Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to think that WASPI women should not be entitled to compensation?

825 replies

mugglewump · 24/02/2025 10:11

They've been on the news again marching for compensation in a climate where the government is having to make very difficult decisions about funding to stop our debt ever increasing.

I think there are far more deserving cases for goverment money than women who didn't act on information at the time and sort their pensions out or keep working (p/t or f/t) until retirement age.

Moreover, the people paying this compensation are those who will be working until they are 67 to 70 to claim a state pension. Surely, it's a bit ick to expect them to bail out women who retired at 60?

OP posts:
Flossflower · 24/02/2025 12:30

I am a WASPI. Of course I knew about it.
YANBU

VindiVici · 24/02/2025 12:31

@NagathaCrispy

I don't know where you were- you're older than me and it was mainstream news for many, many years.

The women who say they didn't know were living under a rock or totally deaf and blind to announcements in the press, all forms of media , etc etc.

They could, and should, have done their own pension predictions along the way as well using the Gov, websites.

It's a nonsense and I feel embarrassed they are my contemporaries.

Lovemycat2023 · 24/02/2025 12:31

I think it’s a really tricky one. There are clearly a few who just weren’t aware, including a couple who sought financial advice but didn’t get told. They took decisions which made them poorer and the ombudsman did say they should have been told properly. I feel like those few should be compensated but I have no idea how you would administer such a complicated scheme.

Perseimmion · 24/02/2025 12:33

Anxioustealady · 24/02/2025 12:28

As opposed to older women who want younger women to work longer, so we can pay for them to retire early. There's no solidarity here but older women started it.

I absolutely rejoice that you younger women don’t face the same level of injustice that us older women have lived through. You have no idea what it was like living through such inequality.

Shwish · 24/02/2025 12:33

Rightsraptor · 24/02/2025 12:12

All I can tell you are my own circumstances and I had 2 years 4 months notice that I would have wait a further 5 years 11 months than I'd expected before I was eligible to draw my state pension. I still have the letter. Can any of you justify that? How was I supposed to make up for 6 years' worth of pension in 2 years and still live day to day?

You may talk about it being 'all over the news' but there still remained an obligation for the government tell us and not rely on us watching TV or reading newspapers. They had a responsibility and they failed. Now they are ignoring the ombudsman.

Honestly? I guess you'd just have to carry on working. Pretty simple really.

SockFluffInTheBath · 24/02/2025 12:34

They didn’t need more time to make extra pension contributions, they just needed to not hand their notice in for their 60th birthday. People need to stop expecting someone else to pick up the pieces for what they want when they’re perfectly capable of helping themselves.

Digdongdoo · 24/02/2025 12:34

Gruttenberg · 24/02/2025 12:29

Well I think we shouldn't be paying for EVERYONE'S kids to have free breakfasts - that's also an undeserving case. People should feed their own kids just like we did.

Surely it's a bit ick to expect the taxpayer to bail out feckless people who prioritise themselves over feeding their own kids? Or who benefit by greedily stealing our tax money when they're earning mega millions?

Edited

I think you ought to be glad that we are investing in the generations who will be paying these pensions.

SineJoanie · 24/02/2025 12:37

PrincessAnne5Eva · 24/02/2025 11:31

@Badbadbunny It's funny you should mention endowment mortgages, that was one of the ones I often had calls about. A lot of the time they hadn't saved the money they should have saved in the investment/endowment side (and which we'd recommended to them to save) and had instead spent it all and were now shocked that they didn't own a house. No rational adult would think £43.50 a month for 25 years was ever going to pay off a mortgage on a £50,000 house. A basic calculator could tell them that.

Edited

Going a bit off topic but the problem with endowment mortgages was that many were advertised (and yes I still have the promotional brochure somewhere) along the lines that not only will you pay off your mortgage but have an expectation of a lump sum bla bla bla. Key words being ‘will’ and ‘expectation’ rather than possibility. Illustrations that didn’t show minus figures and shortfall. And no attitude to risk review. These are facts that applied to me. Endowments were more expensive when I first bought a house, they were regarded as superior. Maybe some sellers and schemes were totally transparent of the risk being taken, but many weren’t.

TheClaaaaaaaw · 24/02/2025 12:37

Shwish · 24/02/2025 12:33

Honestly? I guess you'd just have to carry on working. Pretty simple really.

This.

