I've just finished reading Sheryl Sandberg's book and she said "the single biggest factor in a woman's career is who she chooses as a man or partner". It really resonated with me.
I never thought about it like this but I've seen so many of my female friends with amazing degrees and masters and PhDs whose careers have stalled once meeting their male partner. Yet their partner's doesn't, even if the woman was the higher earner before kids.
Are there any people out there who think they've excelled in their career cos they don't have a partner? Or because they took gender equity seriously within discussions?
I can't believe it's just because "women earn less so they go part time after kids". In the book and research it points to, actually women earn just as much as men until kids. So the idea they earn less and it's a functional decision rather than gender doesn't seem to stack.
I want kids eventually but not without equity and sacrificing my career. What does this look like or what doesn't it look like?