Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Muriel’s Wedding- Toni Collette not fat

89 replies

Choppychop · 06/09/2025 18:01

Im just watching the Aussie 90’s film Muriel’s Wedding and the character Muriel is constantly referred to as being fat. Throughout the movie. Fat fat fat. It’s a 90’s movie so I know times were different, and similar to Renee in Bridget Jones where we are supposed to see these ladies as fat. But (and I’m a slim woman) I just think she looks lovely and healthy and not fat in the slightest? Did people really think this character was fat at the time? It’s only 20 odd years ago. Great film by the way, if you haven’t seen it.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
8
gingercat02 · 07/09/2025 09:37

@ChoppychopI'm 5'9, 74kg, size 12 BMI 24.
That makes me the absolute top end for "normal" weight. If I gained 2kg that would put me in the overweight category, so in my mind absolutely not fat but not in the healthy range either.
I work hard to keep under that weight so it's not like I'm a natural skinny person.
I grew up in the 80s, every one I was at high school with was thin, we have just got used to the population being heavier and heavier.

jamnpancakes · 07/09/2025 10:45

Morningswim · 06/09/2025 23:14

I've been every size. Tiny (4-6 for a while, normal /healthy (8-10) and the large (14 ) thanks to steroids

I think we had very skewed thinking in the late 90s /early 2000s, with anything larger than anorexic being seen as fat

But we also seem to have skewed thinking now where we all have to pretend that large /chubby people aren't fat , even though objectively they are.

It's not a value judgement, just a fact.

She's definitely overweight in Muriel's Wedding

Normal size is not size 8-10 in the UK .

Just the other day I saw a feature with a photo of a woman and how it was photoshopped to show the desirable image in their country. It merely reflected the different natural physical attributes of their female population.

jamnpancakes · 07/09/2025 10:47

This

Muriel’s Wedding- Toni Collette not fat
Zov · 07/09/2025 10:56

jamnpancakes · 07/09/2025 10:45

Normal size is not size 8-10 in the UK .

Just the other day I saw a feature with a photo of a woman and how it was photoshopped to show the desirable image in their country. It merely reflected the different natural physical attributes of their female population.

Size 8-10 is not the average in the UK, (it's size 14-16 I think.) But remember that size 8-10 was a 12-14 around 30 to 40 years ago.

So people who are size 8-10 NOW aren't that thin really. They have a 27 to 29 inch waist. That's OK and they're not fat, but they're not as teeny tiny as they like to think they are.

Size 8-10 pre mid 1990s was a 23-25 inch waist.

Daisydoesnt · 07/09/2025 11:02

vivainsomnia · 06/09/2025 18:51

but to me she looks average, not someone you’d call fat…
Average is fat nowadays.

This! I don’t know why so many people don’t get this? “But she’s a regular size. But she looks normal”. She but sadly today average is fat.

jamnpancakes · 07/09/2025 11:06

Zov · 07/09/2025 10:56

Size 8-10 is not the average in the UK, (it's size 14-16 I think.) But remember that size 8-10 was a 12-14 around 30 to 40 years ago.

So people who are size 8-10 NOW aren't that thin really. They have a 27 to 29 inch waist. That's OK and they're not fat, but they're not as teeny tiny as they like to think they are.

Size 8-10 pre mid 1990s was a 23-25 inch waist.

I was referring to the poster who seemed to say that 8-10 is the norm for now.

Osirus · 07/09/2025 11:11

It was Shallow Hal guys, rather than “Hall”.

I watched this with my daughter recently.

AmadeustheAlpaca · 07/09/2025 11:30

cheekybtch · 06/09/2025 19:57

Firstly, it's a film. No need to get all "big is beautiful" about it. Secondly, you're judging her based on today's weight standards - it was a different time back in the 90s and we didn't have an overweight population because people didn't condone or defend it. She wasn't morbidly obese, no, but she was overweight. The slippery slope we're on these days is all this condoning it and which in turn then allows people to get fatter with no shame or criticism. People never tell their friends that they've actually got bigger than they were because we don't want to offend them or they've let their guard down and sometimes, people might genuinely not realise that weight is gradually piling on, so you need friends to tell you the truth, not lie to you. Because it could be that you care and you are worried that a weight gain could affect their health as to being more worried you don't make them cry. Don't forget, clothes sizes have changed over the years to make fat people feel less shame about being fat so what was a size 8 back then is probably a size 4 now. I guarantee if she was skinny and they all called her skinny and stick-thin, you'd all agree that she'd ought to put some weight on and it wasn't a healthy weight - it only works one way. It's like there's defending being fat, but not being skinny. Notice how, back in the day, when people actually got shamed for being overweight, they'd nip it in the bud and slim down before it got out of hand? Now, we tiptoe around it and say "big is beautiful" and "you're not fat" (when some people really are and need to be told as such) and we've got an obesity epidemic. Clearly body-shaming wasn't a bad thing - it kept people in check of their own gluttonous ways and made them think about what they ate and how much they exercised. People now don't just magically have weight conditions that didn't exist back then yet thats always the defence, but all you hear is "oh they could have a medical condition". Could they? What, every single fat person? They've all got PCOS or an underactive thyroid? Every single one of them? It's a cop out. People just took more pride in their appearance. That's all.

Totally spot on, couldn't agree more. Great post. I hate the whole use of "skinny" as an insult and also the references to "heroin chic" being celebrated in the 1990s. It was a throwaway line used by the media now and again, it wasn't seen as a viable lifestyle choice.
There seems to be a number of threads just now discussing how thin people were in the past, and implying that everyone was anorexic and unhealthy. The implication from lots of posters is that we are all fatter and healthier now. We're all fatter but costing the NHS a fortune.

jamnpancakes · 07/09/2025 11:44

We have indeed moved on within a short spell of time from when people were thin to the present where many people are overweight. I think of my mother who was a child during WW2 and never saw a banana until she was an adult. Many of them then were malnourished as in not enough of the right food. Her mother came from a fishing community and again malnourished and as a result suffered illness and death from diseases resulting from that. Thin isn't always good but was a direct result of circumstances at the time.
Now we have the opposite - too many young fat women again as the result of circumstances - poor food choices, availability of certain foods, lack of education, poverty, lack of exercise and yes body positivity. It's ok to be fat is the message. Medics have to be careful about what they say. Shaming people doesn't help! There's little point to me in comparing how people used to be like historically.

Gowlett · 07/09/2025 11:49

Martine McCutcheon’s Natalie in Love Actually was referred to as fat several times in that film, too. Bridget Jones, fat. Muriel, fat. Certainly, if I transport myself back to my early-mid twenties self, when these movies were released, I would have considered all of these characters fat. And my size 8 self, fat.

Poppingby · 07/09/2025 11:52

It's not really about being fat is it, that film. It's about being happy / self actualised.

She looks way better at the end of the film because she's happy and I don't think particularly thinner but if she is, it's not a happy ending because she's thin. That would be literally the most boring film ever.

MW is a brilliant depiction of escaping a miserable existence confined by other people's narrow, bigoted, and judgemental views. Just saying.

FancyBiscuitsLevel · 07/09/2025 14:10

@gowlett- I’m sure I read than when Martine McCutheon was cast, she was much larger. I’m not sure if you remember, but she yo-yo dieted in the 90s/early 00s and kept being papped larger in the papers, then slimmed down and sold her diet /exercise routines to the same papers. I remember at least 2 times she had a series in a Sunday paper of diet tips.

rookiemere · 07/09/2025 14:42

This is a strange thread. Muriel at the start of the film appeared a solid size 16-18, and was definitely overweight. I am not saying she wasn’t pretty, but I think in the film a lot of her “unattractiveness” was due to her overall demeanour and the way she was deliberately dressed in garish clothes and makeup to emphasise her size. I love Toni Collette and it was a wonderful performance from her.

Movie actresses haven’t got any bigger over the intervening years, indeed due to weight loss injections they appear to have got even smaller recently. I guess it’s because the general population has got larger, Muriel would look less out of place these days. I remember at my school we made a skirt when we were in last year of primary so age 11. Myself and one other girl had to get the pattern for a size 12 ( and that would have been more like today’s size 8-10) and I definitely remember being shamed and embarrassed about it as the teacher drew attention to it, so average weight was a lot less then.

AliceMaforethought · 09/09/2025 11:39

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page