Apologies if this is a silly question, but would appreciate some local insights to settle a debate!
I'm hoping to go to a small weekend event (on my own) for a hobby/sport that I do. I live in the northwest and the event is in Wimbledon. Trains are expensive, even advance, and would mean a walk and change to get to London (Euston) and then getting across to Wimbledon - not impossible, but not an easy journey especially as I'll have quite a bulky kitbag (anyone who travels on Avanti trains will know that getting space on the luggage rack is a lottery, and I imagine navigating the tube with luggage isn't the best either)
The hotel I'm looking at has free parking and I mentioned to DH that I might drive instead. DH thinks that's madness, 'no one drives to London'. He thinks il spend hours in traffic, it'll be impossible to navigate, I'll likely end up with fines for congestion charges/bus lanes etc or get stuck in loops of one way systems.
Obviously I wouldn't drive if I was going to see the sights of central London, but is Wimbledon far out enough to be reasonable to drive to, or am I being naive? I am a careful but confident driver, I drive a lot for work including in the centres of smaller cities - Birmingham, Manchester, Liverpool etc. I wouldn't need to drive once I'm there.
DH has a licence but hasn't driven since he was a teenager so I'm not sure if he's projecting his anxieties or if he has a genuine point. He's fully supportive of me going but thinks I should get the train, tube and Uber if necessary.