Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Maxie Allen and Rosalind Levine arrested - The vindictiveness of the school and police overreach

484 replies

Everanewbie · 01/04/2025 08:45

AIBU to worry that this type of incident seems to be happening more and more? To me, there are several concerning aspects to this story. Here is a link if you aren't yet aware.

www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2025/mar/29/parents-arrested-by-hertfordshire-police-for-complaining-about-daughters-school

Firstly, the apparent opaqueness of a public organisation and attempts to shut down private conversation and the vindictiveness the school has shown in attempting to silence this couple.

Secondly, the treatment of the pupil whereby she is being dropped off an escorted into school, and inability to discuss he disability and SEN with teachers, leading to multiple emails that were ultimately used against the couple.

And thirdly, WTF are the police doing? 6 Officers to arrest a meek professional couple, in front of their daughter. Holding them in a cell for 11 hours? Why are the police not dismissing this out of hand? I have always tried to be a supporter of the police, but how can reasonable people continue to accept this when they wont attend a burglary or detain shoplifters, but turn up in force for a middle class couple who called a governor a control freak in a private conversation?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
17
User46576 · 02/04/2025 13:08

whippy1981 · 02/04/2025 13:02

The parents admitted they were name calling and so the school have every right to challenge that and ask parents to stop.

They asked for such communications to stop which they have every right to stop bullying which name calling is - unless you think it is ok for name calling to go on?

The whatsapp shows they were name calling the staff. They admit it in the whatsapp. The whatsapp literally shows that one parents admits to being mean to the staff. They even say "One of the school mums said something mean about me" So they are admitting they were insulting towards the school staff. Why should schools put up with that level of behaviour? It is harmful to adults as well as children and it also models bullying to the children.

Edited

They called a senior teacher a “control freak” on a parent’s private whatsapp group. No teachers were on the group.

I don’t consider that bullying and it’s certainly not unlawful. They were discussing management of their local school where their daughter attended. Entirely fair enough

Wishyouwerehere50 · 02/04/2025 13:11

User46576 · 01/04/2025 09:23

agree op - Andrew Gold did an interview with the Dad involved on his podcast/you Tube channel Heretics.

It’s genuinely shocking the reaction from the school to some fairly mild criticism in a private whatsapp group. Further there’s no doubt their behaviour in banning the parents from the school for no good reason (because they criticised the board for appointing the deputy head as head teacher instead of having a proper external process) has the potential to be harmful to their child (who has SEN and epilepsy). Absolutely appalling behaviour from police and school imo.

https://youtube.com/@andrewgoldheretics?si=8nkF0IScTWy50q2Q

I watched this yesterday. I was inclined to feel the parents are originally irritating busy bodies. Their concern regarding the appointment of a new Head -:I would have liked more information on that.

I am someone who feels you have to be careful what you say on a group like the school one. Reason being, if you're a person of influence ( the parents really are) it doesn't feel right that they're slating individual people in this collective group that can influence and impact. Texting your friend - well that's different.

I've had personal nightmares with schools especially a very problematic SENCO as a fellow parent to a SEN child. I would not engage in this group criticising ever. But - I don't fully appreciate yet everything that has gone down in this case.

I do know that schools do close ranks, they are out their depth significantly with the high numbers of SEN pupils and do and will behave in ways that I personally find unacceptable. I understand elements of why. Teachers have too much to deal with and not enough resources, tools or understanding of all these diverse needs to manage it all.

The Police response - this feels ridiculous, pathetic and our police are a joke right now. It was an appalling use of resources and really unacceptable to subject the couple to it.

Is there more to this story? Possibly.

Lolapusht · 02/04/2025 13:12

Well here’s your direct quote where you’ve managed to assume it was an admission of being mean…

That story has more of the messages if anyone’s interested.

Maxie Allen and Rosalind Levine arrested - The vindictiveness of the school and police overreach
User46576 · 02/04/2025 13:12

whippy1981 · 02/04/2025 13:05

I've just quoted them direct where they admit to being insulting to staff. I am still waiting on the cctv and the emails from your mate.

You haven’t given any direct quotes at all as well you know.

The spiciest thing the parents said was to call the deputy head a “control freak”. If you don’t know the facts, look into as I said and stop making stuff up.

whippy1981 · 02/04/2025 13:15

User46576 · 02/04/2025 13:08

They called a senior teacher a “control freak” on a parent’s private whatsapp group. No teachers were on the group.

I don’t consider that bullying and it’s certainly not unlawful. They were discussing management of their local school where their daughter attended. Entirely fair enough

I am yet to see the evidence you keep on about which shows this is the only thing said to the school. Odd you refuse to share still.

Nope that isn't bullying as bullying is repeated and on purpose and one which you think is perfectly acceptable to be done on social media. Again please show the evidence! is this the 5th time?

Also no comment on the lies you made up?

The recruitment process is acceptable to be discussed. Again I never said it couldn't be. Why are you lying again!

User46576 · 02/04/2025 13:17

whippy1981 · 02/04/2025 13:07

The parents can criticise them but when it is breaches the law then it falls under harassment laws and the parents then have to accept what comes with it. Sadly teachers are not whipping dogs for you and the public. By all means if you support internet bullying then ask for the school social media policy to be changed so the kids can say what they want about other kids. Parents soon realise the impact when it is the kids who are victims of this. Teachers are humans too and the impact is also seen in schools.

If that is the case then imagine when the parents complain next about their child being name called on social media - school could then say sorry you pushed for free speech on social media to never be held to account so no can do.

I have not said the parents are vile or toxic. Again more lies. Why do you keep lying? What do you hope to achieve?

Edited

Discussing your local school and even criticizing the staff in a private parent’s whatsapp group isn’t harassment or unlawful in any way. We all have to accept that people may criticize us -that just part of being an adult. It’s particularly important that people can discuss and raise concerns about public services including conduct of teaching staff.

whippy1981 · 02/04/2025 13:17

User46576 · 02/04/2025 13:12

You haven’t given any direct quotes at all as well you know.

The spiciest thing the parents said was to call the deputy head a “control freak”. If you don’t know the facts, look into as I said and stop making stuff up.

I did as I copied it directly from the whatsapp! So now you are saying the parents are liars?! Which is it?

I have asked for the emails and CCTV and yet no one has produced these. By all means share. I didn't make it up, I copied it directly from the whatsapp! Seems you haven't read things yourself!

User46576 · 02/04/2025 13:18

Also - @whippy1981 check your posts re your claims that you didn’t call the parents vile and toxic. Obviously it’s there in black and white

Lolapusht · 02/04/2025 13:19

whippy1981 · 02/04/2025 13:07

The parents can criticise them but when it is breaches the law then it falls under harassment laws and the parents then have to accept what comes with it. Sadly teachers are not whipping dogs for you and the public. By all means if you support internet bullying then ask for the school social media policy to be changed so the kids can say what they want about other kids. Parents soon realise the impact when it is the kids who are victims of this. Teachers are humans too and the impact is also seen in schools.

If that is the case then imagine when the parents complain next about their child being name called on social media - school could then say sorry you pushed for free speech on social media to never be held to account so no can do.

I have not said the parents are vile or toxic. Again more lies. Why do you keep lying? What do you hope to achieve?

Edited

Well, you did use the terms “vile” and “toxic” in relation to parents’ WhatsApp groups. Maybe you didn’t mean the couple in particular, but you have referred to “parents” as vile and toxic 🤷🏻‍♀️

Actually, just read it again and it reads as though you are saying this couple are toxic.

User46576 · 02/04/2025 13:21

whippy1981 · 02/04/2025 13:17

I did as I copied it directly from the whatsapp! So now you are saying the parents are liars?! Which is it?

I have asked for the emails and CCTV and yet no one has produced these. By all means share. I didn't make it up, I copied it directly from the whatsapp! Seems you haven't read things yourself!

I can’t really follow what you’re saying. There are no quotes from the parents posted by you.

As I said, there are numerous links to sources on this thread, please feel free to read. I won’t be doing it for you.

whippy1981 · 02/04/2025 13:23

User46576 · 02/04/2025 13:17

Discussing your local school and even criticizing the staff in a private parent’s whatsapp group isn’t harassment or unlawful in any way. We all have to accept that people may criticize us -that just part of being an adult. It’s particularly important that people can discuss and raise concerns about public services including conduct of teaching staff.

I actually stated in my first sentence that parents can criticise. Did you not read those first few words?

However I said at some points that can become harassment and unlawful so yes that is the case.

Oh by all means people can discuss teaching staff but when that breaches the law then the staff have a right to act on that.

whippy1981 · 02/04/2025 13:25

User46576 · 02/04/2025 13:21

I can’t really follow what you’re saying. There are no quotes from the parents posted by you.

As I said, there are numerous links to sources on this thread, please feel free to read. I won’t be doing it for you.

Yes there was! I won't be copying it for you! In your spirit of things!

I've asked many a time for the links you have failed and the ones on the thread are not what I have asked for so I assume you lied about having hold of CCTV and emails as you have proven you have lied multiple times already today.

Which you have still failed to address and just deflected from!

User46576 · 02/04/2025 13:26

whippy1981 · 02/04/2025 13:23

I actually stated in my first sentence that parents can criticise. Did you not read those first few words?

However I said at some points that can become harassment and unlawful so yes that is the case.

Oh by all means people can discuss teaching staff but when that breaches the law then the staff have a right to act on that.

Edited

In this case there as no breach of the law nor harassment. Yet the school sent them a letter then got the police to arrest them and lock them up.

Thats why people are upset. Because it’s absolutely crazy in a free society to have six police officers at your door who lock you in a cell for six hours because of criticism of a public body in a private discussion.

User46576 · 02/04/2025 13:30

whippy1981 · 02/04/2025 13:25

Yes there was! I won't be copying it for you! In your spirit of things!

I've asked many a time for the links you have failed and the ones on the thread are not what I have asked for so I assume you lied about having hold of CCTV and emails as you have proven you have lied multiple times already today.

Which you have still failed to address and just deflected from!

Edited

I think you just don’t seem to know the facts here - you’ve made repeated claims that just aren’t accurate. Please look up the many links on this thread as I suggested.

I have not made any claims to have “hold of cctv” etc never mind lied about it! Please just go look it up - I’m not responding further

whippy1981 · 02/04/2025 13:33

User46576 · 02/04/2025 13:26

In this case there as no breach of the law nor harassment. Yet the school sent them a letter then got the police to arrest them and lock them up.

Thats why people are upset. Because it’s absolutely crazy in a free society to have six police officers at your door who lock you in a cell for six hours because of criticism of a public body in a private discussion.

I'm still waiting on your CCTV and emails to show that they stopped harassing them when they asked. Given they gloated about wanting to carry on I would assume they did do! You say you have evidence they stopped? Stopped what?

whippy1981 · 02/04/2025 13:36

User46576 · 02/04/2025 13:30

I think you just don’t seem to know the facts here - you’ve made repeated claims that just aren’t accurate. Please look up the many links on this thread as I suggested.

I have not made any claims to have “hold of cctv” etc never mind lied about it! Please just go look it up - I’m not responding further

I have looked them up and none of them show what you have said you have on them. You said you know everything and have records of every conversation etc. Yet are unwilling to share them.

You said you know ALL the facts meaning you saw or have seen every conversation and communication relating to this. Hence the CCTV comment. If you have not seen the conversations which would be either seen in person or on ccvt then you lied again. As is the norm for you.

By all means leave because I held you to account for fabricating things and kept deflecting onto other topics.

whippy1981 · 02/04/2025 13:43

Lolapusht · 02/04/2025 13:19

Well, you did use the terms “vile” and “toxic” in relation to parents’ WhatsApp groups. Maybe you didn’t mean the couple in particular, but you have referred to “parents” as vile and toxic 🤷🏻‍♀️

Actually, just read it again and it reads as though you are saying this couple are toxic.

I never said the parents are vile so you lied. You are muddling me with someone else I reckon. I said whatsapp groups are toxic. You saw two words and lied because you wanted to make me out to be a bad person in relation to these parents. This shows how easily ppl can and do lie about others.

Maybe you should criticise your teachers as they failed to teach you to read.

Lolapusht · 02/04/2025 13:46

Lolapusht · 02/04/2025 13:19

Well, you did use the terms “vile” and “toxic” in relation to parents’ WhatsApp groups. Maybe you didn’t mean the couple in particular, but you have referred to “parents” as vile and toxic 🤷🏻‍♀️

Actually, just read it again and it reads as though you are saying this couple are toxic.

Really??

Maxie Allen and Rosalind Levine arrested - The vindictiveness of the school and police overreach
Maxie Allen and Rosalind Levine arrested - The vindictiveness of the school and police overreach
whippy1981 · 02/04/2025 13:46

Lolapusht · 02/04/2025 13:45

This interview has WhatsApp messages and copies of the letters sent by the school

9]]

I've seen those. I've asked for the other evidence. By all means post those.

Lolapusht · 02/04/2025 13:47

Dude, I’m done.

That is all the evidence. Until the school publishes details and examples of the abusive behaviour, what is in that video is IT.

I’m afraid it is impossible to discuss this with you.

whippy1981 · 02/04/2025 13:53

Lolapusht · 02/04/2025 13:47

Dude, I’m done.

That is all the evidence. Until the school publishes details and examples of the abusive behaviour, what is in that video is IT.

I’m afraid it is impossible to discuss this with you.

So all evidence hasn't been seen then! Thank you for admitting that you've just seen selected parts and accepted that without seeing the rest.

Have a nice day. If by any chance you wish to debate further, accept that people can say things that you disagree with! Quite the irony eh?!

Judellie · 02/04/2025 13:56

I thought Academies weren't public authoritiesand didn't really have to answer to anyone? For this reason, I believe schools should have stayed under LEA control.

noblegiraffe · 02/04/2025 14:01

User46576 · 01/04/2025 09:24

Is that the one by the teachers union poster?

It’s my thread, I’m not a ‘teachers union poster’, and I said in my OP I don’t think the police should have been sent round.

Yorkshirelass04 · 02/04/2025 14:08

I agree that 6 police officers appears heavy handed, however the parents seem aggressive and entitled. They had already been banned from school events and not got the message?
I don't feel sorry for them.

If they were working class people would assume they were grubby chavs with no morals who needed a talking to by the police.