Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Generational wealth differences

1000 replies

KeenGreen · 23/02/2025 08:46

My first AIBU so let’s see what I’m in for!

First to make clear none of the problems now are the fault of previous generations. It is not a blame game!!

So AIBU to be frustrated with the rhetoric that todays generations of young families have it no harder than previous generations in terms of wealth and they just need to be more frugal to have the same standard of living??

I am sick of hearing the idea that older generations. So called boomers (for the record I don’t like this term) didn’t have it easier than younger generations.

I am 38 I have worked since I was 16, lived independently since 17. Put myself through university all the way through to PhD. My husband is 39 works in a school as support staff (LSA) and takes up circa £1200 a month. He has a degree.
I work in a university and earn just under £50K before tax so our household income is probably about £65K not the lowest by any stretch but enough for us to struggle to balance costs. We claim child benefit but otherwise no extra help.
Husband only works term time of course, but that means he’s around for our child during holidays.

We have one DC age 5, and can’t afford any more.
Our closest family lives over 2 hours away, so we have no family support with childcare or help if there is a sick day or anything.

We have a mortgaged small semi detached 1930s house with 3 bedrooms, It needs a lot of work but we haven’t been able to do much because of time and money. Current mortgage fix ends in 2026 and I expect our mortgage repayments to go up by about 50% extra £300 a month.

We pay off student loans and my pension contributions are also high.
I took only 6 months maternity leave because I couldn’t afford to go to half pay for long and not into no pay at all.

My husband had virtually nothing in his workplace pension because of low earnings.
Mine is keep being devalued because of sector changes and it’s definitely not the best pension in education. (Teachers pensions are better).
I can’t even imagine what it will be like to try and live off my workplace pension alone and I would have to go all the way up to retirement age which I can’t imagine myself doing in a stressful job.

Retirement age for us is currently 68, that means we have 30 more years.
But with the way things are going I have no hope that there will be a state pension at all for us, or the age will be pushed even higher, so will probably be dead! Despite the fact I will have been paying in with tax national insurance for 50 plus years by that point.

I just feel frustrated about this idea that I hear people say that our generation just needs to work harder, or get better paid jobs etc because it’s not that easy. We both work hard in the education sector. Enjoy our jobs for the most part and find them fulfilling albeit stressful at times!

Like I said not about blaming previous generations for the picture we are in, but I don’t like the rhetoric of ‘well interest rates went up to 15% in my day’ etc when house prices were so much lower in proportion to wages and the cost of living right now and inflation over the last 10 years shows wages haven’t increased in line with this.

ps I know we are not the most hard done by! But still feel the pinch and we certain don’t live an extravagant lifestyle!

OP posts:
Newbie999 · 24/02/2025 18:59

Would you be able to cope with a 15% mortgage? The so called Baby Boomers had to cope with that.
its good that your husband can be around to look after your child in the school holidays and you can have a more relaxed home life because of this. That is a great situation for your family.

maybe he could retrain and do teaching

YesImawitch · 24/02/2025 19:01

Would you be able to cope with a 15% mortgage? The so called Baby Boomers had to cope with that
They did not on a mortgage of 500K
More likely 50K

The issue in those days was it was difficult to ride it out.
No mortgage holidays,mass unemployment, no credit cards to get you through.
It was stark-miss a payment and it was repossession

gingerninja · 24/02/2025 19:02

You can’t tarnish a whole generation with the same brush. There were economic circumstances that many benefited from but there were also a lot of people on the bones of their arses then too. My boomer parents didn’t own a car, house, go on foreign holidays, never ate out or bought ready meals. My parents worked multiple jobs and as soon as we could we all did too. I had three jobs when I was at 6th form! (I’m gen x) Every meal was padded out with bread and beans and we had hand me down clothes but we didn’t feel poor. I think our perception of poverty has changed and we expect more (not necessarily a bad thing) and yes whilst some people did well, that’s the same in every generation. Look at how much millennials and gen z are making with social media. It’s easy to forget that we’re not all having a homogeneous experience.

em2001ily · 24/02/2025 19:04

NamelessNancy · 23/02/2025 09:13

I think those picking up on the DH salary are missing the point. A) in previous generations it was common for one parent to earn less or SAH. Mortgages were obtainable realistically on one salary. B) someone has to do the more poorly paid jobs. All the talk of getting better paid jobs seem to ignore this.

