Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Love locks - basically just vandalism?

156 replies

SnoozingFox · 14/02/2025 19:11

Piece on the One Show about those people who attach padlocks to bridges and it's being pushed as an "awwww isn't this lovely, it's a gesture of love, people come back every year to see their lock, such as shame when they have to be removed" and I'm sitting thinking the opposite.

It's no different from scratching your initials into the bricks of a castle, or spray painting a wall. Vandalism. Nobody cares that some random bridge is where you had your first date or your boyfriend proposed. Nobody wants to walk across a city centre bridge covered in padlocks which the council then eventually have to pay to remove.

Leave no trace.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
Househunter2025 · 16/02/2025 18:17

MrWise · 15/02/2025 10:22

They look beautiful but they do weigh the bridges down so eventually do get removed. Here's an example of one looking lovely before it became untenable.
https://www.alamy.com/love-locks-at-a-footbridge-pegnitz-river-old-town-nuremberg-franconia-bavaria-germany-europe-image229241061.html
More were added until it was heaving eventually
https://www.alamy.com/stock-photo-nuremberg-germany-14th-jan-2015-countless-padlocks-hang-on-a-footbridge-77647844.html
This was when love padlocks became a big thing all over Germany.
Nuremberg then took quite a clever stance and created a small air balloon metal frame at the end of the bridge near the cinema, which is now where all the locks are displayed.

Neither of those pictures are remotely lovely. And one is just a zoomed in version of the other

MrWise · 16/02/2025 18:31

As I said before, beauty is in the eye of the beholder. Myself and many other Nuremberg residents liked the bridge. Many now like the balloon fixture instead. Some of you are very rigid thinkers. One man's fish is another man's poisson Wink

DalzielOrNoDalzielAndDontPascoe · 16/02/2025 19:30

SnoozingFox · 16/02/2025 10:31

I also agree about "shrines" of flowers, teddies and balloons. I don't have an issue with them being placed for an anniversary or a specific day. But the people who do place them should return and remove, and they never do, so it just becomes litter. It is clearly very sad when people die, especially when they are very young or the circumstances are tragic. But it is unfair and unreasonable to expect strangers using a park or driving along a road to be as grief-stricken as the family/friends are.

The first time I really saw anything like this was after the death of Diana, all those acres of flowers. That was probably the start of these mass displays of candles/teddies/flowers/balloons. I'm not sure how you'd stop it though, if you're the parent of a child lost in tragic circumstances the last thing on your mind would be to say - no "tributes", please make a donation to X charity instead.

Maybe I'm just a horrible person, but I can never for the life of me understand why somebody would see an actual mountain of tonnes of flowers as far as your eye can see - in front of the palace gates or in a public park or wherever - and their instinct is that they must go and get another bunch to toss up on top of it.

Why would you do this?

I still remember the lunacy of the people chucking bunches of flowers at the windscreen of the hearse for Diana's funeral. A lot of people complained afterwards about the driver being 'deeply disrespectful' for sensibly putting the wipers on to sweep them away so that he could actually see to drive safely. It's a stupid thing to do in any circumstances; but seriously, at the funeral for somebody who died in a car crash?!

ohgoshitshappening · 17/02/2025 12:08

To PPs... I'd put a photo up but it works be outing.

The park where this awful memorial is known locally for birdwatching and wetlands. There's a lovely walking loop right around the edge of it. This memorial spans both sides on the loop. If you want to walk the loop, you have to walk through it. And let me be clear... there are no teddies and balloons... just piles and piles of plastic flowers, some of which are in 'planters' specially brought for the purpose. But with cellophane over the top to keep them dry. Loads of bunting and streamers, and probably dozens and dozens of laminated photographs of the deceased young man and his 'stoner'-looking mates making v signs to the camera stapled to the trees. Loads of handmade signs with his nickname on, think Wozza or something like that. No plaque. It looks really really shit.

Contrast this to two new benches that have appeared in another park over the last year, that occasionally have a little bunch of fresh flowers tied to them with twine, or a single plastic flower tied on with a zip tie... all regularly replaced, really not interfering with anyone else's enjoyment and pretty subtle.

I didn't know that young man. The way his family remember him is not what I would do. People die for all sorts of reasons all the time. I just don't want to see, process, and have to walk through mounds of gaudy tat at my local nature reserve.

BettyBardMacDonald · 17/02/2025 13:40

CassiasC · 16/02/2025 17:23

I don't think it's down to me or you to decide what makes a 'lovely tribute' for anyone else.

No, but differences of taste are precisely why it’s selfish to take over public space in this way. They can make a lovely tribute precisely to their tastes in their home or garden. Or some designated space. Or publicly for a brief time. But uglifying a park used by all - and many, if by no means all, people ARE going to find solar lights and cellophaned teddies ugly - isn’t on.

Someone decorates a fir tree in our local park every Christmas. They’ve got no taste and can’t reach the top of the tree so you get an effect of baubles haphazardly placed around the lower half. It looks shit and I find the idea that they’re unilaterally entitled to do this utterly selfish. Either that or they’re deluded that everyone will be as enchanted as they are. At least that only happens around Christmas though.

Well said!

Let people make their shrines at their own homes, not tat up public property.

KatiMaus · 17/02/2025 14:09

I agree in general - it's ugly and a structural problem for many bridges and monuments. The one exception is the Hohenzollern railway bridge in my hometown: https://www.cologne-tourism.com/arts-culture/sights/detail/love-locks

It's encouraged here (despite some moaning in recent years). We even have some nice romantic songs about it. I cannot confirm if my teenage love and I are still named here - couldn't find it if I wanted to!

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread