Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to seek a consensus on who is a socially acceptable recipitent of Mounjaro?

266 replies

Periperi2025 · 03/09/2025 19:05

So it seems that much of mumsnet and society judge users of WLI extremely harshly seeing them as fat and lazy people who should just eat less, move more and use more willpower. But apparently not all of us, some of us after divulging enough medical history as 'okay'..."not you just the other fatties!!"

So, are people with diagnosed endocrine and metabolic conditions, acceptable?

What about people with undiagnosed endocrine and metabolic disorders, it's taken me over a decade to get to the point i am now, which is under endcrinology with a confirmed 'problem' and a working diagnosis but nothing more, my story is sadly far from unusual. You don't know who they are, they don't know who they are (although they may have astrong inkling), quite the conundrum!!

What about people with diagnosed Type 2 diabetes, who once were also just fat people without type 2 diabetes (mostly)?

What about people who are just fat now but statistically likely to develop type 2 diabetes in the future, like the current Type 2 diabetes patients were 10 years ago?

What about the people with severely disordered eating? As a society and a health service we deem it justifible and, hopefully preferrable to treat Anorexia Nervosa, including as inpatients at great expense (£500+ per day in the NHS), compared to treating an obese eating disordered patient with Mounjaro at a cost of approx £9 per day to the NHS for the highest dose. Presuambly in a civilised society we think that both groups of patients deserve a chance at a better quality life and improved life expextancy, and we dont think that Anorexics should just eat more and move less?!

So my AIBU is?
Are all of the above groups socially acceptable recipitents of Mounjaro?

YABU - no there are not all acceptable the gluttunous, lazy, weak willed cheats.

YANBU - of course they are all socially acceptable recipitents given that they meet the prescribing criteria for Mounjaro which has been accessed for Risk vs Benefit via peer reviewed research.

OP posts:
Periperi2025 · 04/09/2025 07:23

DisgruntledPelican23 · 03/09/2025 23:33

I've just come across this thread, so I apologise if this question has already been asked. But, what drugs would you remove to allow WLIs to be prescribed outside of the current criteria?

80% of healthcare budget is spent on people the last 12 months of life.

So I'd like to see a cultural shift towards a more pragmatic approach to death and dying, including providing medical assistance in dying to patients with dementia who have either made a clearly expressed wish prior to losing capacity or chosen to assigned a LPoA to make that decision for them. But i think that cultural shift is going to harder to achieve by some people in the UK even than accepting that fat people aren't inherently morally inferior. (But this is a topic for an entirely separate thread).

That would free up huge amounts of money for preventative healthcare, of which i believe WLI are a key part.

However, i started the thread about societal attitudes to fat people not to NHS funding, and since the majority of people currently on WLI are self funding but still getting heavily criticised it demonstrates to me that many of these attitudes are not stimply about people's passion for the NHS and that their negative attitudes run deeper.

I'd be curious to here any views from people abroad living in countries with differently funded healthcare.

OP posts:
GeckoClimber · 04/09/2025 07:27

DancefloorAcrobatics · 04/09/2025 07:06

But diet's do work!
I have a low UPF diet, it does have the desired effect of feeling better and I lost some of the extra weight I am carrying.

I'm currently doing what is known as carb loading for a multiday hike next week- ok I put some weight on (that I will have lost by day 3 hiking up & down some mountains!)

The question is, does the average obese person care enough about themselves to embrace a diet with low UPF's, lots of plain vegetables, fruits and meals cooked from scratch? Do they have the skills and time?

WLI are just creating a dependency that will make some companies billions! Billions that will be paid by individuals, governments and health services.

Diets don’t work.
Is it 5% of people who can lose weight and maintain it?
Thats not diets working.
The diet industry would cease to exist if diets worked.

