childofthe607080s · 23/09/2025 19:47

Nothing?
no roads? No trained doctors and nurses? No bin collections? No one to look after the poor - you would rather they beg at the bottom of your drive for a scrap of bread?

I imagine the OP wants us to get down on our knees and be thankful to her for paying so massively much in taxes.

JLou08 · 23/09/2025 22:44

GabrielsOboe · 23/09/2025 19:18

Taxed reserves/savings.

Go for it. Enjoy your life instead of complaining on MN.

cupfinalchaos · 23/09/2025 22:53

itsAforapple · 23/09/2025 22:15

You chose to spunk your money on school fees and private health care, that’s on you. Same
as if you choose the Range Rover £100k
car over a £30k fam-a-lam car … there are options.

Yes we chose to do all that because the other option that we fund via tax is not fit for purpose (excluding schools)

cupfinalchaos · 23/09/2025 22:55

MaidOfSteel · 23/09/2025 22:40

I imagine the OP wants us to get down on our knees and be thankful to her for paying so massively much in taxes.

I can’t think of another country where higher rate tax payers are scorned so much. You’d think it would be the opposite!

Flossflower · 23/09/2025 22:56

EasternStandard · 23/09/2025 22:03

The last budget was said to be a one off tax hike. Why do Reeves and Starmer need more?

I think they need about 50 billion pounds!!

ByQuaintAzureWasp · 23/09/2025 22:58

Kuretake · 23/09/2025 19:20

If you can afford to retire 100% go for it.

You will still pay tax if you can retire ... looks like it might be more soon

randomchap · 23/09/2025 22:58

cupfinalchaos · 23/09/2025 22:55

I can’t think of another country where higher rate tax payers are scorned so much. You’d think it would be the opposite!

No one is scornful of higher rate tax payers in general. Just those who whinge and whine about their privilege. And those who don't understand that they wouldn't be able to make that much money without the society around them. You know, morons

ElectoralControversy · 23/09/2025 23:00

ZoggyStirdust · 23/09/2025 19:50

Nope.

id be fascinated for you to explain how this is the case (it isn’t)

You might be able to achieve this if the only thing you ever bought were wine and cigarettes? CBA looking it up right now

cupfinalchaos · 23/09/2025 23:03

WunTooThree · 23/09/2025 22:09

If you don't benefit hugely then good for you. You can get private schools, health insurance etc. But you can't have private police or fire service, or roads, bin emptying etc.
You don't get more out of the state as you don't need it. You are very privileged to be in that position. Some of us are very reliant on it. Don't envy us.

Yes of course you’re right in that way, and I’m sure my children will struggle too.. it’s so much harder for that generation to build wealth now. Unless we move away we can forget inheritance by the time we’re taxed on what we’ve already been taxed once on.

cupfinalchaos · 23/09/2025 23:05

randomchap · 23/09/2025 22:58

No one is scornful of higher rate tax payers in general. Just those who whinge and whine about their privilege. And those who don't understand that they wouldn't be able to make that much money without the society around them. You know, morons

Thank you for illustrating my point!

HostaCentral · 23/09/2025 23:09

We've done pretty much the same. The juice is not worth the squeeze as the saying goes. We have bought an annuity, taken some drawdown, and have other flexible savings if needed. We are not going to move house. Recently paid huge amount of cash for DH's hip operation privately. We obviously still pay council tax, VAT, etc etc, and have been net contributors our entire working lives, so no regrets.

Swipe left for the next trending thread