Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Anyone else lost a bit of ambition now they’ve been taxed to the brink?

1000 replies

Peasontoastt · 04/07/2025 19:56

I used to be extremely ambitious and was really eager to reach some sort of financial security. As a consequence, I’m in what’s considered a highly paid career, I work hard and it took me many years to train.

Just as I paid off my student loan (which took many years), I then had a baby and returned to work to be stuck with the childcare dilemma. I struggled through that phase and have come out the other side but being taxed so much, no child benefit, still paying for nursery even though dd has ‘free’ hours now. It’s likely that savings are going to be bashed next, so what’s the point in even putting anything aside when there’s likely going to be a 4K cap on ISAs.

I used to feel so ambitious and of course I know money isn’t everything, not by a long shot. But having worked my way up the ladder and with huge responsibilities only to feel penalised financially for doing so…what is the point? Yes I have more financial security than someone claiming benefits but equally, I am not being flippant when I say a few years of resting and being at home and being frugal is starting to seem so much more attractive. Has anyone else started feeling this way? I feel taken the piss out of by every financial angle!

OP posts:
Thread gallery
11
cloudyblueglass · 08/07/2025 18:18

WideawakeinSanDiego · 08/07/2025 18:15

Maybe you should get yourself a decent and supportive partner rather than taking from the tax payer?

Seriously? That’s truly awful advice.

cloudyblueglass · 08/07/2025 18:19

JuliaSG · 08/07/2025 18:15

Apologies - I hadn’t realised the above. It is a juggle but an after schools programme helps. We can only do our best.

Exactly. That’s all we can do.

Frannieisnthappy · 08/07/2025 18:22

This is interesting; what and how could be tackled?

cloudyblueglass · 08/07/2025 18:22

Gagcaa · 08/07/2025 18:06

I was telling anyone able bodied to work hard. Don't stay on NMW forever. Work hard and work your way to a better job. Take some time to develop up skill yourself. Work extra hours/another job use that extra income to grow your capital/invest.

I give the example of my DH because I know how hard he worked and how he came from little money and made something of himself.

Try that with a disabled child and no help. There are lots of forms of ‘working hard’ - many of them sadly aren’t rewarded with money.

Namitynamename · 08/07/2025 18:23

Googlygogglygoo · 08/07/2025 18:10

What does everyone make of the recent ABTA research that found that holidaying is at an all time high with the average brit taking 4 holidays a year (2 of them international) and huge numbers in the above average category taking 5, 6, 7 or even 8 holidays a year. Young people and people with children apparently take the most.

"The most prolific travellers were families and those under the age of 35, with 18-24 year olds taking an average of 5.33 trips, 25-34 year olds going on 6.43 breaks and families with children over the age of five going on holiday 5.32 times during this period. However, it’s families with young children (aged under five) who took the most holidays, at an average of 6.49, up from 5.27 last year and much more than five years ago (3.89 in 2019)"

This certainly tallies with my own experience of the middle and high income earners I know. They are all off on holiday at the drop of a hat - long haul, luxury etc, kids in tow. I presume they've met all their other expenses and are putting money aside for savings and kids uni etc if they feel able to do this. It does seem to contradict the narrative of all these struggling workers. A huge number of people are clearly doing really well.

www.abta.com/news/number-holidays-taken-person-reaches-new-high-people-seek-getaway-get-together

It's a more expensive equivalent of avocados on toast. None of us Millennials could afford to get on the property ladder because we frittered our money away on lattes.
In reality luxury things are cheaper than they were. But you get used to luxuries (holidays etc) very quickly and take them for granted. Whereas things that actually make people feel well of long term- housing etc is more expensive. So people that can never afford the simple family home their parents had st that age feel understandable resentment. But even people with a lovely house feel oppressed by their mortgage. The holidays don't seem that expensive in comparison. And if they had to give up a holiday because times were tighter/taxes rose that would feel deeply unjust.

Googlygogglygoo · 08/07/2025 18:24

Calidrisalba · 08/07/2025 18:13

@Googlygogglygoo there was a thread on here recently where posters were sharing what they spent on holidays each year it was mind blowing to me.

To me it just seems obvious - everyone take one less holiday a year so the disabled don't starve. We have a real and increasing number of genuinely disabled people and increasing healthcare costs for an increasingly ill population. Surely finding a way to divert a small amount of this money would make sense.

WideawakeinSanDiego · 08/07/2025 18:24

WunTooThree · 08/07/2025 18:16

Yes, because women should just look for a man who can provide for them....

You come up with excuses why people can't unskill or work more hours yet demonise a poster who has a supportive partner abd us no drain.

You can do any of the above and it is of no concern. What is the problem is when you have a begging bowl out directed at the tax payer.

Boohoo76 · 08/07/2025 18:25

cloudyblueglass · 08/07/2025 18:17

i think you’ll find she meant that as a single parent, unless you’re able to afford to buy in help or find that magic family help/school/after school club combo, it’s very difficult to work full time.

That’s the grim reality. Not patronising at all.

No, they were responding to a comment that the person in question would up their hours if their DH no longer supported them financially. That’s exactly what many mums that I know have done when they have separated from their DC’s father. Most of them use before and after school care to facilitate it. It really isn’t that unusual.

FormerAnywhere · 08/07/2025 18:25

YANBU

With fiscal drag etc, we're not far from the minimum wage being in the higher tax bracket

WunTooThree · 08/07/2025 18:26

WideawakeinSanDiego · 08/07/2025 18:24

You come up with excuses why people can't unskill or work more hours yet demonise a poster who has a supportive partner abd us no drain.

You can do any of the above and it is of no concern. What is the problem is when you have a begging bowl out directed at the tax payer.

If PP did not have her DH, she would have a "begging bowl" too.

Frannieisnthappy · 08/07/2025 18:26

Frannieisnthappy · 08/07/2025 18:22

This is interesting; what and how could be tackled?

This was for @WunTooThree about the housing aspect of Universal Credit! What and how could be tackled?

cloudyblueglass · 08/07/2025 18:26

Namitynamename · 08/07/2025 18:05

In fairness they paid in earlier in their lives

What bothers me is that children etc haven't had a chance to pay in. But still need support. So children and a lot of young families look like a net drain.
I pay a LOT of tax now. But when I was younger I needed a lot of additional support for various reasons. The people providing it would have been a net drain on paper but without them I wouldn't be earning the income and paying the tax I am on now so if you assign some of my contributions to them they would be net contributors.

So I hate how short-sighted the rhetoric of who is taking what from the system in number terms. It's decisive. Yes they need to balance the books. But what someone is taking/giving is just a snapshot of their lives at any one time. And people contribute in different ways.

No, they didn’t. That’s Z common misconception. There was no magic money pot they paid into that was invested for them to draw on later. Today’s tax and NO contributions are paying yhd state pension.

Come 2070 that population with have grown to 25%. And the cost of adult social care and health care for over pension age is also currently around 50% of the healthcare and adult social care bills - unless we tackle the reality that we are an aging population and having fewer kids we as a country are going to be in a huge amount of trouble.

I wholly agree with everything else you’ve said but I’m sick to death of being called a drain though whilst pensioners are a sacred cow.

WunTooThree · 08/07/2025 18:27

Frannieisnthappy · 08/07/2025 18:26

This was for @WunTooThree about the housing aspect of Universal Credit! What and how could be tackled?

Ah sorry. I have no idea. I do know that a lot of UC payment is on housing element.

What is the solution? More social housing? Probably.

WideawakeinSanDiego · 08/07/2025 18:28

WunTooThree · 08/07/2025 18:26

If PP did not have her DH, she would have a "begging bowl" too.

If she chose her partner well who says she wouldn't be resourceful career wise, have investments, insurance in place.

U53rn8m3ch8ng3 · 08/07/2025 18:28

Oh boo hoo. You earn too much to be able to get child benefit. Try worrying about how you're going to pay for your food shopping or your rent. Whether you can get new uniform for your child or take them for a single day out in the holidays.

WunTooThree · 08/07/2025 18:30

WideawakeinSanDiego · 08/07/2025 18:28

If she chose her partner well who says she wouldn't be resourceful career wise, have investments, insurance in place.

But she is berating people for not "choosing their partner well".

cloudyblueglass · 08/07/2025 18:31

Boohoo76 · 08/07/2025 18:25

No, they were responding to a comment that the person in question would up their hours if their DH no longer supported them financially. That’s exactly what many mums that I know have done when they have separated from their DC’s father. Most of them use before and after school care to facilitate it. It really isn’t that unusual.

Before and after school clubs aren’t as widespread as mang yhink and frequently isn’t suitable for kids with disabilities.

WideawakeinSanDiego · 08/07/2025 18:33

WunTooThree · 08/07/2025 18:30

But she is berating people for not "choosing their partner well".

You either rely on your own job, your partner or private income. Each person should be responsible for themselves and not the tax payer.

Boohoo76 · 08/07/2025 18:35

cloudyblueglass · 08/07/2025 18:31

Before and after school clubs aren’t as widespread as mang yhink and frequently isn’t suitable for kids with disabilities.

And do you know that the poster in question doesn’t have access to before and after school care, or that her DC are disabled?

WunTooThree · 08/07/2025 18:35

WideawakeinSanDiego · 08/07/2025 18:33

You either rely on your own job, your partner or private income. Each person should be responsible for themselves and not the tax payer.

There is a welfare system for people who rely on it though.

Frannieisnthappy · 08/07/2025 18:36

WunTooThree · 08/07/2025 18:27

Ah sorry. I have no idea. I do know that a lot of UC payment is on housing element.

What is the solution? More social housing? Probably.

Ah I see! Yes agree but I am one of those who through no fault of my own has found themselves in receipt of UC specifically for housing costs. Rightly so I am not eligible for other UC but if the housing element was stopped I don’t know what I would do.

I am looking for a role that pays more and am already full time, got rid of my car etc but is a bloody nightmare situation that I really would rather not be in… even social housing wouldnt help me. Whilst grateful my financial position is very precarious.

Frannieisnthappy · 08/07/2025 18:38

Frannieisnthappy · 08/07/2025 18:36

Ah I see! Yes agree but I am one of those who through no fault of my own has found themselves in receipt of UC specifically for housing costs. Rightly so I am not eligible for other UC but if the housing element was stopped I don’t know what I would do.

I am looking for a role that pays more and am already full time, got rid of my car etc but is a bloody nightmare situation that I really would rather not be in… even social housing wouldnt help me. Whilst grateful my financial position is very precarious.

Just to add though. I cannot quite understand how I am in this position. I have worked hard, prgressed, saved etc etc - I did not expect to be in this situation whatsoever.

Namitynamename · 08/07/2025 18:39

cloudyblueglass · 08/07/2025 18:26

No, they didn’t. That’s Z common misconception. There was no magic money pot they paid into that was invested for them to draw on later. Today’s tax and NO contributions are paying yhd state pension.

Come 2070 that population with have grown to 25%. And the cost of adult social care and health care for over pension age is also currently around 50% of the healthcare and adult social care bills - unless we tackle the reality that we are an aging population and having fewer kids we as a country are going to be in a huge amount of trouble.

I wholly agree with everything else you’ve said but I’m sick to death of being called a drain though whilst pensioners are a sacred cow.

Edited

I know. Sorry. My point really was that everyone's a drain at some point in their lives. Some of my favourite old people (in my life) almost certainly didn't pay as much in tax wise as they are now "taking" from the system in terms of healthcare etc. But they did maleke a massive difference to my life and countless other people's lives whose taxes are now supporting them. Which seems fairer than making them jump of cliffs like vikings. I just also think we should support the next generation (and other groups) as well.

What is going to happen before 1970 though is trillions and trillions are going to pass to some of the people working now. And that's going to increase the divide just as the next cohort get too old to work. Their needs to be some thought about how to navigate that or there.is going to be more resentment and instability.

WunTooThree · 08/07/2025 18:43

Frannieisnthappy · 08/07/2025 18:38

Just to add though. I cannot quite understand how I am in this position. I have worked hard, prgressed, saved etc etc - I did not expect to be in this situation whatsoever.

Well, PP will be sitting at home in her PT role that is funded by her DH, and telling you that you need to work more hours, even if it kills you. Work sets us free.

Namitynamename · 08/07/2025 18:48

Googlygogglygoo · 08/07/2025 18:24

To me it just seems obvious - everyone take one less holiday a year so the disabled don't starve. We have a real and increasing number of genuinely disabled people and increasing healthcare costs for an increasingly ill population. Surely finding a way to divert a small amount of this money would make sense.

I agree, but it would be political cryptonite. There were Americans interviewed just before the US election who said they were voting for Trump because of how hard life was now. The example given was they had to choose between cutting down down on how many trips they took that year, or not paying for their children's ballet lessons. And how the elites in Washington don't care about ordinary working families that are struggling. Compared to lots of poorer Americans (many of whom also voted Trump) they were the elites. But no-one actually feels like that.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread