Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Reception staggered starts are overkill?!

127 replies

SMLSML · 13/06/2025 00:27

My little one starts school in September, we had our first meeting at the school tonight 😊 question... How on earth are you meant to cope with the staggered starts if you both work full time?! She won't officially start until 17th September, all other days before then are half days 🫠 she's been going to childcare since she's 1, she'll be so confused not going more than two hours a day for two weeks 😅 not to mention I have no idea how you make it work with childcare, chuck on top of that I'm meant to be away with work the first two weeks of Sept 🙃 how on earth are parents meant to work around it?! Just seems crazy to me she's not even properly in for half a month. I get all children are different but surely it should be optional?! All suggestions welcome 😅

OP posts:
Parker231 · 13/06/2025 08:37

RareGoalsVerge · 13/06/2025 08:32

If the teacher had 30 new starters all day on day 1, with no idea which 10 are going to cope fine, which 10 will be ok with a bit of gentle encouragement, and which 10 are going to need more significant intervention, the result would be an even larger number of vulnerable children being let down by and excluded from the state education system. For some children, a gentle start is vital. I know your child is used to full days in childcare but are they used to being in a class of 30 with only one adult and very little 1:1 interaction? If you are 100% sure your child will need no individual attention to help settle in, then you do have the right to insist that they give your child the full time place they are entitled to from day 1. They won't like you for insisting, but they can't say no.

As for how - well most working parents organise either for one parent to take those weeks off, or for a grandparent to come and stay, or will pay a childminder extra to do the extra school-runs at odd times. Even if I was working full time and had outsourced the actual pickups and dropoffs I wouldn't arrange to be away from home with work for the first few weeks of any child's transition into a new daily environment of any kind. They need their mum at such times, even if only for a cuddle at bedtime.

If it’s so vital why don’t all schools do a staggered start. DT’s had no problem starting full time from day one together with breakfast and after school clubs later the same week.
Not everyone can create childcare - grandparents don’t live in the uk and have their own jobs, nursery places have been taken up and they don’t offer a shuttle service to and from school at random times, working parents don’t have enough annual leave for unnecessary additions like a staggered start.

OffToLockUp · 13/06/2025 08:53

SMLSML · 13/06/2025 06:56

Thanks all. It's a little village school with 17 children going into reception so it's not been done for over crowding reasons and I think that's perfectly acceptable numbers for the teachers to get to know the kids 😅 I'm emailing them today to see if they'll budge as I just find it madness. As someone said on here there's not many children these days that haven't been to some form of childcare before school and for the ones who have the option is there

I planned the transition for my school.

Small group meetings, small groups in classes, visits to and by day nurseries…all complete in July. All families offered full day, day 1 in September. The family could arrange something different with us if they felt this was more appropriate to their child.

@SMLSML Schools can be challenged on this as legally there is a right to a full time education. Schools should also be setting good patterns of attendance. For some children (those of compulsory school age) this would be a part time timetable with clear expectations around parental agreement. I would be challenging the board/trustees as to how they are meeting the government requirements in this document.

P25
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/66bf300da44f1c4c23e5bd1b/Working_together_to_improve_school_attendance_-_August_2024.pdf

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/66bf300da44f1c4c23e5bd1b/Working_together_to_improve_school_attendance_-_August_2024.pdf

Coffeeandcrochet · 13/06/2025 08:53

My son's primary has the P1s in 10 minutes late and leaving 10 minutes early the first two days to avoid the school gate crush, then it's normal hours after that. They used to do more extensive staggered starts but they found the children were more unsettled by the lack of routine. It's a 3 form entry school btw so hardly a small number of new starters.

Anotherpringle · 13/06/2025 09:14

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 13/06/2025 07:41

This is bonkers. Where I live children start (compulsory) school between the age of 2y9m and 3y8m and it's full days (8:30-4:30) from the second day onwards.

Where is this if you don’t mind me asking?
It sounds so young to start school on a compulsory basis.
Also, what happens if a child has a developmental delay?

Glittertwins · 13/06/2025 09:19

We had this years ago too. The first week my parents stayed with us and did the late morning pick ups. The second week, I changed my hours and worked mornings only. Third week in was normal school hours then wrap around care.
DCs weren’t at all bothered as they’d been in nursery 8-5:30 since 6 months old.

SMLSML · 13/06/2025 09:23

For all those who started their little one earlier and refused the staggered start, how did they cope being the only one, just worried about them being on their own at lunch and things like that?

OP posts:
Chocolateorange22 · 13/06/2025 09:24

I do get that some children struggle. Those children should of course work with school and be offered the staggered starts. However the majority of children are raring to go.

Our primary school used to do the staggered start. They then got my daughters year and turned out all but one child was in the pre school anyway all doing 9-3. They trialled them all doing full days in Reception and they've kept it since. They actively encourage anybody with a school place to use some of their hours to put them into pre school for at least a day in the last term if parents are able to. They do tons of transition activities, we are only in June and they are sitting in reception at story time or nipping in for the odd hour or so with a TA. I WFH during school hours but even I'd be miffed if they staggered the first few weeks of the new term.

Friends I know who've had to do the staggered times have either taken leave or WFH making the hours up on an evening. Obviously that can't work for all parents.

Ilikegreen · 13/06/2025 09:28

I couldn't agree more that it confuses children, my DD was scared the teacher didn’t like them as she sent them away after two hours. It went on for three weeks and we were all exhausted by the end of it. Filling in the rest of the time became putting DD in front of tv, never ending playdates etc. Absolute madness, very unsettling and crazy stressful.

