Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think reality shows of the early 2000s have not aged well! Doing a rewatch

334 replies

Imcomingovertoyourplace · 30/05/2025 08:35

So far I’ve watched
Playing it Straight (the homophobia is rife!)
Fat Families (just horrific, ‘lard busting’ and shaming overweight kids)
Big Fat Gypsy Weddings (did the producers never want to intervene with what is essentially child abuse?)

OP posts:
legsekeven · 30/05/2025 10:44

I loved airport. Would still watch that now. Although now the check in staff would be the villains with a measuring tape for the carry on.

BoredZelda · 30/05/2025 10:45

Onemerrybluesnail · 30/05/2025 10:34

Yes i remember that.

Vomit-inducing.

She wasn't even qualified as a doctor I understand.

She was a “nutritionist” whatever that means!

She pretended she was a doctor by saying she had a PHD from some bogus US “College of Nutrition” which has no accreditation and didn’t actually check the credentials of people applying. Ben Goldacre, who wrote “Bad Science” (fabulous book) managed to register his cat with the same qualifications.

Unsurprisingly, she went on to peddle covid and vaccine misinformation. She is a hideous woman!

EmeraldShamrock000 · 30/05/2025 10:45

They're much worse now.
Virgin Island, that swingers one too, awful.
I'd disown my daughter if she applied for a reality TV show.

BoredZelda · 30/05/2025 10:45

legsekeven · 30/05/2025 10:44

I loved airport. Would still watch that now. Although now the check in staff would be the villains with a measuring tape for the carry on.

Who didn’t love Jeremy!

Simonjt · 30/05/2025 10:47

Oh I had forgotten about our Queen Jane Boulton!

legsekeven · 30/05/2025 10:48

BoredZelda · 30/05/2025 10:45

Who didn’t love Jeremy!

And Jane the check in supervisor. She would step in to sort people out

HashtagShitShop · 30/05/2025 10:49

PeonyBlushSuede · 30/05/2025 10:17

10 years younger?

with the blonde lady - Nicky something.

they used to make them stand in a shopping centre and then have the public guess their age - and it would always be brutally many years above their actual age

I think she's the woman (Nicky something) how does the make overs on This Morning now.

Whoever it is wants sacking from the few I've seen, taking poor women who have been battered by life (illness, caring responsibilities etc were the ones I'd seen) and taking them completely out of their comfort zones.

They dress them in horrendously bright coloured or heavily patterned dresses that swamped them and didn't suit them in the slightest but "were current fashion!" and make up and hair that someone who had no knowledge of self care and no products themselves could ever repeat.

They were completely inappropriate for every day life rather than more reasonable and attainable styles which would make the real difference for them going forward and let them continue what they had learnt.

Lilactimes · 30/05/2025 10:51

BoredZelda · 30/05/2025 10:38

Not so sure about that. It exploded the parents but the children always seemed to come out well at the end of it. She did always make it clear it was a parenting issue not the kids. She was particularly good when dealing with teenagers, she treated them like they were on her level rather than domestic slaves or toddlers.

I agree. She loved the kids - everything was about getting the parents to parent, be more involved and enjoy their time with their kids. It was about balancing time and fun with them but the kids also learning certain ways to interact in shops, at the table and with their siblings to make for a more harmonious life all round.

blacksantanapkin · 30/05/2025 10:52

ButterButterBattle · 30/05/2025 10:22

I absolutely refuse to watch Love Island or any of that shite. I find it pernicious and incredibly damaging to young people's understanding of love or what is important in a relationship. I think it's way more damaging to the psyche than something like wife swap. There you were "laughing at the weirdos" which is horrible of course. The new breed of reality TV takes fakeness and tells kids it's real and what matters. Urgh.

Yes Love Island is ridiculously fake! Everything is planned and manipulated by producers, they even do ‘re-takes’ of conversations. Most years a good chunk of the contestants have already met or know each other on the ‘outside’. I remember watching one series years ago and was shocked at the amount of photos on social media that showed islanders socialising in the same groups of people or with each other in real life. They make out that everyone is a stranger but the reality is they all move in the same ‘circles’.

TheQuirkyMaker · 30/05/2025 10:54

What was the name of the British show where they persuaded a woman she could be a model? She converted her garden shed into a spa and bought a glamour photo shoot and a white Corsa. She was in her forties I think. I've been trying to remember the name of the series, it may have been a spin-off from Benefits Street.

Gwenhwyfar · 30/05/2025 10:55

itsnotabouthepasta · 30/05/2025 09:39

I was literally thinking about that the other day - when Gok would give some poor terrified woman a make over.

Typically it was someone who hated make up, didn't like having her hair or nails done, lived in jeans and a t-shirt, along with trainers. Yet without doubt, Gok would ALWAYS style her in full glam, pretty much a bloomin ball gown and three inch heels.

I always wondered what happened afterwards, and whether anyone genuinely changed their style?

He used to fondle their breasts on TV and then always put them in 50s dresses. Might have worked in London, but they couldn't walk around their small towns looking like that so I'm sure they went straight back to their old jeans.

BeardofHagrid · 30/05/2025 10:55

There’s a couple of episodes of Would Like to Meet on YouTube, the presenters are incredibly cruel!

Another shocking one on YouTube from the Channel 4 series Man Hunters:

- YouTube

Enjoy the videos and music that you love, upload original content and share it all with friends, family and the world on YouTube.

https://youtu.be/UhoI-UD_A1w?si=KDH4098Qr6-9Z9KE

CoffeeCantata · 30/05/2025 10:57

I agree!

There was the awful Changing Rooms in which arrogant and snooty 'experts' belittled and bullied people into creating the most revolting 'themed' rooms for their friends and neighbours. The results were unbelievably tacky and were done very grottily, more like am-dram sets than decor meant to last. The staple gun and glue played a big role. I remember one woman's treasured collection of teapots was topped and broken by one of the professional designers. In retrospect, I'm not entirely sure this was an accident because...

...some of the designers involved have since tried to distance themselves from the naff programme and admitted that a lot of the time they were taking the p*. Lawrence Llewelllyn Bowen admitted that if he took a dislike to the 'clients' he 'gave them the room they deserved', and not in a nice way. It was in that era when the public were constantly being bossed and bullied by 'experts' (see also Trinny and Suzannah in What Not to Wear. Ghastly, cringey stuff. Punters were seen as fair game for a general sneer-fest from their superiors.

Also there was a horrible programme where some smart-Alec, arrogant film-makers had asked people to let them into their homes to film their rooms while talking about their choices. Needless to say, there was a lot of the camera panning around very ordinary (not design-conscious, trendy or sophisticated) homes with snide comments and a general invitiation to viewers to sneer at these people. Horrible!

There are lots of things wrong with today's TV output but I think they've learned to hide the sneering a bit.

Gwenhwyfar · 30/05/2025 11:00

ElliesNextNameChange · 30/05/2025 09:52

Oh God my housemate loved Supersize vs Superskinny. Absolutely batshit premise of a show. So you get one person who binges on junk daily and another that lives on energy drinks and a packet of crisps and swap their diets....why, exactly? What was the even vaguely plausible benefit? And that weird doctor, what a creep. He gave me a strong bad feeling, and I dont get that about many people.

Entertainment.

Also, while neither person eat healthily, I think there was possibly a very slight educational benefit to be had from realising that one big meal won't kill you neither will a few tiny meals.

Dotjones · 30/05/2025 11:02

The difference between reality shows now and back then is that back then the sole purpose of them was for the audience to laugh at the contestants and feel good about how much better they are than them. Then people like Jade Goody started making a career out of being terrible people and things devolved to where a significant number of people see being on a reality show as a valid career choice.

I'm sure there are still some people who watch to mock and feel smug, but the calibre of viewer is probably closer to the calibre of contestant these days.

CoffeeCantata · 30/05/2025 11:08

Dotjones · 30/05/2025 11:02

The difference between reality shows now and back then is that back then the sole purpose of them was for the audience to laugh at the contestants and feel good about how much better they are than them. Then people like Jade Goody started making a career out of being terrible people and things devolved to where a significant number of people see being on a reality show as a valid career choice.

I'm sure there are still some people who watch to mock and feel smug, but the calibre of viewer is probably closer to the calibre of contestant these days.

Yes - definitely.

Oh - one other thing. I don't often watch the house-hunting programmes but what I have noticed is that some telly person seems to be telling couples to hold hands all the bloody time as they parade round the viewings.

It really irritates me! I know I'm a miserable, joy-killing old bat, but it looks so naff, soppy and false. I bet it's reality TV manipulation most of the time.

godmum56 · 30/05/2025 11:08

StepawayfromtheLindors · 30/05/2025 08:40

Reality shows from 2025 are pretty shocking. The genre is basically a modern form of a voyeuristic freak show. Never a comfortable watch.

this.

Imcomingovertoyourplace · 30/05/2025 11:09

@DotjonesI disagree that Jade made a career out of being a terrible person. She was a very young, traumatised woman who did not get an education. People were drawn to her not only because she was so naive and a bit thick, but because behind that was a vulnerability. The nation was invested in this rags to riches story, but also enjoyed her downfall as it was felt to be fitting as she had risen above her station. The fight with Shilpa was as much about class as it was about race.

OP posts:
CoffeeCantata · 30/05/2025 11:10

One other observation and then I'll get my coat...

I've met a few TV people in my career and I'm sorry to say that they've invariably been smug and superior with a very patronising opinion of the viewers and public in general. Very depressing, and it explains a lot.

I know that's an unfair generalisation but when you consider some of the programmes being discussed here, it's not a surprise.

Imcomingovertoyourplace · 30/05/2025 11:11

One thing I always noticed on Clean house, dirty house or whatever it was called was the dirty house owners were usually university professors or the like, whilst the clean house people were…not. There’s a definite link with intelligence, being bookish and not ‘seeing’ mess, and that link could be neurodivergence.

OP posts:
Daybrake · 30/05/2025 11:12

AnAlpacaForChristmasPleaseSanta · 30/05/2025 09:25

Me too. I had a bit of a thing for the Yorkshire headteacher. And the iconic moment that the boy with the stammer is able to speak fluently...😭.

Was that the Asian kid who went onto be a maths teacher? If so he’s a gem.

I didn’t even watch the original but I’ve seen clips and used to follow him on his social media accounts (when he was an adult)

Gwenhwyfar · 30/05/2025 11:15

Imcomingovertoyourplace · 30/05/2025 11:11

One thing I always noticed on Clean house, dirty house or whatever it was called was the dirty house owners were usually university professors or the like, whilst the clean house people were…not. There’s a definite link with intelligence, being bookish and not ‘seeing’ mess, and that link could be neurodivergence.

There's also how you get status. A uni professor already has it through their job and won't worry so much about what people think of the state of the house.

I didn't get the impression it was always academic types though.

The thing is, the people with the most dirty homes would never let the TV in to see it!

Imcomingovertoyourplace · 30/05/2025 11:17

@CoffeeCantatawell I would also say that the TV producers have no duty of care to their contestants. I work in MH. There’s so many unwell people on reality tv. The last thing they need is to be opened up to public ridicule.

OP posts:
GingerBeverage · 30/05/2025 11:28

BoredZelda · 30/05/2025 10:38

Not so sure about that. It exploded the parents but the children always seemed to come out well at the end of it. She did always make it clear it was a parenting issue not the kids. She was particularly good when dealing with teenagers, she treated them like they were on her level rather than domestic slaves or toddlers.

Children cannot consent to having their intimate moments of emotion recorded and replayed for the entertainment of strangers, forever.

It’s child exploitation.

SlashBeef · 30/05/2025 11:30

One 2000s show I genuinely miss is Holiday Showdown. I think about it often!

Swipe left for the next trending thread