Eta not sure why it quoted you! Sorry! Its a generalnpoint below, not aimed at your comment!
I do agree with the general complaint but I do want to make the point that women should never see their salary as pointless because it goes on childcare.
That's a 50/50 expense. Yes, it is usually just shorthand for "childcare costs £800 a month and I earn £900 a month so it wipes it put" but my point is that that mindset devalues women's worth.
We get development, a life outside domesticity, social aspects, we aren't solely dependant on a mans saleary and therefore put up with stuff we wouldnt if we have choices, we arent up shit creek if we want to split up with a husband because we have access to a job and our own money which hits our bank accounts first before we put it into joint funds.
My point is that it's dangerous to reduce our salaries to simply being the cost of childcare, because its so much more. It actually pays towards the childcare, the insurances, the mortgage, the energy bills, the car. It doesn't matter that it happens to be a similar figure as childcare. No man goes to work and says his salary is to cover childcare. His salary is always for the mortgage, even if it's a similar amount.
Womens part time salaries never seem to be to cover the mortgage... it's reductive to say a salary only covers childcare, because you then get into the "pointless going to work to pay someone else to look after my kids" viewpoint.