Your other comments about people not caring enough to sort it out shows that you don’t understand. It’s not about caring, it’s about having a drive to eat that overrides logic. There’s actually research going on at the moment about this - why some people have a faulty driver. Why some people are susceptible to obesity - is it genetics? (In some it is), is it trauma? Neurology? Ancestry?

nellietheellie75 · 04/09/2025 07:33

It's also the fault of our food industry. If fresh fruit and veg, and decent proteins weren't so expensive, a lot more people would be eating healthy meals.

GeckoClimber · 04/09/2025 07:36

nellietheellie75 · 04/09/2025 07:33

It's also the fault of our food industry. If fresh fruit and veg, and decent proteins weren't so expensive, a lot more people would be eating healthy meals.

Some of us avoid UPF and still manage to
be obese.
Of course availability of addictive shit food is a contributing factor, but that’s always the assumption - fat, oh he/she eats shit all
day long, and that’s not always the case. There’s far more to obesity than people’s base judgments.

Digdongdoo · 04/09/2025 07:40

nellietheellie75 · 04/09/2025 07:33

It's also the fault of our food industry. If fresh fruit and veg, and decent proteins weren't so expensive, a lot more people would be eating healthy meals.

Yes I don't understand why governments haven't done something about this. Tax the shit out of processed foods, use the proceeds to subsidise healthy food and invest in infrastructure that supports healthy lifestyles. Far better to invest in societal level changes than dependence upon medication that will end being passed down between generations.

Rainbowcat99 · 04/09/2025 07:40

SunnySideDeepDown · 03/09/2025 19:24

Your post is very black and white. Believe one thing or the polar opposite, but life isn’t like that.

I do firmly believe people need to make better choices. Weekly takeaways, chocolate on the sofa, cans of pop everyday - very common and people need to accept the consequences of consuming that. Being accountable for their actions and choices.

But once someone is largely obese there’s probably no hope of them losing enough weight to be healthy on their own. So WLI have a place.

The problem though, is the next generation are still eating shittily so the situation isn’t improving. We need to be making fundamental changes as a society to how we view food. Every other shop is now a coffee shop for crying out loud.

But your post assumes that once people are allowed WLI then they no longer need “good choices” when actually it’s the reverse.

Good choices are essential on WLI and what the jabs do for me is ensure that I feel the consequences of bad choices rapidly and firmly!!
It also makes it easier to make those good choices in the first place.

Therefore, my children are benefitting from this. On MJ I go shopping and fancy apples and blueberries instead of chocolate and crisps so I buy those and now they are used to having them in the house and choose them for a snack.

So, for me, everybody wins really.

Elsvieta · 04/09/2025 07:41

MsRumpole · 03/09/2025 22:25

So so I, but it's very hard on people in an equivalent position who just can't afford to do that.

Agreed. Roll on the time when these drugs are out of patent or whatever the term is and they become a lot cheaper.

Homec00k · 04/09/2025 07:45

Rainbowcat99 · 04/09/2025 07:40

But your post assumes that once people are allowed WLI then they no longer need “good choices” when actually it’s the reverse.

Good choices are essential on WLI and what the jabs do for me is ensure that I feel the consequences of bad choices rapidly and firmly!!
It also makes it easier to make those good choices in the first place.

Therefore, my children are benefitting from this. On MJ I go shopping and fancy apples and blueberries instead of chocolate and crisps so I buy those and now they are used to having them in the house and choose them for a snack.

So, for me, everybody wins really.

Why on earth weren’t you buying those things for your children before? The NHS should not be paying to parent your children

Homec00k · 04/09/2025 07:47

nellietheellie75 · 04/09/2025 07:33

It's also the fault of our food industry. If fresh fruit and veg, and decent proteins weren't so expensive, a lot more people would be eating healthy meals.

Fresh fruit and veg are absolutely not expensive. Thinking you need out of season strawberries and mango in order to eat fruit and veg is ridiculous. Eating healthily is so much cheaper. Highly processed food is more expensive and so is meat. We should be cutting down on meat.

Givemeachaitealatte · 04/09/2025 07:50

I have none of the above illnesses, I just have tried and failed multiple times to lose weight and I was on a doom loop constantly, felt awful about myself which perpetuated the vicious cycle of eating crap.

I honestly don't care what people think and if they think it's cheating, why would I do it in the same way I have done for years and failed at and not an easier way?

I paid for it myself, and anyone overweight and not yet obese should be able to get it. Although criteria on NHS is wild, someone I know is type 2 diabetic, obese and has struggled massively with losing weight despite calorie counting and was told no, you have to do through diet and exercise - when told this hadn't worked, they just shrugged.

Homec00k · 04/09/2025 07:51

Periperi2025 · 04/09/2025 07:23

80% of healthcare budget is spent on people the last 12 months of life.

So I'd like to see a cultural shift towards a more pragmatic approach to death and dying, including providing medical assistance in dying to patients with dementia who have either made a clearly expressed wish prior to losing capacity or chosen to assigned a LPoA to make that decision for them. But i think that cultural shift is going to harder to achieve by some people in the UK even than accepting that fat people aren't inherently morally inferior. (But this is a topic for an entirely separate thread).

That would free up huge amounts of money for preventative healthcare, of which i believe WLI are a key part.

However, i started the thread about societal attitudes to fat people not to NHS funding, and since the majority of people currently on WLI are self funding but still getting heavily criticised it demonstrates to me that many of these attitudes are not stimply about people's passion for the NHS and that their negative attitudes run deeper.

I'd be curious to here any views from people abroad living in countries with differently funded healthcare.

Right so having lived a life costing the NHS double that of everybody else you now want end of life care cut so that even more can be spent on the same group of people that are getting the most already.

No

itsgettingweird · 04/09/2025 07:53

I think the problem we have as society is people accept those underweight as having an “acceptable” ED.

Not enough is made prominent about how overeating can also be a form of ED. We often talk about “comfort eating” and it’s a thing. Some people with trauma will cease to eat and some will overeat.

That’s aside to the obvious other causes of both forms for disordered eating - illness is one.

Bit also CoL is having an effect as UPF are cheaper and more filling.

It’s such a huge amount of factors that input into it but I think anyone who is overweight and doing something about - however they are - is a great thing. Especially as people on WLI are often sacrificing huge amounts of their income to do so.

The people getting left behind are those who live with little money and their weight is directly related to that and cannot afford WLI.

GeckoClimber · 04/09/2025 07:55

Digdongdoo · 04/09/2025 07:40

Yes I don't understand why governments haven't done something about this. Tax the shit out of processed foods, use the proceeds to subsidise healthy food and invest in infrastructure that supports healthy lifestyles. Far better to invest in societal level changes than dependence upon medication that will end being passed down between generations.

Are our government even competent enough to take this on?
The Change4Life campaign was funded by nestle.
Whatever societal changes are needed they are up against the might of food corporations who employ many people to make their food more and more addictive.
If you’re poor and you’re looking to be satiated it’s very difficult to avoid UPFs totally. Protein is expensive. Healthy fats are expensive. Poverty is heavily linked to obesity.

Digdongdoo · 04/09/2025 08:04

GeckoClimber · 04/09/2025 07:55

Are our government even competent enough to take this on?
The Change4Life campaign was funded by nestle.
Whatever societal changes are needed they are up against the might of food corporations who employ many people to make their food more and more addictive.
If you’re poor and you’re looking to be satiated it’s very difficult to avoid UPFs totally. Protein is expensive. Healthy fats are expensive. Poverty is heavily linked to obesity.

Well it's the consequence of short term politics isn't it. These changes should have been made decades ago. We need the sugar tax on steroids.
A full belly isn't expensive. We would do well to take note of how poor people in other countries, or in our own history ate. A little bit of fatty meat is enough to meet protein and fat needs and is far cheaper than adding healthy fats to lean protein.
I did also mention subsidies to make these choices more affordable. I'd rather government spend money on healthy lifestyles than medication. I appreciate you don't agree but I believe longer term, wider reaching solutions would be better.

spoonbillstretford · 04/09/2025 08:08

FurForksSake · 03/09/2025 19:45

I would be in the non-socially acceptable group, and I don’t advertise that I’ve used medication to lose weight, but in guessing people speculate and assume.

