Let’s say you buy a London flat for £250k, and in 10 years it doubles in value, so it’s now worth £500k. Theoretically you are quids in. But the reason it has gone up so much is that property prices generally have. So if you sell and want to buy somewhere else, you won’t actually be able to afford somewhere twice as nice as previously, you’ll just be in the same situation as before. The only thing that would make a difference is you’re earning more and/or you’ve inherited some money, so you’re able to buy somewhere bigger for that reason. But not because of the flat going ‘up’ in value. Surely?
Presumably the only way to make money on property is if you are lucky enough to buy in an area where prices shoot up, and then you want to move to an area where prices have remained stagnant, so then you can afford more? But if you still want to be in London, then surely your property is basically worth the same as it ever was, despite that fact that you paid £250k for it and it’s now ‘worth’ £500k? Doesn’t do you any good if the bigger flat that cost £500k ten years ago now costs £750k, or £900k?