Edited

I agree, but there is a shortage of some medium-pay jobs (huge teacher shortage for example...yes it's a professional job but hardly big bucks).

venus7 · 24/02/2025 19:05

Sally20099 · 24/02/2025 18:47

You are absolutely right OP. A few MAJOR differences between boomers and all others.

  • economic growth significantly increased GDP per head in UK during their working lives. Last 20 years it’s been virtually non existent and remains so which is a major issue.
  • percentage of population over 60 and retired. Current workers have to contribute towards the pension costs of a much number of OAPs than previous generations.
  • idiotic final salary pensions: current OAP private pension payments are final salary based on virtually nothing like the contribution they put in or that’s needed to be self funding. No generation before or after will ever benefit from that. (Unless you are teacher etc and that needs tackling adap)
  • discovery of North Sea oil. Every other country which discovered oil invested a significant percentage into a sovereign wealth fund for the future of the country. Our boomers said sod that and spent it on themselves. (As an example Norway invested a high percentage and currently has a sovereign fund worth $1.7 trillion! That $300,000 per inhabitant in Norway!
  • nhs costs: same higher ratio of pensioners vs workers causes major issues here. Lifespan, and the cost of that, puts a huge economic burden on tax payers.
  • house prices: the earnings vs house price / house rental ratio has risen so much that a much higher proportion of wealth is needed to cover housing.
  • costs of economic inactivity: particularly things like disability benefit and welfare payments in general (because wages are not keeping up due to lack of growth in economy) are so much higher as a percent.
  • economic growth would help so much in this country. Labour were right to identify that as a priority but sadly they’ve completely messed that up already.

'Boomers'.....if you really are prepared to use that term, didn't keep North Sea oil money for themselves; that was Thatcher's decision. Unfair to blame people of a certain age for the extensive damage she did to this country.

BettyBardMacDonald · 24/02/2025 19:06

sliceoflife · 24/02/2025 18:31

I was born 1965 so right on the cusp of boomers and genx

I remember being hit by the 15% interest rates often quoted by those who didn't experience it.
Fresh out of uni in my first professional job my take home pay was £520/month, mortgage payment on a very basic 2 up 2 down damp Victorian terrace was £510/month.
Two years after buying at the height of the property boom in 1988 our house was worth 10% less than we paid for it on a 95% mortgage, so significant negative equity. We had to get our heads down and save the difference before we could move. Having said that prices had dropped everywhere so once the negative equity was repaid we could start to move up the property ladder. For most of the term of our mortgage we were paying 6-10% interest.

What has changed significantly is lifestyle expectations. We were expected to leave uni at 21/22, get a job straight away and start working our way up the career ladder.

When I look at later generations they spend longer in education and take time deciding on a career path ( not a bad thing). Couples settle down later, rent for longer and maybe decide on buying property later.

I had a mortgage by 23, and 8 years to climb the career ladder and get on the property ladder before having my first child at 31. My children are horrified at the notion of settling down with one partner for life at 22. They are late 20's and still not decided on a career path and are trying out various jobs before deciding what they want to do long term. If delaying entry into a career and buying property until late twenties there will inevitably be fewer years to save and get on an even keel before starting a family. It's the double whamy of a high mortgage and childcare costs that are causing so much financial stress for young families at the moment. I look at what my work colleagues are paying out each month and it's crippling for a few years.

Now at almost 60 I can think of travelling and enjoying the benefits of a frugal youth.
I have had the benefit of no student debt which I will be forever grateful for.

