Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think that no-one can adequately replace Melvyn Bragg on In Our Time?

125 replies

Sausagenbacon · 03/09/2025 21:38

...and my heart sinks to think of what hip young thing the BBC will replace him with.
I think I'd rather the program was cancelled.

OP posts:
AncientHarpy · 04/09/2025 12:07

WitchesofPainswick · 04/09/2025 11:51

Having done a (no way similar but sort of similar) role, there is no way you can grasp crib sheets without having a thorough understanding of the basic topics in question. You literally can't bluff it for an hour without being very swiftly outed as a slightly dim bellend.

Let's not pretend he's anything other than very fucking clever indeed.

You really can. It's a learned technique. My job also involves a version of it.

I'm not dismissing his particular skill -- I think generally he does a very good job in guiding the academic guests and stopping the programme from turning into three people having an argument about the topic in a way that would be inaccessible for non-experts.

He has, of course, the advantage of having done lots of other programmes on cognate topics down the years, so if he's already had detailed notes on episodes on 'Literary Modernism' and 'the Avant-Garde', he will already be partly briefed and have a lot of useful contextual information in note form for an episode on 'Surrealism'. If he's already had episodes on 'Psychoanalysis' , 'Jung' and 'Freud', he'll already be part-briefed for an episode on 'Hysteria'.

Again, I'm not disssing him, just pointing out that he's primarily a good amasser and marshaller of information, not some kind of Renaissance Man.

JambonetFromage · 04/09/2025 12:37

Putthekettleon73 · 03/09/2025 22:43

Is it Matthew Syed who does sideways? I love that programme too, yes.

Oh god no please not Matthew Syed he is insufferable

CoffeeCantata · 04/09/2025 17:02

huffdragon · 04/09/2025 10:04

Can people please stop suggesting old white men, Palin, Portillo, Fry et al? Let’s hand it over to a younger person, possibly as yet unknown, if we have to have it at all. I’ve always disliked the programme and believe other formats could work better. As for Amol Rajan, he is on everything. I don’t want to hear his slightly whiny voice on every programme everytime I put on the radio. I do like him but the BBC have a tendency to over use their talent so we become bored stiff of them, in my opinion.

Edited

I don’t agree that the candidate’s race, age or gender should be a deciding factor.

CoffeeCantata · 04/09/2025 17:05

Brefugee · 04/09/2025 09:27

if we're going down that route, i prefer Sandbrook's voice.

I like Dominic Sandbrook.

RowanRed90 · 04/09/2025 18:26

Brefugee · 04/09/2025 09:27

if we're going down that route, i prefer Sandbrook's voice.

I would love Sandbrook

huffdragon · 04/09/2025 18:33

Sausagenbacon · 04/09/2025 10:15

Can people please stop suggesting old white men, Palin, Portillo, Fry et al? Let’s hand it over to a younger person, possibly as yet unknown, if we have to have it at all. I’ve always disliked the programme and believe other formats could work better.
So, if you don't like it, why bother making racist comments?

You clearly don’t understand what racism is.

I commented because I might listen if someone more interesting hosted it.

NetballHoop · 04/09/2025 18:40

I think someone like Professor Jim Al Khalili would work well. A serious presenter who's NOT a comedian and who seems deeply interested in the people he interviews.

CoffeeCantata · 04/09/2025 18:46

NetballHoop · 04/09/2025 18:40

I think someone like Professor Jim Al Khalili would work well. A serious presenter who's NOT a comedian and who seems deeply interested in the people he interviews.

Yes - I like him!

CoffeeCantata · 04/09/2025 18:47

huffdragon · 04/09/2025 18:33

You clearly don’t understand what racism is.

I commented because I might listen if someone more interesting hosted it.

When you’re in a hole…

CoffeeCantata · 04/09/2025 18:49

Just thought of Matthew Sweet. I really enjoy his stuff and he’s very culturally savvy.

doubleshotcappuccino · 04/09/2025 18:59

Good Lord no … but if we must Stephen Fry

Backgroundnoises · 04/09/2025 20:13

Not a regular listener but I have tried a few episodes as it's my type of programme but I find him irritating. I don't understand those who say they find him relaxing, I found him to be an overbearing host, almost hectoring his guests and rushing them along. Too frenetic for me.. Really pompous at times. I also found he seems to have developed slightly slurred speech which I found too distracting.
Not sure who should replace him, just not someone pompous please!