I’m fed up of their whining, as are others. A case of read the fucking room.

mamalovebird · 24/02/2025 12:39

YANBU.

My mum is a WASPI. Minimum wage job, no private pension, council housed. She doesn't agree with compensation. She just worked the few extra years. Not ideal but she just got on with it. She doesn't get all the hysteria.

Perseimmion · 24/02/2025 12:41

TheClaaaaaaaw · 24/02/2025 12:37

This.

I’m fed up of their whining, as are others. A case of read the fucking room.

It’s bad enough that the government are gaslighting us, without younger women doing the very same.

Aweecupofteaandabiscuit · 24/02/2025 12:41

Gruttenberg · 24/02/2025 12:29

Well I think we shouldn't be paying for EVERYONE'S kids to have free breakfasts - that's also an undeserving case. People should feed their own kids just like we did.

Surely it's a bit ick to expect the taxpayer to bail out feckless people who prioritise themselves over feeding their own kids? Or who benefit by greedily stealing our tax money when they're earning mega millions?

Edited

That’s preventative expenditure in my eyes. Child poverty is mushrooming and it’s not about bailing out the parents - it’s about bailing out the kids on whom free state education would be wasted if they were continually starving (not to mention the future costs to the NHS of all these malnourished kids). If the government ever wants to “waste” money, they should waste it on the youngest members of our society and we will all be the better for it down the line.
Unlike paying the WASPIs compensation. I was aware of this even as a child so I’m baffled as to how so many of my elders could possibly not have known.

VindiVici · 24/02/2025 12:42

Rightsraptor · Today 12:12
All I can tell you are my own circumstances and I had 2 years 4 months notice that I would have wait a further 5 years 11 months than I'd expected before I was eligible to draw my state pension. I still have the letter. Can any of you justify that? How was I supposed to make up for 6 years' worth of pension in 2 years and still live day to day?
You may talk about it being 'all over the news' but there still remained an obligation for the government tell us and not rely on us watching TV or reading newspapers. They had a responsibility and they failed. Now they are ignoring the ombudsman.

@Rightsraptor You should be embarrassed at your own ignorance.
This was first announced in 1995. Where were you then? You'd be in your 40s.

There were ongoing announcements over many years.

How is it that 75% of women DID know but some don't?

You'd also have had the chance to top up your missing pension 'years' by paying a lump sum. Presumably you chose not to engage with that or do it.

QueenOfHiraeth · 24/02/2025 12:42

olderbutwiser · 24/02/2025 11:07

WASPI here. I 100% agree no compensation. I knew at the time the change was made, and regularly thereafter whenever I checked my pension status (not so often in my 20s to be sure).

At a time when women were fighting for and getting equal rights in the workplace (including the right not to have to sit on our boss’s knee) it was hypocritical that men had to work 5 years longer than us - especially as their life expectancy was lower than ours.

Another WASPI here to back you up. I agree it was on the news, on the TV, on the radio, in the newspapers, in womens' magazines, etc so there has to be some personal responsibility taken by those complaining they didn't know.

I have a bit of sympathy for those women who may have retired then got caught with the accelerated age changes but they are very few and I have no sympathy at all for those who retired without checking their entitlements, that is irresponsible in the extreme.
Most of those complaining and demanding compensation are just being greedy and it should not happen when young families are struggling this much

fitzwilliamdarcy · 24/02/2025 12:43

Perseimmion · 24/02/2025 12:41

It’s bad enough that the government are gaslighting us, without younger women doing the very same.

It's not gaslighting to disagree with you.

CloudPop · 24/02/2025 12:43

Ladysodor · 24/02/2025 11:01

Sorry but they did get the info at the time. It doesn’t even affect me and I knew about it.

Edited

Same. It struck me at the time as being a major bummer for those impacted but it certainly wasn't a secret.

I find it really concerning that apparently people planned a retirement without actually checking their pension position.

TheClaaaaaaaw · 24/02/2025 12:44

Perseimmion · 24/02/2025 12:41

It’s bad enough that the government are gaslighting us, without younger women doing the very same.

Gaslighting…🤦‍♀️

SwanOfThoseThings · 24/02/2025 12:44

SineJoanie · 24/02/2025 12:37

Going a bit off topic but the problem with endowment mortgages was that many were advertised (and yes I still have the promotional brochure somewhere) along the lines that not only will you pay off your mortgage but have an expectation of a lump sum bla bla bla. Key words being ‘will’ and ‘expectation’ rather than possibility. Illustrations that didn’t show minus figures and shortfall. And no attitude to risk review. These are facts that applied to me. Endowments were more expensive when I first bought a house, they were regarded as superior. Maybe some sellers and schemes were totally transparent of the risk being taken, but many weren’t.

Yes - another selling point was that the mortgage would be paid off if one of the parties died, as the endowment served as an insurance policy.

At the peak of their popularity, no one foresaw the changes in the financial climate that meant the investments wouldn't perform well enough to repay the mortgage. Yes, people could change to a capital repayment mortgage when it became apparent this was the case, but they then had to repay the capital over a very short term, or extend the mortgage term. As with pensions, it's all about people basing their long-term financial planning on inaccurate information.

theresnolimits · 24/02/2025 12:46

I’m a WASPI woman and I think the ‘compensation’ money would be better spent on supporting the younger generation - put it into schools or libraries or better maternity care or nursery care or free swimming lessons for children- any good cause really. £2000-3000 compensation is not changing any individual’s life whilst the whole amount could make a difference.

It’s done. We need to move on.

VindiVici · 24/02/2025 12:47

Another WASPI here to back you up. I agree it was on the news, on the TV, on the radio, in the newspapers, in womens' magazines, etc so there has to be some personal responsibility taken by those complaining they didn't know.

Exactly.

Longwaysouth · 24/02/2025 12:49

I am a Waspi and totally disagree that they are entitled to compensation.
I was on Maternity leave when the 1995 Pension Act was brought in. It was a gradual yearly increase from 2010 onwards.It was all over the news. A topic of conversation at mum and baby groups etc. I received letters. My Union informed me as did my employer. I was aware that this accelerated.
I think it was 2011 that employers could no longer force you to retire at 65.The same year they brought in a timetable to gradually increase as State Pension age to 66.
From 2026 it will gradually raise to 67. And from 28 a gradual rise to 68.

I can not understand how other people did not know.

I will get my state pension next year at 66 and 3 months.

Currently said DC, will get a state pension on her 68th birthday in 2063. I hope she keeps herself informed.

I really hope that the State Pension continues for future generations.

At least there now is auto-enrolment into pension schemes.

We can not afford to pay compensation to those who choose not to keep themselves informed.

VindiVici · 24/02/2025 12:49

Sadly, and this sounds harsh I know, but the whole process has been initiated by some women who want to make themselves known for a 'cause'. look up the person who initiated this- she's sitting very pretty thanks to her own career. Highly educated, no reliance on a state pension, etc etc.

I'm afraid I'm sceptical and see this as the 'ignorant' Waspis being used for someone else's glory.

SineJoanie · 24/02/2025 12:52

SwanOfThoseThings · 24/02/2025 12:44

Yes - another selling point was that the mortgage would be paid off if one of the parties died, as the endowment served as an insurance policy.

At the peak of their popularity, no one foresaw the changes in the financial climate that meant the investments wouldn't perform well enough to repay the mortgage. Yes, people could change to a capital repayment mortgage when it became apparent this was the case, but they then had to repay the capital over a very short term, or extend the mortgage term. As with pensions, it's all about people basing their long-term financial planning on inaccurate information.

Agree. I think my shortfall was about 9k. I converted and paid much higher monthly payments as a result.

Miaowzabella · 24/02/2025 12:52

I'm a WASPI woman and I don't think it is appropriate for the government to pay compensation. Anyone thinking of retiring has a responsibility to check her own pension forecast before taking any action. You can do it online, it takes minutes. And the change was very well advertised.

Dontknowwhattocall13893 · 24/02/2025 12:56

FuckityFux · 24/02/2025 12:05

If you move abroad like I did in my 40’s then you often don’t hear about pension changes and the Dept. concerned are not easy to communicate with.

I’m several years short of a full pension because I moved abroad and trying to find out how to pay to top up my contributions is extremely infuriating as I can’t seem to get any definitive answers from anyone. They make it as hard as possible to find out information.

Surely though if you move abroad and stop working/paying taxes in your home country you'll realise that may affect your pension entitlements in said home country and you ensure your affairs are in order if you do decide to return, not leaving this to the last minute?
I say that as someone not living in my home country, and not expecting that country to fund my retirement.

Although I appreciate communicating with the government agencies can absolutely be a pain in the ass, isn't it something that's on personal responsibility to keep track of?