I should have been able to make better choices and stick to it, I’m educated and indeed work for the NHS. However, I simply lost and gained the same stone in weight for a couple of years.

I am physically disabled, more so now that I’ve lost weight than previously in fact. And short as heck. Which both make it harder.

but I just did not have the willpower and motivation to stick to the calorie deficit needed for long enough to lose the weight needed. I don’t know why, my job is incredible stressful and draining and working with people in shared offices also with poor habits definitely didn’t help.

i don’t believe the nhs should have funded me currently, they did offer me the tiered approach but I didn’t find it helpful. If and when prices come down significantly I do think it should be prescribed to people with the same guidance as private providers and with the ability to stay on for maintenance. It should go alongside support groups, gym prescriptions, nutrition support and careful monitoring.

I’ve lost 5st7 and have gone from 14st to 8st7. A BMI of 33ish to 22ish.

I think your figures are out somewhere as 8st 7lbs is not BMI 22 for someone who is 5'7, it's BMI 18.6. I know as BMI 23 is about ten and a half stone, which is my goal.

WickedWitchoftheDesk · 04/09/2025 08:12

I have lipoedema, a connective tissue disorder, sometimes called ‘painful fat disease’. I carry large amounts of nodular, unsightly fat on my limbs and upper arms.

I am on Mounjaro because it helps with the pain and inflammation. It is helping me lose any non-lipoedema fat and ready myself for much needed lipoedema liposuction reduction surgery, which is not available on the NHS and will cost me tens of thousands of pounds.

I am otherwise fit, active and healthy so have to pay for my Mounjaro and I will continue to take it. I eat very little now and will soon see my ribs and collar bones sticking out, lose hair and my face look gaunt - whilst still remaining a fat-legged high BMI.

My boss, a GP, won’t even prescribe privately for me (so I can obtain at cost price through our dispensary) even though she can see how much it helps.

I do admit to being mildly irritated by type 2 diabetics, who have brought on their condition entirely due to their unhealthy lifestyle, being given the drug for free but there is absolutely nothing I can do to influence NHS England’s prescribing criteria (I am also annoyed that my GP will prescribe different/special erectile dysfunction meds privately. 🙄) As I have a disease that only affects women, there is barely any research into how GLP1 drugs help the condition, despite all the anecdotal evidence.

It is clear that one of my daughters has the same condition as me, which will only worsen with each hormonal change so I’m saving now for her to be able to access surgery should she wish, before she gets to the stage I am at.

Deepbluesea1 · 04/09/2025 08:12

What about the people with severely disordered eating? As a society and a health service we deem it justifible and, hopefully preferrable to treat Anorexia Nervosa, including as inpatients at great expense (£500+ per day in the NHS), compared to treating an obese eating disordered patient with Mounjaro at a cost of approx £9 per day to the NHS for the highest dose. Presuambly in a civilised society we think that both groups of patients deserve a chance at a better quality life and improved life expextancy, and we dont think that Anorexics should just eat more and move less?!

you clearly know nothing about anorexia. it's a severe mental illness from which people (if they restrict eating) would die very quickly. Its a very very different illness. YABU unreasonable to link it to the conversation.

Worralorra · 04/09/2025 08:14

YABU for thinking it’s any business of anyone other than the person either getting it for free on the NHS under their extremely stringent guidelines or paying for it out of their own pocket, and their respective doctors.
Societal approval/judgement is neither expected, welcome nor wanted.
MYOB people!

Oakcupboard · 04/09/2025 08:18

I’m diabetic and use it, I wish it had have available before I became diabetic

FurForksSake · 04/09/2025 08:22

@spoonbillstretfordi am 5ft2. I’ve lost 5st7.