Parker231 · 13/06/2025 09:30

SMLSML · 13/06/2025 09:23

For all those who started their little one earlier and refused the staggered start, how did they cope being the only one, just worried about them being on their own at lunch and things like that?

They weren’t the only one - you’ll probably find many parents are opting for full time from day one.

Eastie77Returns · 13/06/2025 09:31

SquashedSquid · 13/06/2025 07:55

Well yes, we did, as did most of the other parents I know. We also ensured we had enough savings for every possible eventuality, university, disability, etc.

I find it very odd how people think it's OK to bring another human into the world without knowing they can provide for them, have the time for them etc.

“Savings for every possible eventuality…”

🤣

Eastie77Returns · 13/06/2025 09:34

SMLSML · 13/06/2025 09:23

For all those who started their little one earlier and refused the staggered start, how did they cope being the only one, just worried about them being on their own at lunch and things like that?

DS was fine. He began on day 1 when there were a few kids in, some of whom he knew.

Why would your DC will be the only one (sorry not read the thread so you may have covered this) as there will be other children there on the first day?

ShesTheAlbatross · 13/06/2025 09:41

I agree it’s ridiculous. DD has a friend who has two secondary school teacher parents. They cannot accommodate this at all.
As teachers, they really are keen on supporting the school, they want to support the school. But on this issue they couldn’t, they had to insist she went full time from day 1.

ShesTheAlbatross · 13/06/2025 09:43

SMLSML · 13/06/2025 08:35

It isn't though for the kids going, all of them are in the preschool attached to the school, regularly go in the main school hall and attend the after school club. It's also only a class of 17...

Yes there’s a school near me with a long staggered start period. But most children attend the attached pre school, which is very very integrated into the school. They attend some assemblies, go to the same after school club, wear the uniform. For those children (which is most of the children who start reception) the move is not that significant that they need 3 weeks of a part time timetable.

WhistleBlower8 · 13/06/2025 09:44

I've put annual leave in for that week as DD will be starting school. I do agree it's silly. I think doing 1 or 2 half days is okay, then it should be full days. Not a whole week, or two in some schools.

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 13/06/2025 09:45

Anotherpringle · 13/06/2025 09:14

Where is this if you don’t mind me asking?
It sounds so young to start school on a compulsory basis.
Also, what happens if a child has a developmental delay?

In France. I don't know about children with developmental delays, I guess they must get some additional support.

SortthisoutpleaseJesus · 13/06/2025 09:49

You can insist on it from day 1. You can and must insist on it. I hate being 'that parent' but I had to, but fortunately a load of other parents in DS class did the same.

AprilShowers25 · 13/06/2025 09:51

Our school stopped doing the staggered starts as they found it more confusing for the children, they now have a few transition days in the July, then in September the children who were completely new to the school start the day before the children who were already at the school nursery. They all have a ‘buddy’ assigned who is an older child in school to help them at lunch and playtime for the first few weeks.

Parker231 · 13/06/2025 09:51

SortthisoutpleaseJesus · 13/06/2025 09:49

You can insist on it from day 1. You can and must insist on it. I hate being 'that parent' but I had to, but fortunately a load of other parents in DS class did the same.

I think that is often the case - gone are the days of there being a parent at home who could facilitate all the random days and hours at the start of term.

DancefloorAcrobatics · 13/06/2025 09:53

My DD did full days from the beginning. But I remember being asked if we were OK with it. Their reasoning was that most DC in the year group were already in FT childcare and a lot moved up to school with children they already knew.
I think if everything is new, (school teachers & other children) it can be a bit overwhelming for a lot of DC.

firsttimemum99x · 13/06/2025 10:17

I do think it should be optional. The staggered starts were amazing for my son and I’m a SAHM but it is hard for working parents

SortthisoutpleaseJesus · 13/06/2025 10:18

Parker231 · 13/06/2025 09:51

I think that is often the case - gone are the days of there being a parent at home who could facilitate all the random days and hours at the start of term.

and not everyone has a handy granny who can help.
In our case we have 2, but it just so happened that week MIL couldn't drive (and she lives too far to walk) after a minor operation and my mum was working. Husband is a teacher and while he is quite senior, asking for cover for his lessons in the first week would not have gone down well if it can be avoided. Impossible for me.
Kids survived. Tbh it was better for them.

SMLSML · 13/06/2025 10:39

Eastie77Returns · 13/06/2025 09:34

DS was fine. He began on day 1 when there were a few kids in, some of whom he knew.

Why would your DC will be the only one (sorry not read the thread so you may have covered this) as there will be other children there on the first day?

The majority of parents there last night didn't seem bothered as I think one parent doesn't work, so the childcare isn't an issue. Was only me and another parent that would prefer them to start after the first week of staggered starts

OP posts:
Eminybob · 13/06/2025 10:41

Our school did this. It is a bloody nightmare.
I think I had to take annual leave with DC1.
DC2 was slightly easier as DH and I were both WFH by that point, but as we had 2 DC at school we were having to make multiple school runs each day. Bonkers.

Everydayimhuffling · 13/06/2025 16:05

That's madness! DC's school does 1 half day and one day when only children born January onwards are in, and then normal from then. Maximum of 2 days being disrupted. Multiple weeks is far too much.

longapple · 13/06/2025 16:47

Mine had this and I think the gentle start really helped. It's not really about the length of the day, nursery days were longer. It was more the more structured routine and being in a class of 30 strangers. With the staggered start ours was in a group of about 7 for the first few days, then a group of 15 for a while before upping it to the full 30.
We used annual leave and their nursery was happy to keep them on their books so we used that for the days when they were only in for a couple of hours.