For context we are in a houseshare. There are 3 rooms: one at 9.9 (with a double bed that nobody wants), a room at 11.1m2 and a room at 13m2. Jess, Elle and I are all friends. Previously there was some drama deciding rooms and rent which I won't dive into where Elle moved into the 11.1m2 room ignoring the idea of spinning a wheel to allocate rooms as she had a chronic condition which would make the 9.9m2 room "unliveable". I won't dive into this so much but Elle said she was out of line to me privately. Jess also had to move in and ended up taking the 13m^2 room.
When I raised we should talk about splitting rent, Elle said she would pay £600 and the rest should be worked out amongst Jess and I which I protested. I used this formula:
((Communal space/ 3) + room size) multiply by rent/ square metre to decide how much rent each person pays coming out to £550 for the smaller room and £650 for the larger room.
Jess who had been quiet on the chat the whole time said that she would pay £630 max as last year she had a room much smaller than mine and paid £595/ month so she thought I should pay a lot more. I sent her my working out and she replied she didn't think it was fair and my method only considered floorspace. She didn't find it fair she had to pay £50 more than Elle as she didn't have a desk (despite having a baywindow, a sofa, a coffee table) and me having neither of those things.
The past 3 days had been rough for me because everything I said something both of them would act like I was out of line (and Elle and her boyfriend expected me to go into my medical history as to why I would not thrive in a smaller room as according to them my issues could not be worse than Elle's) so agreed to pay £570 (which would be the minimum rent for my room according to Jess). I don't know if I was being unreasonable so I wanted to hear your thoughts. I definitely will not room with them and see the yealg £240 as a penalty for being too trusting.