Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To wonder how the UK will look in 3 years time?

905 replies

Labradorlover987 · 11/08/2025 13:19

I was inspired to write this after reading the UC post that was just reported - the govt’s welfare bill has passed but was watered down so unlikely to make any real savings.

I earn 40k, have a school age child and just feel like I am living hand to mouth 😩 I 100% think there should be a welfare systems that supports people on low incomes but I wonder how the current system will be sustained in the long run?

Just wondered what other people thought.

I actually wouldn’t mind paying more in taxes if we could be guaranteed more in services etc - for example my council tax just went up and the services seem even worse this year than usual.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
Twofoursixeight · 12/08/2025 21:53

MyNameIsX · 12/08/2025 21:32

And how do you reconcile a wealth tax with Labour’s desperate need for growth?

Bear in mind that wealth taxes are laggy for 2-3 years (in terms of implementation and collection).

As discussed up thread, many economists and institutions now believe that reducing inequality - via, for example, progressive taxation, is more likely to promote growth than reduce it.

https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/policy-approaches-to-reduce-inequalities-while-boosting-productivity-growth_af121c8f-en.html?utm_source=chatgpt.com

https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/ar/2018/eng/spotlight/making-growth-inclusive/?utm_source=chatgpt.com

TheNuthatch · 12/08/2025 21:55

Bambamhoohoo · 12/08/2025 21:45

You can just ask char gpt

Answer: With the threshold dropped to £5,000, the 1.2% employer NI rise would cost ~£207.70 per year per full-time minimum wage employee — about £49 more than under the old threshold.

Labour's changes effectively raised employer NI costs by 1.2 percentage points and lowered the contribution threshold from £9,100 to £5,000, resulting in around £615 extra per employee annually, disproportionately impacting firms with low-wage workers

Are you really an accountant of 30 years, as per your earlier post?
It's astonishing that you don't seem to understand the effect the NI and NMW increases have had on SMEs.

nearlylovemyusername · 12/08/2025 21:56

Bambamhoohoo · 12/08/2025 21:45

You can just ask char gpt

Answer: With the threshold dropped to £5,000, the 1.2% employer NI rise would cost ~£207.70 per year per full-time minimum wage employee — about £49 more than under the old threshold.

Labour's changes effectively raised employer NI costs by 1.2 percentage points and lowered the contribution threshold from £9,100 to £5,000, resulting in around £615 extra per employee annually, disproportionately impacting firms with low-wage workers

Everyone knows that ChatGPT is really sh.t at maths, but how people can be so illiterate???

£615 increase is 15% of difference between 9100 and 5000.

It does not take into account extra 1.2% on everything above this rate!

nearlylovemyusername · 12/08/2025 21:57

TheNuthatch · 12/08/2025 21:55

Are you really an accountant of 30 years, as per your earlier post?
It's astonishing that you don't seem to understand the effect the NI and NMW increases have had on SMEs.

This poster is accountant?!?
OMG

Bambamhoohoo · 12/08/2025 21:58

TheNuthatch · 12/08/2025 21:55

Are you really an accountant of 30 years, as per your earlier post?
It's astonishing that you don't seem to understand the effect the NI and NMW increases have had on SMEs.

Why do you think accountants all work for SMEs? Doing their financial statements and tax returns?

it’s probably your own lack of knowledge that makes you think that. I don’t know anyone that runs an SME professionally or personally. Neither do they interest me.

I do understand business models and sustainability though.

Bambamhoohoo · 12/08/2025 21:58

nearlylovemyusername · 12/08/2025 21:56

Everyone knows that ChatGPT is really sh.t at maths, but how people can be so illiterate???

£615 increase is 15% of difference between 9100 and 5000.

It does not take into account extra 1.2% on everything above this rate!

Did you see the sentence above calculating the 1.2%?

TheNuthatch · 12/08/2025 22:01

nearlylovemyusername · 12/08/2025 21:49

I posted this sometime ago on another thread but this is still relevant. The below is summary of info on gov sites with links supporting every number.

Top 1% (about 310,000 people, on £160k taxable min) pay 29% of all income UK taxes. This is about 80bn.

Top 10% pay 60%, which is 166bn.

About one third of working age population don't pay any tax at all.

Social security spending in Great Britain
In 2025 to 2026 the government is forecast to spend £316.1 billion on the social security system in Great Britain. Total GB welfare spending is forecast to be 10.6% of GDP and 23.5% of the total amount the government spends in 2025 to 2026.

Around 55% of social security expenditure goes to pensioners; in 2025 to 2026 we will spend £174.9 billion on benefits for pensioners in GB. This includes spending on the State Pension which is forecast to be £145.6 billion in 2025 to 2026.

In 2025 to 2026 we will spend £141.2 billion on working age and children welfare. This includes spending on Universal Credit and its predecessors, and non-DWP welfare spending.

In 2025 to 2026 we will spend £75.3 billion on benefits to support disabled people and people with health conditions, and £35.3 billion on housing benefits.
Guidance and methodology: Benefit expenditure and caseload tables - GOV.UK
So welfare payments are only 4.4bn less that all state pensions.

Only 35% of UC claimants are working.
Proportion of Universal Credit claimants in employment in England | LG Inform

There were 7.5 million people on Universal Credit in January 2025, up from 6.4 million people on Universal Credit in January 2024

Universal Credit statistics, 29 April 2013 to 9 January 2025 - GOV.UK
23.7 million people claimed some combination of DWP benefits in August 2024 (of the 17 benefits included in these statistics). Of these:

  • 13.1 million were of State Pension Age (including those in receipt of their State Pension)
  • 9.9 million were of Working Age
  • 750,000 were under 16 (and in receipt of DLA as a child)
Interesting stats on PIP, incl assessment process 1 Link looks strange, but it's Scottish Gov doc. Number of disability benefits recipients in the UK is dramatically higher than in Denmark, France, Norway, Sweden - all comparable countries. "This research has found that extra costs benefits are uncommon in other countries. Indeed, in a New Policy Institute report for the Joseph Rowntree Foundation, MacInnes et al (2014 – emphasis added) argue that, as far as they are aware: ‘no other European or OECD country […] makes such extensive use of a cash benefit to meet the additional costs of disability.’7 As a result, the sample of countries examined was necessarily constrained – including only countries with broadly comparable benefits. To this end, this report presents an examination of assessment for disability benefits in: Denmark, France, New Zealand, Norway, and Sweden. Even in countries where extra-costs disability benefits are offered, their reach is far more limited than in Scotland/UK (see Table 2)." 1

If you spend so much on direct welfare payments and 25% of working age population are economically inactive, your only choice is either to cut services to the bone or to increase taxes until you bleed productive part of society dry.

We do not need more taxation. We need to fundamentally reform welfare system, it's both expensive and doesn't leave any money for investment in public services, but prevents growth.

The UC figures are now even worse.
UC claimants has reached a new high of 8 million.

nearlylovemyusername · 12/08/2025 22:02

MrsBennetsPoorNerves · 12/08/2025 21:53

Use the calculator that you linked to earlier. Put the current minimum wage into it and compare rates for this year and next year. You'll see that the figures are roughly in line with what the posted.

I think you're measuring it by comparing NI on the old minimum wage and the new minimum wage. Which is of course the increase that employers need to pay, but it isn't technically the increase in Employer NI because employers would have been paying more NI on a higher NMW in any case.

As an employer, I totally understand that the increase in NMW is painful (or indeed the increase in real living wage for those of us who are committed to paying it) but what's the alternative. It simply isn't reasonable or sustainable for businesses to pay salaries that staff are unable to live on, and if a business can't afford the NMW increase, they need to rethink their business model.

As I've already stated, I would have preferred an income tax rise rather than the employer NI increase, but I totally support the increase in NMW. If anything, I think it should be higher.

I don't disagree with you about NMW. I'm talking about the overall impact of Labour policies on businesses and then on the economy.

