Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Reeves' plan to tax houses over 500k

1000 replies

FridayFeelingmidweek · 18/08/2025 20:25

Just been reading news about Reeves's plan to tax https://www.theguardian.com/money/2025/aug/18/rachel-reeves-stamp-duty-property-tax-council-tax

AIBU to already be worrying about living in the south east? Surely this will force people either to never move, or move away from SE/London.

I'm glad that there is finally something that isn't negatively affecting areas outside the SE but does she actually understand that 500k isn't much down here - 3 bed terrace at best.

Reeves considers replacing stamp duty with new property tax

Exclusive: Treasury examines options including tax on homes sold for more than £500,000 as well as overhaul of council tax

https://www.theguardian.com/money/2025/aug/18/rachel-reeves-stamp-duty-property-tax-council-tax

OP posts:
Thread gallery
18
FatherFrosty · 18/08/2025 22:40

hangerup · 18/08/2025 22:36

@FatherFrosty we never recovered from 08, the chickens are coming home to roost now.

the austerity measures have meant public services have never recovered.
the housing market, certainly where I am has become obscene and so out of reach for anyone normal now.

1apenny2apenny · 18/08/2025 22:41

It’s no surprise that Labour are simply looking to take as much as they can from anyone who has anything.

What makes me sick is that they go for the low hanging fruit and then just piss it all away. No talk of large reform, which is what’s needed, and they just cave when their back benchers start threatening rebel.

hangerup · 18/08/2025 22:41

@Closetoknowing because of housing costs.

Closetoknowing · 18/08/2025 22:41

Closetoknowing · 18/08/2025 22:39

Well we don’t yet know what this idiotic government will do however..

Wouldn’t this simplistic little idea stop people selling / downsizing? Surely that’s the opposite of what the uk needs.

Why don’t Labour bite the bullet and increase the basic rate of income tax?

The direct tax burden on average earners is below where it has been for most of the last 50 years. There is even less truth than usual in the simplistic mantra that any additional taxes should come not from “working people” but solely from those with the “broadest shoulders”

That’s just another example of the long political tradition of pretending that “we” the people, can have our cake while “they”, the others, pay.

No country raises more tax than we do without taxing working people more than we do.

Lumping yet more taxes on high earners and companies will put at risk the growth the government says it is so keen to foster.’

They also need to look at the fuck up that is ADHD claimants on billions of benefits ‘£3.5 billion:
The Telegraph indicates that the annual cost of benefits for anxiety and ADHD-related claims is £3.5 billion.

  • Doubling since 2020: The cost of these claims has more than doubled since 2020, highlighting the increasing burden of these conditions on the welfare system.’

That cannot be right. Sorry.

https://ifs.org.uk/articles/drastic-times-need-drastic-action-breaking-50-year-tax-taboo

Closetoknowing · 18/08/2025 22:42

hangerup · 18/08/2025 22:41

@Closetoknowing because of housing costs.

?

Mustreadabook · 18/08/2025 22:44

Bambamhoohoo · 18/08/2025 20:48

Labour have a track record of transferring wealth from London - they did something not dissimilar to this is the naughties, giving companies grants and incentives to move to northern cities.
I lost my (student) job to my org moving to Manchester. It worked, tbf, Manchester etc exploded with new investment

Won't this increase the wealth of London? If property taxes going to the council are based on property price, not the services that the council provides, then councils in areas with expensive but small houses, ie London, will get way more money for providing services for the same number of people.

BIossomtoes · 18/08/2025 22:46

Mustreadabook · 18/08/2025 22:44

Won't this increase the wealth of London? If property taxes going to the council are based on property price, not the services that the council provides, then councils in areas with expensive but small houses, ie London, will get way more money for providing services for the same number of people.

No because the unequal funding to local authorities will move away from London. The article actually states that.

StillFeelingTired · 18/08/2025 22:47

Another76543 · 18/08/2025 22:22

I’m fairly sure that Labour won’t introduce any changes which reduce the overall tax take.

That assumes they can follow the repercussions of their fiscal policies to thei logical conclusion. So far they seem largely incapable of that.

Dorisbonson · 18/08/2025 22:48

Letgoofmyblank · 18/08/2025 22:09

Immigration is a fairly insignificant cost when you compare it to other government spending. A cost yes, but people overestimate how big a cost it is.

The government spends on average 17k per person.

The overwhelming majority of immigrants coming to the UK per visa applications in recent years have been in in industries with low paid jobs. Assuming they earn 30k a year they will pay tax and national insurance of just under 5k. Being very generous and assuming that they spend 10k on vatable goods and services you could add another 2k to that (20% vat of 10k). So circa 7k tax paid. That is a 10k tax spending shortfall on average per migrant.

With 1m immigrants a year in recent years that's 10bn shortfall a year. In a decade from now the 1m immigrants from last year will have cost the UK £100bn.

If we continue to run immigration at a rate of circa 1m a year for ten years then the cost of those 10m people would be 100bn annually. We are on track to exceed these numbers.

I don't think those are small numbers and not every migrant will be working.

This is aside from the social and cultural change issues in communities that haven't asked for change but are having it forced on them.

Justchilling07 · 18/08/2025 22:49

soupyspoon · 18/08/2025 22:21

I already made that point earlier in the thread

But its a ridiculous comparison to say that someone would refuse to work based on paying their rent to a landlord because someone who is pissed off at the potential new tax wonders to themselves 'whats the point in working'.

You pay someone, somewhere. We all do. Nothing indifferent about it at all.

Did you? That doesn’t change the comment you just made.No it wasn’t a ridiculous comparison at all and you are coming across as very indifferent.
There’s a big difference, in paying a mortgage, the bank, to paying a greedy landlord, who knows we’re in a houses crisis and they can charge whatever they choose.

BIossomtoes · 18/08/2025 22:50

The government spends on average 17k per person.

Where does that figure come from? It seems unfeasibly high to me.

Dorisbonson · 18/08/2025 22:51

BIossomtoes · 18/08/2025 22:50

The government spends on average 17k per person.

Where does that figure come from? It seems unfeasibly high to me.

Divide total government spending by British population and you get to it. It's also been quoted elsewhere.

hangerup · 18/08/2025 22:52

@Closetoknowing we have high housing costs in this country? For lower incomes it takes up a higher proportion of your income. Increasing income taxes for lower earners just means paying more back in housing benefit and other benefits.

In the past when lower earners paid higher taxes they were not spending as much on housing.

nevernotmaybe · 18/08/2025 22:52

Dorisbonson · 18/08/2025 22:48

The government spends on average 17k per person.

The overwhelming majority of immigrants coming to the UK per visa applications in recent years have been in in industries with low paid jobs. Assuming they earn 30k a year they will pay tax and national insurance of just under 5k. Being very generous and assuming that they spend 10k on vatable goods and services you could add another 2k to that (20% vat of 10k). So circa 7k tax paid. That is a 10k tax spending shortfall on average per migrant.

With 1m immigrants a year in recent years that's 10bn shortfall a year. In a decade from now the 1m immigrants from last year will have cost the UK £100bn.

If we continue to run immigration at a rate of circa 1m a year for ten years then the cost of those 10m people would be 100bn annually. We are on track to exceed these numbers.

I don't think those are small numbers and not every migrant will be working.

This is aside from the social and cultural change issues in communities that haven't asked for change but are having it forced on them.

I must be missing something, it doesn't seem to add up. That's 10k shortfall after 1 year with this massively simplistic view that doesn't take into account the number is high over a small amount that are much more complex - it's not actually 17k per person, that's an average.

But taking it at face value, it's 10k after 1 year, and profit from early in the second year onwards . . . . . .

shuggles · 18/08/2025 22:53

@Letgoofmyblank Get rid of the income tax high marginal tax bands. So many people down tools when they near £100k of income - self employed especially - as there’s no point in earning more if you’re only keeping less than 40% of it.

This point keeps coming up, but I don't understand this.

