Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think this happens everywhere? Nurseries forcing parents to pay towards Gov free spaces

40 replies

HollyBerryz · 08/05/2025 15:14

The Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman has published this press release today telling Councils to keep an eye on nurseries to make sure they aren't charging parents to access Gov funded free hours https://www.lgo.org.uk/information-centre/news/2025/may/council-should-have-better-oversight-of-nurseries-providing-free-places-ombudsman-says

Aibu to think nurseries have been forcing mandatory payments on families for years and it happens all over?

OP posts:
Whiteflowerscreed · 08/05/2025 19:12

All the day nurseries around here charge extra, the only way we found round it was from 3 the preschools attached to schools don’t charge that much extra (just lunchtime supervision cost and hot lunch if you want, otherwise you can bring free packed lunch)

doodahdayy · 08/05/2025 19:15

slowraindrop · 08/05/2025 19:02

A nursery near me upped the cost of unfunded hours to subsidise the funded hours. This was partly the reason why instead we went with a childminder who charges eligible parents the difference between the government funding and her actual hourly rate, as we aren’t entitled to the 30 funded hours.

The childminder isn’t meant to do this, but it works better for us as our hours aren’t artificially increased to subsidise the funded hours other parents access. It feels like a fairer and more sustainable approach, but the government wouldn’t like it as it exposes that the “free” hours aren’t no such thing.

Our childminder does this too. We’re entitled to the funded hours but I don’t mind paying extra. I think it’s fair

LovedFedAndNoonesDead · 08/05/2025 19:19

Absolutely - my twins went to a nursery for 11 hours a week year round provision; it cost me anywhere between £140-180/month for “consumables” and meals! I still had to provide meals for both during school holidays, sandwiches every session as one of my twin doesn’t eat any fruit or veg and, if it was mixed in a meal, he wouldn’t touch it at all. Also had to provide their own nappies, sun cream and nappy cream despite them supposedly being part of the “consumables” The charge also allegedly included outings, parent evenings/consultations and access to their online journal system - but we never had access to consultations or outings and the parent journal was useless as they wrote any old thing whether it was accurate or not. We left after 18 months when they doubled their charges for funded places making them the same cost as if you paid for them to attend for the same number of hours a week!!

After we moved the twins, the new placement never charged for anything unless you ordered a hot lunch (available 2 days a week in an agreement with the primary school next door who provided it) and then it was £2:55 for a 2 course hot lunch, you got a choice of 3 dishes and 3 desserts as well!! The only thing we ever had to pay for was photos!

JoyousEagle · 08/05/2025 19:22

Our nursery doesn’t do this. But I know from MN threads that this is very unusual.

CremeEggsForBreakfast · 08/05/2025 19:27

SillySeal · 08/05/2025 15:23

It definitely happens where we are. £15 per day consumables fee when using the free hours. Free hours can only be used school hours so 8am to 3pm. If a full day is needed it is a £25 top up fee. So essentially costs parents £40 per day for a free day. Full price for a day is £65.

So you save £25 per day / £100 per week as its over 4 days for the 30 free hours and pay £160 a week for 4 days or £225 for a 5 day week.

You have fundamentally misunderstood what the funded hours are. You were never entitled to a free day. You are entitled to 15hrs a week for 38wks of the year. So yes, there will be a charge for extra hours and consumables. If you don't want to pay for the consumables you can discuss providing your own nappies and packed lunch.

SillySeal · 08/05/2025 19:58

CremeEggsForBreakfast · 08/05/2025 19:27

You have fundamentally misunderstood what the funded hours are. You were never entitled to a free day. You are entitled to 15hrs a week for 38wks of the year. So yes, there will be a charge for extra hours and consumables. If you don't want to pay for the consumables you can discuss providing your own nappies and packed lunch.

I haven't misunderstood at all. I have simply stated how our local nurseries work.

Consumables are not paid on 15 hours. So a child could go 2 sessions absolutely free. When you take on 30 hours, you could do 4 sessions and have to pay Consumables for all 4 sessions. I must admit that part I don't get how 2 can be free but 4 you pay for all 4 but I don't personally use 30 hours so it's a non issue.

I was also just stating that here you can't use 30 hours to so full days. So anyone needing a nursery until say 5pm, would have to pay the £25 for 2 extra hours, even if they only took their children in at 1pm for example.

I actually already provide all nappies, wipes, suncream etc. Supplying our own food/ snacks here is not an option.

Like I've said, I don't use 30 hours. I was simply explaining how our local nurseries work with the hours being set at school times, regardless if people want to use them for those times or not, it's what is offered. I can also understand though why someone might see £25 for 2 hours as expensive when you can get 11 hours for £65. It is what it is though.

20 minutes away there's a nursery that doesn't charge consumables and let's you pick the 30 hours you need to use. So it works in a completely different way. So no, I don't think I fundamentally have no idea I am simply stating how our local ones are ran and that costs can still be high for some families. Even at reduced costs, if the hours don't work for them it can still be expensive for some. Mornings and afternoon sessions used to be an option but are not now.

If nurseries are not given a fair price by the government I do understand why there are more costs to the parent. It just isn't as simple as "30 free hours" many people think they get which is sometimes how it is advertised. Especially when it is not the same everywhere.

TunnocksOrDeath · 08/05/2025 20:22

DC is now 6, so past the nursery phase, but their nursery in London Zone 3 charged by the full day (10 hrs) with a minimum of two days a week, and just applied the funding for "free" hours as a straight discount, on your fees that term.
It was a beautiful nursery in a converted house, with a small shady garden full of trees, that just felt like a lovely welcoming calm safe space for DC to play and learn. There was absolutely no way in hell they could have provided that service in that location, with London weighting on the salaries, on what the Government gave them for "free" hours. We're all smart enough to know that, so taking it as a discount seemed a pragmatic solution. I think it's a terrible shame that this small business might actually have to close now because they are not allowed to apply funding in a way that works for them and for parents.
The government should just be honest and say they will fund a certain amount, per child, per annum (pro-rata for shorter periods) and let nurseries and parents work out how to apply that in the most sensible way.

caffelattetogo · 09/05/2025 07:21

Ours doesn’t charge it. Only the big chain nurseries round here charge it.

Nodancingshoes · 09/05/2025 07:29

Example: It's costs £60 a day for a 3 year old to go to nursery. The government gives the nursery £45 for the day. Does this sound fair?? Nurseries will start to close if they have to take this loss every day.

NeedToChangeName · 09/05/2025 07:31

Twas ever thus

My DC are adults now, but their nursery applied govt contribution as a discount on their standard fees

Govt talking about 30 "free hours" was misleading, but don't blame the nurseries

See also care homes, where private residents subsidise the residents funded by the local authority

Nodancingshoes · 09/05/2025 07:32

It also is not 30 hours unless you go term time only. The government are misleading parents.

Absolutely45 · 09/05/2025 07:36

ComtesseDeSpair · 08/05/2025 15:26

Pushing this onto councils to police, when the real problem is that the funding for “free” places is inadequate for childcare providers to provide a service, is a total cop out. What’s going to happen when councils crack down on providers? Well, they’ll be forced to cut places, or close down if uneconomical.

The country has no money for fully funded free places, esp when people on way above avg incomes get them too.

Everyone wants something for nothing but then moan when taxes have to go up or cuts elsewhere.

MsAnnFrope · 09/05/2025 07:44

The issue is it’s promoted by Govt as “free hours” when in fact it’s govt subsidised. Quality early years provision costs way more than this or any govt is willing to pay.
Its not the fault of the nurseries but is something that govt should be more transparent about to parents!

Absolutely45 · 09/05/2025 08:35

MsAnnFrope · 09/05/2025 07:44

The issue is it’s promoted by Govt as “free hours” when in fact it’s govt subsidised. Quality early years provision costs way more than this or any govt is willing to pay.
Its not the fault of the nurseries but is something that govt should be more transparent about to parents!

Govt "subsidised" or tax payers money?

I really don't get why the last Government and now this one is trying to fund 30hrs of childcare, when an ambulance for an emergency takes 30mins to arrive and people are die in AE and corridors through lack of treatment.

Our priorities are arse about face, if you want kids, make provision for their care, birth rates haven't increased since this policy was enacted, its just handing out money to people who in many cases don't need it.

SpecduckularlyQuackers · 09/05/2025 09:13

Absolutely45 · 09/05/2025 08:35

Govt "subsidised" or tax payers money?

I really don't get why the last Government and now this one is trying to fund 30hrs of childcare, when an ambulance for an emergency takes 30mins to arrive and people are die in AE and corridors through lack of treatment.

Our priorities are arse about face, if you want kids, make provision for their care, birth rates haven't increased since this policy was enacted, its just handing out money to people who in many cases don't need it.

Edited

I see it the other way round - if you want care, make provision for kids. Help parents work (some directly in the NHS, all as taxpayers) and reap the benefits now and by ensuring the next generation of taxpayers/NHS workers.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page