Raising income tax will kill everything once and for all - people nearing thresholds either put it into pensions or reduce hours. £100k is simply proverbial at this stage, but those approaching 50k are doing this as well. It hampers productivity.

We can't afford anymore tax increases, we need to review spending.

TheNuthatch · 12/08/2025 22:03

nearlylovemyusername · 12/08/2025 21:57

This poster is accountant?!?
OMG

Apparently so. I'm glad they're not my accountant.

Bambamhoohoo · 12/08/2025 22:03

TheNuthatch · 12/08/2025 22:03

Apparently so. I'm glad they're not my accountant.

You don’t know much about accountants do you?

MrsBennetsPoorNerves · 12/08/2025 22:07

nearlylovemyusername · 12/08/2025 22:02

I don't disagree with you about NMW. I'm talking about the overall impact of Labour policies on businesses and then on the economy.

Raising income tax will kill everything once and for all - people nearing thresholds either put it into pensions or reduce hours. £100k is simply proverbial at this stage, but those approaching 50k are doing this as well. It hampers productivity.

We can't afford anymore tax increases, we need to review spending.

So what would you cut?

TheNuthatch · 12/08/2025 22:07

Bambamhoohoo · 12/08/2025 22:03

You don’t know much about accountants do you?

I've employed quite a few. They can usually add up, and have at least a basic understanding of the economy in my experience. They would all understand immediately the consequences of the budget on SMEs.
I'm certain they would all be aware of the latest jobs market figures showing losses particularly in retail and hospitality, which would include the cafe mentioned upthread.

Bambamhoohoo · 12/08/2025 22:09

TheNuthatch · 12/08/2025 22:07

I've employed quite a few. They can usually add up, and have at least a basic understanding of the economy in my experience. They would all understand immediately the consequences of the budget on SMEs.
I'm certain they would all be aware of the latest jobs market figures showing losses particularly in retail and hospitality, which would include the cafe mentioned upthread.

You should probably be aware that accountants do all sorts of things and a sizeable number do not work for individuals processing their tax returns.

try asking someone who restructures university financing at kpmg to tell you about the latest job market figures in hospitality. Good luck!

nearlylovemyusername · 12/08/2025 22:14

MrsBennetsPoorNerves · 12/08/2025 22:07

So what would you cut?

see my post at 21:49

As a bare min I'd time limit UC. Give claimant a year to sort themselves out. And link it to previous earnings. In parallel I'd actually reduce taxes, especially at the bottom end.

FT NMW now gives you about £1750 net per month. It's tough but liveable. For a couple on FT NMW it's totally liveable with childcare paid for them.

And I'd make PIP to be based on formal diagnosis.

nearlylovemyusername · 12/08/2025 22:19

Bambamhoohoo · 12/08/2025 22:09

You should probably be aware that accountants do all sorts of things and a sizeable number do not work for individuals processing their tax returns.

try asking someone who restructures university financing at kpmg to tell you about the latest job market figures in hospitality. Good luck!

I mean... I'd expect more or less literate people at least to read some news
UK jobs market cools as vacancies fall - BBC News

Accountants I'd expect to read FT
UK economy shed jobs in July

And not to ask ChatGPT about impact of NI and NMW increases

MrsBennetsPoorNerves · 12/08/2025 22:28

nearlylovemyusername · 12/08/2025 22:14

see my post at 21:49

As a bare min I'd time limit UC. Give claimant a year to sort themselves out. And link it to previous earnings. In parallel I'd actually reduce taxes, especially at the bottom end.

FT NMW now gives you about £1750 net per month. It's tough but liveable. For a couple on FT NMW it's totally liveable with childcare paid for them.

And I'd make PIP to be based on formal diagnosis.

I don't disagree that we need welfare reform. However, I don't think it's as straightforward as you think.

Firstly, if we're going to require a diagnosis for PIP, we'll need to sort out NHS waiting lists so that people aren't waiting years for a diagnosis. So that will require increased spending.

Secondly, if we want fewer people on disability benefits and more in work, employers will need to bear the extra costs of making reasonable adjustments etc, perhaps tolerate any attendance issues etc. That isn't necessarily a bad thing, but it won't come without a cost for someone.

What would you propose should happen to someone on UC who doesn't manage to "sort themselves out" after 12 months? Are we leaving them to beg, borrow or steal at that point? What do you think the social consequences of that might be?

Finally, you say that one third of working age population don't pay any tax at all. Surely you meant to say that they don't pay income tax,, rather than not paying any tax at all?

Bambamhoohoo · 12/08/2025 22:28

nearlylovemyusername · 12/08/2025 22:19

I mean... I'd expect more or less literate people at least to read some news
UK jobs market cools as vacancies fall - BBC News

Accountants I'd expect to read FT
UK economy shed jobs in July

And not to ask ChatGPT about impact of NI and NMW increases

Your expectations are wrong, and weird. Being an accountant is a job. Why would they do all that unless they needed to in relation to their role?
Most big organisations (not the high street accountant you use) provide staff with the market intelligence they need for their jobs in house. I would’ve thought anyone with some corporate experience would know that.

NettleTea · 12/08/2025 22:29

Twofoursixeight · 12/08/2025 19:57

The really sad thing is that so many people cannot seem to understand that they are on the wrong side of inequality. Like, they have a house, maybe a few houses, maybe they're property millionaires, they are higher rate taxpayers, and they think for that reason that they are the rich, and that the interests of the rich are the same as their interests.

If you're in this position, I would ask you this: can you afford not only to buy yourself a house, but also buy your children and all your grandchildren houses too, plus pay their bills, pay for their food, pay for their education, their health care, and also all of their pensions?

Because if the super rich are allowed to become richer and richer, asset price inflation will mean that no one can afford these things via wages anymore, only through inheritance. If you can't pay for all of these things for your family, then your family is fucked.

The rich do not need to be awful people in order for this argument to work. They just need to be ordinary people doing what ordinary people do with money, which is to spend it. Even if they hoard lots of it, if they've got billions, then they will inflate asset prices and inflate them by a lot. Your children will not be able to afford assets anymore. You need to understand this.

This in spades.
The 'rich' who think they are rich are far closer to the homeless guy in the street than the uber rich. Its sad that they dont see that, and that when the middle class, and the upper middle have been screwed out of their money, then they, or their children, will be next.

Its time that everyone who works, everyone who isnt in this super elite club, joined together rather than continued to fight and scrabble for whats left. because without doing so there will be nothing left.

nearlylovemyusername · 12/08/2025 22:34

Bambamhoohoo · 12/08/2025 22:28

Your expectations are wrong, and weird. Being an accountant is a job. Why would they do all that unless they needed to in relation to their role?
Most big organisations (not the high street accountant you use) provide staff with the market intelligence they need for their jobs in house. I would’ve thought anyone with some corporate experience would know that.

My corporate experience of 30 years in FTSE top 10 in reasonably senior roles tells me that accountants there have a level of intelligence and education which make them at least understand the impact of tax changes on general economy and behavior of both businesses and individuals.

I'm sorry you don't get it.
Let's move on.

FlowerUser · 12/08/2025 22:41

sassyclassyandsmartassy · 12/08/2025 10:22

Also, on the subject of energy. Our issue is we don’t control enough of our own energy production which is why we are held to mercy from a financial point of view when it comes to prices. It’s also part of the reason why the Cambridge to Milton Keynes project is fine, but won’t achieve what the government expect (that it will be a technological gateway), because data centres aren’t run out of the UK as the price of energy to run them is too high.

This is not true. The UK data centre sector is worth billions and predicted to double in the next five years. I work adjacent to this sector, so I know this.

ChildFreeAndOhSoHappy · 12/08/2025 22:41

Twofoursixeight · 12/08/2025 19:40

Wrong on both counts, actually. My household is well above average in both income and assets. I'm just bright enough to see that my interests align much more closely with those of the ordinary person than those of the very wealthy.

I also love my country and care about the suffering of the poor. It's a little bit sad that you can't even imagine what that's like.

So people who don't want to be taxed into oblivion love their country less? What an idiotic argument. And UK taxes hardly benefit the poor, why don't you read the statistics about who actually benefits the most from those taxes you love paying so much. Why is it that people who proclaim to be oh so bright are actually the opposite?

nearlylovemyusername · 12/08/2025 22:43

What would you propose should happen to someone on UC who doesn't manage to "sort themselves out" after 12 months? Are we leaving them to beg, borrow or steal at that point? What do you think the social consequences of that might be?
But this is exactly how it works in Scandi though. If you didn't find a job in a year you'll be given some in public services - street cleaning, whatever, you can't refuse it. Our current system makes it almost better for an individual to stay on benefits, esp with small PIP supplement, rather than work in NMW. And your point re waiting lists for diagnosis - in most cases they aren't more than several months, at least not for conditions so severe they require PIP. Treatment might be longer, yes, but not diagnosis.

Finally, you say that one third of working age population don't pay any tax at all. Surely you meant to say that they don't pay income tax,, rather than not paying any tax at all?
Well, they pay VAT on their spending and possibly council tax, that's it. They don't contribute anything at all to services they consume.

BIossomtoes · 12/08/2025 23:03

nearlylovemyusername · 12/08/2025 22:43

What would you propose should happen to someone on UC who doesn't manage to "sort themselves out" after 12 months? Are we leaving them to beg, borrow or steal at that point? What do you think the social consequences of that might be?
But this is exactly how it works in Scandi though. If you didn't find a job in a year you'll be given some in public services - street cleaning, whatever, you can't refuse it. Our current system makes it almost better for an individual to stay on benefits, esp with small PIP supplement, rather than work in NMW. And your point re waiting lists for diagnosis - in most cases they aren't more than several months, at least not for conditions so severe they require PIP. Treatment might be longer, yes, but not diagnosis.

Finally, you say that one third of working age population don't pay any tax at all. Surely you meant to say that they don't pay income tax,, rather than not paying any tax at all?
Well, they pay VAT on their spending and possibly council tax, that's it. They don't contribute anything at all to services they consume.

Well, given that some of the services they consume are paid for with council tax and revenue from VAT goes towards health and education, that’s not quite true.

ChildFreeAndOhSoHappy · 12/08/2025 23:33

NettleTea · 12/08/2025 22:29

This in spades.
The 'rich' who think they are rich are far closer to the homeless guy in the street than the uber rich. Its sad that they dont see that, and that when the middle class, and the upper middle have been screwed out of their money, then they, or their children, will be next.

Its time that everyone who works, everyone who isnt in this super elite club, joined together rather than continued to fight and scrabble for whats left. because without doing so there will be nothing left.

I agree with this completely but I also don't agree with an increase in taxes which disproportionately hurt workers, middle class and upper middle class much more than the uber wealthy. So what is the answer?

Dorisbonson · 13/08/2025 00:10

If you want to tax me risking my life savings and my house in the same way as taking a job then be prepared to see investment plummet, start ups plummet.

Who is going to be mad enough to risk everything and then pay 50% tax on it?

There isn't a country in the world that taxes capital gains like that.

Great plan

  • Create 1,000,000 (1m) business.
  • Sell it, pay 45-50% tax on sale.
  • Have 550,000 left.
  • Die, pay 40% on that amount over your house proceeds because you live in the South East.
  • Have 330k left.
Tax paid = 670k Tax rate - 67%

Excellent system. Currently it works as

  • Create 1m business
  • Sell it, pay 24%
  • Have 760k left
  • Die pay 40% on that amount over house proceeds etc
  • Have 420k left
Tax paid = 580k. Tax rate = 42%

Or, I can live in multiple European countries with no capital gains tax and no inheritance tax. Sounds better?

In the UK, the top 1% pay 29% of income tax, top 5% pay 49% of income tax. This is more than any country in Europe. You have to be smoking crack to think we aren't getting enough tax from them.

Can you please look at tax rates in Europe? Other countries have far higher taxes on lower earners.