Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think the NHS is bloated with unnecessary management while frontline staff - doctors and nurses - are overworked and overpaid?

162 replies

AlertBird · 20/03/2025 13:46

It seems like every time the NHS is in crisis (which is always), the conversation turns to needing more funding. But where does that money actually go? It feels like the system is overloaded with layers of management, bureaucracy, and admin roles that don’t directly contribute to patient care, while the people actually keeping the NHS running - doctors, nurses, and other frontline staff - are stretched to their limits and underpaid.

I’m not saying all management is useless but has it gone too far? Shouldn’t more of the money be going to patient care and those who actually treat patients rather than creating more high-paid managerial roles?

AIBU to think the NHS has become a bloated system where too many people exist just to justify their own jobs?

OP posts:
Zebedee999 · 20/03/2025 23:00

Glowingworms · 20/03/2025 18:05

I'd argue some of that is lack of hr support.

You have nurses for example in charge of managing if someone is following sickness policy which is unlikely to be their natural skill set, then when you want to proceed you obviously need hr support. But in my many trusts this is surprisingly limited.

In my areas for example we have 1 part time hr advisor and a shared one with the other half on the trust. We have a staff group bigger than many national businesses, for example wh smith (all employees from truck drivers, to senior staff to shop workers). In no world would WH smith be expected to function with approximately 1 full time equivalent hr person.

I got to where i am (id like to think) because I was strong clinically. I got promoted up in steps from entry level jobs. At no point have I had any hr training, I've been left to read policies and implement them. For example I'm now expected to write building risk assessments, then bollocked when someone complains about disabled access. The trust doesn't own the building, the only disabled loo has been blocked for an age, and I'm spending lots of clinical time chasing it because recently they slashed corporate pushing more facilities, hr style stuff onto clinical managers

Ironically my role is actually a clinical one but by virtue of them axing the managerial one those tasks fall to the senior clinicians

Edited

I just had a look on line and it seems there are 16,000 HR staff in the NHS, about 1 per 88 staff. That's commensurate with various companies I've worked in.
How is it you're not getting your fair share?

Glowingworms · 20/03/2025 23:05

Zebedee999 · 20/03/2025 23:00

I just had a look on line and it seems there are 16,000 HR staff in the NHS, about 1 per 88 staff. That's commensurate with various companies I've worked in.
How is it you're not getting your fair share?

I wonder if that's centralised in nhs England also and also perhaps included things like hr admin, or people involved in other aspects?

For example we have a completely seperate team involved with recruitment checks, putting out job adverts, pay roll and policy writing. They probably come under human resources umbrella

I was specifically talking about hr advisors for things like sickness procedures and disciplinary measures. We also have a senior hr vacancy that's been unfilled (,ironically due to one leaving as a result of excess leave due to stress)

Fordian · 20/03/2025 23:21

jewelcase · 20/03/2025 22:42

But each of the 200 trusts is as big as a large company by itself. Trusts have £1bn turnovers, might have 10,000 staff, are hugely regulated and deliver literally life and death services. They are easily as big. As FTSE250 companies, far higher profile and with more complex services.

But it’s not profit making. You can’t compare them. They exist for different reasons.

Grammarnut · 20/03/2025 23:41

Admin is c. 2% apparently. It just seems topheavy, and also, admin posts are no longer filled by people with some understanding of medicine and clinical needs but people who think the NHS is a business.

Middlechild3 · 21/03/2025 04:18

MoreDangerousThanAWomanScorned · 20/03/2025 14:05

Yes, no one likes talking about this because it makes it sound like people are to blame for not dying, but the reason the NHS takes more and more money to do the same is an ageing population. I had a serious eye injury and almost everyone at the ophthalmology clinic was over 80, many older. Many of them were there for sight-saving procedures - this was a clear and real need. It was also a level of need for that service that just did not exist a few decades ago.

And many hospitals have research projects ultimately aiming at delaying death, for all age groups, as you could say all medical intervention does.

Carinattheliqorstore1 · 21/03/2025 04:45

The NHS is a massive organisation. Of course it’s going to require a significant number of management, admin and other support roles. I work in IT (not NHS) and can see that many NHS roles pay below market rate.

The reason the NHS is struggling is because of an ageing population: it’s a victim of its own success. And another problem is the expectation of a diagnosis for everything: even things that are just part of the human condition, or caused by issues in society.

Mespher · 21/03/2025 05:48

Sounds like they need more admin being paid around £25k and less being paid £100k

HelenWheels · 21/03/2025 05:51

i think it is the lack of any decision making which is a problem and the red tape

user1471497170 · 21/03/2025 06:08

I work in social care and work with NHS. I am amazed they are still spending money on posting letters to their stakeholders (social work) instead of sending emails. I simply don't know what to do with these letters as Wfh most of the time and trying to scan and then spend time shredding confidential waste is a faff. If they are wasting time and money on this what else are they wasting.

Nothanksiwillwalk · 21/03/2025 06:16

I work for the NHS and can clearly see the issues.

Poor digital infrastructure resulting in huge amount of manual admin processes
Governance processes are now really heavy and clinicians have to do all the investigations/reporting
Lengthly complex processes, we need good managers that can streamline and cut out the mess.

Alexandra2001 · 21/03/2025 06:32

Fordian · 20/03/2025 23:21

But it’s not profit making. You can’t compare them. They exist for different reasons.

But they still need managing, the vast amounts drugs ordered, bedding, pharmacies, procurement, mtce, ambulances, staff training, recruitment, pay roll, emergency planning....mobility equipment... operate a morgue, even run a helicopter!

Working with SS, Councils, Care homes, private care companies....

Your average SME will not being doing a fraction of that.

Look at Trump? sacking vast amounts of federal employees and then desperately trying to re recruit them back again.... often without success.

Very easy to destroy something, almost impossible to rebuild it back.

1457bloom · 21/03/2025 06:55

The big problem the NHS has is that it is almost impossible to fire anyone. As a result you have a lot of useless staff who wouldn’t last one week in a private organisation.

HelenWheels · 21/03/2025 07:10

it is shocking to me that some large london hospitals post their letters, do not have emails addresses quoted in the letters, perhaps too big and unwieldly to manage

jewelcase · 21/03/2025 07:10

Fordian · 20/03/2025 23:21

But it’s not profit making. You can’t compare them. They exist for different reasons.

Well, first off, it was you who compared them when you talked about NHS wages relative to engineering consultancy wages.

It seems to be a common tactic amongst the NHS Manager-sceptic community to make a point, have it debunked, and then say that’s not the point.

But regardless, your new argument seems to be that it’s OK for a profit making company to employ a top manager on £1m+, but you begrudge the same role in an NHS trust of the same size being paid one tenth as much? Even though the person concerned would be in charge of healing the sick, dealing with people in the last stages of life and the first of untold grief, bringing babies into the world, and spending £1bn of public money as wisely as possible?

It’s a bold take, I’ll give you that.

jewelcase · 21/03/2025 07:11

HelenWheels · 21/03/2025 07:10

it is shocking to me that some large london hospitals post their letters, do not have emails addresses quoted in the letters, perhaps too big and unwieldly to manage

Edited

Or perhaps their client group is overwhelmingly elderly and prefers real post? And perhaps it’s required for audit and information governance purposes?

jewelcase · 21/03/2025 07:12

1457bloom · 21/03/2025 06:55

The big problem the NHS has is that it is almost impossible to fire anyone. As a result you have a lot of useless staff who wouldn’t last one week in a private organisation.

I think the big problem in the NHS is an ageing population, costing way more to keep alive than could possibly be afforded.

But you do you…

Wintershealing · 21/03/2025 07:17

1457bloom · 21/03/2025 06:55

The big problem the NHS has is that it is almost impossible to fire anyone. As a result you have a lot of useless staff who wouldn’t last one week in a private organisation.

I agree and it's the same in councils; difficult to fire anyone/full sick pay from day one (which leads to so many lost days with some staff taking the piss) and so much dead wood.

HelenWheels · 21/03/2025 07:17

jewelcase · 21/03/2025 07:11

Or perhaps their client group is overwhelmingly elderly and prefers real post? And perhaps it’s required for audit and information governance purposes?

nope not in the area i work in but they dont even quote an email address in their letters.

shockeditellyou · 21/03/2025 07:34

user1471497170 · 21/03/2025 06:08

I work in social care and work with NHS. I am amazed they are still spending money on posting letters to their stakeholders (social work) instead of sending emails. I simply don't know what to do with these letters as Wfh most of the time and trying to scan and then spend time shredding confidential waste is a faff. If they are wasting time and money on this what else are they wasting.

In our trust we still have paper because an extremely vocal minority of our patient groups are tin foil hat nut jobs who refuse to support any move to digital systems because they refuse for their data to be handled electronically.

And if you think NHS management is expensive, you’ve never seen how bad clinical staff can be a managers, or how much time they waste on administration when it could be done by cheaper admin staff, who actually understand administration. This is not helped by the extremely snobbish attitude of some of my colleagues towards non-clinical staff.

HelenWheels · 21/03/2025 07:39

our letters are posted, there is no discussion around emailing letters, however our contacts are made very much by email.

Whyherewego · 21/03/2025 07:43

jewelcase · 20/03/2025 22:42

But each of the 200 trusts is as big as a large company by itself. Trusts have £1bn turnovers, might have 10,000 staff, are hugely regulated and deliver literally life and death services. They are easily as big. As FTSE250 companies, far higher profile and with more complex services.

Exactly this. In fact there is no single company in the UK that is the equivalent of the entire NHS. Shell has 100k employees, NHS has over 1.4m. Shell CEO is paid around £8m.
Honestly I wouldn't be the CEO of a trust if you paid me double their salary. Yes it's different because it's public sector and the pension is good, but I don't think VampVamp and others have actually thought what it means to be accountable officer for a trust.
And by the way VapeVamp the fact that NHS have project managers even though your company supplied project managers, I can confidently tell you that it's because your company PM does not do all the things that need doing. How do you think your invoices get paid? PM has to raise a PQ, confirm the work was done as per contract and then raise the PO and get the invoice paid. Who does all the risk management and governance which again is required of public sector as we can be FOId on this stuff? Who does the benefits tracking? It can't be left to the supplier as the trust would end up in the daily mail criticised for being hands off !

Radiatorvalves · 21/03/2025 07:48

InveterateWineDrinker · 20/03/2025 16:32

I can absolutely believe it. In January 2017 what was then Central Manchester Foundation NHS Trust advertised for an Assistant Director of Equality and Diversity (new post) who would report to the Associate Director of Inclusion. I can't recall exactly how many direct reports the Assistant Director would then have to hire but it was three or four. I recall totting up that the mid-point salary costs alone of this team would be close to £250k, before on costs.

It's scandalous. Equality and diversity requirements apply to the private sector too and no company would ever justify this. The existing management would learn to do it themselves, as part of their general duty.

Just on that point big companies do have DEI teams. I worked for one with c30,000 employees who had about 8 in the Inclusion team.

Choughinthemist · 21/03/2025 08:16

AlertBird · 20/03/2025 15:24

It’s not about targeting individual job titles but about questioning whether the balance is right. The NHS has a growing number of high-paid non-clinical roles while frontline staff are still stretched thin. For example, do we need so many senior managers and executives on six-figure salaries when A&E departments are chronically understaffed? The point isn’t that all management is bad but whether resources are being directed effectively.

You keep repeating this without actually giving anything solid that you’ve based on your opinion on. Just the hur dur too many managers.

Choughinthemist · 21/03/2025 08:18

Badbadbunny · 20/03/2025 16:15

Nail on the head. Always happens when they try to apply "open market" methodology to government controlled organisations. They're wrongly using "financial" yardsticks to measure performance etc by putting a price on everything, but the figures used are entirely artificial and you have a small army of people pushing money around, recording it, analysing it, reporting it, etc., but it's all artificial so completely pointless.

It's like the state controlled railways where there's a small army of admin staff charging between train operating companies and national rail, etc., when there are delays to "punish" the firm that caused the delay. Again, all entirely artificial, especially when national rail and some of the train operating companies are government owned/controlled, so again, just pushing money between different govt controlled bodies, recording it, analysing it, reporting, etc.

They really need to stop using "pretend" figures to measure performance. Financial performance figures works to evaluate performance, efficiency, etc out in the real world, in the open market, but it's just a pointless waste of time trying to play with pretend money (even if it's actually paid, it's still pretend in that the charges etc are manufactured in the artificial world, not real world). Just create performance targets etc based on actual performance and not pseudo cash.

All the different trusts are also arguing between themselves as to "whose budget" each treatment/service has to come out of, so you get GPs refusing to issue drugs requested by a hospital consultant claiming it should be the consultant who issues them and vice versa, same with blood tests - one dept won't do a blood test for another dept which is crazy as my OH has to go to two different places for his blood test to be done twice a month, yet it would save the NHS just to do it once and tick a few more boxes on the form - but because of fragmentation, neither dept wants to "pay" for tests for a different dept, so both depts end up "paying" - of course, if sanity prevailed, they'd come up with a compromise where OH alternated between depts month by month, but there's no "oversight" of common sense to let that kind of micro efficiency happen.

Edited

I 100% agree as someone who has worked in the NHS for 25 years, internal markets caused so many problems for us.

Alexandra2001 · 21/03/2025 08:20

Wintershealing · 21/03/2025 07:17

I agree and it's the same in councils; difficult to fire anyone/full sick pay from day one (which leads to so many lost days with some staff taking the piss) and so much dead wood.

Full sick pay from day one? nope, can take 5 years before the 6month full pay kicks in.

Or do you think a nurse who contracts Covid or another illness during her work should be on SSP and then sacked after 2 weeks? Maybe you do.

The processes and employment law for firing poorly performing staff is exactly the same in a private company as it is in the NHS....