Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Remind HR that job interviews are a two way process

74 replies

wannabewhat · 21/07/2025 15:43

I know the job market is tough right now, and employers have a lot of candidates to choose from, but honestly, that is no excuse to treat people like crap during the hiring process.

I had an interview two weeks ago, and they said they'd be in touch the following week. Nothing came. I chased politely, and got a vague "still having internal meetings, will get back to you by Thursday." Surprise surprise; still nothing. It's now Monday. No update, no rejection, nothing.

This isn't even a one-off it's just the latest in a string of terrible recruitment experiences. Ghosting after multiple interviews, jobs being pulled without notice, automated rejections minutes after sending a carefully tailored application... the list goes on.

AIBU to think that if you actually want to attract the best candidates, you need to treat them with a bit of basic respect? The interview process is a two-way street, I'm assessing them as much as they're assessing me. If this is how they treat potential hires, it doesn't say much about how they treat staff. I am also a customer of this company and starting to think I should place my business elsewhere.

Rant over. Just so sick of the whole process right now.

OP posts:
wannabewhat · 21/07/2025 20:13

FKAT · 21/07/2025 18:18

Well, you're not wrong but as PP said, it's a buyer's market. It's expensive to recruit people, hard to get rid of them if you make the wrong decision - yes even in probationary period and first two years - and the employer is taking a big risk on anyone who hasn't worked in there. For senior appointments there are a lot of stakeholders involved in the decision - not just the recruiting manager and HR. Also there is management and messaging to any internal candidates. The recruiting managers are also having to do their own day to day work and manage their own teams while this is going on.

They haven't rejected you yet - it actually sounds quite positive to me that you are in the range of potential next stage candidates. If you don't need the job, salary or the future relationship, feel free to burn your bridges though.

You need the hide of a rhino to manage the current job market, it's worth developing one. It comes in handy in lots of situations.

I'm not looking to burn my bridges???? Expressing on mumsnet that HR promising you a response on one date and missing that deadline by a country mile is as frustrating as fuck is not looking to burn bridges.

Hopefully a few HR managers might read it though and realise that it is an approach that might lose them the odd candidate that isn't as desperate as fuck.

OP posts:
FKAT · 21/07/2025 20:33

Fair enough. I misunderstood your point about reconsidering whether you want to work for them at all or use their product/service any more. That's all.

RelocatingtoFrance · 21/07/2025 20:46

ToKittyornottoKitty · 21/07/2025 18:14

So do you just ghost those that aren’t first choice and not provide any updates or answers? If so, you are doing a bad job.

no, we do not, as per previous reply.

EBearhug · 21/07/2025 20:50

A couple of months ago, I got a rejection from April the year before. So don't give up hope...

LlynTegid · 21/07/2025 20:58

Maybe someone should start a website so that companies who lack such courtesy can be named and shamed. A league table of those where say more than ten people have responded.

Summerhillsquare · 21/07/2025 21:00

Dead right. In contrast, I had a great interview today and I feel like a million dollars. Panel were warm, open, rigorous but not rigid, and respectful. I don't think I'll get the job but I will sing their praises. I've had some terrible experiences lately so this was refreshing change.

Cavalierchaos · 21/07/2025 22:33

Omg yes. My partner had two nterviews recently with the same company. They said they would be in touch in the next week. That was 3 or 4 weeks ago now. It's so rude! If he hasn't got it, tell him! He's been holding off on going for other interviews in the hope he would get this one.

Spirallingdownwards · 21/07/2025 22:40

LlynTegid · 21/07/2025 20:58

Maybe someone should start a website so that companies who lack such courtesy can be named and shamed. A league table of those where say more than ten people have responded.

There is already - Glassdoor where people can give reviews of their experience either working there or interviewing

EBearhug · 21/07/2025 23:07

He's been holding off on going for other interviews in the hope he would get this one.

Unfortunately you have to keep going with them until you've got an offer from one.

niadainud · 22/07/2025 06:24

RelocatingtoFrance · 21/07/2025 17:17

our HR department is slow and has archaic processes (we re def not "AI ready") - however, in the last 3 rounds of hiring i ve been involved with, we had request for interviews at different days, different times (when the panel where not available), requests for disclosure of the training of all panel members, demands for feedback immediately after interview (before decisions being communicated), salary negociations beyond the scope of what is reasonable (entry level candidate demanding the top salary bracket, arguing that their degree project counts as project management experience), negociation on WFH days for on-site only jobs, and that s not even going over the chatGPT generated fictional cover letters where the candidates we interviewed raised integrity concerns.

all this plays a big part in creating delays... and in 2 out of 3 cases, we went to our reserve choices >2 weeks down the line, when negociations ended with top candidates.

Hope you don't mind me pointing out - as it seems relevant to your role - that it's negotiations.

RelocatingtoFrance · 22/07/2025 07:45

it s not particularly relevant to my role, no, or at least not beyond getting the best person in the role my department has created. I d happilly let HR deal with time and salary negociations, given that i have no role in time or pay - yet HR send all negociations queries past us alongside their recommendations.

Applicants who try to negociate out of scope points (e.g. WFH for on-site only role, or salary brackets explicitly requiring a specific degree they do not have) only 1) delay the process, 2) cast a poor image which makes me regret offering to them. These same people often do not accept that, yes, they can ask, but we are also free to reject their ask(s).

TorroFerney · 22/07/2025 07:49

ExpressCheckout · 21/07/2025 16:12

You make a very good point. I've been in this situation - I've found the best candidate, but HR have screwed it up through lazy, hapless administration. Ironically, it's HR who impose all the 'systems' on us ... then don't follow them!

Agree. The challenge is sometimes I think that hr aren’t affected by the person getting fed up and walking away. Meanwhile you as the manager are desperate to get that person on board as you are a person down or you’ve found the most perfect person.

legolegoeverywhereandnotadroptodrink · 22/07/2025 08:01

Keeping people hanging is not acceptable. Ever

SheilaFentiman · 22/07/2025 08:07

legolegoeverywhereandnotadroptodrink · 22/07/2025 08:01

Keeping people hanging is not acceptable. Ever

If you had offered to your first choice and were waiting to hear back, would you say as much to your reserve choice?

ExpressCheckout · 22/07/2025 08:18

TorroFerney · 22/07/2025 07:49

Agree. The challenge is sometimes I think that hr aren’t affected by the person getting fed up and walking away. Meanwhile you as the manager are desperate to get that person on board as you are a person down or you’ve found the most perfect person.

Exactly.

My employer has got rid of most of the more experienced HR staff, and it's now mainly run by junior (cheaper) staff who don't have the experience or maturity or gumption to make an autonomous decision or the time to work closely with a manager to move the HR process along. This never used to happen.

These days, if I want HR support, I have to create a 'ticket' in an online system. It's infuriating. A quick phone call with a real person used to be able to sort things out. Now I wait up to a week for a reply to my 'ticket'. And people wonder why UK industry lacks productivity and growth ... well, there's one reason.

RelocatingtoFrance · 22/07/2025 08:20

ahh... the tickets. I see we use the same excellent system, @ExpressCheckout

Mydadsbirthday · 22/07/2025 08:25

RelocatingtoFrance · 22/07/2025 07:45

it s not particularly relevant to my role, no, or at least not beyond getting the best person in the role my department has created. I d happilly let HR deal with time and salary negociations, given that i have no role in time or pay - yet HR send all negociations queries past us alongside their recommendations.

Applicants who try to negociate out of scope points (e.g. WFH for on-site only role, or salary brackets explicitly requiring a specific degree they do not have) only 1) delay the process, 2) cast a poor image which makes me regret offering to them. These same people often do not accept that, yes, they can ask, but we are also free to reject their ask(s).

I hate to point this out again but the PP was just saying that you have repeatedly mis-spelled "negotiations".

LumpyandBumps · 22/07/2025 08:28

Whether or not it’s an employer’s market there is no excuse for not conveying a brief no to a candidate who has taken the time and trouble, not to mention the expense, of attending a physical interview. That is just poor organisation or poor manners.
I do understand that a company flooded with applications might screen them and not offer interviews. I don’t see lack of notification then as so much of a problem.
My daughter recently applied for a job around 15 miles away, and was asked to attend an interview with the recruitment agency which was 30+ miles away, and on the day a 90 minute journey. They had checked twice with her that she still planned to attend and she had confirmed that she would be there.
She arrived in good time. The recruiter was busy. He blocked calls from the receptionist. With no update my daughter left 35 minutes after her scheduled appointment time. He eventually called her about 30 minutes later.
Fortunately for her she had other options and calmly told him she wouldn’t be attending another interview.

PaterPower · 22/07/2025 08:44

LumpyandBumps · 22/07/2025 08:28

Whether or not it’s an employer’s market there is no excuse for not conveying a brief no to a candidate who has taken the time and trouble, not to mention the expense, of attending a physical interview. That is just poor organisation or poor manners.
I do understand that a company flooded with applications might screen them and not offer interviews. I don’t see lack of notification then as so much of a problem.
My daughter recently applied for a job around 15 miles away, and was asked to attend an interview with the recruitment agency which was 30+ miles away, and on the day a 90 minute journey. They had checked twice with her that she still planned to attend and she had confirmed that she would be there.
She arrived in good time. The recruiter was busy. He blocked calls from the receptionist. With no update my daughter left 35 minutes after her scheduled appointment time. He eventually called her about 30 minutes later.
Fortunately for her she had other options and calmly told him she wouldn’t be attending another interview.

In those circumstances I’d have been tempted to invoice the recruiting company for my travel expenses, with a charge for a few hours of my time too.

They’d probably not bother to pay, but it might drive home the point that their unprofessional approach has real-world costs.

ExpressCheckout · 22/07/2025 08:45

LlynTegid · 21/07/2025 20:58

Maybe someone should start a website so that companies who lack such courtesy can be named and shamed. A league table of those where say more than ten people have responded.

I like this idea!

rwalker · 22/07/2025 08:56

I 100% get why they don’t give feedback as people can be a nightmare when they don’t like what they hear

as for not letting you know piss poor someone has processed your application and updated the system yet can’t even send a no thanks unsuccessful pre formatted email

SheilaFentiman · 22/07/2025 09:04

Often, by the time we are down to the interview shortlist, any of the candidates would be fine, so it’s quite hard to give useful feedback (X had a bit more experience of Y than you is about all we usually can say)

ChiefCakeTestertoMaryBerry · 22/07/2025 09:09

I worked for a small charity which was recruiting a new member of staff to replace me. The interviews were in early May and the chairman of the charity would not allow me to contact the unsuccessful candidates, both the ones who had interviews and those who didn’t, until early June, when the new post holder was in place. I thought it was very rude, having been on the other end of things many times.

ChimpanzeeThatMonkeyNews · 22/07/2025 09:12

pearcrumblee · 21/07/2025 15:50

It’s an employers market right now. So you have to accept and move on. Cross that particular employer off your list for the future if it bothers you so much.
My SIL works in recruitment and she says they are getting pestered for feedback and special requests for interview day etc. With so many applicants to choose from they have not got the time to pander to each one.

Edited

It’s not ‘pandering’, at all - it’s being professional and treating the candidates with respect.

EmeraldShamrock000 · 22/07/2025 09:14

Yanbu. It is a jungle out there.
I hope you land a great job soon.

Swipe left for the next trending thread