Backgroundnoises · 04/09/2025 20:22

Pissenlit · 04/09/2025 08:57

I don’t know why people seem to think MB has an outsize brain.

He’s reading off cue cards which have been prepared by a team of researchers, plus the experts he’s interviewing aren’t allowed any prompts at all, so he often comes across on air as better prepared on their subject than people who’ve spent decades working on it.

A friend of mine was on it years ago, and said that she and the other two experts (discussing a major early 20thc author) were so rattled by the whole experience that they went straight out for a stiff drink afterwards even though it was about 10 am.)

This is exactly the vibe that puts me off listening to it. My nerves were jangled at the way he constantly interrupts and aggressively directs what his guests are saying. Can totally understand their needing a drink afterwards!

HorribleHisTories15 · 04/09/2025 21:07

Another vote for Dr David Olusoga or even Dr Pamela Cox (who I think has been snatched away from research, boooo, but at least for a good cause).

HorribleHisTories15 · 04/09/2025 21:12

Professor Olusoga, apologies

CoffeeCantata · 04/09/2025 21:40

Backgroundnoises · 04/09/2025 20:13

Not a regular listener but I have tried a few episodes as it's my type of programme but I find him irritating. I don't understand those who say they find him relaxing, I found him to be an overbearing host, almost hectoring his guests and rushing them along. Too frenetic for me.. Really pompous at times. I also found he seems to have developed slightly slurred speech which I found too distracting.
Not sure who should replace him, just not someone pompous please!

I lke(ed) MB but I don’t think anyone would disagree with you that he is past his sell-by date now as a presenter. But finding a replacement…

I feel that it shouldn’t be someone with a strong, dominant broadcasting personality, but someone who can remain in the background and judge carefully when to interject. And they need excellent intellectual credentials.

BumpyaDaisyevna · 04/09/2025 21:45

RowanRed90 · 04/09/2025 18:26

I would love Sandbrook

I quite agree, indeed it is Tom.

Sausagenbacon · 05/09/2025 13:43

In The Times today, Frank Skinner is suggested. Who would be good imo

OP posts:
CoffeeCantata · 05/09/2025 14:20

Sausagenbacon · 05/09/2025 13:43

In The Times today, Frank Skinner is suggested. Who would be good imo

Yes, I could see that. Frank is well-educated and more intellectual than he always admits. He also has the gift of not being adversarial with people - like Amol Rajan he comes over as a warm-hearted and humane man who sees the best in people, rather than someone who’s fashionably offended at everything he doesn’t agree with. Also he’s not a superior git.

Sorted!

Morereadingthanposting · 05/09/2025 14:36

I loved in our time but had to stop listening I hated Bragg so much, mostly the way he patronised and talked over all the female experts, by the end his treatment was so appallingly sexier I couldn’t make it through a podcast, even subjects I felt passionate about

CoffeeCantata · 05/09/2025 14:36

HorribleHisTories15 · 04/09/2025 21:12

Professor Olusoga, apologies

He’s still Dr though- you’re not wrong! Professor is a post, a job, while Dr is an educational qualification.

CoffeeCantata · 05/09/2025 14:37

Morereadingthanposting · 05/09/2025 14:36

I loved in our time but had to stop listening I hated Bragg so much, mostly the way he patronised and talked over all the female experts, by the end his treatment was so appallingly sexier I couldn’t make it through a podcast, even subjects I felt passionate about

Edited

Sorry - tittering at that typo!

I think I know what you meant.

RowanRed90 · 05/09/2025 18:08

CoffeeCantata · 05/09/2025 14:20

Yes, I could see that. Frank is well-educated and more intellectual than he always admits. He also has the gift of not being adversarial with people - like Amol Rajan he comes over as a warm-hearted and humane man who sees the best in people, rather than someone who’s fashionably offended at everything he doesn’t agree with. Also he’s not a superior git.

Sorted!

No thank you to Frank Skinner

CoffeeCantata · 05/09/2025 18:17

RowanRed90 · 05/09/2025 18:08

No thank you to Frank Skinner

🥲🤣

Backgroundnoises · 05/09/2025 20:49

I love Harriet Gilbert from A good read. Her voice is so calming. Assured but calm.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread