I am not against porn out of prudishness. I do take issue against it on the grounds that it harms the women (and at times the men) who work in that industry. The way it portrays women and the kind of violent sexual content that is normalised in porn. The way it can impact on the people who watch it is also problematic in that it can harm their relationships and skew expectations of sex and women in harmful ways.
The way things stand at the moment it is easy for any child with an internet connection to access porn at a few clicks and children as young as seven have viewed hard core porn. We are also seeing increasing rates of porn addiction in adolescents and young men reporting E.D. and sexual dysfunction with girlfriends and wives.
The new laws propose to make porn harder to access by demanding porn sites use age verification for users in the UK (France also has these laws). So that you will need to prove you are 18 or above to access pornography online. There has been a huge outcry about these laws due to come into force at the end of this month that it puts users at risk or that it will be easy for children to get round the age verification.
Personally I think that it is a good move, it shouldn't be so easy to access this material, we wouldn't sell a adult film or magazine to a child so why let them freely access this content online? Adults if they wish to access this material will be able to either by use of a VPN or by using ID. Some children may also find their way around these rules but if it cuts the ease of access and the amount of porn available to children and young teenagers then it still has a great deal of merit.
Is it so unreasonable to think this is a good law?