Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Generational wealth differences

1000 replies

KeenGreen · 23/02/2025 08:46

My first AIBU so let’s see what I’m in for!

First to make clear none of the problems now are the fault of previous generations. It is not a blame game!!

So AIBU to be frustrated with the rhetoric that todays generations of young families have it no harder than previous generations in terms of wealth and they just need to be more frugal to have the same standard of living??

I am sick of hearing the idea that older generations. So called boomers (for the record I don’t like this term) didn’t have it easier than younger generations.

I am 38 I have worked since I was 16, lived independently since 17. Put myself through university all the way through to PhD. My husband is 39 works in a school as support staff (LSA) and takes up circa £1200 a month. He has a degree.
I work in a university and earn just under £50K before tax so our household income is probably about £65K not the lowest by any stretch but enough for us to struggle to balance costs. We claim child benefit but otherwise no extra help.
Husband only works term time of course, but that means he’s around for our child during holidays.

We have one DC age 5, and can’t afford any more.
Our closest family lives over 2 hours away, so we have no family support with childcare or help if there is a sick day or anything.

We have a mortgaged small semi detached 1930s house with 3 bedrooms, It needs a lot of work but we haven’t been able to do much because of time and money. Current mortgage fix ends in 2026 and I expect our mortgage repayments to go up by about 50% extra £300 a month.

We pay off student loans and my pension contributions are also high.
I took only 6 months maternity leave because I couldn’t afford to go to half pay for long and not into no pay at all.

My husband had virtually nothing in his workplace pension because of low earnings.
Mine is keep being devalued because of sector changes and it’s definitely not the best pension in education. (Teachers pensions are better).
I can’t even imagine what it will be like to try and live off my workplace pension alone and I would have to go all the way up to retirement age which I can’t imagine myself doing in a stressful job.

Retirement age for us is currently 68, that means we have 30 more years.
But with the way things are going I have no hope that there will be a state pension at all for us, or the age will be pushed even higher, so will probably be dead! Despite the fact I will have been paying in with tax national insurance for 50 plus years by that point.

I just feel frustrated about this idea that I hear people say that our generation just needs to work harder, or get better paid jobs etc because it’s not that easy. We both work hard in the education sector. Enjoy our jobs for the most part and find them fulfilling albeit stressful at times!

Like I said not about blaming previous generations for the picture we are in, but I don’t like the rhetoric of ‘well interest rates went up to 15% in my day’ etc when house prices were so much lower in proportion to wages and the cost of living right now and inflation over the last 10 years shows wages haven’t increased in line with this.

ps I know we are not the most hard done by! But still feel the pinch and we certain don’t live an extravagant lifestyle!

OP posts:
BeGoldHedgehog · 23/02/2025 10:23

Livelovebehappy · 23/02/2025 09:59

I honestly think this generation want it all. The ‘boomers’ as you call them, made do with what they could afford at the time. Couldn’t afford three kids? Didn’t have that third one. Couldn’t afford to have two cars? Made do with the one, or none at all. Couldn’t afford that two week all inclusive to Greece? Made do with a week in Whitby. Little Simon wanted the latest designer gear and toys? Had to do without. Not enough bedrooms for child to have one each? Put bunk beds in the room, and made do. These days though, people think it’s poverty to not have a two car family, not to have that holiday every year, and of course little Simon (Boden) should be able to have that PS5. And why shouldn’t they be able to have children they can’t afford? The state should pay for them, not capping child benefit entitlement. Note too, there was hardly any child care facilities in the ‘old’ days. So please spare us the whinging. You’ve got it good. Just lower your expectations, and take responsibilty for the position you’re in. 🙄

We did ALL of this! Only holiday abroad was paid for by the inlaws. You're just as bad as the boomer haters.

ploppydoppy · 23/02/2025 10:23

I think you also have to accept that many people progress their careers over time and increase their salaries.

Do they? we don't have very high salaries in this country.

I live on an ordinary street in London where a small terrace needing work starts at 800k. My neighbour to the left bought their house on one postman salary. Ain't no postman buying those houses now.

NamelessNancy · 23/02/2025 10:24

nirishism · 23/02/2025 10:19

And something is definitely worryingly wrong if essential support functions are unaffordable. Anyone doing a job essential to society on a full time basis should be paid enough to live comfortably and to provide reasonably for a family should they choose to have one.

Absolutely this. The only criticism I have about the DH job is why the hell is it so poorly paid in the first place? Necessary jobs for society to function should be paid a fair wage imo. We good support workers in schools.

usernamealreadytaken · 23/02/2025 10:24

Midlifecareerchange · 23/02/2025 09:29

To the people saying why doesn't your DH earn more, I never understand this about right wing thinking, who do they think should do the less well paid jobs, which are usually the ones that are actually essential to society. Why should people have to aspire to earning more when they already do a job they are good at and which contributes meaningfully?

OP it's clear that things are harder for this generation. For example my parents lived on one teacher's income in London with three DC. They bought a house with no family help at all. I have the same job my dad had but there is no way I could do that - we only bought a house thanks to a deposit from DH's inheritance and we can only just support 2 DC on two teachers' salaries.

“who do they think should do the less well paid jobs, which are usually the ones that are actually essential to society.”

While I agree with much of your post, and in particular about OP’s DH’s job being worthy and essential, I’d point out that a huge number of low-paid jobs are definitely not essential, and are also often done by immigrants; coffee shops, car washes, restaurants/fast food, nail bars. All of those are luxuries not essentials, and do little to contribute to our economy overall as many of the workers rely on benefits to top up those low wages, and the businesses pay little tax.

Another disadvantage of having so many foreign workers is that so much money leaves this country and isn’t spent here - we’re literally paying benefits to support families in other countries, while we have a declining economy with too few houses and opportunities.

lifeonmars100 · 23/02/2025 10:24

It is Gen Z that I feel really sorry for and I also fear for the very young children being born now. The West seems to be embracing a new version of fascism, the climate crisis is wrecking the planet and we are yet to see where AI is going to take us. I think it will make our concerns about the reach of the internet trivial in comparison.

friendlycat · 23/02/2025 10:26

EnidSpyton · 23/02/2025 10:22

This hits the nail on the head.

You are saying our generation has it hard and this is why you can't afford a better quality of life, but the reality is, the reason why you can't afford a better quality of life is because you've got a husband who is prioritising having an easy working life over maximising his earning potential. This is nothing to do with generational wealth differences and everything to do with your personal priorities and choices. No one at any point in history has been living a life of luxury on a TA wage.

I agree.

Your standard of living is directly impacted by your DH wishing to remain in his low paying job and not advancing his career in any way. He is comfortable and wishes to avoid stress and happy earning a very low wage. That is the impact on your family.

ploppydoppy · 23/02/2025 10:26

I honestly think this generation want it all. The ‘boomers’ as you call them, made do with what they could afford at the time. Couldn’t afford three kids? Didn’t have that third one. Couldn’t afford to have two cars? Made do with the one, or none at all.

This doesn't make any sense though as people are having less dc or none at all? Car ownership of 2 cars has increased but again with more parents working, dc living at home
as young adults you would expect that.

BeGoldHedgehog · 23/02/2025 10:26

mantaraya · 23/02/2025 10:02

OP you are at the exact age to have been uniquely shafted. Wages haven't increased since the 2008 crash i.e. your entire working life. Meanwhile the cost of student loans, homeownership, renting and childcare has rocketed. I'm a similar age to you and many of my peers got on the property ladder in a Sellers' market just a couple of years before interest rates jumped. One is already selling her first home because she can't afford the mortgage anymore. Our generation really can't catch a break. I hope it's easier for the next generation but it's not looking likely.

God yes to all of this, its relentless.

Lovelysausagedogscrumpy · 23/02/2025 10:26

Badgerandfox227 · 23/02/2025 09:57

I don’t disagree OP. The issue for today’s generation is the cost of housing vs wages, which typically means both parents have to work, adding extra childcare costs.

Many pensioners benefitted from generous final salary pension schemes that are not longer viable in the private sector, so I cannot hope to have the retirement my parents have. I get that some may not have a pension, but a typical trip to Sainsbury’s shows how many pensioners have brand new cars.

I also don’t agree that the boomer generation didn’t have luxuries we have. I remember a childhood of holidays, meals out, take aways, household appliances and the odd avocado! But the difference is only one parent worked and my folks could afford more kids and a bigger house on an equivalent of just one of mine and DHs wages.

Also the rhetoric of working hard! They had no mobile phone or laptops meaning they took work home or answered calls on holiday. When my dad was home from work, he was home! Lots of work jollies, lunches out, dinner dances, company cars that were not taxed to the max.

I certainly don’t begrudge my parents the money they have, and am happy when they spend it now while they still have their health. But it’s unfair to say that younger generations have it easier. It’s obvious with the lack of housing affordability, the hours both parents have to work and the amount of mental health issues that younger generations have that many are massively struggling.

Both my parents had to work to make ends meet and the only mortgage they could get was based on their combined salary - and that was for a modest three bedroom semi. We didn’t have a fridge until l was around six or seven - milk was kept in a bowl of cold water and l remember food being kept in the garage during the colder months. Most people didn’t have a freezer until the 70’s. We rarely ate out and holidays were mostly weekends away in the UK.

And my mum used to bring work home - she was self employed and had business accounts to keep and wages to pay. Why do you think no laptops or mobile phones = no work to take home ? And there were no work ‘jollies’. Work was 9am-6pm and for mum that was Monday to Saturday with a half day off mid week. My dad worked shifts at the local car manufacturers - he was a shift supervisor and frequently bought paperwork home to complete, on top of working long hours. How is that not working hard ?

Your post is a sweeping generalisation based on your own experience, which sounds a ot more privileged than many at the time. You know that the owners of those flash cars in Sainsburys are pensioners ? Sure they’re not leased, or their kids aren’t driving ?

Livelovebehappy · 23/02/2025 10:27

nirishism · 23/02/2025 10:17

I don’t think anyone is calling anyone nasty or greedy. It is about recognising opportunity available to older generations that isn’t available to younger. Obviously the average person in each generation is going to take the opportunities available to them, but there’s something going awry surely if things are in decline?

But why blame ‘boomers’ then? And MN is very derogatory towards them. Surely it’s just the way the economy has been handled by successive governments. ‘Boomers’ may in part have benefited, but obviously that’s just the way it was. You know, a bit like the current ever expanding welfare system, where people can get a lot more from the state than they used to. We shouldn’t blame the current mentality of people claiming money thrown at them - it’s the government that make the decisions, and people accept it. Why wouldn’t they?

DeepFatFried · 23/02/2025 10:28

So AIBU to be frustrated with the rhetoric that todays generations of young families have it no harder than previous generations in terms of wealth and they just need to be more frugal to have the same standard of living??

This is only a part of the ‘rhetoric’. There is PLENTY of commentary and analysis around current house prices and COL. And the mitigating factors are usually only raised once someone starts on about Boomers.

Hey Ho.

Everyone knows house prices are relatively much higher now.

Quality of life and expectations have gone up in many ways, financial challenges have increased.

I am fed up with people making endless banal carping comparisons.

Like you.

Cunningfungus · 23/02/2025 10:28

@KeenGreen YABU. The reality is that you have it easier than previous generations therefore simply don’t understand how hard it was for people like my parents.

My dad left school to work down a coal mine at age 14 -14! Let that sink in. My mum did various cleaning jobs before and after school - me and my sibling had to go with her. No phones, no iPads and no bad behaviour! We just had to sit there for hours, although luckily, one of the families she cleaned for let us use their DCs toys/books. My mum never drove (could never have afforded lessons and even if she could drive, they could never have afforded a second car) so we had to walk mikes every day with her dragging her cleaning stuff in a wee trolly. On my dad’s days off, he was a door-to-door salesman. And he taught himself to fix other people’s cars. Holidays were caravaning about 20 miles from our home, once a year. My dad had multiple work related injuries including being crushed, lung problems and chronic back pain - but he still worked probably about 60 hours a week.

My parents never had “date nights” or anything remotely resembling “them” time. But they played cards and games with us. Both sets of grandparents died fairly young by today’s standards and also had to work (basically until they died) so no help with childcare for my parents.

It really doesn’t sound like your DH is contributing anywhere near as much as he could. He has a privileged existence really - he likes his job, is settled in it, doesn’t want the added stress etc. Lucky him!! Me and my DH have both had to stick at jobs we hated and worked extra shifts/second evening jobs to get where we are.

I mean I envy your DH in some ways but you can’t really blame others/external factors when he is a big part of your money issues!

Alondra · 23/02/2025 10:28

I'm a late boomer. I married early and repented to leisure. In between marriage and the end of it, we bought an apartment in Madrid. It was in the outskirts, with literally nothing around us except apartments. When the marriage went kaput, we sold it at a price. We had no equity at all.

I moved with my toddler son back with parents, and trust me, it brought me to my knees regarding confidence in myself. My parents were wonderful, gave us a home and stability but I hated being back in my childhood home. I worked 2 jobs and saved every peseta I could to get us a home. In the meantime I met my DH and we pooled financial resources when we married.

It was the time when home interest rates went crazy - we paid 18% on the loan at some point. We literally stopped any superfluous expenditure, including buying deodorant. We had a cheap bar of soap to shower with.

We were lucky that local produce in Spain was cheap. We ate lots of legumes and vegies to save.

Our mindset was to put into the mortgage double the mortgage repayment every month. And we did it with plenty of sacrifices and 2 children

One of the problems with so many of you talking about how "easy" is for boomers to enjoy the life they have today, it's that you don't have any idea the awful effort many of us have experienced without inheritance of any kind.

What we have, we've earned. And don't give a shit to anyone telling me the opposite.

Lovelysausagedogscrumpy · 23/02/2025 10:29

Livelovebehappy · 23/02/2025 10:27

But why blame ‘boomers’ then? And MN is very derogatory towards them. Surely it’s just the way the economy has been handled by successive governments. ‘Boomers’ may in part have benefited, but obviously that’s just the way it was. You know, a bit like the current ever expanding welfare system, where people can get a lot more from the state than they used to. We shouldn’t blame the current mentality of people claiming money thrown at them - it’s the government that make the decisions, and people accept it. Why wouldn’t they?

This.

ploppydoppy · 23/02/2025 10:30

But why blame ‘boomers’ then? And MN is very derogatory towards them. Surely it’s just the way the economy has been handled by successive governments. ‘Boomers’ may in part have benefited, but obviously that’s just the way it was. We shouldn’t blame the current mentality of people claiming money thrown at them - it’s the government that make the decisions, and people accept it. Why wouldn’t they?

Well people vote for governments & young people haven't been at the forefront of government policies for some time. I think people get frustrated with some of the Boomer generation who deny that things have changed.

You know, a bit like the current ever expanding welfare system, where people can get a lot more from the state than they used to.

Do they? is there more social housing now vs then?

Charlize43 · 23/02/2025 10:30

AmusedGoose · 23/02/2025 10:10

OK so there are issues with cost of living. However I'm 60 and when we bought our first house interest rates were 10%. By the time I had my first child in the late 80s it was 16%. Mortgage took 3/4 of DH wage. I worked in the evening as there was one nursery to cover 4 small towns and the fees would take ALL of my wages. I didn't have a car and we rarely went on holiday. No takeaways, or coffees or ready made lunches. We often ran out of money and just had to choose which bill not to pay. Clothes were expensive in real terms and a formula and nappies were very expensive. The nappies took all.my child benefit for example. No UC or housing benefit. Truth is there are issues but us boomers didn't have a walk in the park either. I had zero family support as it simply want the done thing and most parents worked until mid 60s. Your DH needs to get a much better job. FWIW I'm still working a physical job and will be until 67 when I get my state pension.

I grew up in the 80s and remember slightly older couples crippled by the 16% interest rate and having to work 3 jobs to make ends meet. I also remember Thatcherism and all the redundancies as things were shut down to later privatise them or import...

People made do with less in the 80s also consumerism wasn't as insane and we didn't have fast fashion or the need to have the latest smart phone every year. Nobody took a holiday to Bali. France & Spain were still considered as exotic. Wearing designer labels hadn't taken hold. The concept of your status being determined by your trainers (Nike, etc) didn't exist. Make do and mend was still very much a big part of life.

BeGoldHedgehog · 23/02/2025 10:31

Livelovebehappy · 23/02/2025 10:12

A SAHP. Because childcare was none existent. People had no choice, and just had to live without the extras in life.

I was SAHP because my wages were less than my childcare. Priced out of work.

Businessflake · 23/02/2025 10:31

splurging £3 on a coffee once a week isn't why people can't save money.

But there are lots who don’t spend £3 once a week. In London it’s closer to £3.50 (more in some places) and plenty of people are getting one a day, all week. That’s over £1,200 a year which is enough for a week in the Med out of school holidays.

BillieJ · 23/02/2025 10:32

I suppose I am one of the people that appears to have had it easy, but in order to get here, we spent years living on baked potatoes and homemade stews and bread. We didn't have a TV for years and when we did, it was a black and white portable set for a long time. We had a phone, but for a long time, it was incoming calls only to reduce the rental - trek round to the phone box to make a call. We didn't spend money on non-essentials - no holidays, takeaways, gadgets or new clothes. We shopped at the cheapest shops and bought kids' toys and clothes fro, thrift and charity shops.

We lived very simply all through our twenties and into my thirties when I did an OU degree and got qualified. I realised that working unqualified was never going to give us financial security - it wasn't easy. Then a lot of years working hard - I could retire, but I'm working to keep us in the luxuries (holidays etc).

MrsPeregrine · 23/02/2025 10:32

I think there is a much bigger issue in the Uk that goes beyond any generational wealth gap. The super rich are getting richer accumulating more and more of the wealth meaning the majority of us as progressively becoming worse off. I’ve listened to a couple of Gary Stephens podcasts and that is how I learned about this.

We are heading towards a nightmare scenario in the future where there will be loads of people reaching their pension years not owning a home and not having enough savings (through no fault of their own due to cost of living, stagflation etc) or a high enough pension to be able to afford massively high rents. They will be at the mercy of their landlord, in fear of a letter landing on the doormat telling them their rent is going to increase again, or worse, their tenancy is being ended.

Can you imagine being a pensioner and realising you have to work until the day you drop dead in order to be able to survive?

And then there are the youngsters who can’t even afford to start a family.

I don’t think foreign investment companies should be allowed to bulk buy UK homes to rent out and there should be restrictions on short term lets and second home ownership. Increase the proportion of affordable housing on residential developments etc.

I lose sleep every night worrying about these things.

Pussycat22 · 23/02/2025 10:32

Ever generation blames the one before.....

ploppydoppy · 23/02/2025 10:32

One of the problems with so many of you talking about how "easy" is for boomers to enjoy the life they have today, it's that you don't have any idea the awful effort many of us have experienced without inheritance of any kind.

What's the difference between some inheritance and living at home with your parents.

Of course it was hard, it's just harder now.

It was the time when home interest rates went crazy - we paid 18% on the loan at some point.

This is a classic example of the lack of awareness though. 18% of a low amount is not too different to 6% of a high amount.

Dahliasrule · 23/02/2025 10:33

I am a boomer and I think nowadays expectations are higher. I went to work a year after our first child was born. I had no maternity leave and no help with childcare. Our first meal out after we were married was for our tenth year anniversary. Our first holiday was a borrowed tent, the second a caravan. Our first abroad holiday was a gite after thirteen years of marriage. We were both teachers but at that time, pre-Houghton report, teachers wages were dire.

However, I agree that the retirement age nowadays is awful. We have been lucky to have been able to retire while still fit enough to do some of the things that we weren’t able to afford when younger. I really feel for those who have to work to 68 and older.

BobnLen · 23/02/2025 10:35

Owning a 30s semi is always going to need stuff doing to it, we (boomers) own a small detached 30s house, (no mansion with bifolds here) and the DIY seems constant, your DH is best to learn to do a lot himself to keep costs down which will also mitigate his lower paid, shorter hours, job.

Panama2 · 23/02/2025 10:35

House prices were lower back in the day but so were salaries. There were less routes to higher education, less maternity leave and I don’t remember getting any maternity pay, no before or after school clubs etc etc.

I think there are good and bad for each generation

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.