Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Could this be classed as unfair dismissal.

19 replies

Tropical68 · 19/03/2025 15:58

Just wondering. If a 17 YO apprentice, is told they haven’t passed probation and they need to leave. They haven’t actually finished their probation yet, but they late to work today. But they said it’s because of her attendance. She did lose her nan who she lived with recently. It was unexpected and they woke up to her and she had to give her cpr so she has been through a lot and that’s the reason she had some time off.

OP posts:
Tropical68 · 19/03/2025 15:59

Btw other than that, no particular issues with the way they worked and did the job.

OP posts:
Whatevershallidowithmylife · 19/03/2025 16:01

No, they can let her go any time within first 2 years without a reason.

Flamingo68 · 19/03/2025 16:01

Google suggests they would have needed to be employed for 2 years first, so I don’t think so.

Tropical68 · 19/03/2025 16:03

I see. Thanks for the info. I didn’t know if there was some sort of thing to protect apprentices but I guess not

OP posts:
Whenyoupickapawpaw · 19/03/2025 16:04

No, they have less than 2 years service so cannot bring a claim. Plus there appears to be a fair reason i.e. lateness and poor attendance during their probation

itsgettingweird · 19/03/2025 16:09

Sadly no protection.

however consider it a blessing in disguise that they aren’t going to be employed by people who have no compassion towards a 17yo woke up to find their grandparent and have to try to provide CPR to them and watched them die.

roundaboutthehillsareshining · 19/03/2025 16:15

Apprenticeships are slightly different. They need to notify their learning provider that they have been dismissed (the employer may already have done this). There is then a 30 day "grace" period in the funding rules to allow the apprentice to find a new employer who wants to take the apprenticeship on. After this time, there is an allowable 3 month break in learning period to continue looking for a new employer, but during this time the apprentice will not attend with the learning provider. After this time, the apprenticeship will have to end.

Apprenticeship learning providers are usually very keen to continue apprenticeships if possible, so the learner in question here should contact their college/learning provider in the first instance for assistance.

Velmy · 19/03/2025 16:25

It depends on the type of apprenticeship they're on. If they are on an Apprenticeship Agreement, they can be terminated for any legal reason prior to 2 years full employment, just like any other employee.

However if they are under a Contract of Apprenticeship, they have additional rights and protections and can only be dismissed prior to the end of their apprenticeship in very limited circumstances. If they are dismissed outside these circumstances, they can claim for loss of earnings up to their apprenticeship end date.

Dig out the contract and find out which one it is, that'll give you more clarity.

EquinoxQueen · 19/03/2025 16:34

You have some good advice about contracts on a pp. Did your 17 year old communicate what had happened with their nan? Most employers would be very accommodating in this scenario so it feels as if there is something that doesn’t add up. Attendance can absolutely be a reason to not pass a standard probation period, are they consistently late? You say no particular issues which suggests there might be some?

are there other apprentices at the company? Can they discuss with Hr?

EquinoxQueen · 19/03/2025 16:38

Just to add, currently unfair dismissal within two years standard employment will be for very limited scenarios related to discrimination. So I doubt there would be a case if the contract is apprentice specific

Velmy · 19/03/2025 16:50

EquinoxQueen · 19/03/2025 16:38

Just to add, currently unfair dismissal within two years standard employment will be for very limited scenarios related to discrimination. So I doubt there would be a case if the contract is apprentice specific

There are different protections in place for some apprentices, depending on the type of apprenticeship they're on. If they're on a COA, sacking them almost always means paying out their full contract for the term of their apprenticeship.

EquinoxQueen · 19/03/2025 16:58

Velmy · 19/03/2025 16:50

There are different protections in place for some apprentices, depending on the type of apprenticeship they're on. If they're on a COA, sacking them almost always means paying out their full contract for the term of their apprenticeship.

My bad I missed out the ‘not’ in my final sentence!!! Agree it all comes down to the type of contract

Velmy · 19/03/2025 17:05

EquinoxQueen · 19/03/2025 16:58

My bad I missed out the ‘not’ in my final sentence!!! Agree it all comes down to the type of contract

This site could really do with an edit function! I refered to my partner as a him and a her by accident in a thread earlier today, MN must think I'm a bisexual bigamist 😂

roundaboutthehillsareshining · 19/03/2025 17:07

It is extremely unlikely that a young person is employed under a contract of apprenticeship, as this does not attract ESFA funding or is covered by the Levy...

LIZS · 19/03/2025 17:46

Did they follow appropriate absence procedures? I doubt one or two incidents lead to dismissal on their own but realistically unfair dismissal would not apply even during privation or apprenticeship within two years service unless there was a protected characteristic cited.

KrisAkabusi · 19/03/2025 18:28

Velmy · 19/03/2025 17:05

This site could really do with an edit function! I refered to my partner as a him and a her by accident in a thread earlier today, MN must think I'm a bisexual bigamist 😂

It does! Just click the three dots at the top of your post and click edit.

Velmy · 19/03/2025 18:55

KrisAkabusi · 19/03/2025 18:28

It does! Just click the three dots at the top of your post and click edit.

It doesn't here :-(

Could this be classed as unfair dismissal.
ShhhhhItsASurprise · 19/03/2025 18:57

Velmy · 19/03/2025 18:55

It doesn't here :-(

You only get 5 mins.

Redrosesposies · 19/03/2025 18:57

Velmy · 19/03/2025 18:55

It doesn't here :-(

The edit function is only there for a short time after you post.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread