Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to think parents on benefits shouldn’t be allowed to have more children until they’re financially independent?

246 replies

Tellitasitisss · 26/08/2025 10:59

I can’t help but wonder why people who are already on benefits are still choosing to have more children. Surely if you can’t afford to support the children you already have, it’s unfair (on the kids and taxpayers) to keep adding more into the mix?

I’m not talking about people who’ve fallen on hard times unexpectedly, or someone who loses their job. That can happen to anyone. I mean those who have never worked a day in their life, keep having baby after baby, and then expect everyone else to fund everything from housing to school meals.

Meanwhile, working households who are just scraping by get absolutely nothing, yet are footing the bill for those who keep expanding their families with no thought for the consequences.

AIBU to think there should be a cap — no more kids funded by benefits after the first two, unless you can afford them yourself? Or is that “punishing children” like people always say?

OP posts:
godmum56 · 26/08/2025 11:44

Mandarinaduck · 26/08/2025 11:41

So the poor and disadvantaged should also be poor, disadvantaged and lonely?
having children is a biological imperative and a fundamental human right.
For some, children are the only ‘riches’ they will ever have.

If you want to bring economics into it, demographic decline is a real issue facing the UK and other developed nations. We need people to have children.

so its ok to have kids you can't care for because you are lonely? I just plain old disagree with the "biological imperative and fundamental human right" crap. "Women can't be happy without children" is an old hat social construct.

PoshDuckQuarkQuark · 26/08/2025 11:45

legoplaybook · 26/08/2025 11:03

Thank goodness poor people throughout history have continued having children or likely none of us would be here now.

Poor but with a strong work ethic, so not the sort of people the OP is referring to.

@Tellitasitisss YANBU. Benefits were brought in as a helping hand to get back on your feet when times were hard. It needs to go back to that, as benefits should not be a lifestyle choice as it has for many. Probably the ones going against your post!

AquaLeader · 26/08/2025 11:45

AquaLeader · 26/08/2025 11:18

Child Benefit stops at £80,000. So the OP’s master plan is mandatory sterilisation for everyone earning less than £80,000 per year.

3amamama · Today 11:21
Isn't it £60k?

Payments start to reduce at £60,000. They stop entirely at £80,000.

KimberleyClark · 26/08/2025 11:45

Mandarinaduck · 26/08/2025 11:41

So the poor and disadvantaged should also be poor, disadvantaged and lonely?
having children is a biological imperative and a fundamental human right.
For some, children are the only ‘riches’ they will ever have.

If you want to bring economics into it, demographic decline is a real issue facing the UK and other developed nations. We need people to have children.

No one has said they should be prevented from having children at all. How many children do you need to not be lonely?

Grammarnut · 26/08/2025 11:46

Sirzy · 26/08/2025 11:01

There is already a two child cap in place (except in limited circumstances)

However there is nothing to suggest this has made any difference other than putting more families into poverty.

The limited circumstance is rape, apparently. The two child cap is an abomination and the suggestion that a woman claim she was raped in order to cover other children so disgusting that no civilised country should require it - which makes the UK uncivilised.

You can't police how many children people have. The right thing to do is to help those parents on benefits to bring their children to be complete human beings and conscientious citizens. That's what I pay my taxes for, anyway, not for promoting rape clauses on benefit claims.

Badgerandfox227 · 26/08/2025 11:47

I’d rather see enhancements made for hard working families than punishments for those on benefits - make working a substantially higher reward.

We do need to help working families more, and that in itself would help the birth rate. I love the example of Hungary where working mums will not pay income tax - what a difference that would have made for me when returning from maternity leave. I’d have chosen to start a family younger and would have had the third child we wanted, but couldn’t afford.

https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/hungarys-orban-launches-tax-exemption-mothers-cap-housing-loan-rates-2025-02-22/

Grammarnut · 26/08/2025 11:48

godmum56 · 26/08/2025 11:44

so its ok to have kids you can't care for because you are lonely? I just plain old disagree with the "biological imperative and fundamental human right" crap. "Women can't be happy without children" is an old hat social construct.

Though I deplore the two child cap, I agree with you about having children. It's not a right.

randomchap · 26/08/2025 11:49

samarrange · 26/08/2025 11:44

Yes, absolutely OP. Couldn't agree more. It would just require a few tiny adjustments to society to ensure that it works, but worry not, I have formulated a foolproof plan:

  1. All girls will be forced to have contraceptive injections from the day of their first period. Anyone who misses her appointment for this will be forced to have a hysterectomy.
  2. When you want to have a baby it's like applying for a mortgage — you have to be earning over £50k a year and have £20k saved uop for setup costs. That earns you permission to come off the jabs.
  3. After the baby is born you (of course!) go back on the jabs immediately. You can apply for permission to have a second child when your income has gone up by £15k.
  4. Repeat step 3 for as many children as you can afford. If you are really rich, have 10. Remember, money is the true determinant of the worth of both you and your child.
  5. If at any point you lose your job, your children will be taken away from you and put in foster care with people who can afford to shop at Waitrose. Unless they are ugly or unintelligent, of course, in which case they will be drowned in a sack so that they don't become a burden on society.

Of course, the woke champagne socialist lefty liberals will moan about "human rights", like they did when I revealed my brilliant plan to stop illegal immigrants by machine-gunning their boats in the English Channel, but the joke will be on them when Saint Nigel is PM and Tommy Robinson is Home Secretary.

