Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Thread 13: To feel disappointed after reading this in The Observer about the author and her husband from The Salt Path book and film?

1000 replies

DisappointedReader · 05/08/2025 15:59

The Observer's original exposé: The real Salt Path: how a blockbuster book and film were ...

The 12 Observer reports currently available online: The real Salt Path | The Observer

Raynor Winn/Sally Walker's statement: Raynor Winn

Thread One ^www.mumsnet.com/talk/amibeingunreasonable/5368194-to-feel-disappointed-after-reading-this-in-the-observer-about-the-author-and-her-husband-from-the-salt-path-book-and-film?^

Threads 2-11: Links all in the OP of Thread 12

Thread 12: https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/am_i_being_unreasonable/5384574-thread-12-to-feel-disappointed-after-reading-this-in-the-observer-about-the-author-and-her-husband-from-the-salt-path-book-and-film?

New posters joining us in the genuine spirit of our civil discourse welcome. It would be helpful to read at least some of the Observer items above before posting. There are currently 12 interesting items on The Observer website and linked to above.

To all - Please be extremely cautious when it comes to naming or implicating people and addresses not in the public eye or with no direct connection to the story, and around the understandable health speculations, especially where details are unclear or still emerging. Please do not engage with visitors who seem to have their own agenda and seek to derail. Avoid @'ing and quoting them as - from experience - this will only encourage them back to the threads. We have done amazingly well together for twelve very interesting, very serious and very silly threads so far. I can't be here as much as I'd like so all help with keeping our discussion walking along in our usual reasonable and respectful fashion is very welcome.

Have the sales or thefts of fudge gone up recently?
Will Simon's head ever turn up?
Has the shed of doubt yet burst at the seams?
Will the old charabanc hold up as a tour bus for our hip new band The Drive-By Scolders?
And finally, how much salt can we possibly cram into a giant pinch?

Keep to the path. No saltiness. May the fudge be with you.

The real Salt Path | The Observer

The real Salt Path | The Observer

<p>The truth behind the blockbuster book and film</p>

https://observer.co.uk/collections/the-real-salt-path

OP posts:
Thread gallery
80
GogleddCymru · 09/08/2025 14:03

This is gold ...

Hyenana · 09/08/2025 14:04

crossedlines · 09/08/2025 13:13

I agree absolutely that the embezzlement and portrayal of Moth as likely having just a few months to live are the 2 most important points.

However, as far as the walk goes, I think there’s a massive difference between rejigging the timelines a bit and actually presenting the walk as one continuous event during which they were homeless, stopping only for the winter in someone else’s property. I feel portraying it as ‘we walked the whole of the SWCP, only taking a break during the worst of the winter’ is a significant part of the story. The (likely) reality of the walking taking place in sections over a much greater period of time, some of which they weren’t camping at all but living in a flat, changes the story hugely.

stopping only for the winter in someone else’s property

But they do stop for much longer, don't they?
According to the TSP timeline, they do the first part from early August 2013 to October 2013 (so about 2 months), then they stay in Polly's shed and don't restart until July 2014, so 9 months later!

I haven't read that part of the book but it has always seemed strange to me that they would wait for so long, even though according to this guide it is possible to backpack/camp on the path from March onwards, and the best time for hiking is even supposed to be April and May - not too hot and less tourists, which I would have thought would be a huge draw for Raymoth (but maybe not - less people to favorably compare themselves to).

Did they never do any short hikes in the book during that stay? If they don't is the reason possibly to avoid the suggestion the hike was done in multiple small portions rather than 2 big ones?

https://wanderingwheatleys.com/south-west-coast-path-hiking-guide/

The long stay in the shed is also weird regarding Sally's claim she had to readjust to sleeping indoors when they moved into the Polruan chapel, if she had spent 9 of the last 13 months indoors.

An Insider’s Guide to Hiking the South West Coast Path

Stretching for a mammoth 630 miles through Dorset, Devon, Cornwall, and Somerset, the South West Coast Path is one of the most epic walking trails in the UK. This is the longest “National Trail” in

https://wanderingwheatleys.com/south-west-coast-path-hiking-guide

mauvishagain · 09/08/2025 14:09

The latest report, from the Australian bloggers, suggests to me a sequence of events that seems to make perfect sense:

2013 - the Walkers lose their home. Off they go for a walk because they need to get away, have all the time in the world, and why not go for a walk. Crucially, TW has seen a doctor, maybe already under the pain clinic, but no diagnosis; physio may have been suggested. So they keep going, past LE, until the weather closes in.

They probably outstay their welcome with Polly from Autumn 2013 - early 2015, when SW's mother dies. I suspect they didn't walk during 2014.

Then in Summer 2015, TW sees the neurologist who raises the spectre of CBD. The doc basically warns them off googling it, but they ignore that and are v alarmed at what they see (SW in particular). And all reassurance from the doc is forgotten, buried under the horrible case histories and scare stories that Dr Google offers. So, believing that time is very limited, they decide to fill in the later part of the SWCP. Perhaps TW is a bit stiffer and less mobile than he was 2 years earlier; they are time limited (he's starting a course though NOT a degree!) so they don't bother walking the boring, tricky bits, but cherry pick the bits they'd rather concentrate on. Wouldn't we all?

The rest is history, and a bestseller ---

FloreatAmbridge · 09/08/2025 14:13

Gouache · 09/08/2025 11:25

The bedroom, according to TWS, has a stained glass window, and doesn’t appear to be fully furnished — they have a mattress and a ‘cardboard’ wardrobe (by which I assume she just means a packing box?) The kitchen has a ‘tall chapel window’ overlooking the neighbour’s garden, and loses the sun by mid-morning in winter. In fact, she makes the flat sound cramped and glum. It’s a ‘long, narrow, corridor-like space’, accessed via an iron gate and a ‘concrete-paved corridor between the building and the cliff face’. The ‘cliff face’ is also rat-infested.

She specifically says at the start of TWS that they’ve lived there a year, but says she’s barely spoken to anyone in Polruan in that whole time, which is kind of a useful alibi.

Although the claim she barely spoke to anyone in Polruan is dubious. This review, posted in these threads a couple of weeks back, suggests she was well known by the locals.

Thread 13: To feel disappointed after reading this in The Observer about the author and her husband from The Salt Path book and film?
FloreatAmbridge · 09/08/2025 14:16

Gouache · 09/08/2025 10:33

Because bloggers want people to read their blog because they’re interested in the content, not for a single encounter with a famous/notorious person. I mean, I don’t think the Parsons asked CH not to link for that reason, especially as she gave all the information needed to find it and said it was still up — I imagine it’s just Observer editorial policy not to direct link. I’m only saying that a single blogpost of mine being pored over by Walker sleuths wouldn’t enthuse me, quite the opposite.

I haven’t looked their blog up, but from what CH says, other than the date discrepancies, the most interesting thing for me is that SW turned what the Parsons appear to have thought was a friendly hour-long encounter into something that makes the Australians look greedy (two ‘mounds’ of all-day breakfast), superficial (concerned with highlights, and having to eat less when they’re back at home or get fat) and a bit wussy (‘a bed and a bath every night’).

One wonders how many other ‘negative’ interactions with other people on the path got the same glumwashing treatment designed to make the other peoole look bad and hammer hone the message that the Walkers are the real deal and have it harder than everyone else.

It feels particularly odd in the circumstances, if the Walkers were no longer even technically homeless, and walking that section of the path either just for fun, or specifically so that SW could write about that part in what would become Lightly Salted Blackberries. Is SW trying to imagine, cackhandedly, how two homeless, hungry people would actually have felt meeting tourists with money for two breakfasts and B and Bs in bad weather?

"One wonders how many other ‘negative’ interactions with other people on the path got the same glumwashing treatment designed to make the other peoole look bad and hammer hone the message that the Walkers are the real deal and have it harder than everyone else."

At this point I think TSP movie is crying out for a remake- 'Rashamon'-style.

AldoGordo · 09/08/2025 14:19

FloreatAmbridge · 09/08/2025 14:16

"One wonders how many other ‘negative’ interactions with other people on the path got the same glumwashing treatment designed to make the other peoole look bad and hammer hone the message that the Walkers are the real deal and have it harder than everyone else."

At this point I think TSP movie is crying out for a remake- 'Rashamon'-style.

Fabulous movie (and short story it's based on)!

Gouache · 09/08/2025 14:22

crossedlines · 09/08/2025 13:37

Oh I’m not minimising the health angle at all. For sufferers and their families, it’s completely awful that SW’s books may have given them false hope. My point is that it’s the more difficult issue to tackle because SW is careful not to present walking as a ‘miracle cure.’ She writes a lot about how it helps Moth physically and mentally - and that’s a subjective feeling to a large extent and therefore harder to disagree with. Likewise, her catastrophising about his health is a subjective thing… she could claim she felt devastated as soon as he presented with symptoms.

the embezzlement however is not a subjective thing. It’s clear cut and although it took place before the ‘walk’ and the book, it’s absolutely central to the events. If she hadn’t embezzled vast sums of money, they’d never have been in the position they were in.

Yes, I agree on the health angle. It’s awful that sufferers from CBD may have been given false hope, or felt their sufferings were being minimised as something curable with exercise, but in fact TSP is very careful not to make a firm diagnosis or to claim a ‘cure’, far less advocate other CBD sufferers should take the same approach of extreme exercise on a restricted diet. The medic who reviewed it in the professional journal makes no diagnostic points about it, merely claims that hope and positivity can help people with serious conditions.

I don’t think it’s comparable to the Belle Gibson case.

Insofar as I understand it, BG claimed to have multiple cancers she knew she didn’t have precisely in order to peddle products, a wellness app and cookbook, with plans to expand further when her fraud was outed. She made vast sums of money when her app was pre-installed onto IPads. She was in perfect health throughout while claiming to have numerous metastasised cancers she was self-treating. She advocated not engaging with traditional medical treatment, and advocated dangerous pseudoscientific treatments, anti-vaxxer positions etc . She withheld large sums of money she’d supposedly fundraised for cancer charities, using them to pay for a luxury rental, car, designer clothes, cosmetic dentistry, and holidays. Action was taken against her by Consumer Affairs. Her publisher agreed to make a payment to the federal Consumer Law fund as a penalty for not fact checking. BG admitted to fabricating her cancer claims, but did not apologise, and has never paid her vast fines.

Yes, the Walkers sold a memoir off the back of a retrofitted diagnosis, but TW was in fact diagnosed with an atypical form of the condition SW claims he has in TSP, and presumably already had some symptoms. They’re not selling anything apart from their own story. There’s no actual snake oil. The alleviation of symptoms, even for TW, is temporary and impossible to maintain. When he tries to replicate the path experience with gym going and long hikes with weights exercise bikes it doesn’t work. They don’t advocate not using traditional medicine. The CBD charity, while cutting ties, says that all money the Walkers raised had been received by the charity.

Catwith69lives · 09/08/2025 14:22

I've been trying to get my brain around why SW would crop the photo of her and Moth at LE on 15 Sept 2013 and then remove it from her IG feed..

The only reason I can come up with (if it wasn't 15 Sept 2015) is that in the cropped photo, Moth looks a wreck compared to how he looks on 8 Aug 2015 at the Fat Apples Cafe). He might look an even greater wreck if his full mug shot had appeared in the photo. It's hardly a stellar advert for the recuperative powers of walking to halt the advance of CBD (even if the diagnosis didn't occur until June 2015.)

So they have walked around 230 miles from Minehead to Land's End in 5 weeks from 8 Aug to 15 Sept and Moth looks completely knackered! It's hardly a story to shift 2 million copies of a book! You can see why it might have needed a bit of re-engineering!

Thread 13: To feel disappointed after reading this in The Observer about the author and her husband from The Salt Path book and film?
Thread 13: To feel disappointed after reading this in The Observer about the author and her husband from The Salt Path book and film?
OpenThatWindow · 09/08/2025 14:24

I've only just seen the article- wow.

Confirms our general theory that 'the walk' was 2015. Also proves they are pathological liars. That's more than creative licence, I wonder how the publishers feel now.

"Lost our house because of embezzlement and went on a walking holiday 2 years later, hubby getting older, mild odd symptoms" doesn't quite have the same hook.

PullTheBricksDown · 09/08/2025 14:24

AldoGordo · 09/08/2025 13:59

Also the Dr supports the decision to undertake university studies, so they've obviously told the Dr that's the plan. But nothing about his opinion on their planning to walk some of the SWCP that we now know they did only weeks later. But perhaps they only decided to walk after this consultation.

I think that if you were reporting these symptoms to a doctor, and then said 'we're planning to go hiking round the coastal path' that doctor would feel that was a bit ambitious and unwise given your unsteadiness and pain and would advise you against it, or maybe say 'some exercise is good but don't overdo it'. And I'd think that would be in the letter, like the plans for university, if they'd mentioned it.

Gouache · 09/08/2025 14:25

Uricon2 · 09/08/2025 13:53

I'm really grateful to everyone working out the "alternative" timelines for the walk(s), it is fascinating. I'm still enfeebled (although infection markers have finally got below 200, go me) so haven't got much useful to add, other than that I think if it does turn out chunks of the walk described in TSP were done on an ad hoc basis years later, when they were no longer homeless, it does yet further change and cast doubt on the nature of the "unflinchingly honest" account (OK, we all know it isn't by now) Getting buses and the odd break to eg stay with family, not so much.

Did you get out of hospital, @Uricon2? That all sounds absolutely horrible. Being a medical mystery is no fun at all. Hope you’re actually feeling better along with infection al markers falling.

OpenThatWindow · 09/08/2025 14:25

Catwith69lives · 09/08/2025 14:22

I've been trying to get my brain around why SW would crop the photo of her and Moth at LE on 15 Sept 2013 and then remove it from her IG feed..

The only reason I can come up with (if it wasn't 15 Sept 2015) is that in the cropped photo, Moth looks a wreck compared to how he looks on 8 Aug 2015 at the Fat Apples Cafe). He might look an even greater wreck if his full mug shot had appeared in the photo. It's hardly a stellar advert for the recuperative powers of walking to halt the advance of CBD (even if the diagnosis didn't occur until June 2015.)

So they have walked around 230 miles from Minehead to Land's End in 5 weeks from 8 Aug to 15 Sept and Moth looks completely knackered! It's hardly a story to shift 2 million copies of a book! You can see why it might have needed a bit of re-engineering!

Edited

I think you're spot on.

Hyenana · 09/08/2025 14:28

crossedlines · 09/08/2025 13:37

Oh I’m not minimising the health angle at all. For sufferers and their families, it’s completely awful that SW’s books may have given them false hope. My point is that it’s the more difficult issue to tackle because SW is careful not to present walking as a ‘miracle cure.’ She writes a lot about how it helps Moth physically and mentally - and that’s a subjective feeling to a large extent and therefore harder to disagree with. Likewise, her catastrophising about his health is a subjective thing… she could claim she felt devastated as soon as he presented with symptoms.

the embezzlement however is not a subjective thing. It’s clear cut and although it took place before the ‘walk’ and the book, it’s absolutely central to the events. If she hadn’t embezzled vast sums of money, they’d never have been in the position they were in.

I agree that the embezzlement is much easier to prove than a possible health scam, and also that 'being conned out of our house' is half of the double whammy that is the emotional hook for the first book.

But in TWS and LL the planned OWS the homelessness narrative fades into the background while the miracle cure gets milked for all it's worth over multiple years without any regard for what it does to the real sufferers from the disease.

And I certainly HOPE that CH finds some killer evidence that shows without a doubt that Raymoth knew it was a false diagnosis.

Although I think the letters they provided already show that from 2019 on at least (so before the 2nd book) the diagnosis was openly called into question, his condition was described as stable, and yet she continued to describe him as a man under the shadow of death per doctor's diagnosis.

That's already way more than a subjective, emotional difference to what she describes.

PullTheBricksDown · 09/08/2025 14:32

Gouache · 09/08/2025 10:33

Because bloggers want people to read their blog because they’re interested in the content, not for a single encounter with a famous/notorious person. I mean, I don’t think the Parsons asked CH not to link for that reason, especially as she gave all the information needed to find it and said it was still up — I imagine it’s just Observer editorial policy not to direct link. I’m only saying that a single blogpost of mine being pored over by Walker sleuths wouldn’t enthuse me, quite the opposite.

I haven’t looked their blog up, but from what CH says, other than the date discrepancies, the most interesting thing for me is that SW turned what the Parsons appear to have thought was a friendly hour-long encounter into something that makes the Australians look greedy (two ‘mounds’ of all-day breakfast), superficial (concerned with highlights, and having to eat less when they’re back at home or get fat) and a bit wussy (‘a bed and a bath every night’).

One wonders how many other ‘negative’ interactions with other people on the path got the same glumwashing treatment designed to make the other peoole look bad and hammer hone the message that the Walkers are the real deal and have it harder than everyone else.

It feels particularly odd in the circumstances, if the Walkers were no longer even technically homeless, and walking that section of the path either just for fun, or specifically so that SW could write about that part in what would become Lightly Salted Blackberries. Is SW trying to imagine, cackhandedly, how two homeless, hungry people would actually have felt meeting tourists with money for two breakfasts and B and Bs in bad weather?

Missed earlier, and have to applaud @Gouache for, the brilliance of 'glumwashing' to describe RW's 'look how bad we have it' style. Genius. And I brought 'drive-by scolding' to these threads so I should know 😎

DisappointedReader · 09/08/2025 14:34

I wonder why Raynor Winn/Sally Walker decided/felt the need to confidently claim in writing and in interviews that they walked all the 630 miles and that her husband only had 2 years to live?

I wonder why Moth Winn/Tim Walker felt the need to claim to Bill Cole (cider farm) that he only had a couple of months to live?

OP posts:
thisisminnie · 09/08/2025 14:35

Catwith69lives · 09/08/2025 14:22

I've been trying to get my brain around why SW would crop the photo of her and Moth at LE on 15 Sept 2013 and then remove it from her IG feed..

The only reason I can come up with (if it wasn't 15 Sept 2015) is that in the cropped photo, Moth looks a wreck compared to how he looks on 8 Aug 2015 at the Fat Apples Cafe). He might look an even greater wreck if his full mug shot had appeared in the photo. It's hardly a stellar advert for the recuperative powers of walking to halt the advance of CBD (even if the diagnosis didn't occur until June 2015.)

So they have walked around 230 miles from Minehead to Land's End in 5 weeks from 8 Aug to 15 Sept and Moth looks completely knackered! It's hardly a story to shift 2 million copies of a book! You can see why it might have needed a bit of re-engineering!

Edited

Is that the original version of the lands end photo? Why can I see a hole through Tim’s shoulder to Sw’s hair and sea behind?
can anyone else see what I mean?

AlertCat · 09/08/2025 14:37

SW is careful not to present walking as a ‘miracle cure.’ She writes a lot about how it helps Moth physically and mentally - and that’s a subjective feeling to a large extent and therefore harder to disagree with. Likewise, her catastrophising about his health is a subjective thing… she could claim she felt devastated as soon as he presented with symptoms.

This is true in TSP, but I would argue that by LL she is being a lot more explicit about the “curative powers” Moth experiences- the scene at the end where the consultant shows them a before scan and an after scan, and says ‘this one is normal’ makes an explicit link between the 1000-mile walk and reversing signs of neurodegeneration on brain scans. I think that goes way beyond what’s reasonably subjective experience.

Gouache · 09/08/2025 14:39

PullTheBricksDown · 09/08/2025 14:32

Missed earlier, and have to applaud @Gouache for, the brilliance of 'glumwashing' to describe RW's 'look how bad we have it' style. Genius. And I brought 'drive-by scolding' to these threads so I should know 😎

It will tell you a lot about my authentically glum week if I say this is the nicest thing anyone’s said to me during it! 😱😀

AldoGordo · 09/08/2025 14:39

PullTheBricksDown · 09/08/2025 14:24

I think that if you were reporting these symptoms to a doctor, and then said 'we're planning to go hiking round the coastal path' that doctor would feel that was a bit ambitious and unwise given your unsteadiness and pain and would advise you against it, or maybe say 'some exercise is good but don't overdo it'. And I'd think that would be in the letter, like the plans for university, if they'd mentioned it.

That's what I mean. Either they didn't tell him they intended to do that or they decided to walk after the consultation date.

PullTheBricksDown · 09/08/2025 14:40

thisisminnie · 09/08/2025 14:35

Is that the original version of the lands end photo? Why can I see a hole through Tim’s shoulder to Sw’s hair and sea behind?
can anyone else see what I mean?

Oh yes I see - thought at first it was a white or grey patch on his top, but you can see her hair there in a weird gap. Very strange.

AldoGordo · 09/08/2025 14:43

thisisminnie · 09/08/2025 14:35

Is that the original version of the lands end photo? Why can I see a hole through Tim’s shoulder to Sw’s hair and sea behind?
can anyone else see what I mean?

I think it's TW's jacket collar creating the perceived hole.

PrettyDamnCosmic · 09/08/2025 14:45

thisisminnie · 09/08/2025 14:35

Is that the original version of the lands end photo? Why can I see a hole through Tim’s shoulder to Sw’s hair and sea behind?
can anyone else see what I mean?

It's not a hole through Tim’s shoulder. It's just the collar of his jacket sticking out behind Sally's head giving the illusion of a hole in his shoulder.

Hyenana · 09/08/2025 14:46

PullTheBricksDown · 09/08/2025 13:46

Reading this again, I'm noticing how many of the effects of TW's condition are self reported. The ones the doctor writing the letter actually observes are almost all described as 'minor' or 'mild' with the most overt being 'There is certainly an abnormal posturing of the left hemi-body as he walks'. The 'numerous tests' done in 2011 including MRI and blood were all negative.

Obviously this is all speculation from a distance but there really is very little of substance here to go on for a diagnosis IMO. The language is very cautious. There's no mention of any previous diagnosis from 2013 - in fact it would be extremely odd to mention negative tests from 2011, if the patient had then been diagnosed with CBD in 2013. So this all suggests to me that there was no diagnosis in 2013, or certainly none known to the clinician writing this letter. Why, we might then ask, would RW share this letter in her rebuttal? Well, it seems likely to me that its main useful point for that purpose is that it mentions CBS (not CBD)so could be just about said to support this as Moth's diagnosis. And at that, my overriding thought is 'Is that all you've got?'

"Is this the best you've got?" was my initial response to the letters - and I think the 2019 one was at least as bad in that it openly called for a re-evaluation of the diagnosis.
I think publishing these letters was a huge own goal for SW - there were certainly people who were satisfied by any medical letter containing the words CBS or CBD, but she has also given valuable information to all her critics (and one of the symptoms described in 2015 seemed so contrary to what I found in the literature that I even wondered if it might be faked).

crossedlines · 09/08/2025 14:47

AlertCat · 09/08/2025 14:37

SW is careful not to present walking as a ‘miracle cure.’ She writes a lot about how it helps Moth physically and mentally - and that’s a subjective feeling to a large extent and therefore harder to disagree with. Likewise, her catastrophising about his health is a subjective thing… she could claim she felt devastated as soon as he presented with symptoms.

This is true in TSP, but I would argue that by LL she is being a lot more explicit about the “curative powers” Moth experiences- the scene at the end where the consultant shows them a before scan and an after scan, and says ‘this one is normal’ makes an explicit link between the 1000-mile walk and reversing signs of neurodegeneration on brain scans. I think that goes way beyond what’s reasonably subjective experience.

Ah, I only read TSP (precisely because of the hype) and I thought it was so poorly written that I couldn’t face any more!

so in LL she explicitly says the walking has led to the normal brain scan? Wow. She definitely needs to be held accountable for that too then

thisisminnie · 09/08/2025 14:49

AldoGordo · 09/08/2025 14:43

I think it's TW's jacket collar creating the perceived hole.

Ahhh ok, I can see that now. Thank you!

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread