Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Reeves' plan to tax houses over 500k

1000 replies

FridayFeelingmidweek · 18/08/2025 20:25

Just been reading news about Reeves's plan to tax https://www.theguardian.com/money/2025/aug/18/rachel-reeves-stamp-duty-property-tax-council-tax

AIBU to already be worrying about living in the south east? Surely this will force people either to never move, or move away from SE/London.

I'm glad that there is finally something that isn't negatively affecting areas outside the SE but does she actually understand that 500k isn't much down here - 3 bed terrace at best.

Reeves considers replacing stamp duty with new property tax

Exclusive: Treasury examines options including tax on homes sold for more than £500,000 as well as overhaul of council tax

https://www.theguardian.com/money/2025/aug/18/rachel-reeves-stamp-duty-property-tax-council-tax

OP posts:
Thread gallery
18
Mrsbloggz · 18/08/2025 22:19

TheGoldoffEternal · 18/08/2025 22:12

the rich are not enough taxed. Sorry to say it but

That's because they use their wealth & power to protect and further their wealth so that they are untouchable.

nevernotmaybe · 18/08/2025 22:19

FridayFeelingmidweek · 18/08/2025 22:17

Well, they will stay through the roof if this comes in because people won't move, so houses will be in higher demand, meaning higher prices.

Not sure that's how numbers work . . . . You don't make another house available when you move, because you take one when you move into the new one. The amount available is identical either way.

hangerup · 18/08/2025 22:20

Much as like some of her policies and dislike other policies I find the whole ‘Rachel from Accounts’ thing deeply misogynistic. This is a site which ought to respect women.

Agree, it's so fucking rude.

SadTimesInFife · 18/08/2025 22:20

hangerup · 18/08/2025 20:41

any government now has no choice but to tap into some of that housing wealth, there isn't any where else to raise tax from.

How about taxing Amazon, Facebook and everyone else who shelters or funnels money off shore?

Government chases home owners as a house is impossible to hide.

AugustSlippedAwayIntoAMomentInTime · 18/08/2025 22:20

God forbid they start with taxing actual wealth, as in billionaire and multi-millionaires, as well as taxing passive income / capital gains at a higher tax rate first.

Way to lose the middle class....

soupyspoon · 18/08/2025 22:21

Justchilling07 · 18/08/2025 22:14

It’s not a ridiculous comparison at all, have you got experience renting privately, in last 10-15 years? No
You haven’t, because if you did you wouldn’t be so indifferent.The point @HPFA was clearly making, how can the younger generation, pay high rents whilst saving for a deposit, when house prices are through the roof.

I already made that point earlier in the thread

But its a ridiculous comparison to say that someone would refuse to work based on paying their rent to a landlord because someone who is pissed off at the potential new tax wonders to themselves 'whats the point in working'.

You pay someone, somewhere. We all do. Nothing indifferent about it at all.

AfroDizzyAct · 18/08/2025 22:22

HelpHedgehogsByFeedingThemCatBiscuits · 18/08/2025 20:35

I hate Labour

Never thought I would ever say this, but I hate them too.

sussexman · 18/08/2025 22:22

Letgoofmyblank · 18/08/2025 22:01

Why not just add it into council tax and call it a land value tax? Simpler. And how would you compensate those like a prior poster who’ve just spent £30k on stamp duty?

Why would you compensate people? They've paid the tax due under the current system. Stamp duty isn't a surprise to anyone. When they buy their next house, that will be potentially subject to the new, but also known, tax.

You also can't add a land value tax to the council tax system. It isn't based on land values. You could, in theory, replace council tax with a land value tax, and I'd be supportive of that, but you can't do it quickly enough. Similarly, you could revalue all our houses to revamp Council Tax bands, but you can't do that quickly enough either.

Another76543 · 18/08/2025 22:22

AlastheDaffodils · 18/08/2025 22:19

@FridayFeelingmidweek this tax, if it replaces stamp duty, massively reduces the cost of moving.

I’m fairly sure that Labour won’t introduce any changes which reduce the overall tax take.

Mrsbloggz · 18/08/2025 22:23

SadTimesInFife · 18/08/2025 22:20

How about taxing Amazon, Facebook and everyone else who shelters or funnels money off shore?

Government chases home owners as a house is impossible to hide.

Yes, but HOW to bring that about??

FatherFrosty · 18/08/2025 22:23

Justchilling07 · 18/08/2025 22:14

It’s not a ridiculous comparison at all, have you got experience renting privately, in last 10-15 years? No
You haven’t, because if you did you wouldn’t be so indifferent.The point @HPFA was clearly making, how can the younger generation, pay high rents whilst saving for a deposit, when house prices are through the roof.

as someone who has paid over £300,000 for rent over my adult life. I’d have paid off my first rented house by now for that amount.
the house hasn’t got bigger, but the cost has doubled.
I will have to continue paying that until I die, mortgaged owners don’t have that worry. so I will pay out at least that again, probably much more as rent rises.

they don’t live with the bank asking them to leave, pass all the checks, find the money for deposit boxes etc and move with 8 weeks notice.
they’ve been able to paint a child’s bedroom. Have pets. Plant bulbs in the garden and see them grow. Let the kids use paints in the house without fear they might get it on the carpet and lose their deposit.

Life as a renter is hard, relentless and seeps into every single decision you make.

soupyspoon · 18/08/2025 22:23

AlastheDaffodils · 18/08/2025 22:19

@FridayFeelingmidweek this tax, if it replaces stamp duty, massively reduces the cost of moving.

How does it? The seller is presumably moving somewhere arent they? Or are they just going to live in a tent somewhere.

