Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Reeves plan to tax houses over 500k PART TWO

442 replies

soupyspoon · 19/08/2025 15:23

I am not the OP from the OP!

OP posts:
Thread gallery
12
hangerup · 20/08/2025 11:17

What do you suggest doing about it?

@BIossomtoes did you miss where I asked you first?

You saw the hysteria when a perfectly reasonable change was made that removed £150 from pensioners who’d never miss it, do you seriously think any government without an electoral suicide wish would touch pensions now?

They have touched pensions though by moving the age out. Agree with you re the hysteria of means testing winter fuel.

hangerup · 20/08/2025 11:17

Life expectancy is actually reducing now because we have a diabetes and obesity epidemic.

Even better!

DrPrunesqualer · 20/08/2025 11:25

hangerup · 20/08/2025 10:49

In terms of your comment no one’s blaming pensioners you haven’t seen some of the comments often on these threads then. ‘ Oh but ‘ pensions and pensioners is often used to blame them. It seems for just existing There were Some truly dreadful comments on discussions re euthanasia and the cost to the tax payer of pensioners

But many posters want to mention the welfare bill and then ignore that pensioner benefits make up a big chunk of that.

This is a thread about stamp duty, council tax changes. The only reason someone would mention the cost of pensions is to blame the elderly yet again.

No it's a thread about tax rises because the country is in dire economic straits. One of the reasons for that is an ageing population and the fact no gov has planned for it. How can you have a thread about economics and related tax rises without discussing the reasons for it?

Acknowledging that is not blaming pensioners. But it does explain why governments have got away with not planning for it because people want to ignore it for some bizarre reason.

I agree no Government planned for the rise in pensions
They should have forced employers to pay in to private pensions a long time before 2018

That should have been introduced at least in the 60s

FableLies · 20/08/2025 11:26

adlitem · 20/08/2025 11:11

Yeah, exactly, it's bizarre. My FIL often tells me how much his pension has increased. I retort that my taxes and pension age are paying for it and perhaps it would be easier if I just transferred the money directly.

But on a serious note it does seem an odd situation that the tax paying population are not allowed to say anything about pensions but on the flip side just accept that we will be in a significantly worse position when our time comes.

Significant worse - plenty of time to prepare, right? Do your bit.

MaturingCheeseball · 20/08/2025 11:28

Do I understand correctly that this would replace council tax? Or would it be in addition?

And those in rented - particularly social housing - would be exempt from any new “council” tax and wouldn’t have to pay anything at all? That would be utterly unfair.

EvangelicalAboutButteredToast · 20/08/2025 11:29

adlitem · 20/08/2025 11:11

Yeah, exactly, it's bizarre. My FIL often tells me how much his pension has increased. I retort that my taxes and pension age are paying for it and perhaps it would be easier if I just transferred the money directly.

But on a serious note it does seem an odd situation that the tax paying population are not allowed to say anything about pensions but on the flip side just accept that we will be in a significantly worse position when our time comes.

So many of you seem to be related to rich pensioners. I find that bizarre. My grandparents were all council house renters and lived pretty much hand to mouth their whole lives. My parents had a modest income and I fully expect the care home fees will swallow the small house eventually. It’s not that I don’t know rich pensioners exist, I see some of them in the local market town to me having lunch abd shopping in the high end shops. I just don’t see this vast proportion of rich pensioners that get discussed on here. The amount of people related to older people who are permanently on a cruise is strange.

EvangelicalAboutButteredToast · 20/08/2025 11:31

MaturingCheeseball · 20/08/2025 11:28

Do I understand correctly that this would replace council tax? Or would it be in addition?

And those in rented - particularly social housing - would be exempt from any new “council” tax and wouldn’t have to pay anything at all? That would be utterly unfair.

The proposal is that there will be two taxes. ‘Council tax’ will become a different tax that goes to local government and rises in line with massive current yearly inflation. Then for those in the south east that have houses over 500k as standard we will pay the first tax and a second tax which will go to central government.

DrPrunesqualer · 20/08/2025 11:32

hangerup · 20/08/2025 10:55

There will be a marked decline in claimants of state pensions over the next 20 years as the boomer generation drops off the perch and Gen X become pensioners.

So what to do during the next 2 decades? Just ignore it? We will still have an aging population after that anyway.

After compulsory employer contributions in 2018 anyone born in 2000 will have the full benefit of that
( although obviously it’s the public sector that get top grade payments and not the private but nevertheless)
So
It won’t be till those 2000 births reach pension age that everyone will have the benefit of a decent private pension
Although private pensions are still not guaranteed or backed up by the state if there’s a crash. That’s another area still very much a problem
So 2070 then ( assuming the age doesnt rise after 2044 which it probably will )

adlitem · 20/08/2025 11:32

EvangelicalAboutButteredToast · 20/08/2025 11:29

So many of you seem to be related to rich pensioners. I find that bizarre. My grandparents were all council house renters and lived pretty much hand to mouth their whole lives. My parents had a modest income and I fully expect the care home fees will swallow the small house eventually. It’s not that I don’t know rich pensioners exist, I see some of them in the local market town to me having lunch abd shopping in the high end shops. I just don’t see this vast proportion of rich pensioners that get discussed on here. The amount of people related to older people who are permanently on a cruise is strange.

The funny thing is my FIL was never rich during his working life. He was in the army and then worked managing properties for the army and veterans. He had engineering training in the army, but not qualifications. MIL worked minimum wage retail jobs. However they both had very good final salary pensions and now to very well. I would guess they have far more disposal income in their pensions than they ever did when they worked.

EvangelicalAboutButteredToast · 20/08/2025 11:33

adlitem · 20/08/2025 11:32

The funny thing is my FIL was never rich during his working life. He was in the army and then worked managing properties for the army and veterans. He had engineering training in the army, but not qualifications. MIL worked minimum wage retail jobs. However they both had very good final salary pensions and now to very well. I would guess they have far more disposal income in their pensions than they ever did when they worked.

Good for them! I’m absolutely delighted there is someone out there keeping the economy going and using shops.

DrPrunesqualer · 20/08/2025 11:40

@EvangelicalAboutButteredToast
Only my FIL had a private pension as he worked on the railways. The other three ( inc my parents ) plus aunts and uncles didn’t. None of them worked for the state and all very much minimum wage.
So all they had was the state pension
My dad in fact thought he’d worked to 72 but he didn’t know his exact date of birth till probate sent us down a black hole and it seems he was actually born 10 years earlier than he thought. So he worked to 82
He did have a small Irish pension from working down the mines in Ireland until age 40 though. Nothing once he moved to England

If any of them had moved to free up money it wouldn’t have been possible due to lack of suitable and affordable properties
So I don’t know any wealthy pensioners

DrPrunesqualer · 20/08/2025 11:45

MaturingCheeseball · 20/08/2025 11:28

Do I understand correctly that this would replace council tax? Or would it be in addition?

And those in rented - particularly social housing - would be exempt from any new “council” tax and wouldn’t have to pay anything at all? That would be utterly unfair.

The tax is on property owners so rents would go ip

Students will be the hardest hit as their properties are exempt
That means higher student loans and a life of paying them off
and round and round we go

MaturingCheeseball · 20/08/2025 11:45

EvangelicalAboutButteredToast · 20/08/2025 11:31

The proposal is that there will be two taxes. ‘Council tax’ will become a different tax that goes to local government and rises in line with massive current yearly inflation. Then for those in the south east that have houses over 500k as standard we will pay the first tax and a second tax which will go to central government.

Noooooooo !! My council tax is going to be £4k next year. That plus a property tax - I read about £4k again on £700k house (and that’s a flippin’ 80s box where I live) - £8k a year? aaaaargggh!!

hangerup · 20/08/2025 11:46

After compulsory employer contributions in 2018 anyone born in 2000 will have the full benefit of that

Do you realise how low most private pension contributions are?

It won’t be till those 2000 births reach pension age that everyone will have the benefit of a decent private pension

This has got to be a joke?

DrPrunesqualer · 20/08/2025 11:47

MaturingCheeseball · 20/08/2025 11:45

Noooooooo !! My council tax is going to be £4k next year. That plus a property tax - I read about £4k again on £700k house (and that’s a flippin’ 80s box where I live) - £8k a year? aaaaargggh!!

The additional tax is on the 200k over £500k
Where did you read these figures ?
There's a lot of conflicting information out there I could equally be wrong

DrPrunesqualer · 20/08/2025 11:48

hangerup · 20/08/2025 11:46

After compulsory employer contributions in 2018 anyone born in 2000 will have the full benefit of that

Do you realise how low most private pension contributions are?

It won’t be till those 2000 births reach pension age that everyone will have the benefit of a decent private pension

This has got to be a joke?

Oh yes I’m well aware how low private pensions are. It’s still more than than nothing though
Im not saying they are great at all. I’m in the private sector and had 5 pensions when you had to get a new one every time you moved practice. That’s stopped now that new employers have to pay into your existing pension and can’t refuse. I’ve lost 3 of my pensions along the way in management fees because new employers insisted on theirs only
Only the public sector have good employer contributions

lkjhgfdsa · 20/08/2025 11:56

Julen7 · 20/08/2025 10:06

But doesn’t everybody pay stamp duty when they buy a house?

This would be replacing stamp duty so no, people would not be paying stamp duty when they bought their house.

adlitem · 20/08/2025 11:59

EvangelicalAboutButteredToast · 20/08/2025 11:33

Good for them! I’m absolutely delighted there is someone out there keeping the economy going and using shops.

Yes, it is very good for them. I am glad they can have a long and comfortable requirement. I don't however see why no one is allowed to bring their pensions without being accused for blaming the elderly

adlitem · 20/08/2025 12:00

It also underscores why investment in childcare is so important. Society needs to encourage people to have children to keep paying for those pensions/ health/ social care costs!

EvangelicalAboutButteredToast · 20/08/2025 12:06

What usually happens is the government leaks information about the next raft of tax rises pre-budget and when it happens we are grateful it’s not as bad as we thought so don’t react to handing more money over.

I just can’t see that they will make moving part of the process as they know directly they do that people won’t move. It makes more sense to me that they will go after the second home owners and holiday let owners first and all our holidays will go up. They’ll no doubt implement a version of the mansion tax and alongside that they will do a watered down version of the stamp duty change.

DrPrunesqualer · 20/08/2025 12:17

lkjhgfdsa · 20/08/2025 09:59

This is well worth a listen (starting from 1:05) for an explanation of how this works. I have seen a lot of misinformation on this thread. People getting upset about things that are not proposed. For example this tax will not apply to people who paid stamp duty when they bought the house.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/m002h13y?partner=uk.co.bbc&origin=share-mobile

For reference the only area in the country where the average house price is over £500k is London. So for the vast majority of people they would only be paying if they live in a more expensive than average house for where they live.

Other articles state the £500k threshold being sited is nonsense and will be much higher

DrPrunesqualer · 20/08/2025 12:20

EvangelicalAboutButteredToast · 20/08/2025 12:06

What usually happens is the government leaks information about the next raft of tax rises pre-budget and when it happens we are grateful it’s not as bad as we thought so don’t react to handing more money over.

I just can’t see that they will make moving part of the process as they know directly they do that people won’t move. It makes more sense to me that they will go after the second home owners and holiday let owners first and all our holidays will go up. They’ll no doubt implement a version of the mansion tax and alongside that they will do a watered down version of the stamp duty change.

Perhaps a far higher stamp duty for second homes and a 200% council tax throughout the country for them too

Then higher again stamp duty and council taxes for non residents

Bruisername · 20/08/2025 12:21

DrPrunesqualer · 20/08/2025 12:17

Other articles state the £500k threshold being sited is nonsense and will be much higher

Doesn’t that pretty much make it a tax on London and SE?

DrPrunesqualer · 20/08/2025 12:24

Bruisername · 20/08/2025 12:21

Doesn’t that pretty much make it a tax on London and SE?

Exactly
With the more expensive properties in those areas yes it is

lkjhgfdsa · 20/08/2025 12:37

EagerHouseMover · 20/08/2025 10:58

Taxing the sellers is ridiculous.
My story:

DH and I completed on our current home earlier this year. 425k, so whilst not at the 500k mark, we're not too far off it (and therefore it is a possibility that we could be there at some point). We paid £11,250 in stamp duty (not first time buyers).

4 bed detached - our forever home. DH works from home, and so uses the smallest bedroom as his office. 2 spare bedrooms - 1 double, and 1 single (could fit double bed and nothing else in the room, or a single bed with wardrobe and desk).

We have unexplained infertility. We are considering adoption - we are currently pre-stage 1 with this, and so very early days. We understand that the adoption process may not work out for us.

DH and I have discussed both approval and non-approval of adoption. If we are approved, and wr get a child, we will stay put. This is a lovely home and perfect for a child to grow up in.

If we do not end up with a child, we have also discussed downsizing in 5 - 10 years. We are able to cover the mortgage and all other costs for our current house, but if it ends up being just the two of us (a very real possibilty), we could buy a 2 bedroom house pretty much outright, and obviously have the advantages that come with being mortgage free.

But- if it costs us to SELL (after we've already paid stamp duty on this property), we may decide to stay put. At the end of the day, we can afford our current 4 bed, and if it's going to cost us to move, why should we? (I don't know the ins and outs of this new tax yet, but asse that any stamp duty we would pay to buy a 2 bed would be less than this new tax to sell a 4 bed).

It's not a tax for the sellers. It is the person buying the house that would be paying the tax.