I have a 10yo cat who began to be unwell in January. She had some small cysts in her ear which were causing an outer ear infection. She had a minor op to remove them and the vet found a larger tumour blocking the ear canal.
We decided to let her recover and give her antibiotics and steroids to see if the lump and infection would calm down.
They have not. The ear infection is worse now, but the tumour bleeds so easily that it cannot be biopsied or cauterised without a specialist vet 90 miles away, and even with insurance it will be thousands of pounds. The tumour is growing already in just a month or two.
The vet wants to do CT scan to see the extent of the tumour and infection. The CT scan would only be diagnostic. It is £1400 as our insurance has already paid out for this condition.
If the CT is bad news, we would probably continue as we are and euthanise when she becomes uncomfortable. If it is less bad, the treatment is expensive and may only buy her another 6-12 months as the infection will probably return and cause problems.
If it is the best news, she still may only live a year or two and it would be an extremely costly year or two.
I am finding the choice absolutely impossible. I love this little creature, but I feel torn between the practicality of keeping her alive for myself and saving the money for my actual human children. We could afford all this. Just. But it would definitely eat into savings.
Am I a horrible pet owner for considering not treating her?