Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think that it should be illegal to go abroad without travel insurance

434 replies

AusBoundDD · 23/05/2025 18:46

A friend has just put a plea for GoFundMe donations on our WhatsApp group as one of her cousins was involved in a car crash whilst on holiday in Spain, ending up in hospital with multiple bad fractures. He was uninsured so the family have been left unable to pay for his hefty ambulance fees, surgery, hospital stay etc. To make matters worse he isn’t fit to fly commercially and instead needs to be medically evacuated home to the UK via private air ambulance.

It feels like a yearly occurrence - someone begging for help to get their relative home after they’ve been stupid/naive enough to leave the country without adequate travel insurance. Surely it should be like having your passport - you can’t board a plane or gain entry to a country abroad without it?!

OP posts:
Botanybaby · 26/05/2025 15:05

I think travel insurance should be compulsory and proven at point of purchase of a holiday however I also think travel insurance companies need to be regulated better and their terms regulated better
A friend of mine tripped and broke her ankle on holiday she tripped over someone's bag by a pool and as she had had a drink (a rum and coke) and this was noted in hospital records the travel insurance company refused to pay up as she was "intoxicated"

She wasn't I was there when it happened she she stepped out the way of some running kids who were not paying attention and dsrting in and out of everyone and then tripped over their mother's beach bag that was on the floor

FedupofArsenalgame · 26/05/2025 15:14

BakelikeBertha · 26/05/2025 14:36

I disagree with this, as when I was taken ill in Spain, I racked up a bill in excess of £12,000, there's no way that I've paid out this sort of money over the years in insurance. I'm lucky enough to have the money to pay a bill like this, if I had to, but I'd rather pay a few hundred pounds over my life time of travels, than £12k, all in one go!

How did you manage that? Were you not in a state hospital?

Scottishshopaholic · 26/05/2025 15:33

AusBoundDD · 23/05/2025 19:24

From my experience you can get insured no matter what condition you have, but for a hefty pricetag. DD for example is not easy to insure whatsoever due to pre existing conditions - her insurance for 1 month in Australia came in at £500, whilst most of her friends were closer to £50! It’s the price you pay to go abroad, no I would not travel without it nor do I think anyone should be able to. Travelling is a luxury, not a right. To knowingly make yourself a liability is simply selfish.

You cant get insurance if you are undergoing any treatment, testing or awaiting diagnosis. With the state of our NHS at the moment that covers a lot of people.

It was impossible to get travel insurance for our toddler last year who had been in hospital a few times with chest infections and was awaiting her follow up appointment with consultant. We made a decision to go without it. We had cash sitting there if needed and multiple family members encouraging us to go.

Maddy70 · 26/05/2025 15:40

If he has an ehic all that would be covered anyway! Assuming he didn't go to a private hospital

Aesop45 · 26/05/2025 15:56

lnks · 23/05/2025 19:11

My family member can't get travel insurance because of several long term conditions. Are you suggesting he should never be able to travel abroad?

That depends, would they expect others to pay for any issues they encounter if they decide to still travel considering the higher risk factors in their circumstances?

PhilippaGeorgiou · 26/05/2025 16:05

lnks · 23/05/2025 19:26

You are incorrect. It is not too expensive, no one will cover him due to a disability and complex health conditions.
If he needed healthcare abroad he has more than adequate funds to pay for it himself.
So why should he be prevented from travelling?

The cost of threatment and potential medical evacuation can run from tens of £thousands to hundreds of £thousands. If he can afford that, then fine. If he can't, then who does he think will pay the bills? If there is disability and complex health conditions then potentially even a minor admission could prove very costly.

Laurmolonlabe · 26/05/2025 16:05

Plenty of people drive around without car insurance , making it legal requirement doesn't solve the problem, I doubt very much if anyone is ever prosected for it- even when involved in an accident I know they often aren't.

saltinesandcoffeecups · 26/05/2025 16:15

So all of you on the mandatory TI bandwagon know what would happen, right? People would buy the cheapest coverage regardless of their circumstances and tic the box. They wouldn’t be covered for more than a lost pair of flip flops.

So absolutely nothing would change except for insurance companies making money off of these worthless but highly demanded products.

Why is everyone in here looking for a government solution to a problem that doesn’t exist. If someone is stuck in a hospital begging for money that’s on them if they didn’t plan ahead.

PhilippaGeorgiou · 26/05/2025 16:30

People assume that other countries - even European countries - have healthcare like the UK. They do not. The E(G)HIC only covers "medically necessary treatment" (which is not necessarily the same thing as full treatment) that cannot wait until you return to the UK, and that that treatment must be free to citizens of the relevant country (which is often is not). For example, in Greece many tests and scans are only available privately and must be paid for. A friend who lives there (and is Greek) had a short hospital stay in Athens (so not in the sticks) a few months ago and had to pay for a nurse because there aren't nurses available. In many places there are so few staff and ambulances now that you must go private - or there is no treatment available for you.

Bearing in mind that you cannot depend on free, accessible and timely medical care in the UK, why would you assume that this is automatically available elsewhere?

That said I don't see how you can force people to have travel insurance, but I certainly wouldn't be stumping up anything for someone elses lack of it.

AlleycatMarie · 26/05/2025 16:55

Totally agree with you @AusBoundDD
I ended up in hospital for weeks in a foreign country once. Had no symptoms of illness at all before going. Without travel insurance I don’t know what we would have done, as it came to an amount way beyond my credit card limit. It really annoys me when I see go fund me’s for this kind of thing. If you can afford to go on holidays you can afford the travel insurance!

PinkSparklyPussyCat · 26/05/2025 16:59

BooneyBeautiful · 26/05/2025 12:32

Yes, but you would still be paying the £400 whether you took insurance out at the time of booking or at the time the balance had to be paid, so you weren't saving any money which either way you did it.

If I'd had to cancel before I paid in full I would have saved around £150 by not having insurance - the insurance was £50 more and the two excesses of £50 each for claiming. Obviously I wouldn't pay the balance without insurance in place.

One other point about insurance, it's not practical to say it has to be taken out at time of purchase in many cases. You can book a holiday in 2 years time for example but policies only cover holidays within the next 12 months so insurance isn't available.

BooneyBeautiful · 26/05/2025 17:10

PinkSparklyPussyCat · 26/05/2025 16:59

If I'd had to cancel before I paid in full I would have saved around £150 by not having insurance - the insurance was £50 more and the two excesses of £50 each for claiming. Obviously I wouldn't pay the balance without insurance in place.

One other point about insurance, it's not practical to say it has to be taken out at time of purchase in many cases. You can book a holiday in 2 years time for example but policies only cover holidays within the next 12 months so insurance isn't available.

That's interesting. I didn't know the policies are only valid for 12 months. I am not one of life's travellers, so was only going on what Martin Lewis says. I am guessing that many people have travel insurance via their bank these days, so that must be ongoing.

BooneyBeautiful · 26/05/2025 17:14

FedupofArsenalgame · 26/05/2025 07:40

How can other airline passengers claim for " inconvenience" This is a new one on me. Seeing as I spend a hell of a lot of time on travel forums it might be useful info. Could you please link me to this information

No idea. I was only going on what a previous poster said. Am not sure who pays for the other passengers' inconvenience/additional costs if an uninsured person causes the plane to divert etc. I trust that they won't be out of pocket though.

Maddy70 · 26/05/2025 17:24

I cruise a lot and it's usually a condition of cruising that you have cruise travel insurance. I can have it but as I'm awaiting surgery anything to do with that is exempt. Nothing to do with charging higher prices for cover they simply won't insure me. I have had beast cancer. I've had the all clear and the surgery is just cosmetic but that doesn't matter.
I rely on my EHIC but always ensure you get treated in a state hospital should you become ill

Catsbreakfast · 26/05/2025 17:27

BCBird · 23/05/2025 19:12

I totally.agree. I was on holiday in Prague with a friend. In passing so mentioned she did not have insurance. I was shocked and angry.

It’s nothing to do with you, why are you angry? In the end it’s on her if she has to pay. The family are cheeky to set up
a gofundme.

Henry8thHoover · 26/05/2025 17:32

I used to work in an embassy overseas and the amount of consular cases where folks didn’t have travel insurance was eye watering.
The EHIC may well cover hospital treatment but it’s doesn’t cover repatriation by medical jet.

FedupofArsenalgame · 26/05/2025 17:57

BooneyBeautiful · 26/05/2025 17:14

No idea. I was only going on what a previous poster said. Am not sure who pays for the other passengers' inconvenience/additional costs if an uninsured person causes the plane to divert etc. I trust that they won't be out of pocket though.

Well they probably will be. I didn't get anything when I was delayed on a plane as it had to divert due to someone having a medical emergency. Up to me to pay for extra car park fees etc.

AgeingDoc · 26/05/2025 18:34

FedupofArsenalgame · 26/05/2025 17:57

Well they probably will be. I didn't get anything when I was delayed on a plane as it had to divert due to someone having a medical emergency. Up to me to pay for extra car park fees etc.

Airlines are only required to provide compensation when they are at fault, not when delays are caused by "extraordinary circumstances" beyond their control. A medical diversion would generally be considered extraordinary circumstances and hence passengers wouldn't be entitled to compensation regardless of whether the sick passenger was insured or not. Travel insurance covers the costs of the insured party, not other passengers. I think you might be able to claim something for delays on your own insurance though, depending on the situation.
"Extraordinary Circumstances" actually seems to cover most of the things that are likely to cause flight delays so seems a bit ridiculous to me, but that's the law.

FedupofArsenalgame · 26/05/2025 18:50

AgeingDoc · 26/05/2025 18:34

Airlines are only required to provide compensation when they are at fault, not when delays are caused by "extraordinary circumstances" beyond their control. A medical diversion would generally be considered extraordinary circumstances and hence passengers wouldn't be entitled to compensation regardless of whether the sick passenger was insured or not. Travel insurance covers the costs of the insured party, not other passengers. I think you might be able to claim something for delays on your own insurance though, depending on the situation.
"Extraordinary Circumstances" actually seems to cover most of the things that are likely to cause flight delays so seems a bit ridiculous to me, but that's the law.

Yes I know this. But was replying to a PP. Luckily it was about a tenner I was out of pocket so not worth worrying about

Noodlehen · 26/05/2025 20:57

I agreed with you on this, but now - I’ve just gone to get a new insurance policy for my next holiday. I have an endoscopy in a couple of weeks, but my appointment for my results is not until August, after my holiday. So I can’t be quoted because I’m “awaiting results” on any I’ve tried.

so now my options are to cancel my holiday, or take the risk - it’s a check up for chronic GERD to make sure my stomach is ok , nothing extremely serious.

I can see why people take the risk, I am personally undecided.

FlyMeSomewhere · 27/05/2025 08:08

fairfat40 · 26/05/2025 09:31

I know many people with metastatic breast cancer who are uninsurable, but want to enjoy their shortened lives by sharing holidays with family. The insurance is absolutely stratospheric.

if people are outraged by the lack of insurance (and yes, there are some idiots, I would agree), hopefully they are also outraged by this. https://www.express.co.uk/life-style/health/1908660/cancer-holiday-travel-insurance-macmillan

I think we do get that it can be pricey but don't go away without money to cover eventualities, don't be that person blocking a hospital bed overseas whilst begging on go fund me's for help. If you are going to go away without Insurance, make sure you can fund care.

FlyMeSomewhere · 27/05/2025 08:19

It is, but these people are tying up these hospital beds whilst they wait for people to donate enough money for surgeries or repatriation and that does have an impact and the more people do that, the more likely countries will start insisting on having of having adequate insurance before being allowed entry into the country and they will want people to have a minimal amount of cover not found on dirt cheap policies.

FlyMeSomewhere · 27/05/2025 08:20

Laurmolonlabe · 26/05/2025 16:05

Plenty of people drive around without car insurance , making it legal requirement doesn't solve the problem, I doubt very much if anyone is ever prosected for it- even when involved in an accident I know they often aren't.

They are, their cars get seized and crushed for a start.

FlyMeSomewhere · 27/05/2025 08:30

BooneyBeautiful · 25/05/2025 23:09

My goodness, that's a long wait! I am in my sixties and about a year ago I was told I likely have ADHD, plus possibly ASD. The wait for a formal diagnosis was expected to be 18 months, so I am hoping to be seen within the next six months or so.

Are things like that and issue though, they aren't something likely to put a child in hospital overseas or contribute to an illness happening are they? I'm guessing adults with these disorders are able to buy travel insurance because they aren't ill as such.

FlyMeSomewhere · 27/05/2025 08:38

Maddy70 · 26/05/2025 15:40

If he has an ehic all that would be covered anyway! Assuming he didn't go to a private hospital

It's a dangerous belief that the EHIC covers everything because if it did, why would any European citizen ever need insurance to travel to Europe! If you have to go to the local general hospital to have an x-ray and your fractured arm put in cast or a few stitches put in a cut! It's for basic accident and emergency treatment, if you find yourself admitted to hospital needing surgery or medical repatriation, you or your insurance company will be expected to fund it.