Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Captain of Solong is Russian

51 replies

Huckyfell · 12/03/2025 09:49

Ok, so the captain of the Solong who crashed into the Stena immaculate, loaded with USA aviation fuel, is a Russian. I'm not usually into conspiracy theories, but am I being reasonable to suspect foul play?

OP posts:
crackofdoom · 12/03/2025 13:53

Having dated a merchant navy captain (British) in the past, I wouldn't say it's correct that a majority of merchant navy captains are Russian! But obviously there are quite a few out there- both in the official Russian flagged fleet, the unofficial "dark" fleet, and in the wider shipping industry, because I imagine they'll accept lower pay.

They do have quite a reputation for drunkenness and incompetence mind you.

maximalistmaximus · 12/03/2025 14:12

If guess he was watching porn on his iPhone.

roundaboutthehillsareshining · 12/03/2025 15:30

theressomanytinafeysicouldbe · 12/03/2025 13:18

Swerve was a bit of sarcasm lol, I know they can't swerve but it a large vessel to miss when you have 2 people on the bridge

The Stena Immaculate was radar dark, so was only going to be detectable visually (a bit like Titanic and the iceberg). It'd take 3 minutes and around 3 Km for the Solong to change course. The human eye can only see around 5km (unaided). Assuming that if this was a modern ship, there wasn't a lookout constantly scanning with binoculars, as they'd rely on radar, that's not a lot of time to make a correction. Also if Immaculate was radar dark, it may not be immediately clear she was anchored, as she was anchored in an unexpected place.

Of course the master has been arrested, that's standard procedure in a maritime collision, generally used to enable the collection of samples for toxicology. But rushing to denounce him with the main evidence being his nationality is very uncomfortable.....

BridgetJonesesOwl · 12/03/2025 17:14

Maybe it's just a big coincidence & it was a horrible accident, but on the other hand it doesn't at all surprise me that the Solong's captain is Russian.

TheCountessofFitzdotterel · 12/03/2025 17:25

roundaboutthehillsareshining · 12/03/2025 15:30

The Stena Immaculate was radar dark, so was only going to be detectable visually (a bit like Titanic and the iceberg). It'd take 3 minutes and around 3 Km for the Solong to change course. The human eye can only see around 5km (unaided). Assuming that if this was a modern ship, there wasn't a lookout constantly scanning with binoculars, as they'd rely on radar, that's not a lot of time to make a correction. Also if Immaculate was radar dark, it may not be immediately clear she was anchored, as she was anchored in an unexpected place.

Of course the master has been arrested, that's standard procedure in a maritime collision, generally used to enable the collection of samples for toxicology. But rushing to denounce him with the main evidence being his nationality is very uncomfortable.....

Could you tell us more about the ship being radar dark?
How do we know, how do they do it, why (in peacetime), isn’t it a bit risky?

pizzaHeart · 12/03/2025 17:28

GabriellaMontez · 12/03/2025 12:26

Could be foul play.

More likely it was on autopilot and the lookout was asleep/drunk.

I agree with this^
especially as part of the team were Russian as well. They are not famous for following health and safety rules and procedures.

GabriellaMontez · 12/03/2025 17:41

@roundaboutthehillsareshining

This post is some kind of weird nonsense.

Radar dark is bollocks.

Immaculate had been moored for hours, her position had been reported and was known to all ships in the area. There was nothing unusual about it.

There should always be a human lookout.

MushMonster · 12/03/2025 17:53

I suspect that bridge was unmanned.
Why? The investigation should throw some clues. But it is suspicious indeed. That is not a tiny vessel that they failed to spot....

crackofdoom · 12/03/2025 17:56

Ships don't just rely on radar nowadays. There's also a system called AIS, which I understand is GPS based. This is how you can see all the ships pootling around on marinetraffic.com. Any ship can switch it off if it wants, and military vessels do do that sometimes. It would be a stupid thing to do if you happened to be parked in a busy area of the North Sea- QED, possibly.

But vessels should all keep an adequate human watch as well- especially if they're under way, but also if they're at anchor. Sounds that this did not happen if the Solong "came out of nowhere", although I do understand it was foggy. If the Solong was the only vessel at fault, you'd expect there to have been some increasingly panicked VHF messages from the Immaculata in the minutes before collision.

Re: "radar dark"- am I mistaken in believing that deflecting radar needs specialist equipment, more usually found on active military vessels, rather than tankers chartered by them? 🤔

GrannyAchingsShepherdsHut · 12/03/2025 18:03

Hang on, they'd buried someone at sea? Has anyone got a link to that please? I can't see it in any news articles.

Is that the missing crew member that was being searched for?! I'm so confused!

crackofdoom · 12/03/2025 18:10

Oh, I should add that even if the Immaculata did spot the Solong bearing down on them, there's only so much they could have done in the space of a few minutes, other than energetically warn the Solong. But the fact that the Solong didn't alter their course at all suggests that they either weren't warned, or that nobody picked up 😬

SirDanielBrackley · 12/03/2025 18:14

BellyPork · 12/03/2025 10:45

Most merchant navy captains are Russian.

Where on earth do you get that idea from?

MistressoftheDarkSide · 12/03/2025 18:23

By bizarre coincidence, I am currently watching Sppoks, and the episode I'm on is about a hijacked cargo ship heading towards the UK to take out a new warship being unveiled. Fortunately the Captain is undercover security services and has just heroically taken back control.

As to the reality of the Solong situation, even if it was something dodgy, I reckon we'd never know cos "national security" , unless it was in any way particularly politically useful.

MistressoftheDarkSide · 12/03/2025 18:37

And fuck me, once disaster was averted a "ministerial" character referenced being "needed at Mumsnet until the next catastrophe (sic)." Rewound to make sure I wasn't mistaken as well. That's quantum entanglement or something right? Lol .....

manywanderings · 12/03/2025 19:01

Sunrisewatcher · 12/03/2025 10:15

BBC Radio 4 also just revealed in this morning's broadcast... that one of the crew members of the Solong died and was buried at sea a few days prior to the collision.

What time was that please? Can't see anything in the media about it elsewhere 🤔

ProfessorPlumInTheLibraryWithAnAxe · 12/03/2025 19:50

In the BBC Verify clip I linked above it said there were several vessels in the area, all waiting in an area designed for them to wait for a short time.

To me that makes it even worse if there was nobody on watch, especially when it’s foggy.

Better link here. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/videos/cj0q11zje3po

An aerial view of a cargo sh

BBC Verify examines moments before cargo ship, tanker collision

Ship tracking data sheds light on what happened before the two vessels, the Solong and Stena Immaculate, collided in the North Sea.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/videos/cj0q11zje3po

BridgetJonesesOwl · 12/03/2025 20:17

MistressoftheDarkSide · 12/03/2025 18:37

And fuck me, once disaster was averted a "ministerial" character referenced being "needed at Mumsnet until the next catastrophe (sic)." Rewound to make sure I wasn't mistaken as well. That's quantum entanglement or something right? Lol .....

@MistressoftheDarkSide 😮

Vitrolinsanity · 12/03/2025 20:24

Where's the bloody spilled cargo?

BellyPork · 13/03/2025 11:16

SirDanielBrackley · 12/03/2025 18:14

Where on earth do you get that idea from?

Sailing around the world. Lots of VHF interactions with commercial ships. AIS meant we could call nearby ships by name, checking that they knew we were there and weren't going to mow us down inadvertently! Watch officers were almost always Russian.

ProfessorPlumInTheLibraryWithAnAxe · 13/03/2025 18:24

Vitrolinsanity · 12/03/2025 20:24

Where's the bloody spilled cargo?

I heard on the radio (BBC R4, or possibly Classic FM) that the drums of sodium cyanide being transported were empty. I can’t find it online, though. Small mercies, if they were.

Barrenfieldoffucks · 13/03/2025 18:31

crackofdoom · 12/03/2025 17:56

Ships don't just rely on radar nowadays. There's also a system called AIS, which I understand is GPS based. This is how you can see all the ships pootling around on marinetraffic.com. Any ship can switch it off if it wants, and military vessels do do that sometimes. It would be a stupid thing to do if you happened to be parked in a busy area of the North Sea- QED, possibly.

But vessels should all keep an adequate human watch as well- especially if they're under way, but also if they're at anchor. Sounds that this did not happen if the Solong "came out of nowhere", although I do understand it was foggy. If the Solong was the only vessel at fault, you'd expect there to have been some increasingly panicked VHF messages from the Immaculata in the minutes before collision.

Re: "radar dark"- am I mistaken in believing that deflecting radar needs specialist equipment, more usually found on active military vessels, rather than tankers chartered by them? 🤔

Agreed. She won’t have been sat there invisible, can you imagine how dangerous that would be!

While the capt has overall responsibility legally and morally, he will not have been the only person on watch. Someone was probably asleep with the alarms switched off, having told the other to nip off for a snooze or a coffee or whatever.

No excuse, but not all of the merchant ships operate under the same strict guidelines.

I’ve put feelers out for more information.

15minutesaday · 13/03/2025 19:00

@roundaboutthehillsareshining

"if Immaculate was radar dark, it may not be immediately clear she was anchored, as she was anchored in an unexpected place."

Radar dark means the AIS has been switched off. A vessel is still visible on other radar systems that detect physical objects.

Also, Stena Immaculate wasn't anchored in an unexpected place, she was anchored in an "anchorage" - a known holding pen for vessels waiting for high tide to enter the Humber.

crackofdoom · 13/03/2025 19:43

Barrenfieldoffucks · 13/03/2025 18:31

Agreed. She won’t have been sat there invisible, can you imagine how dangerous that would be!

While the capt has overall responsibility legally and morally, he will not have been the only person on watch. Someone was probably asleep with the alarms switched off, having told the other to nip off for a snooze or a coffee or whatever.

No excuse, but not all of the merchant ships operate under the same strict guidelines.

I’ve put feelers out for more information.

The Guardian says that the Immaculata definitely had its AIS switched on while anchored.

kalokagathos · 13/03/2025 19:57

Huckyfell · 12/03/2025 09:49

Ok, so the captain of the Solong who crashed into the Stena immaculate, loaded with USA aviation fuel, is a Russian. I'm not usually into conspiracy theories, but am I being reasonable to suspect foul play?

These were my thoughts exactly when I read it. I also shared the story with my Polish cousin who is a captain on a tanker checking if it’s not his ship. He is around UK atm bit the other side, thankfully. He said the crews are full of Poles, Russians, Indians, Filipinos because we are simply cheaper labour. So it could just be a coincidence but given the circumstances, I see how we’d jump to conclusions…

KenAdams · 13/03/2025 19:58

roundaboutthehillsareshining · 12/03/2025 15:30

The Stena Immaculate was radar dark, so was only going to be detectable visually (a bit like Titanic and the iceberg). It'd take 3 minutes and around 3 Km for the Solong to change course. The human eye can only see around 5km (unaided). Assuming that if this was a modern ship, there wasn't a lookout constantly scanning with binoculars, as they'd rely on radar, that's not a lot of time to make a correction. Also if Immaculate was radar dark, it may not be immediately clear she was anchored, as she was anchored in an unexpected place.

Of course the master has been arrested, that's standard procedure in a maritime collision, generally used to enable the collection of samples for toxicology. But rushing to denounce him with the main evidence being his nationality is very uncomfortable.....

Where have you got this entirely inaccurate account from then?