Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Would you pay more tax to boost defence spending

494 replies

trainermush · 20/02/2025 17:42

Obviously we are now in a more precarious position & defence spending has been underfunded for some time. RR had just said we need to spend more money & she will but without breaking her fiscal rules,

"So we will stick to our fiscal rules. But recognising the priority of defence spending in the world that we live in today means that we will have to make difficult choices so that we can spend that money that is needed to keep our country safe."

Mulling it over & even though I think I pay enough tax I would pay more each month towards this (cut back in other areas) as opposed to labour cutting back on something else. I guess thinking about my dc & other loved ones has changed my mind somewhat now things appear more bleak. What do others think?
Conscription of young people terrifies me even though my dc are too young.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
dontcryformeargentina · 21/02/2025 11:45

Nope.

HRTQueen · 21/02/2025 11:49

No

If we become more involved it will not just be extra tax we pay directly but indirectly too

seebiscuit1 · 21/02/2025 14:41

DetectiveSleuth · 21/02/2025 11:37

For all the people saying ‘absolutely not’, I can 100% bet you’d change your tune if we went to war and there wasn’t enough money for us to have an effective defence. I work in the MOD and know that we’re massively underfunded yet people still expect to be protected. Can’t have it both ways 🤷‍♀️ There’s plenty of things that can be cut back on that will mean we won’t pay more in tax but defence can have more money.

Absolutely not. Give peace a chance

Alexandra2001 · 21/02/2025 14:44

seebiscuit1 · 21/02/2025 14:41

Absolutely not. Give peace a chance

If you want Peace, Prepare for war!

Putin understands nothing but strength.

MissConductUS · 21/02/2025 14:46

seebiscuit1 · 21/02/2025 14:41

Absolutely not. Give peace a chance

How did that work out for Ukraine?

BIossomtoes · 21/02/2025 15:26

MissConductUS · 21/02/2025 14:46

How did that work out for Ukraine?

Quite. It’s a bit hard to give peace a chance when your country’s just been invaded. 🙄

taxguru · 21/02/2025 15:26

BIossomtoes · 21/02/2025 08:14

Reversing those NI cuts would make perfect sense, it was stupid not to do it when they first took office. It was blatantly obvious that cut was an only made to salt the earth.

I'd rather income tax was raised to "spread" the load of tax rises over the entire population rather than hike NIC which is just another tax on workers. Either that or extent NIC to ALL income sources, including pensions, rental income, interest, foreign income, capital gains, etc for ALL age groups. We can't keep hiking taxes only on the workers and working age population.

BIossomtoes · 21/02/2025 15:27

It wouldn’t be a tax hike, it would be a reversal of an unaffordable tax cut.

Talonz · 21/02/2025 15:36

Alexandra2001 · 21/02/2025 08:39

So an 10bn extra for defence spend isn't welcome? would take us above the Tories target of 2.5% of GDP.

Whats your solution?

Oh and on your knowledge of UK deep ports, its Falmouth

Edited

You don't get humour? I know where our very few deep water ports are. Cornwall was a tilt to you.

ScholesPanda · 21/02/2025 15:47

Yes, absolutely.

Fluffyholeysocks · 21/02/2025 15:50

No. Reduce the 22bn going to net zero policies.

BIossomtoes · 21/02/2025 15:54

Fluffyholeysocks · 21/02/2025 15:50

No. Reduce the 22bn going to net zero policies.

Sounds like you’re hellbent on destruction one way or another.

Andwhoisasking · 21/02/2025 15:54

taxguru · 21/02/2025 15:26

I'd rather income tax was raised to "spread" the load of tax rises over the entire population rather than hike NIC which is just another tax on workers. Either that or extent NIC to ALL income sources, including pensions, rental income, interest, foreign income, capital gains, etc for ALL age groups. We can't keep hiking taxes only on the workers and working age population.

This.

TwinklyPearlPoster · 21/02/2025 15:55

DetectiveSleuth · 21/02/2025 11:37

For all the people saying ‘absolutely not’, I can 100% bet you’d change your tune if we went to war and there wasn’t enough money for us to have an effective defence. I work in the MOD and know that we’re massively underfunded yet people still expect to be protected. Can’t have it both ways 🤷‍♀️ There’s plenty of things that can be cut back on that will mean we won’t pay more in tax but defence can have more money.

It’s a false dilemma.

Apart from removing some of the waste in our military, we could also raise funds by selling of things we don’t need.

For example the Chagos islands

Obviously we offer the Donald first refusal and then invite tenders from India and China.

They must be worth tens of billions to the right buyer

The aircraft carriers are probably worth something also, if only as scrap

RedHelenB · 21/02/2025 15:57

No.

seebiscuit1 · 21/02/2025 16:30

BIossomtoes · 21/02/2025 15:26

Quite. It’s a bit hard to give peace a chance when your country’s just been invaded. 🙄

Bombing ethnic Russians in the Donbass isn't peaceful.
Actions have consequences

Papyrophile · 21/02/2025 16:33

Falmouth was (in the 1960s) going to be the main submarine base for the UK, but it was eventually relocated to the west coast of Scotland and Faslane. We would definitely need to upgrade to a much faster motorway or A road to Falmouth though.

I though Stoltenburg had retired and been replaced by Mark Rutter as SecGen of NATO?

Alexandra2001 · 21/02/2025 16:36

seebiscuit1 · 21/02/2025 16:30

Bombing ethnic Russians in the Donbass isn't peaceful.
Actions have consequences

But that started when a Russian led unit started attacking Sloviansk, should the Ukrainians have done nothing at all about that?

& what about Russia taking Crimea, Crimea was Internationally recognised as Ukrainian territory.

The conflict in Ukraine is 100% on Putin, he could end it today.

MissConductUS · 21/02/2025 16:39

Papyrophile · 21/02/2025 16:33

Falmouth was (in the 1960s) going to be the main submarine base for the UK, but it was eventually relocated to the west coast of Scotland and Faslane. We would definitely need to upgrade to a much faster motorway or A road to Falmouth though.

I though Stoltenburg had retired and been replaced by Mark Rutter as SecGen of NATO?

Stolteberg did retire, but stayed on for a year until a consensus was reached about Rutte taking the job.

dottiehens · 21/02/2025 16:51

As 60 percent is on welfare who would be paying? Can we trim the benefits list of recipients?

seebiscuit1 · 21/02/2025 17:04

Alexandra2001 · 21/02/2025 16:36

But that started when a Russian led unit started attacking Sloviansk, should the Ukrainians have done nothing at all about that?

& what about Russia taking Crimea, Crimea was Internationally recognised as Ukrainian territory.

The conflict in Ukraine is 100% on Putin, he could end it today.

The population of Crimea voted overwhelmingly to become part of Russia.
So too did the other former Ukrainian regions.
Peace is better than war.

JassyRadlett · 21/02/2025 17:23

seebiscuit1 · 21/02/2025 17:04

The population of Crimea voted overwhelmingly to become part of Russia.
So too did the other former Ukrainian regions.
Peace is better than war.

Oh mate I've got a bridge for you to buy.

seebiscuit1 · 21/02/2025 17:41

JassyRadlett · 21/02/2025 17:23

Oh mate I've got a bridge for you to buy.

You're welcome

BIossomtoes · 21/02/2025 17:46

Alexandra2001 · 21/02/2025 16:36

But that started when a Russian led unit started attacking Sloviansk, should the Ukrainians have done nothing at all about that?

& what about Russia taking Crimea, Crimea was Internationally recognised as Ukrainian territory.

The conflict in Ukraine is 100% on Putin, he could end it today.

Precisely.

1dayatatime · 21/02/2025 19:29

@seebiscuit1

"Peace is better than war."

Whilst most people would agree with this simplistic statement, what you are missing out is "peace on what terms".

A peace agreement enforced against a nation and the wishes of its citizens down the barrel of a gun is very much what happened to Germany in 1918 and the desire of an aggrieved and humiliated German citizens wanting to restore their dignity is what led to the rise of Hitler and WW2.

Zelensky and the Ukrainian people want a peaceful end to this war just like everyone else- what they don't want is a capitulation as that will just set up another war.

The best thing for Ukraine is to negotiate from a position of strength, so at least they can say no to whatever is presented to them by Putin / Trump and now that the US has backed away from military support, then their only hope for Ukraine is for Europe to take up the military aid shortfall and quickly.