Anyone with even a quantum of common sense would be putting all money above £100k into a pension fund (unless they are an extremely high earner, in which case money is no object).

Dorisbonson · 18/08/2025 22:53

nevernotmaybe · 18/08/2025 22:52

I must be missing something, it doesn't seem to add up. That's 10k shortfall after 1 year with this massively simplistic view that doesn't take into account the number is high over a small amount that are much more complex - it's not actually 17k per person, that's an average.

But taking it at face value, it's 10k after 1 year, and profit from early in the second year onwards . . . . . .

How is it a profit?

I don't think you understand maths.

Mrsbloggz · 18/08/2025 22:53

brewshaw · 18/08/2025 21:18

I listened to Radical with Amol Ragan where he talks to Paul Morland about demographic shift and where things are headed very soon as the baby boomers retire and there are less and less workers to carry the financial burden of caring for the elderly and its only going to get worse. Very interesting listening BBC Radio 4 - Radical with Amol Rajan, Grey Britain: Do We Need To Have More Children? (Dr Paul Morland)

This is very interesting, please listen if you can!

BIossomtoes · 18/08/2025 22:54

Dorisbonson · 18/08/2025 22:51

Divide total government spending by British population and you get to it. It's also been quoted elsewhere.

But you can’t do that and be accurate. It’s nonsensical.

hangerup · 18/08/2025 22:54

The overwhelming majority of immigrants coming to the UK per visa applications in recent years have been in in industries with low paid jobs.

Don't we still need this workers though eg in the NHS & social care?

Justchilling07 · 18/08/2025 22:54

FatherFrosty · 18/08/2025 22:23

as someone who has paid over £300,000 for rent over my adult life. I’d have paid off my first rented house by now for that amount.
the house hasn’t got bigger, but the cost has doubled.
I will have to continue paying that until I die, mortgaged owners don’t have that worry. so I will pay out at least that again, probably much more as rent rises.

they don’t live with the bank asking them to leave, pass all the checks, find the money for deposit boxes etc and move with 8 weeks notice.
they’ve been able to paint a child’s bedroom. Have pets. Plant bulbs in the garden and see them grow. Let the kids use paints in the house without fear they might get it on the carpet and lose their deposit.

Life as a renter is hard, relentless and seeps into every single decision you make.

Thank you, for sharing your actual experience.

MrsVino · 18/08/2025 22:55

HelpHedgehogsByFeedingThemCatBiscuits · 18/08/2025 20:35

I hate Labour

Me too.

shuggles · 18/08/2025 22:56

@FridayFeelingmidweek Seems to be a lot of anger about this on the thread, but ultimately, taxing wealth is the right thing to do.

Perhaps if previous generations had treated houses as... houses, instead of "investments," then this mess would not have happened.

A lot of the tension and anger in society solely boils down to the mess of the housing market. If house prices had risen in line with inflation, then the average house would only cost about £75k or so.

By the way; when your house goes up in value, you don't profit. That's because you don't sell it (as you need a place to live), and if you do decide to sell it... well, all other houses have gone up in price too. The ONLY people who benefit from expensive housing are the banks because they profit off the loans.

Dorisbonson · 18/08/2025 22:56

hangerup · 18/08/2025 22:54

The overwhelming majority of immigrants coming to the UK per visa applications in recent years have been in in industries with low paid jobs.

Don't we still need this workers though eg in the NHS & social care?

That's a pointless argument as the vast majority of migrants don't get visas for that type of work.

samthepigeon · 18/08/2025 22:58

SimoneHere · 18/08/2025 20:39

i was thinking it would need to be something that takes into account regional differences in house prices … then I realised we already have something like that - council tax. Couldn’t they increase council tax in higher bands and then take take a proportion back from the council?

Edit - I misunderstood and thought it was an ongoing rather than one-off tax.

We already have this in Scotland. It just means no one downsizes ever because it’s not worth it.

Edited

I wish it was more equal across the country. Westminster has the lowest council tax in the country. It must have some of the most expensive properties in the country. It don't seem right.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.