Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think maternity leave should be capped at 6 months to protect small businesses?

165 replies

YourOpalLeader · 04/04/2025 15:37

Hear me out before throwing things! I work for a small business, and every time someone goes on maternity leave, it causes massive disruption. Hiring temps who don’t know the role, training them, juggling workloads - it can’t always be absorbed. I completely understand that maternity leave is a right but should it really be up to 12 months? For SMEs, it’s almost impossible. AIBU to think six months should be the limit, with the rest unpaid or taken as shared parental leave?

OP posts:
MoreDangerousThanAWomanScorned · 04/04/2025 21:26

Gogogo12345 · 04/04/2025 21:22

That's jumped up a lot. From 2 weeks up to 37

Actually, sorry, it could be 50 weeks off, for 37 of which the man would get pay. With shared leave you share what would be the maternity leave (39 weeks statutory pay, 52 weeks leave) between the couple as you like, except the woman has to have the first two weeks. Very few people do split it so the man does 50 weeks, but it's possible. When we did shared parental leave I had 6 months and then DH had 4. I don't think his employer was absolutely delighted, but so it goes!

Gogogo12345 · 04/04/2025 21:35

MoreDangerousThanAWomanScorned · 04/04/2025 21:26

Actually, sorry, it could be 50 weeks off, for 37 of which the man would get pay. With shared leave you share what would be the maternity leave (39 weeks statutory pay, 52 weeks leave) between the couple as you like, except the woman has to have the first two weeks. Very few people do split it so the man does 50 weeks, but it's possible. When we did shared parental leave I had 6 months and then DH had 4. I don't think his employer was absolutely delighted, but so it goes!

That's actually very interesting. I think my daughter might like to know that as she's chomping at the bit to return to work and her husband is lower paid.

Stompythedinosaur · 04/04/2025 21:41

I say the same to this as I say to business owners who "can't afford" to pay minimum wage.

If your business is only sustainable by reducing worker's legal rights, then it isn't sustainable. Best wind it up and try again with a better business model. The issue is the lack of profit of the company, not workers exercising their legal rights.

I've heard so many people use the "small businesses' card, and yet miraculously dp and the numerous other small business owners I know manage to treat staff decently and still survive.

MoreDangerousThanAWomanScorned · 04/04/2025 21:42

Gogogo12345 · 04/04/2025 21:35

That's actually very interesting. I think my daughter might like to know that as she's chomping at the bit to return to work and her husband is lower paid.

https://www.gov.uk/shared-parental-leave-and-pay

She can check eligibility there. I think it's a great thing and a shame so few couples use it. I honestly think it was one of the most important factors in making us genuinely equal parents.

Shared Parental Leave and Pay

You can start Shared Parental Leave (SPL) and Statutory Shared Parental Pay (ShPP) if you're eligible and you or your partner ends your maternity or adoption leave early - eligibility, entitlement, starting SPL and splitting blocks of leave

https://www.gov.uk/shared-parental-leave-and-pay

TempestTost · 04/04/2025 21:56

I don't know why you are getting so much trouble, OP, because while I don't think the answer is cutting maternity leaves, I also think that in some small businesses it can be a really serious problem. It's not crazy to notice it's a problem.

In some cases it works fine, there isn't a serious issue finding people to fill the place, they have the skills needed, and sometimes it can be a good chance for the employee to gain some skills or experience without a commitment on either side.

But in some businesses, particularly ones that require an unusual skill set, or a lot of continuity, and especially if the profit margins are also tight, it's an issue.

TempestTost · 04/04/2025 21:57

Stompythedinosaur · 04/04/2025 21:41

I say the same to this as I say to business owners who "can't afford" to pay minimum wage.

If your business is only sustainable by reducing worker's legal rights, then it isn't sustainable. Best wind it up and try again with a better business model. The issue is the lack of profit of the company, not workers exercising their legal rights.

I've heard so many people use the "small businesses' card, and yet miraculously dp and the numerous other small business owners I know manage to treat staff decently and still survive.

I there any set of legal rights the state could grant workers that you feel would be too onerous for businesses?

RightThenFred · 04/04/2025 22:00

TempestTost · 04/04/2025 21:56

I don't know why you are getting so much trouble, OP, because while I don't think the answer is cutting maternity leaves, I also think that in some small businesses it can be a really serious problem. It's not crazy to notice it's a problem.

In some cases it works fine, there isn't a serious issue finding people to fill the place, they have the skills needed, and sometimes it can be a good chance for the employee to gain some skills or experience without a commitment on either side.

But in some businesses, particularly ones that require an unusual skill set, or a lot of continuity, and especially if the profit margins are also tight, it's an issue.

The thing is, any member of staff could leave for any reason. They could get a new job, move away, go on long-term sick leave, get hit by a bus. Any business which is relying on having no staff turnover is skating on thin ice. If the roles are so specialised, they need to plan for this proactively, not act blindsided when it happens. At least with mat leave there's plenty of warning, and you get your employee back at the end of it.

I would also add - is it actually a problem? Compared to the alternatives, which could be more women simply not coming back to work (and the employer has to find someone new)? Given that women have babies, and that women are half the population, pregnancy will always affect business one way or another.

SCWS · 04/04/2025 22:01

Fuck no.

I was off April 2016 to July 2017. I had the best time.

UrinalCake · 04/04/2025 22:01

TempestTost · 04/04/2025 21:56

I don't know why you are getting so much trouble, OP, because while I don't think the answer is cutting maternity leaves, I also think that in some small businesses it can be a really serious problem. It's not crazy to notice it's a problem.

In some cases it works fine, there isn't a serious issue finding people to fill the place, they have the skills needed, and sometimes it can be a good chance for the employee to gain some skills or experience without a commitment on either side.

But in some businesses, particularly ones that require an unusual skill set, or a lot of continuity, and especially if the profit margins are also tight, it's an issue.

OP is getting trouble because she's completely ignored people pointing out the issues her proposals would cause for small businesses and not engaged with any of the other ideas people have proposed.

Scottishshopaholic · 04/04/2025 22:06

Should smalls businesses be exempt from allowing time off for long term sickness as well?

I agree that if your business isn’t sustainable enough to employ people legally than it isn’t one worth having. If you can’t afford to give your PAYE employees their legal rights then hire people as contractors as you need them. Then maybe you’ll find that this works out more expensive, you don’t have the loyalty and the quality of people isn’t as good as it isn’t as attractive a role.

Shallana · 04/04/2025 22:25

What are you actually suggesting/asking OP? Your original AIBU was should we cap maternity leave at 6 months. You then suggest maternity leave shouldn't be capped, but that pay should be capped. You've backtacked further stating that you are not suggesting that mother's should be forced back to work after 6 months at all, but questioning whether there should be more structural support for small businesses.

As other posters have pointed out, small businesses are already entitled to reimbursement of matenity pay, and shared parental leave exists. Your complaint is about business disruption, however it's not the states' nor the employee's job to manage your organisational structure - recruitment/reorganisational, training and managing workload is entirely the responsibility of the business owners/management team.

There are already many options available to you to cover maternity leave - fixed term contracts, agency staff, secondments, stepping up. It really isn't clear what further 'support' could be offered that doesn't water down women's maternity rights.

Rachaelsyndrome · 04/04/2025 22:40

Snugglemonkey · 04/04/2025 16:22

No. I think that statutory maternity pay should be extended to a full year, making it easier for women to take the full time.

I agree but would also extend this to SSP which I would make equivalent to SMP, as it is currently significantly lower.

DazzlingCuckoos · 07/04/2025 11:03

RedToothBrush · 04/04/2025 16:49

I was told in no uncertain terms by a previous employer that if I got pregnant he would sack me because he couldn't afford to plan for it.

I left eventually (before getting pregnant) his business went under within 12 months. Someone was doing the work of about three people and he broke them

Edited

We were having a conversation at work last week where we were saying that employee protections have rightly been brought in to protect employees from dodgy employers, but your point just proves what I also said in that it doesn't actually stop them!

Bigger employers can effectively do what they want by paying people off and the dodgy employers just get rid of who they want and deal with any consequences later.

Being a good, honest employer is really hard because we follow the rules, but it then ends up being really difficult to get rid of a poor performing employee that you know the dodgy employer would just chuck out the door.

That said, your previous employer obviously got his comeuppance, though it's a shame for your former colleagues that it came to that point.

JHound · 07/04/2025 12:14

I will say though much as I think maternity is needed too many companies don’t properly cover it. In a number of our teams they just shrug and expect other staff to cover despite not having enough people before staff go on parental leave.

BeesAndCrumpets · 07/04/2025 12:29

YourOpalLeader · 04/04/2025 16:39

I hear you and I’d never suggest separating a mother from her baby at that stage just for convenience. I’m not dismissing how physically and emotionally demanding it is to care for a 6 month old, especially if breastfeeding is still central.

What I’m questioning is whether there’s a better way to support everyone, including businesses, so that maternity leave isn’t something that places disproportionate strain on one side or the other. If we want parents to be supported properly, that means everyone needs to be supported: the mother, the baby, and yes - the business trying to keep going while that parent’s away.

I’m not calling for a rigid 6 month cut off. I’m raising the question of whether more flexibility and shared support could make things fairer for all involved. This isn’t about taking anything away - it’s about making the system work better.

You allow the mother to choose what's best for her and her child and then you, as a small business owner, make arrangements for your business.

(I have been a small business owner.)

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread