Are we guilty of taking 'Moth' at 'Raynor's estimation, though?
I'll admit that I've seen very few video clips or interviews with TW to compare how he comes across in the media with the representation of him in TSP and its sequels, so I'm speculating here, but is the reflected glow of the adulatory depiction of him in the book (blond, free-spirited eco-warrior turned charismatic ruin restorer, farmer, poetry reader and font of knowledge of all things nature-related, tragically cut down in his prime by a horrible illness, to which he refuses to give in) affecting how we see him?
Because surely another way of looking at him would be an above-average-looking chancer and layabout, not good at holding down a job for long, helping cover up his wife's criminality, colluding with his wife on a bestseller which falsifies both their past and his diagnosis, claiming he has two months to live when the cider farm doesn't seem to be working out, letting her do the work of publicity upfront while he glories in her hagiographic depiction of him and happily shares in the moneys it has accrued?
(Hell of an ego boost to have Jason Isaacs play you in a film, too, and be all over the media weeping and enthusiastic about what a fantastic person you were. SW says in interviews that she couldn't see how someone as glamorous as GA could play her, but TW has never chimed in with 'Ditto!')
Is he not just also, possibly, a self-satisfied layabout who's been fictionally elevated to sainthood in book form by his adoring wife?