Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Reeves plan to tax houses over 500k PART TWO

442 replies

soupyspoon · 19/08/2025 15:23

I am not the OP from the OP!

OP posts:
Thread gallery
12
DrPrunesqualer · 20/08/2025 18:55

Marshmallow4545 · 20/08/2025 18:51

No, it doesn't apply equally because under the current stamp duty system everyone pays something. If the government want the policy to be cost neutral and to not apply to the majority of house purchases then it doesn't take a rocket scientist to work out that those that do pay the new tax will have to make up the shortfall. I don't understand why people don't understand this.

Exactly
The Government doesnt pick and chose who pays tax on other purchases
You buy something there’s a tax to pay
If not everyone pays then others have to pick up the tab
Again!

BIossomtoes · 20/08/2025 18:57

Marshmallow4545 · 20/08/2025 18:51

No, it doesn't apply equally because under the current stamp duty system everyone pays something. If the government want the policy to be cost neutral and to not apply to the majority of house purchases then it doesn't take a rocket scientist to work out that those that do pay the new tax will have to make up the shortfall. I don't understand why people don't understand this.

I really don’t want to be argumentative but everything you said in the paragraph I quoted is equally applicable to Stamp Duty.

Marshmallow4545 · 20/08/2025 19:00

lkjhgfdsa · 20/08/2025 16:30

But how is that worse than stamp duty? That is also a tax based on the value of the house you are buying but it starts at a much lower level.

Both go up in increments. The 0.54 % is for houses between £500k and £1million. I don't know what the higher bands are. I guess ultimately the money will be made up because as people buy houses and shift onto the new system they will be paying regularly so each house above threshold will be generating that income forever whoever lives there instead of unpredictable irregular lump sums.

But it will take many many decades to be cost neutral and this is why it's worse. The government will suddenly lose out on all the stamp duty that would have been paid on houses under £500k. They will also lose out on a large percentage of the stamp duty that would have been paid by those houses over £500k. How do we fund this shortfall? You do realise that any increase to National Debt will lead to ever higher interest payments so it's something that needs to be factored into the whole equation.

It's also worse because it ultimately is relying on the few to fund the many. We know how these policies work and yet Labour keep pretending they will miraculously work here. Look at the non dom tax. We have to accept that ordinary people need to pay taxes like stamp duty.

Incidentally I see a number of property professionals are supportive of the measure and suggest it will get the market moving and ultimately lead to price increases lower down the market as stamp duty isn't an issue anymore. Is that really what people want? The money goes to the vendor instead of the government and ultimately inflated the market further.

MaturingCheeseball · 20/08/2025 19:03

This new system would appear to bring in precisely zero extra money which one would think would be the whole point of the exercise.

i think they’re actually looking at annual property taxes. The thing is in other countries you get tax relief on property maintenance - even interior decorating. You can’t just land homeowners with £££ without some incentive to keep the home in good order.

Marshmallow4545 · 20/08/2025 19:04

BIossomtoes · 20/08/2025 18:57

I really don’t want to be argumentative but everything you said in the paragraph I quoted is equally applicable to Stamp Duty.

But it's not applicable to the same extent. Nobody is saying that the purchase of a more expensive home shouldn't bring about a larger tax bill than that of a cheaper home. That's the current system. The new tax though would create a threshold where it was effectively tax free to buy or sell a property below £500k and could get very very pricey to buy an expensive home above this threshold.

Marshmallow4545 · 20/08/2025 19:09

MaturingCheeseball · 20/08/2025 19:03

This new system would appear to bring in precisely zero extra money which one would think would be the whole point of the exercise.

i think they’re actually looking at annual property taxes. The thing is in other countries you get tax relief on property maintenance - even interior decorating. You can’t just land homeowners with £££ without some incentive to keep the home in good order.

It's so depressing as property taxes already high in the UK

https://taxfoundation.org/data/all/eu/real-property-taxes-europe/

This cash cow has already been milked and yet they come for more.

Real Property Taxes in Europe, 2024

High property taxes levied not only on land but also on buildings and structures can discourage investment in infrastructure, which businesses would have to pay additional tax on.

https://taxfoundation.org/data/all/eu/real-property-taxes-europe/

DrPrunesqualer · 20/08/2025 19:10

Marshmallow4545 · 20/08/2025 19:04

But it's not applicable to the same extent. Nobody is saying that the purchase of a more expensive home shouldn't bring about a larger tax bill than that of a cheaper home. That's the current system. The new tax though would create a threshold where it was effectively tax free to buy or sell a property below £500k and could get very very pricey to buy an expensive home above this threshold.

Agree
An awful lot of our housing stock would be unaffordable to live in
Can we really abandon so many older and historic buildings many of which also require high maintenance.

If these older expensive houses had to reduce their sale price to sell, can those buyers afford the extortionate costs of maintenance and running costs - not many I think.

I doubt RR would even concider this serious problem

DrPrunesqualer · 20/08/2025 19:14

Marshmallow4545 · 20/08/2025 19:09

It's so depressing as property taxes already high in the UK

https://taxfoundation.org/data/all/eu/real-property-taxes-europe/

This cash cow has already been milked and yet they come for more.

Thanks for that
So our property taxes are already by far the highest in Europe!

suburburban · 20/08/2025 19:27

Bruisername · 20/08/2025 18:37

The difference with stamp duty is that it is a known amount and if you borrow to pay it you know how that will cost you annually etc

once the property tax has been introduced and the principle established you then have uncertainty over the amount as you don’t know if a government will come in and ramp it up etc. perhaps I just distrust governments when it comes to tax rates

Yes I’d rather pay stamp duty. They’ve already increased it

in the SE modest houses are well over 500K

lkjhgfdsa · 20/08/2025 20:10

BIossomtoes · 20/08/2025 18:38

So austerity was pointless then? Where’s all the money gone? And I notice that’s not real terms, it takes no account of inflation.

Edited

Covid and Brexit

Bushmillsbabe · 20/08/2025 20:12

GasPanic · 20/08/2025 15:24

You're comparably rich compared to the rest of the UK.

And like it or not, the most likely reason that you have amassed that amount of property wealth is because successive governments have failed to control property price rises in the interests of the country as a whole, and tax property appropriately.

As I said before, everyone wants more and better services. And everyone seems to think it should be someone richer than them who pays for it. And everyone has a story why. Because they have worked hard. And scrimped and saved while doing all sorts of vital work. And they just don't deserved to be taxed. Even though they might have more wealth than a very significant fraction of the population.

Not really though, at least in part we grew the money through doing up really run down properties, we added extra value.

And I have no issue with paying tax which is spent wisely. My issue is with being told that people who own a home over 500k 'just have to take it' and are 'up to their eyeballs in property' with our 1 3 bedroom house 😂

lkjhgfdsa · 20/08/2025 20:14

Marshmallow4545 · 20/08/2025 18:51

No, it doesn't apply equally because under the current stamp duty system everyone pays something. If the government want the policy to be cost neutral and to not apply to the majority of house purchases then it doesn't take a rocket scientist to work out that those that do pay the new tax will have to make up the shortfall. I don't understand why people don't understand this.

Currently properties under £125k do not pay stamp duty. So no. Everybody does not pay it. All that is changing in that regard is that the threshold is getting higher.

DrPrunesqualer · 20/08/2025 20:16

suburburban · 20/08/2025 19:27

Yes I’d rather pay stamp duty. They’ve already increased it

in the SE modest houses are well over 500K

I agree
Pay it and move on. We never know what our future holds and I wouldn’t want another yearly bill to worry about.

lkjhgfdsa · 20/08/2025 20:18

Marshmallow4545 · 20/08/2025 19:00

But it will take many many decades to be cost neutral and this is why it's worse. The government will suddenly lose out on all the stamp duty that would have been paid on houses under £500k. They will also lose out on a large percentage of the stamp duty that would have been paid by those houses over £500k. How do we fund this shortfall? You do realise that any increase to National Debt will lead to ever higher interest payments so it's something that needs to be factored into the whole equation.

It's also worse because it ultimately is relying on the few to fund the many. We know how these policies work and yet Labour keep pretending they will miraculously work here. Look at the non dom tax. We have to accept that ordinary people need to pay taxes like stamp duty.

Incidentally I see a number of property professionals are supportive of the measure and suggest it will get the market moving and ultimately lead to price increases lower down the market as stamp duty isn't an issue anymore. Is that really what people want? The money goes to the vendor instead of the government and ultimately inflated the market further.

I think it is worth remembering here that this is not Labour policy. This has been suggested by a think tank and Labour are considering it. I think this thread is full of people hating on the idea because they think it has come from Labour.

suburburban · 20/08/2025 20:18

lkjhgfdsa · 20/08/2025 20:14

Currently properties under £125k do not pay stamp duty. So no. Everybody does not pay it. All that is changing in that regard is that the threshold is getting higher.

Nothing where we live is under this threshold, perhaps 20:years’ ago

lkjhgfdsa · 20/08/2025 20:21

DrPrunesqualer · 20/08/2025 18:55

Exactly
The Government doesnt pick and chose who pays tax on other purchases
You buy something there’s a tax to pay
If not everyone pays then others have to pick up the tab
Again!

Not on purchases but council tax is based on property, current stamp duty is based on property, income tax is based on income, inheritance tax only applies after a certain amount. Pretty much any tax outside of VAT is bbased on property or income.

lkjhgfdsa · 20/08/2025 20:24

suburburban · 20/08/2025 20:18

Nothing where we live is under this threshold, perhaps 20:years’ ago

In my county there are 554 properties on Rightmove under that value. In my Mum's there are 1,570 and in my Dad's 5,065.

Marshmallow4545 · 20/08/2025 20:26

lkjhgfdsa · 20/08/2025 20:14

Currently properties under £125k do not pay stamp duty. So no. Everybody does not pay it. All that is changing in that regard is that the threshold is getting higher.

It's hardly a tweak to the threshold. The percentage difference between houses worth less than £125k and those worth £500k is massive.

It means the vast majority of people currently pay stamp duty whereas a minority of people will pay the new property tax.

Letgoofmyblank · 20/08/2025 20:44

BIossomtoes · 20/08/2025 18:31

Because it's essentially punishing people for daring to own a house worth a certain value. The underlying assumption is that people that 'own' houses worth £500k are somehow inherently wealthier than those that own a house worth £499k when we knowthis isn't the case. It ignores regional variance, needs of family units and those that aren't geographically mobile. It is designed to disproportionately certain areas and regions.

All that equally applies to Stamp Duty.

I work in tax and do a lot of research into these sorts of policies. Anything with any sort of threshold introduces ways of getting out of the tax. Anything that taxes transactions prevents transactions. It’s so daft to only introduce the tax over a certain threshold.

Whet will happen if this tax is introduced? People in houses over £500k won’t move. There will be a glut of houses for £499,999. It’s so obvious. Why do this?

Papyrophile · 20/08/2025 21:15

I just don't buy this proposal or think it is workable in terms of raising more tax. Cornwall has the highest rate of council tax in the UK, at 5.5%, despite being a low wage/income county. I already pay £3900 pa in council tax for a (very nice 4-bed) home and we have lived here so long we have never paid stamp duty either, because it didn't exist when we last bought a house. We are planning to move because we're fed up with the M5 traffic jams in summer. But I don't hate where we are so if the rule change is significantly bad news for us, then I probably won't bother with the move at all, and HMRC will get nothing at all.

Fraudornot · 20/08/2025 21:36

I work in tax and do a lot of research into these sorts of policies. Anything with any sort of threshold introduces ways of getting out of the tax. Anything that taxes transactions prevents transactions. It’s so daft to only introduce the tax over a certain threshold.
Whet will happen if this tax is introduced? People in houses over £500k won’t move. There will be a glut of houses for £499,999. It’s so obvious. Why do this?

I could see house builders selling the basic shell of the house for £499 (a bit like a Ryanair flight) and then everything else would be added on (cooker, toilet, radiators etc) so that they are not included in the basic house price

EvangelicalAboutButteredToast · 20/08/2025 22:18

lkjhgfdsa · 20/08/2025 20:18

I think it is worth remembering here that this is not Labour policy. This has been suggested by a think tank and Labour are considering it. I think this thread is full of people hating on the idea because they think it has come from Labour.

Edited

I think people hate the idea because Labour is proposing to implement it. We don’t give a shit where it came from.

Fretfulmum · 20/08/2025 22:29

There is a move to widen the tax base. It is coming for everyone, regardless if people have been in their houses for 50 years or are buying next year, mortgage free or in debt to their eyeballs. They will start by picking on newly bought properties first, then it will widen to include everyone.

SpaceRaccoon · 21/08/2025 16:17

They will start by picking on newly bought properties first, then it will widen to include everyone.

Well, everyone who works and pays taxes, that is.

Bruisername · 21/08/2025 16:21

The one I saw was higher rate taxpayer and property over 500k. That’s 120k people

but then the threshold will change to everyone and the amount will change

and why the higher rate tax payer? Don’t they realise HNWI manage their finances so they’re not!!

Swipe left for the next trending thread