Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Nobody is allowed to choose not to work. Fed up of hearing this expression.

697 replies

girlfriend44 · 18/03/2025 21:18

I keep hearing people say people who choose not to work. Target them.
Nobody is allowed to choose not to work. I wonder if some people actually know what they are talking about?

Nobody is allowed to just lounge around and not look for work.

Able bodied people on UC who don't have a paid job are harassed all the time.
They will probably be attending interviews at the jobcentre once a week, where they have to provide evidence they are jobsearching 35 hours a week.

They can be sanctioned over any little thing.
They have to attend any courses they are sent on, even if they are useless courses. Non attendance will end in a sanction.

The staff can arrange interviews on their behalf if the employer has a tie up with the jobcentre which some do.
If it's deemed you didn't try hard enough at the interview, the employer can discuss this with the staff,and you'll be hauled up and sanctioned for not trying.

Those who think people choose not to work please be educated.
It's a hostile environment for anyone out of work.
Not every able bodied person can find employment.
Your not just allowed to sit at home and choose not to work though.

You'll have a claimant commitment and you have to provide evidence of jobsearching. 35 hours too.

I think alot of people who comment don't really know. Everyone is under pressure.
The days of just signing on once a fortnight and not having to.prove your doing everything you can have long gone.

OP posts:
Blackbookofsmiles1 · 18/03/2025 22:52

You are so far wrong it’s actually amusing.

You tell yourself that if it makes you feel better, but I know people who can work but choose not too and live life on benefits.

Just to clarify for you further, the job centre or DWP see some claimants as low risk, so are not required to look for work if the benefit money is a low enough amount. I know a couple where the woman works full time but is on minimum wage, pays into a pension so only take home around 1500 a month, this is then topped up with UC of about £600. If the man worked too they wouldn’t get it, they get it because he doesn’t work. He is choosing to stay at home and not work, as it’s “only” £600 he doesn’t have to attend meetings or is even asked about applying for jobs, he is classed as low risk or something so doesn’t get pestered at all. It’s unbelievable as he can work but isn’t.

HuffleMyPuffle · 18/03/2025 22:53

That wasn't my experience when I had to sign on between jobs
The first 2/3 months I had to go weekly and then I dropped down to "less intensive" and only had to go in/do a phone call twice weekly
I was applying to plenty of jobs, it wasn't taking 35 hours a week by any stretch but showed up as plenty

I could easily see how people could game the system if they wanted

Crispynoodle · 18/03/2025 22:54

Genuine question how much are benefits actually worth? I get PIP due to having Rheumatoid Arthritis and constantly worry about being made to retire through ill health. I would never be able to manage on benefits if I had to. I do know that young people with MH problems sign themselves in to a local unit every time their PiP is due to be reassessed but can’t imagine having to cope with so little

OneAmberFinch · 18/03/2025 22:55

I've noticed a theme in a lot of the benefits threads here and elsewhere the last few days.

"You guys just don't understand, it's really hard, we have to fill in a page of diary entries / spend 20 hours filling out the application forms / call an advisor occasionally!"

Yeah okay, I have to work a 50h+ work week. Every week. Plus commute.

Worriedatwork1 · 18/03/2025 22:56

Wakeywake · 18/03/2025 22:45

I think you're missing the point here. My acquaintance was actively applying only for positions he knew he wasn't qualified for. Like he'd go on indeed and apply for 20 truck driver jobs when he didn't have a license. He applied for a CFO position for a laugh. He wasn't job hunting. He was absolutely choosing not to work and thought it was such a good joke to tell people down the pub. The requirements are only hard when you're a genuine job seeker. When you're a piss taker, it's dead easy to play the system.

Having worked in recruitment I can confirm this happens all the time, blank application forms, applications off people with no relevant experience at all, multiple people who are shortlisted for jobs like cleaners and never turn up for interview even when chased - you can spot the ones doing it so that they are seen to apply for jobs

Ilikeadrink14 · 18/03/2025 22:57

Gemmawemma9 · 18/03/2025 21:21

But this is not the case for everyone.
i know someone who chooses not to work, she has literally no reason to other than she doesn’t want to. She’s qualified in nothing and doesn’t want to lower herself to working in a supermarket.
I am sick of it to be honest.

I’m sure supermarket workers will love your opinion of them!

LifeIsBadEnoughAlreadyWithoutThis · 18/03/2025 22:57

Dear employers.
I have triple organ failure, malignant hypertension and diabetes. I can only walk a few feet before collapsing.
I have to sleep for an hour every time I get up for a piss. Going for a shit takes me an hour and four hours sleep to recover from. I'm not legally allowed to drive. I don't have the strength to push my own wheelchair. I'm in so much pain I can't even tolerate moderate sound. I regularly shout at people because I can't cope with the suffering and be polite at the same time. Sometimes I can't remember simple words. I'm fully lucid for about two hours a day. It's random and only if conditions are just so and often in the middle of the night when the tablet's side effects are wearing off. I used to be fit and quite intelligent. Can I have a job. Maybe, a public facing role. I smell a bit like shit, piss and infected pus sometimes and all my teeth fell out but I have to do my part for society. Go on. Pleease

P.S. This is true, my life, not hyperbole.

Narwhalsh · 18/03/2025 22:59

Honestly if someone is genuinely spending 35 hours a week working on getting a job for a long time (months) and not getting any job offers then they are performing very poorly at that role! Sounds to me like they are purposefully incompetent

Littletreefrog · 18/03/2025 23:00

LifeIsBadEnoughAlreadyWithoutThis · 18/03/2025 22:57

Dear employers.
I have triple organ failure, malignant hypertension and diabetes. I can only walk a few feet before collapsing.
I have to sleep for an hour every time I get up for a piss. Going for a shit takes me an hour and four hours sleep to recover from. I'm not legally allowed to drive. I don't have the strength to push my own wheelchair. I'm in so much pain I can't even tolerate moderate sound. I regularly shout at people because I can't cope with the suffering and be polite at the same time. Sometimes I can't remember simple words. I'm fully lucid for about two hours a day. It's random and only if conditions are just so and often in the middle of the night when the tablet's side effects are wearing off. I used to be fit and quite intelligent. Can I have a job. Maybe, a public facing role. I smell a bit like shit, piss and infected pus sometimes and all my teeth fell out but I have to do my part for society. Go on. Pleease

P.S. This is true, my life, not hyperbole.

I'm not sure anyone here has expressed the opinion that those with genuine illnesses and disabilities that mean they are incapable of working should not be supported by the relevant benefits. That's what they are there for.

Happilyobtuse · 18/03/2025 23:01

DurbevillesGirl2 · 18/03/2025 22:10

But isn’t being a mum a job in itself? Lots of full time mums not working who are supported by their partner and they aren’t forced to work. It’s only single mothers who a forced to find a job as soon as their children turn 3.

Well you only get to stay at home if you and your partner decide that works for your family. A lot of mums go back to work to support their families after having kids. If you are a single parent the onus is on you to provide for your child and ofcourse claim from the other parent of your child. But a lot of single parents think it is a right to sit at home, if you want to do that then find someone who will support you with that, it can’t be other tax payers. You chose to have a child, take responsibility for it.

LSTMS30555 · 18/03/2025 23:03

@girlfriend44 honestly wrong place to post this. MN's hate benefit claimants and for so many of them who apparently earn 6 figures and all the "nobody in my circle" brigade bullshitters they all seem to have a story of siblings/parent in laws/cousins/aunts/uncles or neighbours who definitely do choose not to work or fiddle or claim disability benefits.

glacancalman · 18/03/2025 23:06

DurbevillesGirl2 · 18/03/2025 22:45

This isn’t my experience of my social circle. Obviously, it’s not all mothers who get to be SAHMs but it’s not all mothers who have to work after maternity leave either. But neither are looked down upon for not working like single mothers and pressurised by both society and the government to find work.

Single mothers are not pressurised to find work. They don't even need to look for work until the youngest is 3, which I wholeheartedly agree with. They can't stay off work forever though, that wouldn't be fair on those parents who have to go out to work.

Mindgardner · 18/03/2025 23:06

Covid changed everything mostly phone service now.

Wexone · 18/03/2025 23:06

Ilikeadrink14 · 18/03/2025 22:57

I’m sure supermarket workers will love your opinion of them!

I think she is saying her friends opinion of supermarket workers not hers

Radionowhere · 18/03/2025 23:06

I know of someone in his 40's who has never worked a day in his life. He absolutely 100% is making a lifestyle choice.

0ohLarLar · 18/03/2025 23:08

If someone like my dad for example who worked all his life in manual work could no longer do that due to health, there’s no way he’d have got a job in an office or similar. He just wouldn’t have had the manner to do it.

But he couldn't do anything? Couldn't go work in a college training young people in his trade? Or work in a trade outfitters like wickes or the like?

I think we all have to be more open to doing different work if no longer suited to our first/preferred career. Sometimes that might also mean earning less - but surely better to earn something than nothing.

DurbevillesGirl2 · 18/03/2025 23:10

Happilyobtuse · 18/03/2025 23:01

Well you only get to stay at home if you and your partner decide that works for your family. A lot of mums go back to work to support their families after having kids. If you are a single parent the onus is on you to provide for your child and ofcourse claim from the other parent of your child. But a lot of single parents think it is a right to sit at home, if you want to do that then find someone who will support you with that, it can’t be other tax payers. You chose to have a child, take responsibility for it.

I have a partner. I was speaking on behalf of the woman the other poster was so bitterly jealous of. As if being a single mother and having to do everything yourself, barely getting by on benefits payments is a life to be so envious and enraged by.

hcdwys · 18/03/2025 23:11

my neighbour does. he openly talks about never working and playing the system. overheard him on the phone with someone recently telling them how to score points for pip and if they got it he wanted some of their backpay when they got it for helping them, seen him with my own eyes when someone from housing was coming to his house he called his ex and told her to drop two walking sticks off, she did, he then walked around hunched over with two sticks until housing officer left, sticks never to be seen again.

he's late 30s and never worked. he openly says to people theres nothing wrong with him, he openly calls the walking sticks 'pip sticks' he openly tells people how he scams the system.

as well as pip he is on uc and is classed as not fit to work.. its people like him they should be targeting not genuinly sick and disabled people.

GreenSkyes · 18/03/2025 23:12

I once sat in on an interview (training on doing them in future) and the person sat down and said, I'm only here because they said I need to attend interviews or they'd stop my money.🤣

Alternatively I went through a period of 7 months where I wanted to work but I just couldn't get an interview, it was soul destroying, I really did want to work.

Tellmemore16 · 18/03/2025 23:18

I know numerous people who go on to job sites and take a note of jobs and update their journal to say they have applied for them when they haven’t, no one checks. They don’t get sent on courses or interviews as standard as a lot of work coaches don’t care enough and just tick the box. Yes there will be some who go through it but for most part it’s pretty easy to claim. P.s I worked in DWP for 13 years so this comes from experience

0ohLarLar · 18/03/2025 23:18

they all seem to have a story of siblings/parent in laws/cousins/aunts/uncles or neighbours who definitely do choose not to work or fiddle or claim disability benefits.

I don't think people "choose not to work" or "fiddle".

I think people find work hard (don't we all). But some people give up a bit more easily if they can, and some people develop a self perpetuating mindset, one they truly believe, that they can't work.

I don't for a minute think anyone thinks "oh i'll pretend I've got anxiety to get benefits". I do think people struggle to contextualise, and get in a mentality of thinking that what others consider "normal" feelings of stress and worry in life, are "worse" for them. If you don't ever have to cope and soldier through, you don't recognise your own ability to do so. I thinka lot of people get trapped in a cycle of thinking they can't, and work is scary, and they can't manage it, then they haven't worked for a while and it's even more scary and unmanageable.

Then actually, they've not worked for ages and become less employable - so probably what's accessible to them is entry level/low paid. But what they've been receiving as tax free benefits actually works out as quite a bit more money than the minimum wage job that looks quite scary. So work is scary, and feels like you'll be worse off, so how are you supposed to manage and you can't etc and its overwhelming and anxiety provoking.

It's a trap and a lot of people are in it. What Liz Kendall is trying to do is get people out of it, and not let people get stuck in it to begin with, younger people especially.

Hwi · 18/03/2025 23:18

Utter bollocks

ammamug · 18/03/2025 23:19

Userlosername · 18/03/2025 21:45

I was on uc for a time op and that’s not my experience

My daughter was on UC and was penalised for doing her MA to improve her chances of getting off UC 🤷‍♀️.
We funded her studies ,she is now in a profession which is helping other people to improve their lives and got her off UC .

Crikeyalmighty · 18/03/2025 23:20

@girlfriend44 I think lots of the people posters are talking about are more often than not getting UC in relation to ‘health’ aspects rather than pure joblessness/between jobs- it’s quite amazing the number of people who can’t actually complete a decent application form or turn up on time but are more than capable of multiple hoop jumping with forms for cash that doesn’t require them to work and struggle with getting through life but seem to be quite capable when it comes to holidays or hobbies or meeting up with family.

im actually a centre left voter and I want more help for those genuinely needing help be it short term or long term , I am though very aware that there are many pisstakers around - a few of whom I know. One is a single mum, gets great maintenance, ( not counted against UC) her rent fully covered ( housing association) plus full amount of UC - both kids over 8 - she simply isn’t hassled- it’s come up in conversation before- as she says she would be receiving only about the same in a modest just aboveMW job and would be no better off at all - plus the hassle of school holidays etc. do I think it’s pisstake - yep, would I do same in her position- I’m honestly not sure .

two others I know Late 50s- haven’t worked since their 20s - both a bit odd I admit but savvy enough to make sure they got diagnosed that looking for a job was giving them severe anxiety - so now receive because of their health condition- both more than capable of working albeit not in every job- but both have developed 12o clock get up habits and lazyitis

its an epidemic sadly of people who if they can ‘get by’ on benefits can no longer be arsed- and whilst the OPs post may be what she has experienced I think that situation is very specific to claiming based on joblessness for non habitual claimers- not the true professionals who know every trick in the book !

BassesAreBest · 18/03/2025 23:21

0ohLarLar · 18/03/2025 23:08

If someone like my dad for example who worked all his life in manual work could no longer do that due to health, there’s no way he’d have got a job in an office or similar. He just wouldn’t have had the manner to do it.

But he couldn't do anything? Couldn't go work in a college training young people in his trade? Or work in a trade outfitters like wickes or the like?

I think we all have to be more open to doing different work if no longer suited to our first/preferred career. Sometimes that might also mean earning less - but surely better to earn something than nothing.

That simply isn’t possible for everyone, though.

Not every trade needs people to work in a college to train others and you probably don’t need that many people to do that anyway, even if everyone was suited to that.

I have an older relative (now retired) who did unskilled manual work all his working life. Possibly has a mild intellectual disability but never diagnosed. Never learnt to drive. There’s absolutely no way he could have retrained into anything but that type of work - yes, he could have transitioned to a different type of unskilled manual work, but when you become physically incapable of doing one type it tends to let most of the others out as well.

He would fall between the cracks of the system if he was a few years younger. Don’t think he could have carried on until 68 but (rightly) wouldn’t qualify for disability benefits as he’s perfectly capable of doing the “life skills” activity and his walking ability isn’t restricted.

There will probably be quite a few people like him around.