Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

3d/4d scans

41 replies

spogs · 14/05/2008 19:56

anyone had one if so where and were they happy????

OP posts:
spogs · 14/05/2008 20:02

3d/4d scans agree??? or not????

OP posts:
Broodymomma · 14/05/2008 20:05

I had one with my son. Little monkey hid his face in the placenta the whole time so for us was not great but I know loads of people who have had excellent 4d scans.

spogs · 14/05/2008 20:08

hi where did you have it done and how much?

OP posts:
Klaw · 14/05/2008 20:12

I disagree with unecessary scans because no-one can tell us for sure if they are safe. There is a body of thought that says we should not be subjecting our foetuses to a huge amount of radiation/sound waves/whatever because we truly are not aware of the possible long term affects. I could find and post links that discuss this if you want...

IF there is good medical reason to scan ie, IUGR, previous pg problems etc then it may be a risk worth taking in these cases but I don't think we should be doing so many routine scans and 3D/4D just to have a nosey at the baby goes against the grain for me, I'm afraid.

If I had another baby I would certainly be refusing the dating scan and sticking to basic anomoly scan and any that are medically necessary.

My personal opinion, that's all

spogs · 14/05/2008 20:23

but i have heard some people it helps with the bonding process etc
have you ever had one ?

OP posts:
ChukkyPig · 14/05/2008 20:51

Hi Spogs

Have you had the usual NHS scans yet? They were incredible as far as I was concerned, the little baby (didn't find out the gender) was wriggling it's little heart out and me and DH were transfixed. After that I don't really see the need for paying for extra ones.

If you've already had other babies/scans then it's up to you whether you want to pay to see more I suppose! If it's your first, maybe see how the NHS ones go. I promise that any pics in utero will be swiftly surpassed by the 6 million snaps of the little one when it arrives!!

Klaw · 14/05/2008 20:52

No, I haven't . Can't justify paying for it.

Anyway bonding is done perfectly well in the first few hours after birth when your hormones are raging and doing just that! This link tells you how your hormones work in labour and the first hour after birth, so will hopefully explain what I mean.

I'm just saying I wouldn't have one and why. You asked for opinions and hopefully, with a variety from people, you will make the right choice for you

Klaw · 14/05/2008 20:54

BTW I had four normal scans with my dd for one reason or another so it's not as if I don't understand how nice it is to see baby. Just that with a little hindsight I would have declined at least one of them.

Chequers · 14/05/2008 20:55

Message withdrawn

2boys2 · 14/05/2008 20:57

i have had one.

It was ok but i did feel alittle disapointed

with the quality but it was also a once in

a life time thing to get the chance of having done.

I also wanted my ds2 to have something of

his "own" as everything else he would be

using would be hand downs from ds1. I also

wanted to find out the gender

spogs · 14/05/2008 21:06

where did you go ?

OP posts:
bruhaha · 14/05/2008 21:11

i had one done - because i had a lot of stress at the beginning of my pregnancy i was convinced there was something wrong with my baby - he was fine. He hid himself in the placenta as well so only got half his face but that was enough to reassure me.

i wouldn't have it done again if i had another pregnancy though.

i got mine done in glasgow

spogs · 14/05/2008 21:13

why would you not do it again ?

OP posts:
trixymalixy · 14/05/2008 21:15

I paid for a 20 week anomaly scan because you don't get them on the NHS where I live.

TIt was only supposed to be 2D, but the consultant doing the scan did a bit of 3D/4D for free.

I wasn't interested in paying for 3d/4d because I thought it looked a bit freaky, but it was sooo exciting, so much better than a 2D scan.

trixymalixy · 14/05/2008 21:16

I got mine done in Glasgow too bruhahah!!

bruhaha · 14/05/2008 21:21

i just wouldn't see the need second time round. It was our first and i was desperate to know everything was ok - we only get one scan here and wanted to be sure.

If it was my first all over again then i would get it done

2boys2 · 14/05/2008 21:22

had mine done in northampton

Moorhen · 15/05/2008 12:54

I paid for a nuchal fold test at Fetal Medicine Centre in London and got some 3D/4D (don't know if it was free, but wasn't expecting it). It was lovely! So exciting, really brought home that there was an actual little baby in there.

Expensive, yes, but probably would do it again.

squiffy · 16/05/2008 10:16

with my 8th pg (after 7 m/cs) I was scanned more or less every fortnight to make sure no problems, and it was fantastic to see baby growing and to know everything was fine. But I would never do it out of choice - there is clear statistical evidence to show that in every country where routine scanning has been introduced (even if just one or twice in pg), there is a leap in the number of children who are left-handed. So there is known to be a neurological effect of some kind (no-one knows quite how/what changes). Obviously the later in the pg the lesser effect because most of the neruon devt is in the first trimestar, but just not worth it IMHO.

spogs · 16/05/2008 11:53

which clinical papers did you see this in I have never heard of such nonsense

OP posts:
squiffy · 16/05/2008 12:00

here, for one

squiffy · 16/05/2008 12:03

Oh, and here

spogs · 16/05/2008 12:03

that is not clinical mere media.......

OP posts:
StarlightMcKenzie · 16/05/2008 12:03

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn

Stroppyknickers · 16/05/2008 12:05

We had one and it was great, at 24 weeks. We had the anomaly scan done privately. Also, when a problem was detected, it was quite good not to feel rushed, and to be in comfortable surroundings. Not being preachy, but remember that they might tell you something unexpected.