I'm curious to hear other viewpoints on this. I was listening to Trevor Noah's podcast recently and he interviewed Jonathan Haidt, author of 'The Anxious Generation.' The book is about how younger generations struggle with anxiety and mental health issues. A lot of the blame is put on social media, gaming and the internet in general, which I agree with to a certain extent though I think it's not the full explanation.
One thing that he said which struck me was that overscheduling and overprotecting children makes them more vulnerable to accepting an authoritarian/right wing mindset. They become so used to having others protect them and tell them what to do that they become anxious when they have to deal with adversity and make their own decisions, so they seek out 'parental' figures to solve their problems for them - i.e. dictator types that provide a villain (immigrants, people who are different) and certainty about how to vanquish said villain.
His argument was that it's important to let children experience disappointment and failure so they can learn to get back up and rely on their own resources. He argued that our level of overprotection is so extreme that we make playgrounds soft and don't allow children to experience a bump and some pain - we don't let them 'learn to fall well.' He believes that trying to protect kids too much lets them down in a big way, by leaving them resourceless and vulnerable to manipulation.
It seems a bit simplistic but it also makes logical sense.
I think he definitely has a point but I was curious to hear other views on it so I can form my own thinking a bit more.