AlastheDaffodils · 18/08/2025 22:23

SadTimesInFife · 18/08/2025 22:20

How about taxing Amazon, Facebook and everyone else who shelters or funnels money off shore?

Government chases home owners as a house is impossible to hide.

Well they tried - that’s what the digital services tax was supposed to do. Trump made clear that there would be no US/UK trade deal if it was introduced. Tens of thousands of UK car workers, among others, would have lost their jobs - we export a lot of Range Rovers to the US. So they scrapped it.

Taxing American tech companies more is no longer a viable option. RR knows this very well.

Papyrophile · 18/08/2025 22:25

@AlastheDaffodils , I suspect the plan will be to impose tax on both buyer and seller, as well as an annual % charge on values. Which, like the increase in CGT, will mean that I probably won't bother to move. I like my house now as much as the day we bought it, but I would quite like to move closer to my sister and out of the tourist environment that's evolved.

BIossomtoes · 18/08/2025 22:26

soupyspoon · 18/08/2025 22:23

How does it? The seller is presumably moving somewhere arent they? Or are they just going to live in a tent somewhere.

Increasingly for the next few years they’ll be dead.

Amonthinthecountry · 18/08/2025 22:27

Rhayader · 18/08/2025 20:47

It’s very unclear what this tax would actually be — it seems to be talking about two new taxes.

Part of the reason that house prices are inflated is that people are encouraged to sit put in large properties. If you are an elderly couple in a 5 bed, moving means paying stamp duty. Additionally, if more of your net worth is held up in your property it’s exempt from inheritance tax. Both of these factors need to be addressed.

I think we can all agree that stamp duty is an awful tax, but a tax on selling instead of buying doesn’t really help. An actual % on the value of a home makes way more sense, especially if they are replacing council tax too as the article seems to be suggesting. As houses get seriously expensive they should be paying more (this is how it works in most countries). 20m should pay more than 1.5m, this isn’t the case currently.

IMHO:

— Scrap stamp duty
— Scrap council tax
— Introduce fixed 0.5% annual tax on property prices
— Change IHT so it’s the same rate for all assets, not special rates for houses.

This appeals to me! Our annual payment would go down to £1,500. How would you calculate the property price though? I thought the problem with Council Tax was that it would be a massive ball ache to update the outdated rateable values?

Dorisbonson · 18/08/2025 22:27

Mrsbloggz · 18/08/2025 22:19

That's because they use their wealth & power to protect and further their wealth so that they are untouchable.

I'm unclear how taxing people who own homes worth more than 500k will crack down on ultra wealthy tax avoiders?

Also wealthy people pay vast amounts of tax already. You are just ignorant of the statistics.

Another2Cats · 18/08/2025 22:27

There are two very different policies mentioned in that article.

One is an overhaul of council tax so that it is more proportional, ie everyone pays a percentage of the value of the house (up to £500k) with a minimum of £800. Where I live, the council tax for a Band A property is currently £1,166.

It will need some sorting out but it seems fairer than the current system.

The other policy of replacing stamp duty seems odd but that may work as well.

As far as I understand it (please let me know if I'm wrong). Under the new system, if somebody buys a house for more than £500k then they will not pay any stamp duty but they will then have to pay an annual charge (and a bigger one if the cost if over £1 million). Houses under £500k are not subject to this charge and will be free of stamp duty.

From the paper, they are suggesting that if you buy a £600k house then you do not have to pay any stamp duty (which would currently be £20k in England & Wales) but instead you would pay an annual charge of approx £540 per year. This is in addition to the replacement council tax.

Or, if you buy a £1 million house then, instead of paying stamp duty of £43,750 you pay £2,700 per year.

Tiredofallthis101 · 18/08/2025 22:28

But is it not talking about replacing stamp duty? Which already charges you a higher chunk of money for buying a £500k plus house? Not sure why everyone thinks this is so terrible, at least until we see the details of the implementation- it could actually work out cheaper for many people. Where I live I ended up paying the best part of £25k in stamp duty on a £350k house (not a second home), I imagine on a £500k+ house it would be more like £30-35k. So I can't see this necessarily working out worse for most people- but do recognise it will disproportionately affect those in SE England. Nothing to stop you moving elsewhere though where your money goes much further - which may also be a positive in bringing house prices down, if people don't want to spend over £X due to the high rates of tax. Agree on it potentially encouraging older people to just sit on their wealth though, so you'd also have to ensure the council tax replacement or something else tackled that.

hangerup · 18/08/2025 22:28

The housing market is such a huge financial piece of the UK economy, they would not do anything that would cause price drops - hence all the relaxation of lending, help to buy, mortgage guarantees for banks etc etc.

Ever increasing prices are the economy. It's reductive.

FatherFrosty · 18/08/2025 22:28

We know all the services are on their knees.
everything needs money and more of it

I’m not being goady. But where is it going to come from?

soupyspoon · 18/08/2025 22:29

BIossomtoes · 18/08/2025 22:26

Increasingly for the next few years they’ll be dead.

Really, how do you work that out. People with properties worth over 500k are all going to die?

hangerup · 18/08/2025 22:29

How about taxing Amazon, Facebook and everyone else who shelters or funnels money off shore?

key is offshore! You need global initiatives to target global wealth.

hangerup · 18/08/2025 22:29

God forbid they start with taxing actual wealth, as in billionaire and multi-millionaires, as well as taxing passive income / capital gains at a higher tax rate first.

they have targeted non doms

FatherFrosty · 18/08/2025 22:29

soupyspoon · 18/08/2025 22:29

Really, how do you work that out. People with properties worth over 500k are all going to die?

I think they mean it won’t be a choice to move. The only people moving will be probate moves because it’s too expensive

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread