Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to think that WASPI women should not be entitled to compensation?

825 replies

mugglewump · 24/02/2025 10:11

They've been on the news again marching for compensation in a climate where the government is having to make very difficult decisions about funding to stop our debt ever increasing.

I think there are far more deserving cases for goverment money than women who didn't act on information at the time and sort their pensions out or keep working (p/t or f/t) until retirement age.

Moreover, the people paying this compensation are those who will be working until they are 67 to 70 to claim a state pension. Surely, it's a bit ick to expect them to bail out women who retired at 60?

OP posts:
Thindog · 24/02/2025 13:55

VindiVici · 24/02/2025 13:42

I don't agree.

In my peer group the majority of my friends (women) went to uni and into work comparable with men. I did and spent my career with men and we earned the same. If I declined promotion it was a choice, based on family circumstances.

You've omitted to say how many men went to university in those decades.

Girls may have decided not to go into higher ed but that was often down to family expectations - not lack of opportunity. Women chose to marry much younger and have children much younger.

There was no 'tacit' agreement. That's a nonsense.

Edited

Sorry, I wasn’t clear. I should have said those statistics were from the number of students at universities, not the whole population. So 23%of women at universities compared to 77% of men. Only about 12% of the population actually had university degrees. Times have massively changed.

VindiVici · 24/02/2025 13:55

Completelyjo · 24/02/2025 13:54

@GottaGetOutofDairy Further more, it was seen as fairer because men typically married women a few years younger than them and so it seemed better to retire both people in a couple at about the same time. In a time where one wage often did support a household, it was seen as likely to cause financial hardship if the man retired and then had to 'keep' the couple on a single pension. Plus, it stopped 'him in doors all day' having to do the washing and cooking himself if his wife still worked

Why is this nonsense regularly posted on mumsnet?

Is this an extract from a Barbra Cartland novel?

Completelyjo · 24/02/2025 13:55

The pension age has already gone up twice in my working life and will be increased again in the next few years. Who do I moan to?

ThisAintNoPartyThisAintNoDisco · 24/02/2025 13:56

BobnLen · 24/02/2025 12:04

Mumsnet is very anti older women as seen by this thread and many others on here

Was just thinking exactly the same

VindiVici · 24/02/2025 13:56

Thindog · 24/02/2025 13:55

Sorry, I wasn’t clear. I should have said those statistics were from the number of students at universities, not the whole population. So 23%of women at universities compared to 77% of men. Only about 12% of the population actually had university degrees. Times have massively changed.

It was 4% in the early 1960s- all people at uni.

Completelyjo · 24/02/2025 13:57

ThisAintNoPartyThisAintNoDisco · 24/02/2025 13:56

Was just thinking exactly the same

Disagreeing with the nonsense claims regarding the pension age being equalised isn’t being anti older women. Yawn.

People can disagree with you because your points are stupid without it having anything to do with being older or a woman.

twistyizzy · 24/02/2025 13:57

All these MC, educated women saying they were fully aware of the changes etc. Many women weren't in that position eg my MIl who is a WASPI.
Mining town in NE England. Left school at 13 to work in a mill, got married at 19 and left all financials up to her husband. Worked 2 hours per day as she was at home raising her kids + carer for her parents. She would never have even opened a letter, let alone understand the content. She doesn't watch news or read any paper other than the local rag. 1000s of women were in a similar position.

Very easy to judge from a position of education and awareness.

StElse · 24/02/2025 13:57

Even if the WASPI women were not informed at the time of the change, did they not check their entitlement and amount before retiring?

That way, even if you'd not been informed at the time of the change, you'd still be informed before you actually retire and it's too late.

And if you do retire and find there's no pension for you yet, you can go back to work, no?

Changes do happen. Laws change. I think we are all required to react accordingly when they do.

VindiVici · 24/02/2025 13:57

ThisAintNoPartyThisAintNoDisco · 24/02/2025 13:56

Was just thinking exactly the same

The way I see it is that most posts here are from Waspi women who agree that the campaign is wrong.

JasmineAllen · 24/02/2025 13:57

milveycrohn · 24/02/2025 13:46

I am a waspi woman who was made fully aware of the changes.
I have not been on any marches etc as I am fully aware that the numbers are too few; ie not enough votes. Secondly, the country is too broken for any compensation.
However, I should point out that there were two changes and the second change was less than 5 years notice. (I still have the letters).
What stings is that when it came to MPs themselves, they decided not to implement changes that would take place within 5 years, yet they did with this group of women.
However, I am surprised at women who did not know as I certainly was applying for forecasts etc as retirement approached. (Apart from the notification received, which I guess some women may not have received).
I certainly find it hard to believe that some women did not know of either of the changes. As I said there were two changes. The first was to align the retirement age with men, then 65. The second changes was to put the age later and to speed up the alignment.

Thank you explaining it so well. I remember it being in the news at the time so I've always felt confused about the whole waspi issue.

RosesAndHellebores · 24/02/2025 13:59

Perseimmion · 24/02/2025 13:48

Of course the historical discrimination is relevant. Women of my era didn’t have access to workplace pensions, therefore their current situation is affected. Moreover, the casual way pension changes were introduced is a perfect example of discrimination.

I can’t believe I’m having to explain this.

What era are you? I started work in 1980 aged 20. Admittedly I couldn't join the workplace pension until I was 24 but I joined it then. Because I couldn't I whapped £50 a month into a ten year savings plan. And took out another a couple of years later. They each paid out £10k which was very handy when I started a family.

VindiVici · 24/02/2025 13:59

twistyizzy · 24/02/2025 13:57

All these MC, educated women saying they were fully aware of the changes etc. Many women weren't in that position eg my MIl who is a WASPI.
Mining town in NE England. Left school at 13 to work in a mill, got married at 19 and left all financials up to her husband. Worked 2 hours per day as she was at home raising her kids + carer for her parents. She would never have even opened a letter, let alone understand the content. She doesn't watch news or read any paper other than the local rag. 1000s of women were in a similar position.

Very easy to judge from a position of education and awareness.

Edited

Don't make location the issue.

How old is your MIL? Because the school leaving age was not 13 if she's now in her 60s or early 70s.

The SLA was 15 in 1947 and 16 in 1972

So she's confused or you've misunderstood.

Completelyjo · 24/02/2025 13:59

twistyizzy · 24/02/2025 13:57

All these MC, educated women saying they were fully aware of the changes etc. Many women weren't in that position eg my MIl who is a WASPI.
Mining town in NE England. Left school at 13 to work in a mill, got married at 19 and left all financials up to her husband. Worked 2 hours per day as she was at home raising her kids + carer for her parents. She would never have even opened a letter, let alone understand the content. She doesn't watch news or read any paper other than the local rag. 1000s of women were in a similar position.

Very easy to judge from a position of education and awareness.

Edited

So whether she retired at 60 or 70 she took absolutely no interest or role in her future and somehow that’s the fault of other people?
Never opened a letter, read a paper, or watched the news? Are you aware these changes were announced in the mid 90s not 1901?!

twistyizzy · 24/02/2025 14:01

VindiVici · 24/02/2025 13:59

Don't make location the issue.

How old is your MIL? Because the school leaving age was not 13 if she's now in her 60s or early 70s.

The SLA was 15 in 1947 and 16 in 1972

So she's confused or you've misunderstood.

Edited

Yep she's early 70s. It is irrelevant what the school leaving age was, that's when she left school. We really aren't that far away from when kids had to work in order to feed the family.
Location IS part of the issue, NE is still behind the South in terms of culture + attitudes.

twistyizzy · 24/02/2025 14:01

Completelyjo · 24/02/2025 13:59

So whether she retired at 60 or 70 she took absolutely no interest or role in her future and somehow that’s the fault of other people?
Never opened a letter, read a paper, or watched the news? Are you aware these changes were announced in the mid 90s not 1901?!

Yes and see my other comment about the culture + expectations where she lives.
She left everything up to my FIL because that was his role.
She has reading age of approx 9 years old and takes no interest in any current affairs.

caramac04 · 24/02/2025 14:02

fitzwilliamdarcy · 24/02/2025 11:34

I think what sticks in the craw for me is the way in which so many of the news articles contain sentences like, "after working for 30 years, Brenda was in dire need of her retirement, only for it to be torn away..."

I started work at 16 and fully expect SP age to be 75 by the time I get there. So I'll have worked 59 years, almost double what Brenda has. Even those of my peers who started working at 21 will have worked 54 years. And yet Brenda wants my generation to pay compensation because it's outrageous that she had to work for 36 years rather than 30.

And that's if there even is a state pension by the time I get there, which I fully expect there won't be. We'll be working until we drop, but sure, let's ensure that those who got to go at 66 get their windfall.

Edited

Well I will have worked for over 50 years when I get my pension unless it changes again

VindiVici · 24/02/2025 14:02

twistyizzy · 24/02/2025 14:01

Yep she's early 70s. It is irrelevant what the school leaving age was, that's when she left school. We really aren't that far away from when kids had to work in order to feed the family.
Location IS part of the issue, NE is still behind the South in terms of culture + attitudes.

You could not leave school at 13 then.

Even my parents (one would be almost 100 now if alive) couldn't leave school till 14.

It's not irrelevant. It was the law.

twistyizzy · 24/02/2025 14:03

VindiVici · 24/02/2025 14:02

You could not leave school at 13 then.

Even my parents (one would be almost 100 now if alive) couldn't leave school till 14.

It's not irrelevant. It was the law.

Edited

It doesn't matter what the law was, she left school at that age! Not sure how else I can phrase that.

JasmineAllen · 24/02/2025 14:03

twistyizzy · 24/02/2025 13:57

All these MC, educated women saying they were fully aware of the changes etc. Many women weren't in that position eg my MIl who is a WASPI.
Mining town in NE England. Left school at 13 to work in a mill, got married at 19 and left all financials up to her husband. Worked 2 hours per day as she was at home raising her kids + carer for her parents. She would never have even opened a letter, let alone understand the content. She doesn't watch news or read any paper other than the local rag. 1000s of women were in a similar position.

Very easy to judge from a position of education and awareness.

Edited

I though waspi women were born 1950 - 1960? School leaving age has been at least 15 years since the 2nd WW.

Also it was on the national news which is why I knew about it and I'm not even affected.

VindiVici · 24/02/2025 14:04

twistyizzy · 24/02/2025 14:03

It doesn't matter what the law was, she left school at that age! Not sure how else I can phrase that.

Well she was playing truant or she's confused at best. As you weren't alive then not sure how you're so sure she's right!

FindusMakesPancakes · 24/02/2025 14:04

twistyizzy · 24/02/2025 13:57

All these MC, educated women saying they were fully aware of the changes etc. Many women weren't in that position eg my MIl who is a WASPI.
Mining town in NE England. Left school at 13 to work in a mill, got married at 19 and left all financials up to her husband. Worked 2 hours per day as she was at home raising her kids + carer for her parents. She would never have even opened a letter, let alone understand the content. She doesn't watch news or read any paper other than the local rag. 1000s of women were in a similar position.

Very easy to judge from a position of education and awareness.

Edited

By that argument, no changes can ever be made, just in case the less well educated don't understand or choose not to engage.

twistyizzy · 24/02/2025 14:05

VindiVici · 24/02/2025 14:04

Well she was playing truant or she's confused at best. As you weren't alive then not sure how you're so sure she's right!

Edited

Or she was earning money. Jesus christ just because this is outside your own experience doesn't mean it didn't happen.

Completelyjo · 24/02/2025 14:05

twistyizzy · 24/02/2025 14:01

Yes and see my other comment about the culture + expectations where she lives.
She left everything up to my FIL because that was his role.
She has reading age of approx 9 years old and takes no interest in any current affairs.

Edited

I’m from one of the most deprived post codes in the UK and your nonsense exaggerations about “culture and expectations” in the NE are completely stupid.
The majority of women in 1995 when this was announced had tv, satellite tv even, access to the news etc and weren’t living in some Dickensian life too busy hand washing their rags to hear anything about the pension changes.

twistyizzy · 24/02/2025 14:05

FindusMakesPancakes · 24/02/2025 14:04

By that argument, no changes can ever be made, just in case the less well educated don't understand or choose not to engage.

Not arguing that at all just stating the experience of 1 woman as to how some women may not have been aware.

Nannydoodles · 24/02/2025 14:05

But even if she had of known as PP stated, what would she have done differently?