Snoken · 04/09/2025 08:24

I think the reason why a lot of people view WLI negatively is because of how it started. It started with rich and famous people who carried a few extra pounds (if even that) who bought up medication (I think mainly Ozempic back then) that was desperately needed by diabetics who because of it had to go without. It was seen as a greedy, vain and quite cruel. The situation and production volumes have changed since then but I think the reputation has stuck with many.

I think any way to safely reverse the growing obesity crisis is good and needed. It will cost us all so much more in the end if nothing is done and if this is what works for people right now then great. Something else might come along eventually and then that will be seen as controversial and WLI will be the old trusted method.

PutThe · 04/09/2025 08:26

Digdongdoo · 04/09/2025 08:04

Well it's the consequence of short term politics isn't it. These changes should have been made decades ago. We need the sugar tax on steroids.
A full belly isn't expensive. We would do well to take note of how poor people in other countries, or in our own history ate. A little bit of fatty meat is enough to meet protein and fat needs and is far cheaper than adding healthy fats to lean protein.
I did also mention subsidies to make these choices more affordable. I'd rather government spend money on healthy lifestyles than medication. I appreciate you don't agree but I believe longer term, wider reaching solutions would be better.

I expect we all think they would be better. If they existed. But there's no evidence they do, whereas there is evidence that long term WLI use keeps the weight off. Your argument is essentially that there must be a way to deal with societal obesity in an environment completely different to what humans evolved in, because you want there to be.

We ought to address the obesogenic environment anyway, and improve access to healthy foods. Thin people can be malnourished, skinny fat is a thing, so MJ doesn't deal with that specific problem. Being a healthy BMI doesn't mean a person can access adequate nutrition, their 5 a day. But we also can't afford to indulge ourselves with people's vague ideals when we have a societal obesity crisis and a drug that actually works and will be much cheaper in a decade or two.

spoonbillstretford · 04/09/2025 08:27

FurForksSake · 04/09/2025 08:22

@spoonbillstretfordi am 5ft2. I’ve lost 5st7.

Ah, sorry. I can't find my reading glasses at the moment. Also, well done on your weight loss!

MizzeryGuts · 04/09/2025 08:29

In 1950 the average British woman was 5’2” and weighed 59kg.

By 1993 according to the NHS average height of a woman had increased to 5’4” and weight was now 66.6kg.

By 2019 the NHS reported average weight of a woman is now 72.1kg and obesity prevalence among the overweight has shot up to 29%.

There are lots of reasons why this happened, but there hasn’t been a genetic or evolutionary shift towards all of these complicating conditions that you mention in the OP. So it’s - combination of lifestyle choices and environment.

I am overweight and I absolutely know that I have caused this situation - not entirely by choice but certainly I could have done more to stay fit and active. I was clearly educated at school on the benefits of healthy food and an active lifestyle.

So I think that’s what there is judgement. It’s not that people don’t understand there are conditions causing obesity but that many people have made choices that trigger or drive these conditions to become worse.

Digdongdoo · 04/09/2025 08:32

PutThe · 04/09/2025 08:26

I expect we all think they would be better. If they existed. But there's no evidence they do, whereas there is evidence that long term WLI use keeps the weight off. Your argument is essentially that there must be a way to deal with societal obesity in an environment completely different to what humans evolved in, because you want there to be.

We ought to address the obesogenic environment anyway, and improve access to healthy foods. Thin people can be malnourished, skinny fat is a thing, so MJ doesn't deal with that specific problem. Being a healthy BMI doesn't mean a person can access adequate nutrition, their 5 a day. But we also can't afford to indulge ourselves with people's vague ideals when we have a societal obesity crisis and a drug that actually works and will be much cheaper in a decade or two.

Of course there's evidence that healthy lifestyles reduce obesity. Medication may be easier, but societal level changes are certainly possible. Japan is a good example.

Swipe left for the next trending thread