Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Group of cyclists not letting cars past- is this legal?

600 replies

Serenity674 · 27/04/2025 20:07

Interested in whether this was legal. Was driving to my parents this morning, they live remotely so it was a single track country road, although not narrow, with wide verges on either side.

i came up behind a group of circa 20 cyclists, probably doing about 15-20mph and ended up stuck behind them for about 10 mins. Round the bends was fine and they actually went faster than I would have gone in my car but there were several very long straight stretches of road where I could have got up to 30-40 mph (it’s a NSL road) but they wouldn’t move to let me past, just rode 2 or 3 abreast taking up the whole road. They definitely knew I was there as the ones at the back kept looking behind at me.

i know the law says cyclists can ride 2 abreast and it’s actually safer as it means cars overtake them properly but surely this doesn’t apply regardless of the road? Were they just doing the safe thing or should they have let me past?

I am a horse rider so i am always on the side of passing more vulnerable road users safely but this just seemed like a bit of a dick move- or were they actually doing this for a reason I’m unaware of? If I was riding my horse on a road like this I would ride 2 abreast until the car slows down then move into single file to let them past.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
7
Musclewoman · 28/04/2025 17:57

NeedAnyHelpWithThatPaperBag · 27/04/2025 20:11

A whole 10 minutes, the horror.

Found the obnoxious cyclist....
Ten minutes is a long time if you have kids to collect....and why be purposely obstructive anyway? 🙄

Atsocta · 28/04/2025 17:59

Seems cyclists have the right to ride on public roads, and drivers must respect their space. However, cyclists should not intentionally block traffic or obstruct other road users.
Cyclists should be mindful of their impact on traffic and allow others to pass when possible.

Redpeach · 28/04/2025 17:59

DutchEmerald · 28/04/2025 12:42

They were being entitled arseholes and hopefully karma will come knocking soon and a few of them end up on their entitled arses.

So you want them knocked off?

asrl78 · 28/04/2025 18:00

Regular cyclist here. Cyclists will ride away from the kerb in primary position if it is unsafe (from the cyclist's perspective) for motorists to overtake. Where it is safe to overtake, they will move into secondary position. On narrow country lanes, it is rarely safe to overtake a cyclist so sometimes you will have to deal with waiting behind them. That is a feature of driving on minor roads and is no different to being stuck behind a farm vehicle, horse riders or a nervous driver who thinks their car will explode if they exceed 20 mph. If anyone tries to complain to me personally about holding them up, I will suggest they use the parallel primary A road or dual carriageway if they want to go fast, rather than rat-running along B and unclassified roads.

Having said this if there are in a group, they should break up and leave gaps when it is safe for drivers to overtake. I used to do this when I was out with the local cycling club. I agree there are thoughless bastards out there who go around with a ladedadedadeda-nooneelseexistsbutme-ladedadeda mindset and wouldn't notice if a hand grenade exploded next to them, frequently found in SE England. These are probably the same people who drive at 40 mph everywhere even where the speed limit and road conditions allow for NSL. Since giving such gormless people a slap is illegal, we unfortunately are stuck with the externalised inconvenience.

Redpeach · 28/04/2025 18:00

Musclewoman · 28/04/2025 17:57

Found the obnoxious cyclist....
Ten minutes is a long time if you have kids to collect....and why be purposely obstructive anyway? 🙄

Leave time for delays surely

asrl78 · 28/04/2025 18:02

Musclewoman · 28/04/2025 17:57

Found the obnoxious cyclist....
Ten minutes is a long time if you have kids to collect....and why be purposely obstructive anyway? 🙄

Why would they be deliberately obstructive? What possible gain do they have by being deliberately obstructive? Just stop and think about it for a minute please. If you haven't got 10 minutes padding in your day to account for minor delays, get out of bed earlier, sort your time management out, or stop dawdling yourself during other times of the day.

MemorableTrenchcoat · 28/04/2025 18:03

Atsocta · 28/04/2025 17:59

Seems cyclists have the right to ride on public roads, and drivers must respect their space. However, cyclists should not intentionally block traffic or obstruct other road users.
Cyclists should be mindful of their impact on traffic and allow others to pass when possible.

What do you mean, it “seems” they have the right to ride on public road? Cyclists have always had this right, from before cars were even invented. Moreover, unlike driver’s, they don’t need a licence to do so.

boodlesandpoodles · 28/04/2025 18:04

I have this a lot - I live rurally and tow a horse trailer and often get stuck behind huge groups of them for 20/30minutes as its totally impossible to overtake them doing 10mph up hills with such a long vehicle with precious cargo. On one occasion i was trying to get to the vet with a very serious horse emergency, think life or death situation I wound down my window tried to call excuse me but they don't give a flying fuck. It aggravates me beyond belief, its very selfish. Yet when I am riding my horse out on the roads they will happily whiz past at great speed scaring the poor thing half to death screaming at each other about their speed. For me road cyclists on racing bikes are the worst kind of road user i experience as an equestrian mountain bikers (all call out to let us know they are coming) car drivers, motrocyclists, lorry drivers on the whole all treat our horses with great respect and we always make sure we move out of the way for them.

