Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to find the wording of this question offensive?

86 replies

3beesinmybonnet · 28/04/2025 14:49

Bought a dishwasher from Argos and just filled in their customer satisfaction survey, giving them top marks throughout.

Then they asked me the question below. AIBU to find the wording offensive?

AIBU to find the wording of this question offensive?
OP posts:
C8H10N4O2 · 28/04/2025 22:25

Strangeworldtoday · 28/04/2025 16:18

I work in marketing and have to put together surveys like this. Agree it is worded awkwardly, you should write to them and offer feedback as it will be appreciated. Marketers are usualy not trying to upset or offend anyone, we are usually nice people doing a job 😁 but can and do sometimes get it wrong.

What is the justification for asking customers to provide confidential, sensitive information after the service/goods have been provided? At the very least they should be clearly providing info on why they want it, how the data will be used, stored and their retention policy.

I’m amazed how few posters think this is an issue.

C8H10N4O2 · 28/04/2025 22:26

HarryVanderspeigle · 28/04/2025 20:39

Because they are just asking what's "wrong" with you, not what do you need to access their shopping. Someone might need step free access because they have a wheelchair, have a push chair, have had a stroke and are wobbly etc. But the adaptation is the same regardless of the reason. People with hearing loss might need a loop, to be spoken to directly so they can lip read, or a BSL interpreter. Just knowing they have hearing loss isn't enough.

I do think it's great that places want to support, I just don't see how this list will.

It won’t help. You are entirely right - this kind of random personal and sensitive data capture won’t help them do anything to improve access or services, it only provides them with marketing data.

wobblyweasel · 28/04/2025 22:31

Why are you offended? Bit of an over the top reaction. Not the best wording of a question I do admit, but offensive? No. Just don’t answer it

AthWat · 28/04/2025 22:54

C8H10N4O2 · 28/04/2025 22:25

What is the justification for asking customers to provide confidential, sensitive information after the service/goods have been provided? At the very least they should be clearly providing info on why they want it, how the data will be used, stored and their retention policy.

I’m amazed how few posters think this is an issue.

It's a voluntary, anonymous survey. I'm sure all that information is provided.

AthWat · 28/04/2025 22:55

C8H10N4O2 · 28/04/2025 22:26

It won’t help. You are entirely right - this kind of random personal and sensitive data capture won’t help them do anything to improve access or services, it only provides them with marketing data.

You've seen one question. Why are you so sure?

Dramatic · 28/04/2025 22:59

KilkennyCats · 28/04/2025 14:59

They’ll both have the condition, whatever they feel about it 🙄

I'm visually impaired but I am not disabled in any sense of the word.

tipsyraven · 28/04/2025 23:05

3beesinmybonnet · 28/04/2025 15:18

It was the "do you identify as" wording re disabilities. I don't have any disabilities but thought if I did I'd have found this offensive, but didn't want to be getting offended on others behalf if they themselves think it's OK IYSWIM.

The questions asks about impairments or health conditions. They don’t use the word ‘disabilities‘. As someone with health conditions which can be disabling, I find this a much more sensitive way of asking people about their impairments as not everyone with them would consider themselves disabled. Using the word identifies covers that quite well. As for a PP suggesting that it is an opportunity for those who are neurodiverse (self diagnosed as it was put) to be pandered to, in what way is this pandering to them and why do you care?

C8H10N4O2 · 29/04/2025 08:50

AthWat · 28/04/2025 22:55

You've seen one question. Why are you so sure?

Hard experience of companies and their marketing departments misusing data. Its widespread, common and the data can be sold to other organisations.

Its not anonymous - the OP received a direct request, those requests have unique links in them. How else do you think they “share it with other relevant third parties”? It also claims to be a “customer satisfaction survey”. Again what is the relevance of a past customer’s disabilities in a "satisfaction survey"?

Try filling in one of these surveys mentioning eg a hearing problem and see how long it is before you are being spammed by hearing aid/similar marketing. Disability aids is a big market and its worth a lot of money.

TheOriginalEmu · 29/04/2025 22:50

Skepticalsausage · 28/04/2025 18:41

After you explained it, you are right. It is offensive. People either are or are not disabled.

But that’s not true. Many Deaf people do not consider themselves disabled. Many autistic people do not consider themselves disabled. I have a friend CP who doesn’t consider herself disabled.
disablity is nuanced and not a binary thing.

theunbreakablecleopatrajones · 29/04/2025 22:51

I thought you meant the box marked other as that’s what’s highlighted..

It could be better put but I think you must be working hard to be actively offended

theunbreakablecleopatrajones · 29/04/2025 22:53

C8H10N4O2 · 28/04/2025 22:25

What is the justification for asking customers to provide confidential, sensitive information after the service/goods have been provided? At the very least they should be clearly providing info on why they want it, how the data will be used, stored and their retention policy.

I’m amazed how few posters think this is an issue.

It’s not an issue because no one has to fill it in.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page