It's not possible to compare the experiences of one generation with another as the external and societal factors are so different. Each generation has faced ups and downs financially.
We couldn't take cheap flights as that sector simply didn't exist, neither did the internet, computers, smartphones, streaming services or cafe culture. If these things had existed then we would have aspired to them like everyone else. I am not going to judge anyone on their choices but you can't spend your money on what hasn't been invented yet. My parents didn't have a car, dishwasher, package holidays or a tv when first married, but neither did any of their peers. No one would expect anyone to go back to living like their grandparents as we have moved on, lifestyles and expectations have improved immeasurable and comparing the expectations and aspirations of one generation and another is unrealistic.

Agree with all of this. Lifestyle expectations are off the charts. People in their 20s and 30s expect to live with the ease and amenities of those who have put a couple additonal decades into working and saving.

Also the post-war economic stimulation had its effect. Those are circumstances beyond the control of any generation. Yes, boomers may have benefited from some of it, just as newer generations are benefitting in myriad ways from the tech boom.

Life is no harder now than it ever was. It's just different.

And frankly, expecting life to be "easy" is bullshit. There are 8 billion people on this planet and growing,all of whom need shelter, food, fossil fuel, a livelihood, health care, education, potable water and clean air. None of which is getting any more plentiful. Scarcity and competition for resources are going to INCREASE, not DECREASE. Buckle up and be grateful for what you do have; your kids likely will have even less.

Lovelysausagedogscrumpy · 24/02/2025 19:16

YesImawitch · 24/02/2025 19:01

Would you be able to cope with a 15% mortgage? The so called Baby Boomers had to cope with that
They did not on a mortgage of 500K
More likely 50K

The issue in those days was it was difficult to ride it out.
No mortgage holidays,mass unemployment, no credit cards to get you through.
It was stark-miss a payment and it was repossession

Edited

Well let me ask you the same question only slightly differently. Would you be able to cope with a 15% interest rate on a mortgage of £16000 when your combined earnings are less than £5k ? Everything is relevant - it’s not only house prices which have risen since boomer days, but salaries as well. Could you cope with the mortgage payment initially taking up every penny of one wage and then eating significantly into the second when mortgage rates rose to their peak at 17.5% ?

BettyBardMacDonald · 24/02/2025 19:20

Lovelysausagedogscrumpy · 24/02/2025 19:16

Well let me ask you the same question only slightly differently. Would you be able to cope with a 15% interest rate on a mortgage of £16000 when your combined earnings are less than £5k ? Everything is relevant - it’s not only house prices which have risen since boomer days, but salaries as well. Could you cope with the mortgage payment initially taking up every penny of one wage and then eating significantly into the second when mortgage rates rose to their peak at 17.5% ?

Edited

I know. People in this thread and elsewhere constantly banging on that double-digit interest rates were no big deal because mortgage loans were lower clearly aren't good at maths.

Scrubberdubber · 24/02/2025 19:20

Scrubberdubber · 24/02/2025 17:17

Its got nothing to do with "generations" "boomers" "zoomers" or whatever terminology. There are poor young people poor old people and poor all ages in-between. Wealthy families have intergenerational wealth that they pass along.

To expand on this more the people I see who moan the most about "rich boomers" are the children of wealthy individuals (or at least above average) who are pissed off that mummy and daddy aren't sharing their money as much as they believe they should. Or just have really high standards for life after being pandered and spoilt by mummy and daddy for their whole childhood.
My boomer parents were/are far from rich and I know they're far from the only ones.

Same goes for older people moaning about young people maybe consider just because your own children are little shits that doesn't mean EVERYONE their age is.

Its a your family thing not a generation thing.

Shotokan101 · 24/02/2025 19:23

KeenGreen · 23/02/2025 10:04

Thank you I agree, someone has to do this job and it’s important he enjoys it he is good at it, and he supports children and young people with SEND and who need extra support.

To answer other questions:

Yes he has a degree. When we met he was finishing his off and I was doing my undergraduate degree.

He works in a private school and could earn more in a state school doing the same role but he is happy and settled and been there for 10 years.

He works school open to school close (8.30-4) plus one afterschool club once a week and he works every day of term time yet he is classed as part time.

He could absolutely train to be a teacher and I have encouraged this multiple times over the years but he doesn’t think he’s capable or wants that stress and pressure. I feel I need to support what he feels comfortable with.

For additional context he has struggled with social anxiety his entire adult life that we strongly suspect is actually undiagnosed autism (he hasn’t wanted to pursue a diagnosis at this point).

If the roles were reversed and the earnings were the other way around would there be this much push back on it? Especially with a young child?

Husband picks up the vast majority of the housework.

OP's post quoted here pretty much answers all if her own questions and gives the reasons for them too.

She's enabling her selfish lazy husband to ride on her coat tails into a pretty bleak retirement....

He's been there 10 years.
He's happy and settled.
He doesn't think he's capable of being or wants the stress of being a teacher.
He's working (?) at the school for 7.5 hours a day plus one after school class and he and she seem ok with that being classed as part time.
He could get the same job at a public school and be paid more, but won't.

Stop whinging about problems of your own making that are limiting your earning potential as a family.

So.... YAB(F)U.....

BettyBardMacDonald · 24/02/2025 19:27

gingerninja · 24/02/2025 19:02

You can’t tarnish a whole generation with the same brush. There were economic circumstances that many benefited from but there were also a lot of people on the bones of their arses then too. My boomer parents didn’t own a car, house, go on foreign holidays, never ate out or bought ready meals. My parents worked multiple jobs and as soon as we could we all did too. I had three jobs when I was at 6th form! (I’m gen x) Every meal was padded out with bread and beans and we had hand me down clothes but we didn’t feel poor. I think our perception of poverty has changed and we expect more (not necessarily a bad thing) and yes whilst some people did well, that’s the same in every generation. Look at how much millennials and gen z are making with social media. It’s easy to forget that we’re not all having a homogeneous experience.

When we were kids in the late 60s and early 70s and the ice cream vans would go by, my mother always refused us one. We'd watch some neighbour kids run up and select 10p ice lollies or whatever. Not us.

As an adult I asked my mother why, assuming it was some nutritional reason. She said "Honey, we simply couldn't afford it." The ice cream cost about the equivalent of a pound or less in today's money. "We were on a very tight budget. If I saw them on offer at the supermarket I'd get them, but the ones from the van were just too much."

Compared to the way even 'poor' people order up takeaways and deliveroo today.

BettyBardMacDonald · 24/02/2025 19:27

Shotokan101 · 24/02/2025 19:23

OP's post quoted here pretty much answers all if her own questions and gives the reasons for them too.

She's enabling her selfish lazy husband to ride on her coat tails into a pretty bleak retirement....

He's been there 10 years.
He's happy and settled.
He doesn't think he's capable of being or wants the stress of being a teacher.
He's working (?) at the school for 7.5 hours a day plus one after school class and he and she seem ok with that being classed as part time.
He could get the same job at a public school and be paid more, but won't.

Stop whinging about problems of your own making that are limiting your earning potential as a family.

So.... YAB(F)U.....

Edited

Exactly. This is not a societal problem, this is a very lazy DH problem.

justasking111 · 24/02/2025 19:29

KeenGreen · 23/02/2025 18:35

I think we can look into it when DS is older.

He is in reception, and it would seem holiday clubs start older 5+

Im not sure how DH will feel about it though! He will likely say he can’t do it because of his MH

Sorry you're supporting a man child. Mental health indeed. I've close friends who teach in private schools. In the holidays, they tutor either one to one or in school clubs.

I'm sorry @KeenGreen he saw you coming. His parents should be so grateful that you picked up their load.

YesImawitch · 24/02/2025 19:29

Lovelysausagedogscrumpy · 24/02/2025 19:16

Well let me ask you the same question only slightly differently. Would you be able to cope with a 15% interest rate on a mortgage of £16000 when your combined earnings are less than £5k ? Everything is relevant - it’s not only house prices which have risen since boomer days, but salaries as well. Could you cope with the mortgage payment initially taking up every penny of one wage and then eating significantly into the second when mortgage rates rose to their peak at 17.5% ?

Edited

I coped on a mortgage of 58K interest rate 10-17.5%

I was there and it was for a very short period .
My salary was considerably more than 5K though- let alone combined.

Jetandianto · 24/02/2025 19:30

The whole world is different.. Our family had similar occupations to yours but in the 1980s. It wasn’t easy.

Times were different.We had no financial support for childcare at all, state nursery places were extremely hard to come by and only for rising five year olds. There were just mother led playgroups, which were of no use if you were working. Our first mortgage took up half of our income each month, before other bills and my salary almost completely went on childcare. We never bought any new furniture, the kids clothes were hand me downs. We never went out for meals and coffee would be in a friends house not a coffee shop. I used to dream of being able to go into a supermarket and buy all the food we needed instead of scrimping and making do. We did not pay for any out of school activities and we had one small television. We also managed without a car for ten years, while living in a rural area, once a week I would take three small children and a buggy on an unreliable local bus to do some basic shopping and lug it all back again.

I’m not saying families have it easy today but I do think expectations have changed.

Sally20099 · 24/02/2025 19:31

venus7 · 24/02/2025 19:05

'Boomers'.....if you really are prepared to use that term, didn't keep North Sea oil money for themselves; that was Thatcher's decision. Unfair to blame people of a certain age for the extensive damage she did to this country.

Thatcher left office in 1990 and boomers have been running the country ever since. Currant PM is 62 so I think that makes him one as well? Not 100% sure when the cut off is. Not one govt after 1990 has done anything differently to thatcher regarding North Sea oil - except the current idiots who won’t even allow further exploration and therefore blocked additional income for the country!

YesImawitch · 24/02/2025 19:32

BettyBardMacDonald · 24/02/2025 19:20

I know. People in this thread and elsewhere constantly banging on that double-digit interest rates were no big deal because mortgage loans were lower clearly aren't good at maths.

No I was pointing out that it wouldn't be 15% of 50K but 15% of 500K these days for probably a similar house.

Killam · 24/02/2025 19:36

It's Gary's economics innit.

lifeonmars100 · 24/02/2025 19:40

anotherside · 24/02/2025 18:20

The boomers were a huge demographic and have always voted en masse - for their own interests. And of course the politicians will pander to the biggest demographic. Politicians mostly care about getting elected.

I had a sharp intake of breath when I read your arrogant and ignorant post. I am a boomer and I have no recollection of a stampede to the polls every election, some people always voted, some voted occasionally and some never bothered, a bit like nowadays. I always vote, less to do with my advanced years and a lot more to do with the struggle that ordinary working class men had to get the vote and of course because of what women went through to gain the same right. There is a tendency for people to become more right wing but let me spell it out for you one more time, we are individuals, just as you are an individual shaped by what you have expericenced in life.

lifeonmars100 · 24/02/2025 19:44

LakieLady · 24/02/2025 18:14

I'm 69, and despite being pissed off at having to wait 6 years longer than I expected to get my state pension, I still feel fortunate compared to younger people.

It still wasn't easy though. At one point, when interest rates were well into the teens, I was doing 3 jobs in order to be able to pay my mortgage.

I remember that, as a single mum I was panic stricken and worried about losing my home. I think that things are extremely difficult for young people today and they are being denied the chance to be in control of their futures.

RosesAndHellebores · 24/02/2025 19:46

Lovelysausagedogscrumpy · 24/02/2025 19:16

Well let me ask you the same question only slightly differently. Would you be able to cope with a 15% interest rate on a mortgage of £16000 when your combined earnings are less than £5k ? Everything is relevant - it’s not only house prices which have risen since boomer days, but salaries as well. Could you cope with the mortgage payment initially taking up every penny of one wage and then eating significantly into the second when mortgage rates rose to their peak at 17.5% ?

Edited

I think most people would be dancing if they had a £16000 mortgage on 15% and £k a month coming in Grin

Luddite26 · 24/02/2025 19:46

Has anybody mentioned the damage done by people repeatedly borrowing in the 00s.
I had a friend gen X who bought a 3 bed semi for £50000 at the same time as me they remortgaged in 2001 and again in 2003 and again in 2005 then owing more than the house was worth because house prices fell then the 2008 crash. The 2001 remortgage was for a Disney holiday and a Primark shopping spree. Loads of people were using their mortgages as a personal account and banks were letting them.

venus7 · 24/02/2025 19:56

Sally20099 · 24/02/2025 19:31

Thatcher left office in 1990 and boomers have been running the country ever since. Currant PM is 62 so I think that makes him one as well? Not 100% sure when the cut off is. Not one govt after 1990 has done anything differently to thatcher regarding North Sea oil - except the current idiots who won’t even allow further exploration and therefore blocked additional income for the country!

I'm well aware of when Thatcher stood down; do you mean current PM?

asrl78 · 24/02/2025 19:57

KeenGreen · 23/02/2025 08:46

My first AIBU so let’s see what I’m in for!

First to make clear none of the problems now are the fault of previous generations. It is not a blame game!!

So AIBU to be frustrated with the rhetoric that todays generations of young families have it no harder than previous generations in terms of wealth and they just need to be more frugal to have the same standard of living??

I am sick of hearing the idea that older generations. So called boomers (for the record I don’t like this term) didn’t have it easier than younger generations.

I am 38 I have worked since I was 16, lived independently since 17. Put myself through university all the way through to PhD. My husband is 39 works in a school as support staff (LSA) and takes up circa £1200 a month. He has a degree.
I work in a university and earn just under £50K before tax so our household income is probably about £65K not the lowest by any stretch but enough for us to struggle to balance costs. We claim child benefit but otherwise no extra help.
Husband only works term time of course, but that means he’s around for our child during holidays.

We have one DC age 5, and can’t afford any more.
Our closest family lives over 2 hours away, so we have no family support with childcare or help if there is a sick day or anything.

We have a mortgaged small semi detached 1930s house with 3 bedrooms, It needs a lot of work but we haven’t been able to do much because of time and money. Current mortgage fix ends in 2026 and I expect our mortgage repayments to go up by about 50% extra £300 a month.

We pay off student loans and my pension contributions are also high.
I took only 6 months maternity leave because I couldn’t afford to go to half pay for long and not into no pay at all.

My husband had virtually nothing in his workplace pension because of low earnings.
Mine is keep being devalued because of sector changes and it’s definitely not the best pension in education. (Teachers pensions are better).
I can’t even imagine what it will be like to try and live off my workplace pension alone and I would have to go all the way up to retirement age which I can’t imagine myself doing in a stressful job.

Retirement age for us is currently 68, that means we have 30 more years.
But with the way things are going I have no hope that there will be a state pension at all for us, or the age will be pushed even higher, so will probably be dead! Despite the fact I will have been paying in with tax national insurance for 50 plus years by that point.

I just feel frustrated about this idea that I hear people say that our generation just needs to work harder, or get better paid jobs etc because it’s not that easy. We both work hard in the education sector. Enjoy our jobs for the most part and find them fulfilling albeit stressful at times!

Like I said not about blaming previous generations for the picture we are in, but I don’t like the rhetoric of ‘well interest rates went up to 15% in my day’ etc when house prices were so much lower in proportion to wages and the cost of living right now and inflation over the last 10 years shows wages haven’t increased in line with this.

ps I know we are not the most hard done by! But still feel the pinch and we certain don’t live an extravagant lifestyle!

"I don’t like the rhetoric of ‘well interest rates went up to 15% in my day’"

There is an easy answer to that one. Ask how much the mean house price was compared to earnings back then compared to today, what income you would have to earn and what deposit you would need to get a mortgage for a typical small family home (say two bedrooms), what proportion of the average earnings would have been spent on a mortgage compared to today, and how long were the interest rates at 15% and how long have house prices been pushing ten times the mean wage and how muich longer are they likely to continue to do so. The truth is people love to trot out rhetorics as though they can explain everything because it doesn't require any effort to logically analyse i.e. think.

Shotokan101 · 24/02/2025 20:01

BettyBardMacDonald · 24/02/2025 19:27

Exactly. This is not a societal problem, this is a very lazy DH problem.

....but the OP must also share a substantial portion of the "blame" for putting up with the "situation".... and for sooooooo long......

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.