I really really hope this is satire

Rollingdown · 26/08/2025 11:49

You could argue that they have fallen on hard times because why are they in such a position in the first place where they can’t work or make something of themselves. That would mean they were failed by someone in the first place. It’s not great because then they are unlikely to give their children a good life which means a cycle of generational poverty. Yes, it needs to be stopped, but I don’t think that preventing somebody from having children is the answer

dizzydizzydizzy · 26/08/2025 11:51

I don't agree with the 2 child benefits cap because it disadvantages innocent children of parents on benefits. It's not the childrens' fault they that exist but once they do, we should do everything we can to help them become healthy, well educated and decent members of society.

I think it is however reasonable to discourage people living on benefits to not have more than 2 kids, even though I would see it as human right to decide for myself how many kids I am going to have.

Make it easier still to access contraception. I bet the wait for a vasectomy is ridiculously long and first you have to manage to get a GP appointment which most people find very hard.

somethingnewandexciting · 26/08/2025 11:51

AquaLeader · 26/08/2025 11:45

3amamama · Today 11:21
Isn't it £60k?

Payments start to reduce at £60,000. They stop entirely at £80,000.

Edited

Maybe there should be something that says if you can't save even on 60-80k you should have CB cut? If you have savings you can't claim it, yet there is no imperative to think ahead and plan and save for couples on CB. It's incentivising spending all the time to make sure you don't go over a savings threashold.

samarrange · 26/08/2025 11:53

randomchap · 26/08/2025 11:49

I really really hope this is satire

Ummm, yes it is. I did try to make it obvious. 🙏 But it is not far off what would be needed to implement the idea, which a lot of people here seem to have, that it should be "not allowed" to have more than X children as a function of your income.

Hobnobswantshernameback · 26/08/2025 11:53

One post goady bollocks from an op with a shitty goady user name
froth inducing nonsense
and still people bite

BiffandChip2 · 26/08/2025 12:00

Yeah, the cap isn't on child benefit - I get 3x payments for that. It's on UC or child tax credits which I think is UC anyway

vodkaredbullgirl · 26/08/2025 12:02
Drama Club No GIF by Nickelodeon

🤔

godmum56 · 26/08/2025 12:03

Rollingdown · 26/08/2025 11:49

You could argue that they have fallen on hard times because why are they in such a position in the first place where they can’t work or make something of themselves. That would mean they were failed by someone in the first place. It’s not great because then they are unlikely to give their children a good life which means a cycle of generational poverty. Yes, it needs to be stopped, but I don’t think that preventing somebody from having children is the answer

well no but do you not think that preventing them having more children would benefit them?

Corfumanchu · 26/08/2025 12:05

There is a 2 child cap, and has been for years, you doughnut!!

Corfumanchu · 26/08/2025 12:07

dizzydizzydizzy · 26/08/2025 11:51

I don't agree with the 2 child benefits cap because it disadvantages innocent children of parents on benefits. It's not the childrens' fault they that exist but once they do, we should do everything we can to help them become healthy, well educated and decent members of society.

I think it is however reasonable to discourage people living on benefits to not have more than 2 kids, even though I would see it as human right to decide for myself how many kids I am going to have.

Make it easier still to access contraception. I bet the wait for a vasectomy is ridiculously long and first you have to manage to get a GP appointment which most people find very hard.

Innocent children of working parents are disadvantaged by them having more children than they can afford??

somethingnewandexciting · 26/08/2025 12:07

Can anyone explain the sense of saying you can get free money for kids if you don't have savings?

Obviously you don't get benefits if you own a house and choose not to work, but saying savings isn't optimal with kids is a weird stance, no?

Mischance · 26/08/2025 12:07

Tellitasitisss · 26/08/2025 10:59

I can’t help but wonder why people who are already on benefits are still choosing to have more children. Surely if you can’t afford to support the children you already have, it’s unfair (on the kids and taxpayers) to keep adding more into the mix?

I’m not talking about people who’ve fallen on hard times unexpectedly, or someone who loses their job. That can happen to anyone. I mean those who have never worked a day in their life, keep having baby after baby, and then expect everyone else to fund everything from housing to school meals.

Meanwhile, working households who are just scraping by get absolutely nothing, yet are footing the bill for those who keep expanding their families with no thought for the consequences.

AIBU to think there should be a cap — no more kids funded by benefits after the first two, unless you can afford them yourself? Or is that “punishing children” like people always say?

Might I suggest that you volunteer for the RTF (reproduction task force) to police the sex lives of all families on benefits? I am sure they would welcome you.

Hedgehogbrown · 26/08/2025 12:08

Did you accept any maternity pay? Well you must be a lazy bastard, you should have saved up for the time off you had. Did you accept any childcare subsidies? Never have tax credits? Have your parents ever given you money? You sound so stupid it's unreal.

Rollingdown · 26/08/2025 12:08

godmum56 · 26/08/2025 12:03

well no but do you not think that preventing them having more children would benefit them?

Yes that’s the obvious answer but its unlikely to be enforced that way or they already would have done it

Praying4Peace · 26/08/2025 12:09

I echo your thoughts exactly OP

snughugs · 26/08/2025 12:09

Sirzy · 26/08/2025 11:01

There is already a two child cap in place (except in limited circumstances)

However there is nothing to suggest this has made any difference other than putting more families into poverty.

There’s been a drop in births amongst the poor. So yes it has worked. Only now we import people on mass.

Kreepture · 26/08/2025 12:10

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.