I realise I’m late to the party on this. Just listened to the interview they did on Piers Morgan. They’re really bad at interviews, not sure why they keep doing them.
Controversially I kind of get what they’re saying though?
He raised money for charity. Good for him (I didn’t get the hype about it at all - a man walking round his garden? But he raised money so fair play). Then signed book deals which were for him personally to earn money from. Again fine in my opinion. Then he died and wanted his family to cash in on his fame.
I may well be missing out on other information here (I haven’t followed it all that closely) but if I was in his shoes you better believe I’d want my family to cash in if I died. Squeeze every penny from my name that you can.
I think the problem the family have is that the public think every penny earned from his name should go to charity and they’re saying no, the charity and the money making stuff are 2 separate things.
Anyone more informed about this than me want to set me straight? Or who just disagrees with me on this?