PumpkinsAndCoconuts · 28/04/2025 18:06

Sirzy · 27/04/2025 20:13

If it was a single track road then surely even if single file it wouldn’t have been safe to overtake a long line of them?

Precisely. There are a lot of drivers that try to squeeze past if they go single file even if it’s unsafe due to the conditions of the road (specifically the road being too narrow / single track).

which is probably why they’ve developed this „tactic“.

and as pp said: could have just as well been a tractor or similar.

SingingGoldfinch · 28/04/2025 18:08

As ops have said, the Highway Code is quite clear on this and I think it’s more about considerate road use and courtesy. Not a road, but I was running down a wide-ish tarmac track the other day (well used by runners, dog walkers etc) and 4 Lycra clad cyclists came along in the opposite direction. None of them made any effort to move over to let me past and I ended up having to run on the verge - they even smiled and waved at me as they sailed past me scrambling through the brambles! Some cyclists are sensible and courteous but some definitely have an entitled approach to their hobby!!

Steve3742 · 28/04/2025 18:09

EveryFlavourJellyBeans · 27/04/2025 20:45

Rule 66:

"be considerate of the needs of other road users when riding in groups. You can ride two abreast and it can be safer to do so, particularly in larger groups or when accompanying children or less experienced riders. Be aware of drivers behind you and allow them to overtake (for example, by moving into single file or stopping) when you feel it is safe to let them do so"

Cyclists always conveniently ignore this part of the highway code despite being apparent experts on the rest of it.

Edited

"You can ride two abreast and it can be safer to do so, particularly in larger groups..."
So, they were right to ride 2 abreast (20 is a larger group).

"Be aware of drivers behind you and allow them to overtake (for example, by moving into single file or stopping) when you feel it is safe to let them do so"
There were 20 of them. They'd all have to move to single file, which is hard to coordinate. And, if they had done, they'd form a line c. 50 m. long. This would take around 45 seconds to pass at 30mph (assuming the cyclists were doing 10mph), 37 if they stopped (even harder to coordinate). I'm guessing the road was winding (single lane country roads usually are). There would, I'm guessing, be few or, more likely, no stretches of this road where a car could zoom past at 30 mph for 45 seconds and be sure that a vehicle wouldn't come from the opposite direction before they'd passed all the cyclists. If one did, the OP would have had 3 options:

  1. Brake furiously and hope the tail of the cyclist group passes them (allowing them to pull in) before the oncoming car hits them;
  2. Accelerate furiously and hope they pass the head of the cyclist group before the oncoming car hits them;
  3. Pull in to the group of cyclists before the oncoming car hits them, hoping the cyclists can dodge out of the way before the OP hit them.

None of these fall under the Highway Code's injunction of "safe to let them do so"

Cyclists are aware of these things. Most car drivers don't have a clue.

GiveDogBone · 28/04/2025 18:09

ScrewedByFunding · 27/04/2025 20:11

Actually no, riding on the opposite carriageway is not legal unless overtaking, which they aren't 🙄

Did you actually read the OP.? It was a single track country road there is no other side. The clue is in the phrase “single track”. “Single” meaning “one” 🙄🙄🙄

Booboobagins · 28/04/2025 18:11

Serenity674 · 27/04/2025 20:19

I’m not arguing that I should have over taken them. They were taking up the whole road so no, there was no opportunity to do this safely. It was no issue, I was in no rush and so I just followed them til I had to turn off. I was just musing where the line is between something that is perfectly legal to do and what is antisocial to do, and whether there was actually a safety reason they were doing it.

they could have ridden in smaller groups and gone single file so cars could have gone past when there was a safe opportunity.

legally, I can ride my horse down the middle of the road and make everyone wait til I turn off onto a bridle way. Just that would be rude and anti social so I don’t do that. Tractors and herds of cows are indeed part of rural life but they don’t tend to go far, I’ve never been stuck behind.a tractor for miles and miles.

Also, I would feel on edge knowing that someone was following me and I was holding them up, surely that spoils the enjoyment of the bike ride?

I agree road users need to be respectful. Just because its not illegal to do something doesn't mean you should and hold up traffic. In fact the HWC is set out to facilitate traffic flow.

Some cyclists just like some motorised vehicle drivers are AHs.🙄😡😬

ScrewedByFunding · 28/04/2025 18:14

GiveDogBone · 28/04/2025 18:09

Did you actually read the OP.? It was a single track country road there is no other side. The clue is in the phrase “single track”. “Single” meaning “one” 🙄🙄🙄

🙄 yourself! Have you seen the photo? Two cars can pass, they were being dickheads!

mamaB00 · 28/04/2025 18:17

Nonametonight · 27/04/2025 20:09

Yes, this was legal

They're just another road user. Same as if you were stuck behind a slow tractor

You don't have a right to drive roads as fast as you want to

Do cyclists pay Road tax?

vitahelp · 28/04/2025 18:17

It shouldn’t need pointing but those who want cyclists knocked off just remember they are someone’s Mum/Dad/Son/Daughter/Partner etc. They may even be someone who helps you and your family (Doctor, Nurse, Teacher, supermarket staff etc). Try to look at it that way and remember it’s quite rare to encounter a truly horrible person who actually wants to ruin your day or make you late.

LillyPJ · 28/04/2025 18:17

IwasDueANameChange · 27/04/2025 21:08

To a pp however there is no road tax in the uk. There is vehicle excise duty, it's a tax on cars.

Yeah but... It's pretty common to refer to 'road tax' and everyone knows what they mean, so I think you're being pedantic. I think almost everybody says they need to 'tax' their car.

vitahelp · 28/04/2025 18:18

mamaB00 · 28/04/2025 18:17

Do cyclists pay Road tax?

Nope nor do horse riders. There isn’t an option to.

MemorableTrenchcoat · 28/04/2025 18:22

mamaB00 · 28/04/2025 18:17

Do cyclists pay Road tax?

There’s no such thing as road tax. Do pedestrians pay a pavement tax? The cost of roads and pavements is met from general taxation, which nearly everyone pays. It’s also worth noting that most cyclists also own a car, so are already paying the vehicle excise duty.

Oldtigernidster · 28/04/2025 18:23

CopperWhite · 27/04/2025 20:11

They were doing it for the sake of being selfish dickheads. It’s not illegal but it should be.

This, Fairly typical I’m afraid.

Beauty3102 · 28/04/2025 18:25

TimeForTeaAndG · 27/04/2025 20:12

If there is no space to give them enough room when you pass (is it 2m?) then it doesn't really matter if they're going 1, 2 or 10 abreast. It wasn't safe to pass them.

Or if you had been able to pass them slowly you probably then didn't have enough road to safely pass them single file.

It could have been a car or a tractor or a bunch of cows on the road it's just a part of rural road life.

but they cycle for miles and a country lane isn’t 20 miles an hour it’s 60. A tractor doesn’t drive miles it drives to the next field. What a stupid comment. You obviously don’t live in the countryside.

trelynarks · 28/04/2025 18:26

Cyclists do not pay road tax or need insurance .

JBut · 28/04/2025 18:31

These cyclists are usually in cycling clubs and do it on purpose. They're a pain in the arse!!!!

LordEmsworth · 28/04/2025 18:32

Allthenameshavegone1972 · 28/04/2025 17:49

@LordEmsworth for all anyone knows op could have had a "very important journey". An ill child, a dying parent? Thankfully she hadn't, but.the mamils holding her up just because they're arseholes and can, do not know this. Sick of them hogging the road & not letting people pass.

That logic suggests that road users in general should only be allowed to use the road for urgent reasons. That seems somewhat OTT. The chances that a driver is on their way to a dying parent are pretty low, surely... much more likely that they're on their way to the shop.

As a cyclist and driver, I maintain that cyclists have the right to cycle in a way that maximises their safety. That does not mean hugging the gutter and stopping every time a car appears on the horizon, it means being confident in your legal right to be on the road.

It is very concerning, the number of drivers here basically threatening cyclists that "if you get in my way it'll be dangerous for you". But yes, cyclists are the entitled ones, whereas all car journeys are essential and urgent. Got it, thanks.

Lonelycrab · 28/04/2025 18:35

These arguments and threads never actually get anywhere do they

Lets just remind ourselves of the injury statistics, quick google:

”An average of 2 cyclist deaths and 83 serious injuries occur weekly”

Do any of the bad, impatient and uniformed drivers want to contribute similar statistics re death and injuries committed by cyclists upon drivers

Fwiw the last dangerous incident involving a cyclist and driver I was involved in was just a week ago. I approached a bend on a good NSL road doing around 45-50. Suddenly, in my lane approaching at around 30 mph (so a closing speed of 80mph!!!) was a Land Rover that had decided to blindly overtake a cyclist on the entrance to the bend

Thankfully I’m alert as a driver, fit good tyres to my car and it has good ABS. My ds afterwards said he thought we would have a head on collision but thankfully slowed enough. Do you know what the (woman with kids in the back of her Land Rover) did?

She lsughed as she scraped infront on the cyclist.

This is the reality of selfish motorists in this country.